Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Chapter 11 APUSH key terms

Good Essays
592 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chapter 11 APUSH key terms
APUSH Chapter 11 Key Terms “revolution of 1800”: The transfer of power from Federalists to Democratic Republicans. The transfer was so peaceful and it was going to back to the spirit of the revolution of 1776. By restoring original American ideas.

2. Thomas Jefferson:

3. Midnight judges: Judges that came to Adam's right before he his term was over. So they were all to sign the federalist papers. Which were all later revoked by the new congress under Jefferson.

4. John Marshall: Chief Justice of the Supreme Court from 1801 until his death in 1835. Under Marshall’s leadership, the Court became as powerful a federal force as the executive and legislative branches. Marshall’s most notable decision came in the 1803 Marbury v. Madison case, in which he asserted the principle of judicial review.

5. Marbury v. Madison: In this 1803 case, Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional because Congress had overstepped its bounds in granting the Supreme Court the power to issue a writ of mandamus (an ultimatum from the court) to any officer of the United States. This ruling established the principle of judicial review. Marbury's pay was cut.

6. Alexander Hamilton:

7. Barbary Pirates:

8. Mosquito fleet:

9. Louisiana Purchase: Territory purchased from Napoleon by the U.S. in 1803. The Louisiana Purchase nearly doubled the size of the nation and opened the West to exploration and settlement. But the new acquisition also caused strife: border disputes with foreign powers as well as congressional debates over the admission of new states from the region.

10. Aaron Burr:

11. Impressments:

12. Chesapeake Incident: The U.S. Frigate the Chesapeake off the coast of Virginia was demanded to give over sailors for deserting. Then the British ship shot at the frigate and caused a rage for war to go across the nation.

13. Embargo Act 1807: Endorsed by Thomas Jefferson and passed in December 1807. The act ended all importation and exportation in response to theChesapeake-Leopard affair. Jefferson hoped the embargo would put enough economic pressure on the French and British that the two nations would be forced to recognize U.S. neutrality rights in exchange for U.S. goods. The embargo, however, hurt the American economy more than it did Britain’s or France’s, leading to the act’s repeal in March 1809.

14. Non-Intercourse Act: After the repeal of the Embargo Act, this 1809 law restricted trade with Britain and France only, opening up trade with all other foreign ports.

15. James Madison:

16. Macon’s Bill #2: James Madison’s 1810 ploy to induce either Britain or France to lift trade restrictions. Under the bill, U.S. trade sanctions were lifted with the promise that if one country agreed to free trade with the U.S., sanctions would be reimposed against the other nation.

17. War Hawks: People who wanted to go to war with Britain and have the war of 1812.

18. Henry Clay: As Speaker of the House, Henry Clay was a prominent War Hawk, pushing for expansion and war with Britain.

19. John C. Calhoun:

20. Tecumseh and the Prophet: Tecumseh a Shawnee chief who tried to unite Native American tribes in Ohio and Indiana to thwart white settlement. His forces were defeated in the 1811 Battle of Tippecanoe. Tecumseh later allied with the British during the War of 1812. The prophet was Tecumseh's brother Tenskwatawa. He concluded that Indians must stop the expansion of Americans on the frontier to they banded together a confederacy of tribes/ They were to also avoid western influence likes clothes and culture. Was also the reason battle of Tippecanoe and lost the battle against Harrison.

21. Andrew Jackson:

22. Battle of Horseshoe Bend:

23. William Henry Harrison:

24. Battle of Tippecanoe:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Marbury v. Madison (1803) the supreme court had announced for the first time the concept that a court has the right to declare an act of congress void if it is inconsistent with the constitution. In addition William Marbury was an intended recipient of an appointment as a justice of the peace in the area of Columbia. Then when James Madison, Thomas Jefferson’s secretary of state, he refused to deliver Marbury’s commission. Marbury and 3 others joined and petitioned for a writ of mandamus compelling delivery of the…

    • 90 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article Marbury v. Madison and the Establishment of Judicial Autonomy by William E. Nelson, discusses “. . . a balance between two concepts democracy . . . and the rule of law. . .” (Nelson 240). The court case Marbury v. Madison took place in 1803. This court case is famous for the creation of judicial review; “the doctrine allowing courts to hold acts of Congress unconstitutional” (Nelson 240). During the presidency of Adam, sixteen circuit judges were appointed. Adams secretary of state at this time was Marshall, whom could not “deliver the commission for one of the new justices of the peace . . . William Marbury, before the end of President Adams’s term . . .” (248). Marbury v. Madison was started because Thomas Jefferson’s secretary of state James Madison refused to give William Marbury as well as others their commissions. Because of this act by Madison, Marbury as well as others decided to petition for a writ of mandamus for their commissions. According to Cornell Law School, a writ of mandamus is “an order from a court to an inferior government official ordering the government official to properly fulfill their official duties or correct an abuse of discretion”. The case of Marbury v Madison led to the Judiciary Act of 1801. This…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case Marbury v. Madison highlights the issue of an end of term appointee of President John Adams who didn’t ascend to the office upon the assumption of the presidency by Thomas Jefferson. Marbury sued the then secretary of state James Madison for failing to execute the commission. According to the Law, the supreme court has the authority of reviewing both executive and legislative orders. The court, however, has limited jurisdiction that is bounded by the Constitution and cannot be enlarged by the Congress.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Marbury vs Madison case would have to be one of the most important cases in Supreme Court history. The Marbury vs Madison cases was one of the first cases in U.S. history to ever to apply the principle of Judicial review the Judicial review had the power of federal courts to void acts of Congress in conflict with the Constitution , which was written by Chief Justice John Marshall. How it had all started was in 1803 in John Adams last few hours of office John Adams had appointed Marbury and many other judges in his last few hours of office. Republicans argued that these appointments were aimed at maintaining Federalist power. When Thomas Jefferson finally took office he ordered his secretary of states James Maddison to cease the work of…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nfib vs. Sebelius

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. Madison, he says, “if both the law and the constitution apply to a particular case, so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the constitution; or conformably to the constitution, disregarding the law; the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty” (317). Judicial review for Marshall was to balance the powers of the branches of government and to establish…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison (1803) changed the role of the Supreme Court forever. The case started as a conflict of delivering court commissions, but ended as a precedent for the Supreme Court. During the case Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789—authorizing the Supreme Court to issue writs to government officials—was unconstitutional. This began the practice declaring laws that…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Marbury v Madison case (1803) the Supreme Court announced for the first time the principle that a court may declare an act of Congress void if it is inconsistent with the Constitution. William Marbury had been appointed a justice of the peace for the District of Columbia in the final hours of the Adams administration. When James Madison, Thomas Jefferson’s secretary of state, refused to deliver Marbury’s commission, Marbury, joined by three other similarly situated appointees, petitioned for a writ of mandamus compelling delivery of commissions (history.com).…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prior to Marbury v Madison, the Supreme Court only received it's judicial powers through the construction of the Constitution and what legislature enacted. Marbury v Madison was known as the first judicial review conducted by the Supreme Court. As a result of the Supreme Court's decision in Marbury v Madison, it gave the court its power to review the acts of Congress and the Executive and to oppose any acts of the legislature and the Executive that violated Constitutional rights of all citizens in the United States. The Supreme Court began its rise to an equal branch of the government.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On May 28, 1788 Alexander Hamilton wrote the Federalist 78. He stated “The Judiciary…has no influence over the sword or the purse… it may be truly said to have neither force nor will, but merely judgment… the judiciary is beyond comparison, the weakest of the three departments of power…” This statement has only grown more valid with each passing year due to biases and inefficiency.…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The decision increased the power of the federal government over the states. It reaffirmed that the U.S. Supreme Court could invalidate state laws when it found those laws unconstitutional. Further, the case reinforced the practice of imposing restrictions upon state legislatures with regard to the regulation of corporations.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Marbury v. Madison (1803) the Supreme Court announced for the first time the principle that a court may declare an act of Congress void if it is inconsistent with the Constitution. Chief Justice John Marshall, writing for a unanimous Court, denied the petition and refused to issue the writ. Although he found that the petitioners were entitled to their commissions, he held that the Constitution did not give the Supreme Court the power to issue writs of mandamus. Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 provided that such writs might be issued, but that section of the act was inconsistent with the Constitution and therefore invalid.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nationalism Project APUSH

    • 1818 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Louisiana Purchase brought much more than land to the U.S. With the presence of France now gone from the states, we rid ourselves of all European interactions within our home. This gave us a sense of freedom. No more influence meant control over us was no longer an issue. We could be free and make decisions on our own. Along with freedom, the purchase brought us economic opportunities. The vast territory was barren – free to be utilized to American benefit. Being able to explore new land and start a new life was appealing to Americans. Due to the fact that the hunt for land was an issue among all citizen, and knowledge that it was now seemingly unlimited, it sparked a nationalistic mindset. Knowing that opportunities were endless, Americans now had a chance to become independent.…

    • 1818 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marbury v. Madison was a United States case between William Marbury and James Madison. Marbury wasnt appointed his justice of peace and demanded that Madison deliver his commission documents. In result Madison refused to compensate or send the official documents and Marbury order the court to demand that Madison comply. The court then found Madison's stance as illegal and unnecessary. This decision sparked a landmark for the basis of judicial review in the U.S. It also created a line that helped identify the threshold between executive and judicial branches of the government.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marbury V. Madison

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marbury v. Madison was a very influential Supreme Court case in the history of the United States. Marbury v. Madison was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court formed the basis for the exercise of judicial review. This happened under Article III in the Constitution. The court case helped to make a boundary between the executive and judicial branches of the American form of government. In the final days of his presidency, John Adams appointed a large number of justices of peace for the District of Columbia whose commissions were approved by the Senate, signed by the president, and had the official seal of the government on them. William Marbury, who was the Justice of Peace, asked the Supreme Court to force James Madison, Secretary of State, to deliver the commissions. The commissions were not delivered, however, and when President Jefferson assumed office, March 5, 1801, he ordered Madison not to deliver them. Marbury then asked the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus forcing Madison to show reason not to receive his commission. It was through three questions asked by John Marshall that the case was resolved. First, did Marbury have a right to the writ for which he petitioned? Second, if he has a right and that right was violated, do the laws of the United States allow the courts to grant Marbury such a writ? And third, if they did, is it right to ask the Supreme Court to issue such a writ? (Nichols 1).…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Under Article III of the Constitution the judicial branch was established, but rather implicit in proportion to the other two branches of government. This ambiguity allocates various opportunities for interpretation of judicial power. In Federalist 78, Alexander Hamilton addresses the role of the judiciary branch within the federal government in regards to political immunity of judges through life tenure and contribution to checks and balances through power or judicial review. Chief Justice John Marshall, in his ruling of Marbury v. Madison, established the principle of judicial review advocated by Hamilton in the Federalist Papers. Originally designated as the weakest of the three branches in government by the framers of the Constitution, the Judiciary has accumulated an increase in political influence through judiciary review and has proven to be an essential institution in the separation of powers as well as an active participant in the system of checks and balances.…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays