Preview

Chief Justice John Marshal's Judicial Review

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
554 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chief Justice John Marshal's Judicial Review
1. INTRODUCTION

"It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is."
—Chief Justice John Marshal

Judicial review was seldom used before the 20th century and the power of the Supreme Court only evolved over time, through a series of milestone cases. Judicial review is one of the courts most fundamental powers wherein the judge has the power to evaluate the constitutionality of any act or law of the executive or legislative branch Marbury v. Madison,1803 laying the foundation for the Court's ability to render its decisions about laws and actions was indeed a landmark judgement which established the power of judicial review and established one of the cornerstones of the American constitutional system.

2. BACKGROUND
2.1 FACTS

In the election of 1800, the newly organised Democratic-Republican party of Thomas Jefferson defeated the Federalist party of John Adams, creating an atmosphere of political panic. During his final days he made several appointments in Judiciary for the district of
…show more content…
There were two landmark judgements by the U.S. Supreme Court served to confirm and uphold the constitutional authority for judicial review in USA being: Hylton v. United States was the first case decided by the Supreme Court involving a direct challenge to the constitutionality and the second being the case of Marbury v Madison wherein the Court asserted its authority for judicial review to strike down a law as unconstitutional. At the end of his opinion in this decision Chief Justice John Marshall maintained that the Supreme Court's responsibility to overturn unconstitutional legislation was a necessary consequence of their sworn oath of office to uphold the Constitution as instructed in Article Six of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    4.) Assess the leadership of John Marshall as Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison:(1803) Judicial review In 1801, Justice William Marbury was to have received a commission from President Adams, but Secretary of State James Madison refused to issue the commission. Chief Justice Marshall stated that the Judiciary Act of 1789, which was the basis for Marbury's claim, conflicted with Article III of the Constitution. Marbury did not receive the commission. This case determined that the Supreme Court and not the states would have the ultimate word on whether an issue was in violation of the Constitution. The ruling, based on judicial review, made the Judicial Branch equal to the other two branches of government.…

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs. Madison Case

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    . Judicial review is usually associated with the U.S Supreme Court and is processed by most state and federal courts of law in the United States. Judicial review also determines whether or not state statues and state executive acts are valid. Judicial review came to part in 1803 where the Marbury VS Madison case was going on it was the first time they ruled the congress unconstitutional. The exercise of judicial review is about the important rules of judicial self-restraint which also allows the burden of proof to be…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early national period, the judiciary was the weakest of the three branches of government. When Chief Justice John Marshall established the principle of judicial review in MarburyMadison by declaring an act of Congress unconstitutional, he greatly strengthened the judiciary. Even though the high court exercised this prerogative only one other time prior to the Civil War (Dred Scott v. Sanford), the establishment of judicial review made the judiciary more of an equal player with the executive and legislative branches.…

    • 325 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marshall’s ruling for Marbury v Madison was one of the most controversial decisions to ever be handed down from the Supreme Court. The landmark decision ultimately made the Judicial branch the most powerful branch because of the judicial review. With judicial review the Supreme Court has the ability to interpret the Constitution or any law any way that the court sees fit accordance to the law. Marshall’s ruling was clear and concise. Marbury did have the right to his appoint under law. Marbury had the right to seek a remedy because he deemed himself injured but the Supreme Court could not issue the writ because it was not of original jurisdiction. If Marbury was to have went through a lower level court, the court would have issued the writ and taken his appointment as the chief justice of…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Written by Chief Justice John Marshall, the majority ruled that while Marbury was entitled to receive his commission and that courts are able to grant remedies, the Supreme Court did not have the right to grant the plaintiff his legal order. The reasoning behind this was that Marbury’s request was based on a law passed by Congress that the Court deemed unconstitutional (Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789). The Court then stated that when the Constitution and the law conflict, it is the Supreme Court’s duty to uphold the law of the land and rule in unity with the Constitution.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court formed the basis for the exercise of judicial review in the United States under Article III of the Constitution. The decision helped define the boundary between the constitutionally separate executive and judicial branches of the American form of…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The election of 1800 marked the beginning of a 28-year period during which Republicans dominated national politics. Jefferson’s party won easily, in part because of the public outrage over the Federalist Alien and Sedition Acts; in many ways, the acts proved the undoing of the Federalist Party.…

    • 2569 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1801, John Marshall was named as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. He held that position until he died in 1835. Very early during Marshalls time in the Supreme Court, Marshall made the doctrine of judicial review in handing down the Courts ruling in Marbury v. Madison. The Judicial review is the doctrine that allows United States courts to review state and federal laws and regulations and decide if they are Constitutional and strike down laws and regulations courts decide are unconstitutional. The thing is about the Judicial review is that it is was not found in the Constitution and through his ruling Marshall created a power that was not explicitly given to either the judicial branch or the Supreme Court. Marshall, then, through his decision in Marbury v. Madison, gave in one of the best decisions he made to the Supreme Court/judicial branch on the executive and legislative branches. The ability to declare the actions, laws and regulations of those branches unconstitutional. The Fletcher v. Peck case in 1810, was the first time in history that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled a State law…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Marbury Vs. Madison case is important because it was the first United States Supreme Court case to apply the judicial review principle. This case was between a man named William Marbury and James Madison, when James Madison refused to deliver Marbury's commission, Marbury made a petition, which would bring forth delivery of the commissions. Marbury’s petition was denied and proven not…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison (1803) case was the beginning of the corrupt theories of John Marshall. William Marbury had been a “midnight judge” appointed by John Adams in the last hours of being president. Marbury had been named Justice for Peace for the District of Columbia, but when Secretary of State James Madison shelved the position, he sued for its delivery. Chief Justice Marshall knew that his Jeffersonian rivals, deep-rooted in the executive branch, would not attempt to enforce a writ to deliver the commission to Federalist Marbury. He therefore dismissed Marbury’s suit. Despite the dismissal of the case, Marshall snatched a victory from this judicial defeat. In explaining his ruling, Marshall said that part of the Judiciary Act of 1789 on which Marshall tried to base his appeal was unconstitutional. This attempted to assign the Supreme Court power that the Constitution had not anticipated. This act by Marshall attempted the shift of power to the Supreme Courts for his benefit. This greatly magnified the authority of the court.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial review is a process that is conducted in the Supreme Court that hears an appeal over lawfulness of a case. It is not focused on the rights and wrongs of…

    • 1086 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    • Which of these is an example of judicial review? A federal court declares a statute unconstitutional…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the primary foundations for the power which it exercises over the American judicial system is the basics of judicial review. This power consists of the ability of the Supreme Court to decide upon “review” that a piece of some form of Government action is not permitted under the Constitution and can be deemed “unconstitutional”. The Supreme Court established this idea early in its existence and was empowered as a vital institution in the American Government primarily by exercising it. Judicial review is controversial because an unelected group is charged with interpreting the Constitution and the validity of laws affecting the population. Judicial review should be void of all political favoring, however, the power granted to a body that is not accountable to the public can be seen as an imbalance in the checks and balances intended by the three branch system of democracy in the United States.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The power of judicial review has allowed the Supreme Court to protect civil liberties within America. Its involvement in civil rights issues have ranged from racial issues, to the rights of those accused and the reapportionment of electoral districts.…

    • 583 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays