Challenges in Hrm
Studies in C ontinuing Education, V ol. 23, N o. 1, 2001
Challenges in Human Resource Development Practitioner Preparation
ROBYN JOHNSTON
University of Technology, Sydney
This article describes some of the challenges that confront designers of programs which prepare or upskill Human Resource Development (HRD) practitioners. It surfaces varying perspectives of human resource development and some of the issues that confront organisations in the post-industrial economy which have implications for HRD practice. It also surfaces some tensions and areas of convergence that can be seen in recent studies which have investigated the role of HRD practitioners. The ® nal section recommends some substantive areas that should be addressed within HRD preparation programs which are designed to equip learners for practice in the current organisational context.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Organisational learning and skill formation initiatives are increasingly being seen as contributing to the achievement of organisational competitiveness in the contemporary economy. As a result, the development of employees has become a more prominent organisational practice. Since Human Resource Development (HRD) practitioners are primarily responsible for employee development there is a need for them to become more highly skilled to ensure that their practice meets the changing needs of organisations. Formal educational programs in the practice of HRD provide a way of assisting practitioners to acquire the skills they now need for effective practice. The design of such programs, however, is problematic given the emergent and cross-disciplinary nature of the ® eld. This paper surfaces some of the challenges associated with program design for the development of HRD practitioners, drawing from discussions in, and pro® ling research from, the HRD literature. The ® nal section of the paper proposes several key areas that need to be addressed in preparatory programs for HRD practitioners. Some
Challenges in Human Resource Development Practitioner Preparation
ROBYN JOHNSTON
University of Technology, Sydney
This article describes some of the challenges that confront designers of programs which prepare or upskill Human Resource Development (HRD) practitioners. It surfaces varying perspectives of human resource development and some of the issues that confront organisations in the post-industrial economy which have implications for HRD practice. It also surfaces some tensions and areas of convergence that can be seen in recent studies which have investigated the role of HRD practitioners. The ® nal section recommends some substantive areas that should be addressed within HRD preparation programs which are designed to equip learners for practice in the current organisational context.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Organisational learning and skill formation initiatives are increasingly being seen as contributing to the achievement of organisational competitiveness in the contemporary economy. As a result, the development of employees has become a more prominent organisational practice. Since Human Resource Development (HRD) practitioners are primarily responsible for employee development there is a need for them to become more highly skilled to ensure that their practice meets the changing needs of organisations. Formal educational programs in the practice of HRD provide a way of assisting practitioners to acquire the skills they now need for effective practice. The design of such programs, however, is problematic given the emergent and cross-disciplinary nature of the ® eld. This paper surfaces some of the challenges associated with program design for the development of HRD practitioners, drawing from discussions in, and pro® ling research from, the HRD literature. The ® nal section of the paper proposes several key areas that need to be addressed in preparatory programs for HRD practitioners. Some
References: ALLAN CONSULTING GROUP. (1999). Training to compete: The training needs of industry. Report to the Australian Industry Group. NSW, Australian Industry Group. AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT (ASTD) (1996). ASTD report: Competencies for HRD practitioners. Training and Development in Australia, 23(3), 25± 30. ANDERSON , G. & JOHNSTON , R. (1997). Human resource development: Developing developers in a changing landscape. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Post Compulsory Education and Training, Grif® th University, Qld, Australia. ARGYRIS, C. (1994). The future of workplace learning and performance. Training and Development Journal, 48(5), 36± 47. ARNOLD, J. (1997). Managing careers into the 21st century. London: Paul Chapman. BARRIE, J. & PACE, W. (1997). Competence, ef® ciency and organizational learning. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 8(4), 335± 342. BOXALL, P.F. (1996). The strategic HRM debate and the resource based view of the ® rm. Human Resources Management Journal, 6(3), 59± 75. BRIDGES, W. et al. (1994). The future of workplace learning and performance. Training and Development Journal, 48(5), 36± 47. CASEY, K. (1999). The changing contexts of work. In D. BOUD & J. GARRICK (Eds), Understanding learning at work. London: Routledge. CHALOFSKY, N. (1992). A unifying de® nition for the human resource development profession. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 3(2), 175± 182. COOPEY, J. (1996). Crucial gaps in the learning organisation: Power, politics and ideology. In K. STARKEY (Ed.), How organisations learn. London: International Thomson Business Press. DAVERNPORT, T.H., DE LONG, D.W. & BEERS, M.C. (1998). Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Management Review, Winter, 43± 54. DENTON, J. (1998). Organisational learning and effectiveness. London: Routledge. DUNPHY, D., TURNER, D. & CRAWFORD, M. (1997). Organizational learning as the creation of corporate competences. Journal of Management Development, 16(4), 232± 242. DUNSTAN, B. (1993). Views for the training and development workplace: A report of practitioner survey ® ndings. Sydney: AITD. FIELD, L. (1997). Training and learning in small business: Issues for research (pp. 1± 21). Sydney: Research Centre for Vocational Education and Training, University of Technology Sydney. FIELD, L. & FORD, B. (1996). Managing the learning organisation. Melbourne: Longman. GARAVAN, T. (1997). The learning organisation: A review and evaluation. The Learning Organization, 4(1), 18± 29. GARAVAN, T.N., COSTINE, P. & HERATY, N. (1995). The emergence of strategic human resource development. Journal of European Industrial Training, 19(10), 4± 10. GARRICK, J. (1994). Postmodern doubts and ª truthsº about training. Studies in Continuing Education, 16(2), 127± 142. GARRICK, J. & SOLOMON, N. (1997). Technologies of compliance in training. Studies in Continuing Education, 19(1), 19. GOLDRICK, P. (1996). Don’ t shoot the messenger. Australian Training Review, 21, 8± 11. HAMEL, G. & PRAHALAD, C.K. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston: Harvard Business School. HANDY, C. (1995). Beyond certainty: The changing worlds of organisations. London: Hutchinson. HARRIS, R. & SIMONS, M. (1999). Rethinking the role of workplace trainer: Building a learning culture. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Post Compulsory Education and Training, Grif® th University, Queensland, Australia. HENDRY, C., ARTHUR, M. & JONES, A. (1995). Strategy through people: Adaptation and learning in the small± medium enterprise. London: Routledge. HILLTROP, J. (1995). The changing psychological contract: The human resource challenge of the 1990s. European Management Journal, 13(3), 286± 294. JONES, A. & HENDRY, C. (1992). The learning organization: Review of the literature and practice. Coventry: Warwick Business School, University of Warwick. Challenges in HRD Practitioner Preparation 53 KANTER, R. (1989). When giants learn to dance. New York: Simon & Schuster. KOSTOS, C. (1998). Issues facing learning and development professionals. Training and Development in Australia, 25(5), 19± 20. KUCHINKE, K.P. (1998). Moving beyond the dualism of performance versus learning: A response to Barrie and Pace. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 9(4), 377± 384. LAWLER, E.E. (1994). From job-based to competency-based organizations. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 15, 3± 15. LEONARD-BARTON, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111± 125. MARQUARD, M. & SOFO, F. (1999). Building the learning organisation: Best practice from around the world. In F. SOFO (Ed.), Human resource development perspectives, roles and practice choices (pp. 321± 336). NSW: Business and Professional Publishing. MARTOCCHIO, J.J. & BALDWIN, T.T. (1997). The evolution of strategic organizational training. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 15, 1± 46. MOY, J. (1991). Human resource development practitioner roles and competencies: An analysis of recent research. Asia Paci® c HRM, 29(4), 7± 23. MULDER, T. (1992). Towards a comprehensive research framework for training and development in business and industry. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 1(2), 104± 114. NIJHOF, W. & DE RIJK, R. (1997). Roles, competences and outputs of HRD practitioners: A comparative study in four European countries. Journal of European Industrial Training, 21(6/7), 247± 255. OSTERMANN, P. (1988). Employment futures, reorganization, dislocation, public policy. London: Oxford University Press. PRAHALAD, C.K. & HAMEL, G. (1990). The core competence of the organization. Havard Business Review, 68, 79± 91. RHINESMITH, S. (1995). Open the door to a global mindset. Training and Development, May, 49(5), 35± 43. RIFKIN, J. (1995). The end of workÐ The decline of the global labour force and the dawn of the post market era. New York: G.P. Putman’ s Sons. ROWDEN , R. (1995). The role of human resource development in successful small to mid-sized manufacturing businesses. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 6(4), 355± 373. SENGE, P. (1990). The ® fth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organisation. New York: Random House. SMITH, A. & HAYTON, G. (1999). Enterprise training in Australia. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(2), 251± 272. STACE, D. & DUNPHY, D. (1996). Beyond the boundaries: Leading and recreating the successful enterprise. Sydney: McGraw Hill. STEWART, T.A. (1996, January). Taking on the last bureaucracy. Fortune Magazine. STULLER, J. (1998). Chief of corporate smarts. Training, 35(4), 28± 37. TESSARING, M. (1998). Training for a changing society: A report on current vocational education and training research in Europe. Thessaloniki: CEDEFOP European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training. TORROCO, R. & SWANSON , R. (1995). The strategic roles of human resource development. Human Resource Planning, 18(4), 10± 21. ULRICH, D. (1998). Intellectual capital 5 competence 3 commitment. Sloan Management Review, Winter, 15± 26. ULRICH, D., LOSEY, M. & LAKE, G. (Eds) (1997). Tomorrow’ s HR management. New York: John Wiley. WATKINS, K. (1989). Five metaphors: Alternative theories for human resource development. In D. GRADOUS (Ed.), Systems theory applied to human resource development (pp. 167± 184). Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development. WATKINS, K. & MARSICK, V. (1992). Building the learning organisation: A new role for human resource developers. Studies in Continuing Education, 14(2), 115± 129. WILSON, J. & BARNACOAT, M. (1995). The self-managing strategy. Sydney: Business and Professional Publishing.