Preview

Causes of the Boer War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
497 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Causes of the Boer War
There were significant political conflicts between the two sides. The Boers treated all blacks very badly and did not give basic human rights even to the blacks working for them. They made them pay taxes but could not vote. It was said to be through religious reasons that the Boers treated blacks so badly. This awful treatment infuriated the British, who had abolished slavery in all its colonies as well as at home in 1834. The Dutch wanted to keep its slaves. Europeans working in the Boer territories were also mistreated. These "Uitlanders" as they were known were key to the Boers' economic success, yet were still denied the vote.

The war occurred also because of strategic reasons. The British had already seized Swaziland, Bechuanaland and Basutoland, which more or less surrounded the Boers who feared that if the British took any more territory, they could be under siege, particularly if their route to the sea was blocked. The British wanted to control all of Southern Africa, not just small areas which were isolated - the Boers were their main opponents.

There were economic issues involved in the war. The Boers took control of the Transvaal and set up the Orange Free State. They found gold in the Transvaal and this area became very rich indeed. Later diamonds were found in this area as well, and there was argument between the British and Boers over in which nation's territory they lay.
Certain individuals had a major role in provoking the war. Cecil Rhodes was probably the most ambitious of Britain's leaders abroad. He was a real imperialist, and strove to expand the British Empire further, especially through his dream of a "Cape Colony to Cairo" railway. He was strongly anti-Boer, and his actions seemed to shape British policy back at home. Also highly influential was Sir Alfred Milner, who was the British High Commissioner and was also strongly anti-Boer. He was supposed to be a peacemaker, but it were the demands he placed on the Boers which sparked

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Source A is an extract from a book by Andrew Roberts, published in 1999. Its purpose is to inform people, but with the intention of selling copies. The source suggests the support for the Boer war was political; however it did not have the public’s backing. This caused national tension and the government’s decision to continue the war was deemed as a mishandling of the situation. “Church bells were rung, flags were flown, and school children were given a half day off school, stock exchange was suspended.” This shows the lack of support for the war as the public were elated to hear the news that soldiers were returning from home. Evidently, they supported Britain as a country to do well, but did not support the government’s ideas to resume the war. The reliability of the source however could be questioned, as the intention of the book is to sell copies, therefore it must be intriguing. As a result, the book may not be 100% factual in order to bring about some excitement in the book and so cannot be considered completely reliable.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the essay Too Many Bananas, Not Enough Pineapples, and No Watermelon at All: Three Object Lessons in Living with Reciprocity by David Counts, there is a misunderstanding between cultures about the rules of sharing. The events in David Counts's essay were humorous anecdotes about fruit. Unfortunately for the ! Kung people, differing ideas of sharing can sometimes be catastrophic for a culture. The previous social interactions of the !…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1899, Britain became involved in a war, known as the Boer War, in South Africa, which was part of the British Empire at that time. As a result of Britain having a relatively small army, volunteer recruits were needed to increase the army size. However, the British Government became alarmed when almost 25% of the volunteers were rejected because there were physically unfit to serve in the armed forces. This figure was even higher among volunteers from the industrial cities. Politicians and the public…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    WW1 DBQ

    • 354 Words
    • 1 Page

    opposing British power, all of which they could not do without multiplying military costs (Doc…

    • 354 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, others have argued that rather than showing a positive reaction to progressive Liberalism, the result reflected an overwhelming rejection of Conservative policies. The main and perhaps one of the most damaging issue for the Conservatives was the Boer War; though it had originally benefited the Conservatives in 1900, promoting patriotism and helping them win the 1900 election, by 1906 there had been more deaths than Britain expected and it had been much more drawn out. The Boer War also helped unveil the poverty…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, The Boer War is one of the most important events. The war started in 1899 in South Africa; the enemies of the British were the…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Their leader Shaka had planted all his ideas and teachings into the Zulu people and because of him, they had this fearless persona about them to. All they were known for was wreaking havoc and growing their already growing empires with trained a killer, which was going to be a problem. I resented the British Laws that was passed to abolish slavery. If they never passed these laws things would have never changed and this would have never stroked their already growing egos. These laws caused us Boers to revolt and try to escape British rule. This was one of the key opponents that lead us into battle with the Zulu people. These ignorant, blood-thirsty, man slaying, people are dangerous. They start countless wars and make a lot of enemies which would hurt them because they were creating countless enemies. The only thing that they know how to do is how to kill and to start war amongst themselves, when we were trying to compromise with them. We was only trying to teach these barbaric people some of our ways and to civilize them, trying to help the blacks of the South Africa. All the “Great” King of The Zulu Land had to do was disband his military and recognize Britain’s authority, or face invasion. As usual they chose what they knew how to do best, which was how to start war. The same British people that passed the slave abolishing law for these people they were now going into war with them. So not only did they have wars with Boers they also had war with the British now to, how ironic. Even though I despise these people they were very courageous. It’s almost funny how the Zulu’s thought they could defeat us with their sticks. They knew that they could not have stopped us with their assegai which was basically a spear, while we…

    • 619 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Boers attempts at trying to Siege us have caused us greatly. Supplies are now growing scarce my English men are running low on supplies and many of the civilians are dying of hunger. It is a sign that the battle may not end well. The Boers, the disgusting fighters had cut the railway link to Durban.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly the Boer War also had an effect on the general election of 1906; Joseph Chamberlains appointment as colonial secretary whose job it was to strengthen the empire. South Africa was important in these plans as it had the most valuable land on the continent not only because of its prime trading location but also because of the recently discovered goldfield's. Agreements in 1881 and 1884 gave the Boer states independence but they faced interference from imperialist Britain which escalated hostilities. These and other factors eventually led to war with the Boer states. Views were split on the subject but as the war went on the Conservatives were being increasingly blamed for their military incompetence. The war also allowed the Liberals to start a revival as it took views off the internal cracks in the party and gave it a united front as most Liberals disagreed with the war. The Boer War created other issues for conservatives. There were Chinese workers in South Africa and despite the Conservative government having little to do with it the Liberals could portray them as exploiters…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The British wanted the fertile soils, diamond mines, and gold deposits of South Africa, but the Zulu tribe stood in their way. The British sent 30,000 troops led by Lord Chelmsford to battle the Zulu nation. As a result, 15,000 Zulus died reducing them to a small quantity. In the final battle in 1899, the British completely wiped out the Zulus and their civilization. In effect, the rest of South Africa fell under British hands. Over in Kenya, the British fought and killed 12,000 Kenyans during the Mau Mau Rebellion, some of them died in confinement camps . A few thousands more were displaced or driven away from the country, leaving their people scattered in neighboring countries. Europeans didn't only bring troops over, they brought diseases too. Rinderpest, a European livestock disease killed off 90-95% of the live cattle in Africa and other grazing animals. The lack of grazing animals changed the landscape that made it easier for tsetse fly to nest. The tsetse flies spread a sleeping sickness that killed about 200,000 Ugandans from 1902-1906 . African tribes were very dependent on their livestock; as a result, tribes like the Maasai in Tanzania lost two thirds of their population. The livestock diseases also brought with it epizootic, a lung disease that hit many animals in South Africa . Other diseases from the Europeans that affected the continent greatly were smallpox and malaria because the Africans didn't have much immunity to them. Disease became a huge factor in the deaths of the African continent, both directly and indirectly; without livestock comes no food, which leads to starvation. However, these weren't the British's intentions. One of their main intentions of colonizing Africa was for their resources. Diamond mining was very profitable for the British in South Africa. They used slave labor force (the South Africans) to dig out the diamonds and left the higher and more important…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One major similarity between China and Africa while they were undergoing Imperialism was that both nations opposed to Imperialism. The way this was done in Africa was by the Zulu war and mahDist war. The Zulu war was led by the Zulu nation (an African tribe) in the 1820’s and they fiercely resisted the British. This lasted till the 1880s and the Zulu nation was broken apart. However, in 1899, the Boer war began. In this the Boers, who were the Dutch farmers in Africa, resisted against the British. During the war, the British has discovered diamonds and gold and this led to even more encouragement to win the war. By 190s, the British had ended the war. Similarly, in China, there was the Opium war, which existed between the Chinese and the British because the Chinese has destroyed 6 million dollars worth of opium which was owned by the British. The British had once again, seceded and won the war. There was also the Taiping Rebellion and the Manchu dynasty was weakened but only won because of help from the west. In China there was one more form of resistance…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq Essay on Nationalism

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Britain also had colonies in Africa. They also had colonies in India because of this the economy of Britain became bigger and became very powerful. The British restricted Indian trade and made free trade for British goods. In document 5 Britain was the major trading nation with India they claimed it was all for the good of India. The actions taking by the British caused revolts and disunity in India. The Indians never accepted being under British rule and always tried to revolt.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Boer war had effects on the soldiers on both sides of the war, the indigenous people of South Africa and the families of the Boer soldiers. The Boers were constantly shelling the British and this meant that the British soldiers could not move openly during the day and had to camp in insanitary dugouts rather than in the open, which accelerated the spread of disease in the British camp. Evidentially, this is a social impact and has affected South…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism Dbq

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Great Britain, Joseph Chamberlain felt that colonizing Africa and maintaining India would be a symbiotic relationship. He says that the relationships they will have with their colonies will open up commerce and trade and increase more demand for products from both countries and that India may be one of their most valuable trade partners (Doc 1). Frederick D. Lugard believed that Africa specifically would benefit from British rule, since they are eager to advance their agricultural techniques and tools, irrigation, and blacksmithing. This would bring the Africans a more civilized and advanced society so they could become fruitful trading partners (Doc 2). He also admitted to the fact that in the beginning, Britain had their own personal gain in mind, but now, they would change that. They had added transportation, ended slave trade and tribal warfare, and got rid of many diseases with medical advancements (Doc. 3) . Along with all of these advancements Lugard stated, British…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the beginning of the war, the colonies were split into Patriots, Loyalists, and the African slaves. The Loyalists and most of the Africans supported the British because they believed that the British were in the right. In the middle of the war, colonies in the north were mostly inhabited by Patriots, while colonies in the south were crowded with British troops, Loyalists, and African slaves. The Patriots were slowly losing the war due to their small army, so they recruited many Africans by promising them freedom and liberty. In this way, the northern colonies started to abolish slavery before the southern colonies did (Litwack, Leon F. North of Slavery.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays