Preview

Civil Strife in England: The Ambition of Richard of York and the Incompetence of Henry VI

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3134 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil Strife in England: The Ambition of Richard of York and the Incompetence of Henry VI
How Far was the ambition of Richard of York the key cause to the civil strife (unrest) in England between 1450 and 1461?
It can be argued that the civil strife in England during the years 1450-1461 was the consequence of Richard of York’s ambition to be king of England. Although this is an important cause to the civil strife’s occurrence it is however not the most significant or key cause to the civil strife as the personality, actions and incomptenance of Henry VI as king of England is the major reason to why the civil strife occurred as Henry can be seen as the centre and basis of the all the factors that could arguably of caused the civil strife supported by Alison Weir: “at the centre of this bloody faction fight was the pathetic figure and the mentally unstable Henry VI whose ineptitude in government and mental incapacity gave rise to political instability, public discontent and dissensions between the great landed magnates that in turn led ultimately to war and a bitter battle over the throne itself” in her account of the civil strife, Lancaster and York: the wars of the roses in 1995.
Despite Henry VI feuding and escalating Richard of York’s ambitions to be king, York still played a key role in the cause of the civil strife. York’s personal ambition to be a part of the king’s council was stimulated from his desire to be a significant figure in England and to be recognised as a great leader; not only this but that he was indeed a magnate of the royal blood and as a rightful heir he ultimately believed he should be on the king’s council. This highlights Richard of York’s ambitions from the outset of Henrys reign. However York’s expectations of a prominent position in the counsels was soon overseen as Henry dismissed York; appearing not to accept and acknowledge his birth right. Therefore it is clear York was ambitious yet all he originally wanted was to be given the place in the King’s Counsel he was entitled to not to be king and usurp the throne. Henrys

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It is clear that many of the origins of this 'crisis' have their roots in the reign of Henry VIII. He left a very difficult legacy to his successors, but it must be remembered that Somerset provoked the problems already in existence and Northumberland and Mary I then had the difficult task of resolving them. Henry VIII was only one contributing factor to the crisis.…

    • 1997 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    under-mighty king Henry who did not make the right decision between York and Somerset. The king is…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On 22nd August 1485, King Richard III lost the Battle of Bosworth to Henry Tudor. One of the main reasons for him losing was due to his unpopularity with the people and his nobles. Richard was disliked by many of his nobles because he gave power to nobles from the north, which he knew, annoying the nobility in the south of England. This meant that in the battle he had little support, and some of his nobles, such as the Stanley’s fought for Henry. Richard was also disliked by the people of England. He seized the crown in 1483, and rumours spread that he killed his two nephews. This made him disliked, and few people supported him.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain why Edward IV’s death opened up such a bitter family feud in the weeks from 9th April to 26th June 1483 (12 marks)…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Edward IV died in 1483, a dispute began between to major factions – the Woodvilles and Richard of Gloucester. The Woodvilles were the family of Elizabeth Woodville, Edward’s wife, with whom he shared many children. Edward V, the heir to the throne, was the son of Elizabeth Woodville, and so this put them in a good position. However, Richard of Gloucester was Edward’s brother and had shown himself to be a very useful and successful man to Edward during his reign. They both had their various strengths and weaknesses, and they both wanted the same thing. Control of England.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Edward VI died in 1483, there was debate as to who was most suited to take up his position on the throne. It has been argued that Richard, Duke of Gloucester had himself set on usurping the throne from the rightful heir Edward V, as soon as his brother died. Others argue that it was never the case that his immediate wishes were to seize the throne; actions after his brother’s death led him to this decision. There is evidence for and against to support the principal statement.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that Henry VIII was ultimately unsuccessful in his aims from 1509-1514. He had three mains aims during this time and these were to secure the dynasty that Henry VII had created, assert his authority over his new kingdom and Foreign Policy, which Henry was planning to completely change. Various factors and traits contributed to this lack of success, which will be explored in this essay.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To some extent Henry VII was successful in dealing with the challenges to his royal authority in the years 1485 to 1509. However, there were also limitations to this success. This essay will evaluate Henry’s actions, meaning that a conclusion can be drawn on how effective they in fact were.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The removal of dynastic threats and the stability of the monarch was the key cause to the decrease in rebellions. Before hand there were numerous noble led dynastic threats, including Simnel in 1487 which was only a year after Henry VII had managed to secure the crown after the battle of Bosworth, and it contained much yorkist support a group which it can be argued that Henry should have dealt with sooner like Elizabeth did in destroying any potential threats as soon as she could. Simnel was passed off as Earl of Warwick who was rumoured to have died, he managed to get the support of 2000 mercenaries sent by Margaret of Burgundy and the rising became a real challenge and although Henry was eventually successful it did…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the War of the Roses, England was constantly in a state of war between the House of Lancaster and the House of York, who were massive rivals that competed for the throne of England (History 320 Lecture, 10/30/2015). In Polydore Vergil’s account of Henry VII, Richard III’s personal ambition can be seen. The author first tells of a nightmare Richard has the night before Bosworth Field, which Vergil believes was “no dream but a conscience guilty of heinous offences, a conscience, I say” (Polydore Vergil, Account of Henry VII, 479). Though the source makes no explicit mentions of it, it is widely believed that Richard III murdered his nephews to take the throne. When his brother, Edward IV died, his legitimate son was crowned Edward V, but was shortly taken captive by his uncle and placed into the Tower of London (History 320 Lecture, 10/30/2015). Instead of allowing for a legitimate heir to take the throne as it should have gone, Richard went to immeasurable lengths to ensure he would be king, further escalating the conflict and disrupting English society as a whole. This caused not only great scandal, but Richard III was a terrible king, guilty of many offenses as Vergil states. He created great disruption not only in his court by taking the throne away from his nephew, but also to the lives of his subjects. Vergil makes note of this as well, specifically mentioning the strife of the English people, who had consistently been “torn by rival factions” (Polydore Vergil, Account of Henry VII,…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lotherington says, ‘No king could rule without the co-operation of the nobility, which was largely responsible for conducting the king’s business in the provinces’ and Pendrill supports this when he says that Henry VII’s prime aim was to restore a partnership in government, shifting the balance in his favour after the disruption of the Wars of the Roses. Policies to achieve this combined a mix of the ‘carrot and stick’ technique. The ‘stick’ approach combined military and financial restraints and a reduction in central and local power. Whereas the ‘carrot,’ approach saw Henry develop a reward system for service and encouraging loyalty from his peers. However the question remains, how did Henry do when meeting the nobles. Are we to believe Pendrill who claims, ‘Henry’s relationship with his nobility was, ultimately a failure.’ Or are we to follow Guy’s line who claims, ‘by means of bonds, Henry VII in effect disabled his nobility.’…

    • 1899 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Level

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There were three main rebellions in Henry VIII’s reign as king; The Lincolnshire Rising, The Pilgrimage of Grace and Cumberland Rebellion. These rebellions were all connected because each one triggered off the next one. The three main factors that set off the rebellions were the economic state of the country, the political state and the religious activities at the time.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A deeper understanding of ambition and identity emerges from pursuing the connections between King Richard III and Looking for Richard.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first initial problem Henry had was one he inherited from Richard III – the Princes in the Tower. While there was even the slightest doubt that these two boys were dead those who supported the Yorkists always had a chance of rallying around someone to challenge Henry VII. The first of these people was Lambert Simnel. LAmbert Simnel pretended to be the Earl of Warwick,…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lucille Laydon- In what ways was dynastic marriage important in Henry VII’S relations with foreign power in the years 1487-1509? (12 Mark)…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays