Preview

Civil Disobedience And The Effect Of The Civil Rights Movement

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
798 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil Disobedience And The Effect Of The Civil Rights Movement
In a free society, it is inevitable for reform to occur.It is a common theme across world history for people to peacefully challenge the decisions of those above them.From the plebeians disobeying the laws of Ancient Rome to the Indian Independence Movement, civil disobedience has been among us for so long, and each society is able to build off its predecessors’ mistakes.Henry Thoreau inspired generations to come in his essay, “Civil Disobedience”, and the effect of it was widespread.In fact, while in jail, Mahatma Gandhi picked up a copy of Thoreau’s essay and was able to utilize the tactics discussed by Thoreau to successfully challenge Britain’s control over India.That movement created a template itself as the Civil Rights movement of the …show more content…
Ezell Blair, Jr., Franklin McCain, Joseph McNeil, and David Richmond are names less common to the average American in the twenty-first century, yet their impact on society will forever be maintained.When they decided to purchase items at a store in North Carolina in 1960 and subsequently sit at the counter at the restaurant, they had no idea that their actions would lead to protests across the country for months and eventually set a model for the rest of the world to follow forever.When it was decided that they had broken no rules, twenty more black students joined them the following day.The increase in news coverage of the events would eventually lead to a successful Civil Rights movement in which desegregation occurred, and African Americans were essentially “freed” from discrimination following the Civil War era.After sit-ins' success in North Carolina, it became an increasingly popular way to protest, as it was seen effective through forcing the people being protested to find alternative means of enforcing the policy in controversy.Sit-ins can also be seen as having an overall positive impact due to the template they set for other peaceful protest types to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    You are one of the many people to enter your local Woolworth’s to join the protests. That was a very common situation in February of 1960. Sit-Ins became a highly influential factor in Civil Rights. They were created and popularized in Greensboro, North Carolina in 1960, during the Greensboro Sit-Ins. The Greensboro Sit-Ins were a series of protests led by four young black college students that were committed to equality in civil rights.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful protest in the years 1955 to 1964 helped the civil rights movement little by little through the use of forcing the government to implement legal change. The laws that were passed mostly ended segregation in public places such as the law passed in 1956 that banned segregation of busses. This law was a result of the Browder vs. Gayle case that revolved around Aurelia Browder who refused to give up her seat to a white person, this stemmed from the Montgomery Bus Boycott of the previous year. She was backed up by the NACCP and the case went all the way to the Supreme Court who ruled in her favour and thus making segregation on all bus services illegal. Peaceful protest also helped to gain the support of white people in power and ordinary white people, therefore putting more pressure on the government to make the demands of black people a reality. However peaceful protest was not very good at making de-jure legation into de-facto reality as it was very easy to ignore these laws due to wide spread racism and corrupt police forces. There were also other factors at work that were responsible for the success…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thomas Jefferson, the third president and author of the declaration of independence, once exclaimed, “If a law is unjust a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so.” Jefferson declares that at any cost if one finds a law wrong than it is his duty to stand against it for the common good. He implies that people should never stand idly by or blindly follow a law that is immoral only because it is the easiest way. Knowing when a protest against government is needed was also what the writers Martin Luther King, Henry David Thoreau, and Arthur Miller wanted to instruct to their readers. King was a significant activist and leader of the civil rights movement who was the cause of many amendments and progress for the rights of African Americans. His A Letter From…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Disobedience means to peacefully refuse or comply with specific laws you personally do not agree with, and accepting the consequences by not following said laws. Throughout history you see Civil Disobedience from great people such as Martin Luther King Jr, Rosa Parks, “later in life” Malcolm X and Nelson Mandela. Each of these great historic people contributed to Civil Disobedience, trying to equalize African Americans in a Caucasian set world. As a whole our instinctive feeling is to divide up things that are different, one of those things being race.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, peaceful protests only effectuate change when the participants are lawful and accepting of consequences. Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr, and Nelson Mandela are examples of participants who used civil disobedience to leave an impression. Gandhi adopted ideas from Henry David Thoreau’s, 'On the Duty of Civil Disobedience', to shape his approach to obstruct corruption. During the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr. constantly promoted peace and justice to the nation, despite the vulnerable position he held. Nelson Mandela also acted upon Thoreau’s ideas when he attempted to end the apartheid in South Africa. Each of these three activists successfully effectuated modifications to their country’s government. However, if participants were to resist legislation without accepting the repercussions, it would promote anarchy. Without legal cooperation, their actions would represent utter lawlessness. The government of a free society is designed to consider its people’s best interests, so why would it be effective to bite the hand that feeds? When individuals do not accept consequences associated with resistance, they obstruct the necessary mutual respect between the individual and the state. Without which the purpose of resistance would be insignificant, as the authority would have no desire to cooperate with the…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The effects and repercussions of civil disobedience reverberate throughout society, not just in American culture, but in cultures worldwide. Look at history and it’s easy to see. The Revolutionary War could be said to an act of civil disobedience, though in the beginning the colonists didn’t actually want to be separate until the Olive Branch Petition was rejected. That petition was asking the King to see their point of view, and expressed their hopes of reconciliation (…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King, Jr. Colin Kaepernick. Malcolm X. Rosa Parks. Huey P. Newton. These individuals are famous for their work in protesting, but the methods of conveying a message differs greatly between these influential figures. The spectrum ranges from taking a knee during the national anthem to armed protests. Although many people think that violent protesting is an effective means to spark change, the truth is that peaceful dissent prevails as the superior catalyst to combat injustice.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Civil disobedience is a form of protest in which protesters deliberately violate a law” (suber). It is a way for society to reform itself to reflect its current values while maintaining its fundamental ideals. Some may argue civil disobedience is a “slippery slope” leading to anarchy or it cannot be justified in a democracy. Civil disobedience, while not optimum, is a way to accomplish change with the intent of reform and stabilizing communities.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful resistance to rules and regulations among society goes down historically as something so inevitably iconic as an occurrence known as civil disobedience. It is no doubt that civil disobedience, the act of opposing a law deemed unjust and peacefully disobeying it henceforth, spurs such great controversy in our society. Civil disobedience impacts society in a positive manner that does not hinder nor deteriorate the good name of the just nation that is home, but moreover poses as an influence for what is better accepted by humans as lawful.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Disobedience,” the word has different connotations. Many people have disobeyed throughout the course of their life, considering that rebellion is a natural human instinct. This refusal to obey is a trait that cannot suppress, especially in the fight for correct human rights.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    History is marked by endless suffering and tragedies. In the forming of the United States it was established that the rich would be separated from poor and whites would be separated from blacks. And because of this throughout history there has been many injustices and suffering for African Americans and other minorities. Laws were made to keep these people far below their level. When people are oppressed it is in their nature to rebel. Those people are forced to do what they have to do to seek fair equal treatment like everyone else.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A group of African Americans started one of the earliest sit-ins that made an impact that lasted through today. Another big sit-in was when 4 men stayed at a lunch counter and refused to move. When 4 students that sat at the counter where only whites were served refused to give up their seats, and the police couldn’t fix the situation from the lack of provocation. They soon obtained the name “Greensboro Four” (www.history.com). The next day, more college kids joined them and made the scene huge. Eventually the police arrived and escorted them outside the building, and possibly to jail. The sit-ins spread to over 55 cities in 13 states (www.history.com). The increase of this event did not stop the police from taking action. Even though just about everyone was arrested for doing this, people still continued to bring support to the law change they want. The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) was formed as one of the top forces that organized the “Freedom Rides” (www.history.com). The sit-ins were not the last of the encouragement for rights, speeches were…

    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On February 1, 1960, four students, Ezell A. Blair, Jr., David Richmond, Joseph McNeil, and Franklin McCain from North Carolina Agricultural & Technical College, an all-black college, sat down at the segregated lunch counter to protest Woolworth's policy of excluding African Americans from being served there. The "sit-in" technique was not new—as far back as 1939, African-American attorney Samuel Wilbert Tucker organized a sit-in at the then-segregated Alexandria, Virginia library. In 1960 the technique succeeded in bringing national attention to the movement. On March 9, 1960 an Atlanta University Centre group of students released An Appeal for Human Rights as a full page advertisement in newspapers, including the Atlanta Constitution, Atlanta Journal, and Atlanta Daily World.…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience is a vital and necessary part of life in a democratic system of government. It serves to keep the government from overstepping its bounds. There are times in the history of countries where the governing body has become complacent and has begun to violate the rights of their citizens. Civil disobedience is an effective way of discouraging and preventing such transgressions. Without the threat of dissidence from the public, there is nothing to keep governments honest except for the honor of those governments, which is highly questionable even in the noblest of nations. The role of elected officials in the United States is to represent their constituents, be they from their district, state, or party. If there is nothing to hold these politicians to this purpose, can we truly be sure they are ruling in a representative way and not in self interest?…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History will reveal the major part civil disobedience has played on overcoming governmental injustices. Today, people know Gandhi’s Salt March to Martin Luther King’s demonstrations. Gandhi’s actions helped gain India’s its independence and King’s tactics were instrumental in winning rights for black people in the United States. Others situations include the successful protest of 1998 rioters in Indonesia against the despotic system of government under the Suharto regime.[3] In the US during the early 1900s strikes organized by mistreated workers led to the introduction of labor unions, end of child labor and improved job benefits.[4] Those in the opposite mindset believe that civil disobedience is counter-productive and that the court system should combat unjust laws. However what all these causes listed above has in common was that, “there was no other avenue open to redress grievances” making civil obedience the only way to protest…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays