Preview

Causes of the Streltsy Revolt in 1698

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
425 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Causes of the Streltsy Revolt in 1698
Explain the causes of the Streltsy revolt in 1698

There were many causes leading up to the second Streltsy revolt in 1968. Peter left Russia almost immediately to go on his tour round the Great Embassy having no strong leader, rumors had circulated that he was not who he said he was and when the Streltsy went to Asov they were very far away from Moscow so couldn’t see there families.

Peter left Russia to try and westernize it. He went on the Great Embassy travelling to countries such as England and Holland etc to see how there country was run. In doing so, he left Russia in a state. There was no one running the country and there was no strong leadership or discipline therefore the Streltsy had no threat. In addition, when the Strelty were working in Asov, it was run by westerners something they really did not like, as they didn’t want Russia to become westernized.

Another reason why the Streltsy revolted in 1698 was due to rumors that Peter was actually the Anti-Christ and not himself. People believed that he had been bewitched and that was why he wanted to westernize the country. The Streltsy were not best pleased with this, as they thought there leader was therefore not very strong and couldn’t lead them to victory. Also, rumors were made that Peter died in the west and that Sophia was going to become Tsarina again something that the public and the Streltsy did not want.

Furthermore, this was a key reason that pushed the Streltsy over the edge and to revolt. When in Asov, the Streltsy were far away from Moscow so therefore could not see there families. They were treated very poorly when in Asov also, so they didn’t really see a reason to be there as they couldn’t be with the people they loved the most and were treated horribly and had awful living conditions. Many of them were also not paid at all, leaving the Streltsy angry and unhappy.

In conclusion, I believe that the Streltsy had a right to revolt as they didn’t have a strong leader at the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peter the Great was considered on of the greatest czar of all Russian history. He did attempt to build a bigger army to overpower other European countries, but that costed a great deal of money and a raise in taxes. In 1700, he went to war with Sweden, raging on for 21 years. As Russia took on the victory of the battle, they gained power over the Baltic Sea and transformed the Russian Tsardom into the Russian Empire. Soon, Russia became the world’s top producer in cast-iron melting.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This man is known as Peter the Great and was considered to be a absolute monarch. Peter and his brother Ivan were both rulers until his brother died, making Peter sole ruler of Russia. One of his greatest accomplishments were founding the city of St. Petersburg. Russia also became one of the most powerful Europe countries while Peters ruling. Peter had faced many different challenges as he ruled but one of the biggest ones was the power of the nobles. He ultimately influenced Russia by laying a strong foundation for Russia by many cultural, education, and architectural achievements.…

    • 98 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In July 1918, the royal Romanov line was suddenly and brutally ended by the Bolsheviks. The Romanov family had ruled the Russian Empire for over three centuries. The Romanovs reign was one of strict tyranny. Tsar Nicholas II of Russia made one big step toward a more equal Russia by freeing the serfs but because the serfs owned no land they had little to no money still. After WWI when nicholas led Russia to a crushing defeat there was lots of unrest throughout Russia. I think that the main reason the Tsar was forced to abdicate the throne and then was slaughtered is that he made a more equal Russia but in doing so he made the serfs more impoverished than ever, that he had led Russia into multiple wars that had ended badly and that the technology…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    War broke out in 1914, with Tsar Nicholas becoming commander-in-chief in 1915, meaning he was away from Petrograd. Not only was this poorly thought out by Nicholas because it gave the people an opportunity to plot against him, but as he was away he left Tsarina (also a German princess), Alexandra, in charge during his absence. Due to the war being against Germany, this made the Russian people nervous and skeptical towards the extreme power she had over them during such a crucial time. Not only were they disgruntled by this, but also Alexandra’s close friendship to Rasputin, a Serbian peasant. This particularly angered the aristocracy and middle classes as they believed they were being led by someone of lower demeanor than that of themselves. This weakened support for the autocratic rule and lost the Tsar many of his supporters, which put him in a vulnerable position in the case of revolutionary upturn. This also could have inspired the peasantry to discover greater aspirations and encourage their belief that they could have greater status which in turn could trigger new revolutionary ideas amongst the lower classes. This demonstrates a link between Nicholas being away in order to commandeer army movement for the war, however it is arguable that it was a lack of authority and respect for the Tsarist regime that caused the change of opinions towards the Tsar amongst all classes, lessening his support and leaving him far more vulnerable in the case of a revolution.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion was an important factor when dealing with Louis XIV and Peter the Great. Louis XIV held simple views regarding religion and it was that the king controlled the Catholic Church and that the Church should do his bidding. Louis got into conflict with some popes, but in the end he got his way, because he was more powerful. Louis believed that what was good for him was good for France. He saw no difference between the two. During Peter's reign the Russian Orthodox Church was reformed. The traditional leader of the Church was the Patriarch of Moscow. In 1700, when the office fell vacant, Peter had refused to name a replacement, allowing the Patriarch's deputy to discharge the duties of the office. In 1721, Peter followed the advice of Feofan Prokopovich and erected the Holy Synod, to take the place of the Patriarch and deputy. Peter also implemented a law which stated that no Russian man could join a monastery before the age of 50. He thought that too many able Russian men were being wasted away by clerical work when they could be joining his army. In 18th century Russia, few people lived to over a half century, therefore very few men became monks during Peter's reign. The monks were not pleased with this. In…

    • 942 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Latvia and Great

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    a.i. Before Peter the Great, no Russian had the courage to even try to convert Russia into an westernized, European nation. When Peter the Great acquired power, he improved the Russian army, remodeled the social and economic structure of Russia and conquered territory towards Sweden to gain access to the Baltic Sea.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some peasants were more radical than the methods that Lotzer suggests. He highlights the idea that the peasants matter as individuals and should be respected. This is echoed in Document 3. The peasant speaker asserts that they are as hold as the Emperor and demand to be freed. This shows it inspired them to rebel. This also shows that they were the first willing to consult the government for help before the violence. In Document 8, the peasant’s perspective is relayed. Lorenz Fries writes to an archbishop who may be a victim of the revolts and may be skewing the truth. However, he does suggest that the peasants’ ideas of brotherhood are becoming radical as they discuss the redistribution of wealth. The responses to the peasant’s rebellions and concerns by the government were made to seem reasonable but were made to seem reasonable but in actuality were not. In documents 4, 10, and 12, you can see this. In Document 4, the government responds to a request by saying that for the peasants to be free they must buy themselves out of serfdom. Very few peasants would have the means to accomplish this. This may have inspired more revolts through its ineffectiveness. Another comical governmental reason falls by the…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When you think of Peter I or Peter the Great, as he gave himself that name, one thinks of Russia and the many Tsars that ruled this interesting part of the world. To learn of Peter the Great is to explore his life during 1682 . Peter was responsible for bringing Russia out of darkness and into a more civilized country in hopes that Russia, the Motherland, would gain the respect of the rest of the European theatre and become a great power. To do this required many changes and reforms which Peter the Great was responsible for. Although not completely successful in his reforms, Peter the Great had the attitude that he could never fail. Russia, considered by other countries as primitive, was at no point prepared to expand its territory or even be considered a threat by others with all the internal conflicts happening in the diverse land. Peter the Great was the answer to the lack of respect by the Western world, as he was raised differently than any other tsars or family that came before him. This upbringing will show the attitude and demeanor with which Peter the Great was able to meet the needs of the state. Previous to Peter the Great, the state had never…

    • 2206 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    With Russia’s improvements in the military, Peter thought this wasn’t going to be a very hard war, but he was wrong. Sweden didn’t want give up their land, but Peter really wanted the land. He really wanted to get the ports on the Baltic Sea. He also was suspected to have wanted control of Poland, but no one could understand why he wanted control of such a small, barely blossoming nation. Sweden was also Russia’s main threat, and he wanted to stop them from expanding incase of anything they could do to hurt Russia in the future (Hughes 27). A quote by Peter the Great explains his look on how he changes Russia “ I have a great bundle of grain, but I have no mill and there is not enough water close to build one. But there is water enough distance if only I shall have time to build a canal, but the length of my life is uncertain. Therefore I build the mill first and have only given order to build the canal, which will better force my successors to bring water.“ (Woodlock). It didn’t seem to me that Peter the Great gained a lot of land. Russia was already great in size, but he did gain very vital land and ports. Even though Russia was great in size, it lacked major ports and fertile land before Peter expanded. Russia really needed the ports, and Peter obtained them. This directly links to my thesis because he made Russia a major trading and more of an agricultural nation because of the land he…

    • 1991 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    'Disputes over the succession to the English throne were the most common cause of rebellion in the period from 1485 to 1603.' How far do you agree with this view?…

    • 1214 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the sixteenth century, peasants and the poor rose against the German states and their lords. To show their unhappiness, the peasants and poor would perform rebellious actions and created the grievances in word in hope to make a change with their lords' control over them. The probable main cause for the rebellion and uprisings was due to the hatred on the lords oppressions. Responses varied, considering that lords and theologians such as Martin Luther did not agree with the choice of the peasants while some other theologians did agree with the peasants and even urged and praised them to continue.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The rebellion in Late Medieval Europe was caused by numerous individuals, events and developments in the 14th Century. In this essay I will be discussing the significance of each of these factors concerning the English, Czech and German revolts, and the opinions of Cohn, Tuchman and Walsingham.…

    • 4136 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    russia revision guide

    • 7465 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Explain why Alexander II introduced further reforms following the Emancipation Edict of 1861. (12 marks)…

    • 7465 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tsar Peter I, also known as Peter the Great, ruling Russia from 1689 to 1725, implemented major military and domestic reforms that centralized Russia and increased its role in Europe. He centralized his power and revolutionized the role of the servant nobility, creating a vast bureaucracy that would stabilize Russia. He would apply Western principles to his armies and the Russian Cossacks would expand throughout Eurasia. Peter also introduced radical reforms that discouraged the ancient traditions of the Boyars and in establishing St. Petersburg would create a model European city. His great changes would revolutionize Russia and establish the nation as a formidable power in Europe.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Tsar’s remodelled regime was highly opposed by the Russian people, which encouraged opposition towards their regime. The Tsars in general were majorly violent. They implemented this by the use of the Okhrana, which were the Russian secret police. They would fight out against people that did not believe in the Tsarist regime, usually killing them or sending them to Siberia, to where they would have to live in extreme conditions until their death. This meant that people were worried about their freedom in their own country and therefore disliked the leaders of their country, as they did not like the way the Tsars dealt with Russians who broke the law, or the powers they gave the Okhrana. The Tsars also believed they were chosen by God. This was because of the importance of the Christian church in the country, and by the Tsar, and this meant the Tsars believe they were valued highly by God to be born a Tsar. This infuriated the people, because of their strong Christian believes on equality “in God’s image”. This meant the Tsars had opposition from some of the Christian church because of their strong beliefs on why they were in power. The Tsar also had the problem of their knowledge of their people; the fact was they did not have much knowledge of them. The Tsar, because of the poor communication and connections throughout the country…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics