Chaos Theory In Michael Crichton's Jurasssic Park
Jurasssic Park is a #1 New York best-selling, science fiction novel written by Michael Crichton. Hammond creates Jurassic Park with a small amount of staffs to increase efficiency and money flow. Hammond, instead of a large group of staff, has a computer system that operates all the park’s functions. A large function in the computer system is deciphering and filling in DNA, with some supervision of Doctor Wu, the head scientist. For instance, after Doctor Wu takes out blood from a preserved insect that may have a dinosaur’s blood and extracts the dinosaur’s DNA. The computer system would later fill in the gaps in the DNA, since cannot survive completely. It sounds possible and accurate, at first glance. But, for example, when the gaps in the
…show more content…
The chaos theory explains how chaos is predictable and not random. As well as, straightforward, uncomplicated systems creates complex behaviors, such as the “butterfly effect “mentioned in the novel, and systems that are typically complicated carry a fundamental order. The chaos theory can apply to ecosystems. For example, preys and predators, they must undergo their nature: predator eats the prey; if, in this case, bear’s population rises, so will the fishes’ population and vice versa when the predators and prey rate drops. Also, something as straightforward as the weather, if it’s too hot, a drought or even a fire can hurt the ecosystem. They are quite a few differences between the novel and the movie. To start off, in the novel, the theme park is destroyed by Costa Rica’s Air Force, while in the movie, the island was left alone. As well as, in the novel, Hammond faces his death by compys, but he doesn’t die in the movie. To be able to improve the film scientifically, I’d first add the graphs from the book to demonstrate data; more data, more scientifically correct. I would add the part where Malcom examines an increase of the dinosaurs, instead of Grant finding hatched
The chaos theory explains how chaos is predictable and not random. As well as, straightforward, uncomplicated systems creates complex behaviors, such as the “butterfly effect “mentioned in the novel, and systems that are typically complicated carry a fundamental order. The chaos theory can apply to ecosystems. For example, preys and predators, they must undergo their nature: predator eats the prey; if, in this case, bear’s population rises, so will the fishes’ population and vice versa when the predators and prey rate drops. Also, something as straightforward as the weather, if it’s too hot, a drought or even a fire can hurt the ecosystem. They are quite a few differences between the novel and the movie. To start off, in the novel, the theme park is destroyed by Costa Rica’s Air Force, while in the movie, the island was left alone. As well as, in the novel, Hammond faces his death by compys, but he doesn’t die in the movie. To be able to improve the film scientifically, I’d first add the graphs from the book to demonstrate data; more data, more scientifically correct. I would add the part where Malcom examines an increase of the dinosaurs, instead of Grant finding hatched