Civil Disobediences Essay
In the past, we’ve seen incidents where large hordes of people march in unison, carry banners and shout slogans to bring attention to an issue. These incidents are known as civil disobediences, an act performed by a group of people, usually civilians, to protest a law imposed on them by a governing body or fight for something they believe in. This act differs from something like a violent protest or a revolution is that civil disobediences firstly put emphasis on the rule of law while disobeying the one specific law they seek to abolish. Second, the people that practice civil disobedience will plead guilty to any violation of the law. The third and final principle of civil disobedience is that it tries to convert the opponent by demonstrating
…show more content…
On that afternoon, black leaders met to formed the Montgomery Improvement Association and elected Martin Luther King Jr. as president of the group. African Americans ensured the sustainability of the boycott by organizing carpools, lower taxi fares to bus fare prices and simply walked to their destinations. Finally, on June 5, 1956, a Montgomery federal court ruled that the law imposed on segregating seating on buses violated the 14th Amendment and integrated the bus system on December 21, thus ending the boycott. Throughout the protest, no blood was shed by the protestors to achieve their goal, instead, they used other more peaceful methods to do so, preserving the peace and prosperity of the society. In conclusion, we can see civil disobediences can positively impact a free society by raising awareness of an issue or law and prompting action from a governing body. This allows the voices or the people to be heard, giving them more perceived power to alter the law imposed on them. Besides that, civil disobediences are also away for people to protest for something without having resort to violence, shedding blood of both civilians and armed personnel. This way, local governments can listen to the people’s demands without having to take drastic action and suppress the
On that afternoon, black leaders met to formed the Montgomery Improvement Association and elected Martin Luther King Jr. as president of the group. African Americans ensured the sustainability of the boycott by organizing carpools, lower taxi fares to bus fare prices and simply walked to their destinations. Finally, on June 5, 1956, a Montgomery federal court ruled that the law imposed on segregating seating on buses violated the 14th Amendment and integrated the bus system on December 21, thus ending the boycott. Throughout the protest, no blood was shed by the protestors to achieve their goal, instead, they used other more peaceful methods to do so, preserving the peace and prosperity of the society. In conclusion, we can see civil disobediences can positively impact a free society by raising awareness of an issue or law and prompting action from a governing body. This allows the voices or the people to be heard, giving them more perceived power to alter the law imposed on them. Besides that, civil disobediences are also away for people to protest for something without having resort to violence, shedding blood of both civilians and armed personnel. This way, local governments can listen to the people’s demands without having to take drastic action and suppress the