Preview

Cicero's Second Triumvirate Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1968 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cicero's Second Triumvirate Analysis
The hit list was set as the Second Triumvirate rose to its power of a three man dictatorship to hold power over Rome. The select three, Octavian, Antony and Lepidus, had handpicked the group that was to face punishment for speaking out against them. Among this group of the damned, an orator named Cicero stood proudly. Previously having spoken out against Caesar for fear of the loss of liberty, this great speaker felt the need to call out Antony on the same charge. As the Second Triumvirate rose in Rome, it was determined that Cicero would die. While he potentially could have escaped, it was with courage and dignity that he perished at the hands of Antony’s men in the year 43 BCE. (Everett) However, while an exciting part of his life, Cicero was known for much more than his death at the hands of this new regime. Aside from being a well-known orator, he was involved in politics and literature of the time which placed him in the center of Roman life. Cicero was a monumental figure of his time, and even though he came from somewhat humble beginnings, he ultimately became one of the largest impacts on Rome that can still be seen today.
I. Biographical Information Cicero’s early life was largely and undeniably ordinary for a citizen of the Roman Empire. He was
…show more content…
As with any personal letter, it shows Cicero’s personal and emotional side as he writes to friends and even his son. Some of the manuscripts are as carefully written and executed as some of Cicero’s orations and because of this, they are just as valuable. As a philosopher, Cicero’s letters are important because they show what ultimately was going on in this man’s mind. His ideas and thoughts that prevailed in many of his more developed speeches, yet with a more personal note.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    The aim of this essay is to discuss whether the death of Julius Caesar by acquaintances Marcus Brutus and Cassius Longius was due to political or personal motives. The focus will lay in understanding Rome’s political situation at the time, evaluating Caesar’s policies and the possible explanations resulting in Caesar’s assassination. The essay will begin by explaining the political situation in Rome at the time in order to understand the tensions between Caesar and the Senate. The concluding part of the investigation…

    • 2263 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    MULTIPLE CHOICE UNIT TEST 1 - Julius Caesar I. Matching/Identify _____ 1. Strato _____ 2. Lucilius _____ 3. Octavius _____ 4. Artemidorus _____ 5. Brutus _____ 6. Caesar _____ 7. Casca _____ 8. Calpurnia _____ 9. Mark Antony _____ 10. Portia _____ 11.Lepidus _____ 12. Decius _____ 13. Pindarus _____ 14. Cassius _____ 15. Soothsayer A. Captured by Antony's soldiers, mistaken for Brutus B. Persuades Caesar to attend Senate meeting C. First to stab Caesar D. convinces Brutus to join conspiracy with false letters E. Holds the sword for Brutus to kill himself F. Wife of Brutus G. The least important member of the 2nd triumvirate H. warns Caesar “Beware the Ides of March” J. Joins and then leads conspiracy to kill Caesar K. Emperor of Rome L. Caesar's wife M. Heir of Julius Caesar; joins Antony N. servant who gives a false report to Cassius O. Devoted follower of Caesar; avenges Caesar’s murder P. Gives Caesar a letter of warning…

    • 1967 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some years into the republic age of Rome, Marcus Cato was born into a less-than-impressive, but honorable home. Over time, Cato would prove to be a great statesman as well as earn many other titles and honors. However, before one can understand the great man, one must understand the society that shaped him. At this time in its history, Rome had formed its republic by vesting the power in the people, represented by the senate. Despite there being instances of corruption, the republic naturally defended against corruption by keeping too much power away from just one man and dispersing it to the many. Under Roman tradition the citizens lived praiseworthy family lives, and ancestry, as well as different traditions, shaped those lives. On top of those two sorts of body politic, the republic and the family, a true Roman citizen had a balanced and temperate form of self-government. Each of these three traits of Rome helped to shape not just Marcus Cato, but all of its inhabitants. Being well versed in Greek tradition as well as very knowledgeable in Roman history and politics, Cato came to be a very prosperous political figure, war hero, and most of all a well-rounded model for a republic even today. It was mostly his moderate combination of all of these traits through temperance and a strong code of morals that allowed Cato to achieve this status.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Source 1 is a description of the Republic of Rome from Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 - 43 BC). Cicero was a writer and philosopher who is famous for his vast collection of private letters to various individuals, such as Titus Pomponius Atticus to whom he wrote to without fear about every day Rome and it's politics.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Midterm 3 History

    • 8039 Words
    • 33 Pages

    o Cicero was supporting the senate and Pompey and was in Rome stirring up trouble for the first Triumvirate by speaking out of ending Caesar’s Gallic command to prosecute him for his injustices during consulship.…

    • 8039 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the chief figures in Roman philosophy. For most of his life Cicero was centred in Rome, where he was famous as a lawyer and orator and held various public offices, finally reaching the dizzy heights of consulship; he was one of the last to hold the office before its importance was ended by the Empire. Cicero declared that his primary interest was in philosophy, but that, because of the necessity of making a living, he was compelled to take up the practice of law and politics. When, in his late years, he was forced out of public life, he withdrew to his villas, villas, especially the one at Tusculum, and, gathering a group of friends, he discussed philosophical questions with them. He tried to be the medium of transmission of Greek culture to the Romans and had a great influence on philosophical terminology.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marcus Tullius Cicero was born in 106 BC and died in 43 BC when, according to Plutarch, two men came to execute him. His last words to them were “There is nothing proper about what you are doing, soldier, but do try to kill me properly.” He was born to a wealthy family with connections in Rome, but no one in his family had previously been a senator, making him novus homo. However, through his brilliance as an orator and advocate in court cases he ran for consul at the minimum age for the office, as a novus homo and won the seat, it had been thirty years since any novus homo had reached the consulship.[1]…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Suetonius

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Suetonius was born in Africa c.ad70 into a wealthy equestrian family. He trained as an orator (the usual education for an aspiring politician) and was an expert in rhetoric. He became a close friend and client of the Senator Pliny the Younger, who described him as ‘quiet and studious, a man dedicated to writing’, and ‘a man of the highest honesty and achievement’.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    [Exordium] Imagine your most noble friends turned out to be your murderers. {Subject}(3) Miserably, Julius Caesar experienced this in his final hours before his death. [Background]Caesar’s death took place on March 15, 44 BC in the Senate House, Rome. [Additional details] [A] Innocent of the knowledge of the plot, Caesar was with the other senators, all who had turned against him, when the famous historically known deed was done. [B] Brutus, one of Caesars best friends and trusted senator, was one of the leaders of the plot against Caesar's life. [C](4) Surprising, Caesar thought until the time of his death, that he was surrounded by his friends, although he was accompanied by his enemies. [Enumerations] This essay has three topics, which…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case it was Mark Antony. The series of events that led up to the final reveal of the play all showed that Brutus was not going to win . When the people of Rome started to rebel it showed Antony gaining power. Then when Antony’s army wins it shows that no matter how much you try the good always wins. And finally Brutus killing himself shows that everything works out the way they should. Antony didn’t end up killing the other conspirators because he believed that they didn’t do anything wrong and they were just under the influence of Brutus. He knew that deep down they were good people that loved Caesar, they just let their minds get the best of them. In the end Caesar's death was avenged and Rome’s peace was restored to what it was before. Although there are many lessons you can learn from this piece, these are a few main ones. Good will always outweigh…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Caesar is a powerful and ambitious leader which the conspirators are very aware of. This makes him dangerous because he is loved by the people and they will follow him. When Brutus and Cassius are conversing, you can see this as Brutus says “what means this shouting? I do fear, the people choose Caesar for their king” (1.2. 168-169). This fear comes from believing that Caesar wants the power for his own benefit and not Rome’s. Many of the senators believed Caesar to be an overly ambitious man. If the Romans choose Caesar as their king, the senators will no longer have power. Caesar wanting to strive for greatness and be in control is why he is brutally stabbed. After the death of Caesar, Antony, Caesar’s most loyal friend, wants to avenge him. After gaining army power to take down the conspirators, his character begins to change becoming dark and deceitful. This is where the ambitiousness of the leaders causes corruption and problems. The ambition also brings competition to the table. The competition is what brings the battles and therefore brings death. After many deaths in both of these books, ambition is shown to be the driving force behind it…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He robbed farmers, and cancelled inheritances, redirecting funds to himself. He treated his allies like enemies and let his ports go to ruin. Cicero lists all of his great atrocities, and exposes the fact that during his three years of absolute malpractice in Sicily, no-one rose up against him and he was never taken from his position by the Senate. The fact that this could occur in a province, devastating the lives of thousands of people without anyone stopping him, shows that there were huge holes in the Roman political system that allowed malpractice to…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Act 4 of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Scene 1 shows the 2nd Triumvirate of Mark Antony, Octavius Caesar, and Marcus Lepidus composing a list of people who need to be killed. Caesar has been assassinated, and Antony has started a civil war against the conspirators to avenge Caesar’s death. He has formed a triumvirate with Octavius Caesar, Caesar’s adopted son, and Marcus Lepidus, a close friend and ally of Caesar. The triumvirate is supposed to share power equally, but Antony is taking advantage of Lepidus’s stupidity to gain more power for himself, At the beginning of Scene 1, Antony is seen making a “hit list of people who should be killed because they pose a threat to the triumvirate’s power. The three are ruthless, brutal, and…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Biography

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Julius Caesar is “without a doubt the most significant figure in the history of Rome” for a vast majority of reasons (Knight). Julius’ full name and official title was “General Gaius Julius Caesar” and remained so throughout his entire life (“Julius”). When Julius Caesar was born is not agreed upon between most historians. But the closest approximation is around 100 B.C.E. Julius Caesar’s family was apart of the Roman aristocracy. He died around 44 B.C.E. He was murdered by a group of “60 influential Romans” and was stabbed “23 times” with a dagger when he entered a “senate chamber” (Knight). His assassination was planned by his “friends” “Brutus and Cassius” and the famous line “Et tu? Brutus” comes from his death…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He included all people in the government by letting them have influence in the vote. He travelled to Rhodes for philosophical studies and, on the way, was kidnapped by pirates (Rinaldo 11-13). By been kidnapped by pirates, he increased his tactics by negotiating with them and then going back to slit their throats. He campaigned successfully for the consulship in 60 B.C. and made a deal with two of Rome’s leading figures, Pompey the Great and Crassus. Even while conquering Gaul, Caesar was thinking of the political picture back home. He hired key political people to act on his behalf in Rome while he was away. He crossed the Rubicon and marched on Rome at the head of his battle-hardened army, where he got through with ease. He also proved to be a good and fair victor by inviting some of his defeated rivals to join him in the government. Senators Gaius Cassius Longinus and Marcus Junius Brutus used to be enemies, and became friends in conspiring to assassinate Caesar (Rinaldo112-117). They betrayed Caesar and assassinated him on the Ides of March (the 15th), 44 B.C.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays