Preview

Chapter 22 Criminal Investigation Written Assignment

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
408 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chapter 22 Criminal Investigation Written Assignment
Lesson14. Written Assignment Ch22

1.Why must a criminal investigator know the rules of evidence?

It is the criminal investigators responsibility to collect and preserve evidence that will later be used in court to aid in a prosecution. It is essential that the criminal investigator knows the rules of evidence because lack of such knowledge could result in inadmissibility of the evidence to be used against the defendant in court.

2.What is the hearsay rule and why does it exist?

Hearsay evidence is where a testifying witness with no experience or factual knowledge of the event repeats information heard outside of court from someone else. It’s an overheard version of truth used to testify by a second hand witness. Since the first hand witness isn’t in the courtroom, the defendant cannot cross examine them. It exists because when stories are repeated, they are often changed and thus their reliability is questionable, making such evidence inadmissible with a few exceptions in the hearsay rule.
3.Describe the manner in which circumstantial evidence is used in a criminal prosecution.
Circumstantial evidence is basically evidence that has been drawn or inferred from a series of facts to draw the conclusion that a defendant is connected to a certain crime. The series of facts could just be a series of unfortunate events and do not constitute guilt. However, the more facts there are to infer from, the higher likelihood that the juror is going to infer guilt.
4.What factors affect the credibility of the investigator as a witness?
For law enforcement officers as witnesses, the public usually expects nothing to be short of perfection from an officers’ performance of duties and presentation of testimony, such may affect the credibility. Perceptions of the jurors may also affect an officers’ credibility with defense attorneys seeking to discredit the testimony of the officer. By preparing for the testimony and giving straight forward and non-emotional

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    IS4670 Unit 2 Lab 1

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page

    2) Information received from others that cannot adequately substantiate. In the case of computer evidence, if an email was sent from my email account linking me to a crime, it is hearsay because there is no way to prove that I wrote it.…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Q: In what ways have our historic roots affected the manner in which criminal investigations are conducted in the United States today?…

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "All relevant evidence is admissible, except as otherwise provided." The goal of this rule is to allow parties to present all of the evidence that bears on the issue to be decided, and to keep out all evidence that is immaterial or that lacks Probative value. Evidence that is offered to help prove something that is not at issue is immaterial. For example, the fact that a defendant attends church every week is immaterial, and thus irrelevant, to a charge of running a red light. Probative value is a tendency to make the existence of any material fact more or less probable. For instance, evidence that a murder defendant ate spaghetti on the day of the murder would normally be irrelevant because people who eat spaghetti are not more or less likely to commit murder, as compared with other people. However, if spaghetti sauce were found at the murder scene, the fact that the defendant ate spaghetti that day would have probative value and thus would be relevant evidence…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The government may not like it but freedom of speech is a right guaranteed all American citizens. People can “advocate” all they want about terrorist organizations so long as they don’t provide aid, material or financial support or any other type of tangible help. Advocating for a terrorist group, even a so called terrorist group like some abortion groups are labeled, is frowned upon but entirely legal. Someone advocating for Al Qaida will not make many friends but they can say what they want.…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Midterm Unit 5 Criminology

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A recent policy was implemented by Jackson Tennessee’s Police Department, and Family Service’s dealing with the problem of child endangerment. Any household that has any documented offense of domestic violence, child abuse, or drug or alcohol related offense committed by the parents, guardian, grandparent, or babysitter, the child/children will be placed in the care of the state or foster care services, until it is proven that the offender has undergone any or all of the following, and has been offense free for a period of no less than six-months. The offender can choose from one of the following alcohol and/or drug treatment, counseling, family therapy sessions, mental health treatment, anger management, or parenting classes.…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introducing Evidence

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Ohio v. Roberts, the Court treated the question of when the Confrontatiion Clause prohibits the introduction of out of court statements against a criminal defendant. The Court created a reliability test and conditioned the admissibility of hearsay evidence on whether it fell under a “firmly rooted hearsay exception” or bears “particularized guarantees of trustworthiness”. Firmly rooted exceptions included excited utterances, statements concerning medical diagnoses, and co-conspirator statements. If the hearsay statement did not…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Hearsay Rule

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hearsay is an out of court statement offered in court to prove the truth of the matter asserted. The Hearsay Rule was developed in order to prevent unreliable testimony from being admitted in court and misleading the jury. Hearsay was considered unreliable because it was not given under oath, cannot be heard and observed by the jury, and cannot be cross-examined. Being crossed examined allows the court and jury to assess the declarant’s ability to perceive initially, remember accurately, and narrate correctly the event that occurred. Hearsay can be seen as a violation of the defendant’s Sixth…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, in the Brian Banks case, he has been convicted only based on Gibson’s testimony, there was no other evidence indirect or direct has founded. Because of that , he’s conviction is vacated after he served six years in the prison (Possley 1). Another example is from the Ted talks. The victim’s family has been asked to choose the person he saw as the murderer from total six suspicion. They choose the picture with the darkest lighting because the day of murder is at a dark night. Reconstructing memories are a memory that is not accurate, and been influenced by various objects or people. It does not mean that the Victim’s family is lying, but they had been influenced by police officers, and each other, to identify the killer (Fraser). Of course, circumstantial evidence is unbelievable, even there are…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic Science

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. It is important because, if you don’t have the right evidence and facts, you can’t find the criminal that did the crime. You might have evidence but the evidence could be false and you might take an innocent man and put him through trial for something he didn’t even do. So it is important to use the proper methods when you are collecting evidence.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fred is drunk and driving his dad’s car. Fred is a 21 year old student at Columbia College. Fred rams into a parked car at 10th and Rogers. Thinking no one saw him; Fred moves his car and parks it on an adjacent lot. He sprints to his dorm room in Miller Hall. A neighbor saw the wreck and Fred running to the dorm. Police are called and they arrive ten minutes after the wreck. The officers see several empty beer cans and a bottle of tequila (half full) in the front seat. The tags are traced to Fred’s dad, who is called by police. Dad says that Fred is a student at Columbia College. Police run Fred's record and determine that he has two prior DWIs within the past five years. The third DWI in 10 years is a felony. Police contact Columbia College security who leads them to Fred’s dorm. Fred is passed out, so security lets them in. The officers smell intoxicants, give Fred some Field Sobriety tests (he fails) and confirm that he was driving the car. Fred is arrested for DWI. It is his third offense, a felony under Missouri law. Fred is given a breath test, which registers at .13 on the scale. During the processing of his arrest paperwork, the officers search Fred’s possessions which he brought to the station, and a small quantity of cocaine is found in Fred’s pocket. Fred is charged with DWI, leaving the scene, and possession of cocaine. What issues do you see? How should they be resolved? (50 points)…

    • 6313 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fourth Amendment Essay

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Matthew, H. (n.d). CJC to probe police case leading to wrongful jailing. Courier Mail, The (Brisbane), Retrieved from Newspaper Source database.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal Justice Midterm

    • 1410 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Many people of history lived in limited geographocal colonies that were independent, close-knit entities called:…

    • 1410 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal Justice Paper

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I went to a case in Peoria, Illinois at the Peoria County Courthouse. The case that I observed was not the first that I have seen there and actually the first case I saw there was similar to the one that I had saw for my Business Law class. The case that I saw was Sate vs. Wilkers and the charge that was brought to him was 1st degree murder. The first case I went to was also a 1st degree murder but it happened a little differently then the way this one happened. There were not many people in the courtroom really just the family of the person that was murdered and I think the reason that it was that way is because the shooting was gang related. It was pretty easy to fond a trial in Peoria because they have one of the highest crime rates in Illinois, but also because gangs are known in Peoria. The first case I had ever gone to was definitely gang related because it happened in a shooting involving two gangs. One thing I noticed was that another state attorney, I think, followed every witness out that testified against Wilkers. Which was a little weird but I am not sure if that is done regularly or there was a reason why he followed just them out. I missed the opening statements but obviously they did not have a plea bargain and Wilkers obviously pleaded not guilty.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Evidence builds the basis of any criminal trial. The judge regulates the evidence that is introduced into court. Evidence can be deemed inadmissible if it was illegally obtained under the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), for example, police forcefully acquired the confession out of the suspect. Most evidence is in the form of oral statements – witnesses that are competent, compellable and non-privileged are called to testify. There are many issues regarding the reliability of evidence. Most trials take place a few months after the crime and witnesses are asked to recall information after this substantial amount of time. The witnesses may not remember all the information correctly or forgetting details as to what had occurred.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role of the criminal investigation process is to balance the rights of the victims and offenders in society. All individuals’ wether victim, offender or member of society have basic rights to which the law attempts to adhere to. While all are individual, the rights will differ for the purpose of maintaining a balance in society. Though upholding the rights of the people is essential in order to ensure that the investigation process is conducted correctly and without abuse.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics