Preview

Chaplin and Fascism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1276 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chaplin and Fascism
In the second decade of the twentieth century, a man named Charlie Chaplin achieved world fame through cinema. He did so even before the cinema had come of age. Chaplin 's contribution to the development of cinema was nothing short of enormous. The time in which Chaplin 's career was flourishing, was also a time when the world was experiencing many problems. Chaplin 's personal beliefs, in combination with the events happening in the world at the time, were a driving force in what message one of his later films carried. Many historians note the similarity of Chaplin to Hitler. One of the most apparent facts is that they were both born within four days of each other in the year 1889. Furthermore, the two men bore a resemblance as adults, and a demand for "strict control over their subordinates when, as adults, they achieved positions of power." (Maland, 164) In the 1940 's, Chaplin chose to make a film entitled The Great Dictator, in which he played a Jewish ghetto resident under the regime of Adenoid Hynkel (also played by Chaplin). The similarity of Hynkel to Adolf Hitler wasn 't exactly a coincidence. Being Chaplin 's first sound film with dialogue, he decided to make it an attack on fascism. The leading symbol of fascism in that time, of course was Hitler. In the film, Hynkel is portrayed as a loud-mouthed fanatical fool. (McDonald, Conway, Ricci, 206) Chaplin always disliked the idea of being compared to the German ruler, despite the obvious similarities. There is much evidence that Chaplin had a good reason to dislike the Nazis, despite the many similarities he had in his public appearance. He had a great dislike for authoritarian government, especially its dehumanizing aspects. These beliefs were brought into full light with a 1937 short story Chaplin wrote entitled: Rhythm: A story of Men in Macabre Movement. Al Hirschfeld said "Chaplin was on the side of the angels. He was for the downtrodden…" (Vance, 299) Chaplin 's memoirs and public statements made


Bibliography: Gernstein, David. "Charlie Chaplin: An online Celebration" (February 1996) 14 December 1996. http://wso.williams.com/~dgerstei/chaplin/intro.html Maland, Charles Chaplin and American Culture: The Evolution of a Star Image. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1989. McDonald, Gerald ed., and Conway, Michael ed., and Ricci, Mark ed. The Films of Charlie Chaplin. New York: Bonanza Books, MCMLXV. Vance, Jeffrey Chaplin: Genius of the Cinema. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc, 2003.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    different people with very different beliefs. The cinema has a way of being able to portray different beliefs, traditions, or memories in a way that is appreciated by so many when done right. This week I chose to watch Fiddler on the Roof, directed by Norman Jewison in 1971. Through this essay I’m going to be looking specifically at the correlation between Judaism and its effects on the cinema. I’ll take a look at three of the different representations Jews attained during 1920’s cinema, and I will also look at the involvement of Judaism in the romantic comedy genre of film.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Over a period of time, specific audiences construct expectations of different types of media, related to either what they have been told, or perhaps what the media have exposed them to in the past. Indeed, it could be argued that the success of a film to a large degree, rests on whether or not such expectations are met, surpassed, else the audience successfully surprised. Certainly, such expectations have to be addressed by the film, if it is to be considered satisfying for the audience, and in this way, elements within the film, such as character representations, the narrative and cinematography are all important components which allow this to be achieved. Additionally, the social and political context in which the film is being viewed must be considered, as it is against this background that their expectations will have been formed.…

    • 3110 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I found that people in the 1940’s commonly choose what to view films based on what they already believed. The power of film-makers portrayed influence that knowledgeable people depend…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The term Auteur seems to bless a privileged group of filmmakers with an almost messiah-like legacy. Men such as Alfred Hitchcock, John Ford and Fritz Lange are believed to inhabit the ranks of the cinematic elite, and not surprisingly most critics are more than willing to bestow upon them the title of Auteur. By regarding filmmaking as yet another form of art, Auteur theory stipulates that a film is the direct result of its director's genius. With the emerging prominence of auteur based criticism in the 1950?s, the role of the director became increasingly integral to a film's success. However most would argue that this form of criticism didn't reach its apex until 1960s, when Andrew Sarris released his seminal works "Notes on the Auteur Theory" (1962) and "The American Cinema" (1968). With this book, Sarris further elaborated on Truffault's theory that "There are no good and bad movies, only good and bad directors"1. To abuse a cliché,Sarris assumed that films are a director's canvas, and only they have the ability to create a great work of art. As intriguing as this notion might seem, there is no doubt that auteur theory is an example of oversimplification at its finest. Unlike many other forms of art, Cinema is the direct result of the cooperative effort of hundreds of people, of which the director and cast are merely the most prominent. To subscribe to auteur theory is to ignore 95% of what makes the production of a film possible, while also adhering to a set of criteria which merely accepts a specific definition of greatness. Auteurism may quite possibly be as much a stigma as a blessing because it celebrates those who adhere to a consistent style, while ignoring those who constantly reinvent themselves.…

    • 2739 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    11 Thomson, David. A Biographical Dictionary of Film 3rd Ed. Alfred A Knopf (1998) p. 801…

    • 2041 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Eisenstein Montage Lists

    • 3942 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Historically, his reputation developed around four factors. First there were the films themselves, which were not only masterpieces but almost attracted controversy and indeed censorship, in their home country as well as abroad. Secondly, in conjunction with the films, there were the theoretical writings, in particular those of the 1920s, which both rationalised his own practice and provided a possible model for cinema more widely.…

    • 3942 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fiction films are often stigmatised by historians, as they distort the truth, causing problems when trying to use them as a source. Their wildly varying content matter, inaccuracies, and bias make them hard to use. Film does not simply suggest a worldview; it states, and we experience, its existence as truth, which is the fundamental power and danger it poses to the observer. One cannot deny, however, film’s phenomenal impact in the twentieth century, drastically changing the way we see the world and how we absorb information. In this way, film is best considered as one stage in the ongoing history of communications. As a historical medium, therefore, fiction film can be very valuable, as despite fictitious content, it still has the potential…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Billy Wilder

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Billy Wilder’s work today remains masterful and memorable. From his skilled screenwriting to his directing, Wilder holds a key position in cinema history. Wilder’s stylistic and thematic elements are recognizable and give off a complex reflection of his American and European cultural influences. I think that Billy Wilder should be considered an “auteur” even if he is not already considered one, for his personal film style and the mere fact that his cynical vision allowed him to create many admirable films across a number of genre boundaries throughout his career. However, film critics tend to disagree and believe that Wilder was too cynical, while also complaining about the lack of conviction in his films.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    She has affirmed that Leni Riefenstahl’s work is aesthetically pleasing, however, the film is a fascist propaganda film that is built upon the political ideologies of Hitler. She explains that Riefenstahl is an “…apolitical artist whose work was used by others for political means” (Sontag, 1976p. 35). She is stating that Hitler ultimately sought out Riefenstahl and commissioned the making of this film to convey his own message. The film stars Hitler and he is also a producer, thus, propaganda is perpetuated throughout the entirety of the film. Riefenstahl received an unlimited budget and was given a large financial budget to produce the film and this is how she was able to get into close proximity of the leader (Sontag, 1976p. 35). However, she must’ve known that this reality was being constructed to serve a certain…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1914, Making a Living was released, and with it, the world was introduced to Sir Spencer “Charlie” Chaplin. Born in 1889, Chaplin spent his early years preparing himself for the camera in dance troupes and stage comedy routines (Charlie Chaplin, 2005). Having been born into poverty, Chaplin’s rise to fame and riches was tremendously difficult, and in no small part due to Chaplin’s revolutionary approach to cinema and comedy specifically. Chaplin redefined the comedy genre by bringing intelligence and sophistication to what was otherwise a slap-stick dominated field (Charlie Chaplin, 2005). Chaplin achieved this through refining the conventions of filming, extensive character development, portraying gender roles realistically, bringing attention…

    • 2154 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    By playing a mute commoner triumphing over government officials out to get him, Chaplin represented the powerlessness that the masses felt while also inspiring and empowering those very masses. The combination of being mute – powerless – yet overcoming his foes, proved a most effective combination for getting people 's attention. Chaplin became an icon for the commoners, and with this, a threat to the establishment, especially considering the propaganda power of the developing motion picture. Chaplin 's fame, popularity, as well as the themes of his films, were the reasons that senator McCarthy came to blacklist him as a suspected communist. Add to this sexual deviance (he had an underage wife, and there were to be more), leftist political views, and not being an American citizen, and senator McCarthy had all he needed to target Chaplin. John Sbartellati and Tony Shaw write in Booting a Tramp: Charlie Chaplin, the FBI, and the Construction of the Subversive Image in Red Scare America, these things, “provided ammunition for those who sought to transform Chaplin 's image from popular star to despised subversive” (The Pacific Historial Review,497). It did not take long for US public opinion to sway against…

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlie Chaplin wrote, directed, produced, and starred in the movie “The Great Dictator”, which was released on October 15th, 1940. This is during the time when the US was still trying to appease Nazi Germany. Chaplin’s primary goal with the movie was to satirize Hitler and castigate the Nazi’s and their values. The two main characters in the movie are both played by Chaplin. One is a Jewish barber with amnesia, the other is the dictator to the ‘Nazi’ party, and they are of course identical.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the Kid Chaplin

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    this time Chaplin also produced, directed, and starred in The Pilgrim, A Woman in Paris, The Circus, and The Gold…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Essay on Charlie Chaplin

    • 2424 Words
    • 10 Pages

    My presentation starts with a short / brief biography of Charlie Chaplin. Then, I will continue by describing his acting career which will later build up to the main characters that he interpreted. Finally, I will present to you the wonders of his great film: “The Great Dictator”.…

    • 2424 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Maybelline SWOT Analysis

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Charlie Chaplin (1889–1977) was a British comic actor, filmmaker, and composer who rose to fame in the silent era. Chaplin became a worldwide icon through his screen persona "the Tramp" and is considered one of the most important figures of the film industry. His first screen appearance came in February 1914, after which he produced the popular features The Kid (1921), The Gold Rush (1925), and The Circus (1928). Chaplin refused to move to sound films in the 1930s, instead producing City Lights (1931) and Modern Times (1936) without dialogue. He became increasingly political and his next film, The Great Dictator (1940), satirised Adolf Hitler. The 1940s was a decade marked with controversy for Chaplin, and his popularity declined rapidly. Accused of communistsympathies, he was forced to leave the United States. The Tramp was abandoned in his later films, which includeMonsieur Verdoux (1947), Limelight (1952), and A King in New York (1957). Chaplin wrote, directed, produced, edited, starred in, and composed the music for most of his films. His work is characterised by slapstick combined withpathos, and continues to be held in high regard. (Full article...)…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays