Causes of Corruption
Econ Gov (2008) 9:245–263 DOI 10.1007/s10101-007-0033-4 O R I G I NA L PA P E R
Causes of corruption: a survey of cross-country analyses and extended results
Lorenzo Pellegrini · Reyer Gerlagh
Received: 30 September 2005 / Accepted: 20 October 2006 / Published online: 23 February 2007 © Springer-Verlag 2007
Abstract We survey and assess the empirical literature on the sources of corruption Thanks to the improved availability of data, we are able to produce an improved cross-country econometric model to test well-established and more recent hypotheses jointly. We do not find that the common law system, or a past as a British colony predicts corruption. Our results support cultural theories on the causes of corruption, and suggest that a medium-long exposure to uninterrupted democracy is associated with lower corruption levels, while political instability tends to raise corruption. Our results also suggest that the diffusion of newspapers helps to lower corruption levels. Keywords Corruption · Ethnolinguistic fractionalization · Democracy · Political instability JEL classification D72 · H11 · H50 · K42 · O17
L. Pellegrini (B ) Institute of Social Studies (ISS), Kortenaerkade 12, 2518 AX The Hague, The Netherlands e-mail: Pellegrini@iss.nl L. Pellegrini · R. Gerlagh Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands R. Gerlagh University of Manchester, School of Social Sciences, Economics, Manchester, UK
246
L. Pellegrini, R. Gerlagh
1 Introduction Corruption is a widespread phenomenon affecting all societies to different degrees, at different times. On the one hand, as corruption scandals have repeatedly shown, bribes are common in all countries notwithstanding differences in income levels and law systems, as they are common in democracies and in dictatorships. Recent scandals over corruption have shown that also supposedly free-from-corruption societies are affected. The ELF scandal demonstrated
Causes of corruption: a survey of cross-country analyses and extended results
Lorenzo Pellegrini · Reyer Gerlagh
Received: 30 September 2005 / Accepted: 20 October 2006 / Published online: 23 February 2007 © Springer-Verlag 2007
Abstract We survey and assess the empirical literature on the sources of corruption Thanks to the improved availability of data, we are able to produce an improved cross-country econometric model to test well-established and more recent hypotheses jointly. We do not find that the common law system, or a past as a British colony predicts corruption. Our results support cultural theories on the causes of corruption, and suggest that a medium-long exposure to uninterrupted democracy is associated with lower corruption levels, while political instability tends to raise corruption. Our results also suggest that the diffusion of newspapers helps to lower corruption levels. Keywords Corruption · Ethnolinguistic fractionalization · Democracy · Political instability JEL classification D72 · H11 · H50 · K42 · O17
L. Pellegrini (B ) Institute of Social Studies (ISS), Kortenaerkade 12, 2518 AX The Hague, The Netherlands e-mail: Pellegrini@iss.nl L. Pellegrini · R. Gerlagh Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands R. Gerlagh University of Manchester, School of Social Sciences, Economics, Manchester, UK
246
L. Pellegrini, R. Gerlagh
1 Introduction Corruption is a widespread phenomenon affecting all societies to different degrees, at different times. On the one hand, as corruption scandals have repeatedly shown, bribes are common in all countries notwithstanding differences in income levels and law systems, as they are common in democracies and in dictatorships. Recent scandals over corruption have shown that also supposedly free-from-corruption societies are affected. The ELF scandal demonstrated
References: Acemoglu D, Verdier T (2000) The choice between market failures and corruption. Am Econ Rev 90(1):194–211 Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA (2001) The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. Am Econ Rev 91(5):1369–1401 Arikan GG (2004) Fiscal decentralization: a remedy for corruption? Int Tax Publ Fin 11(2):175–195 Barro R (1996) Democracy and growth. J Econ Growth 1(1):1–27 Beck T, Clarke G, Groff A et al. (2000) New tools and new tests in comparative political economy: the database of political institutions. The World Bank, Washington DC Becker GS (1968) Crime and punishment—economic approach. J Polit Econ 76(2):169–217 Bohara AK, Mitchell NJ, Mittendorff CF (2004) Compound democracy and the control of corruption: a cross-country investigation. Policy Stud J 32(4):481–499 Brunetti A, Weder B (2003) A free press is bad news for corruption. J Public Econ 87(7–8):1801– 1824 Chafuen AA, Guzmán E (1999) Economic freedom and corruption. In: O’Driscoll GP, Holmes KR, Kirkpatrick M, 2000 index of economic freedom. Heritage Foundation, Washington DC Chong A, Calderon C (2000) Causality and feedback between institutional measures and economic growth. Econ Polit 12(1):69–81 Chowdhury SK (2004) The effect of democracy and press freedom on corruption: an empirical test. Econ Lett 85(1):93–101 Elazar DJ (1995) From statism to federalism—a paradigm shift. Publius J Feder 25(2):5–18 Fisman R, Miguel E (2006) Cultures of corruption: evidence from diplomatic parking tickets. NBER working paper. National Bureau of Economic Research Fisman R, Gatti R (2002) Decentralization and corruption: evidence across countries. J Publ Econ 83(3):325–345 Causes of corruption 263 Glaeser EL, Shleifer A (2002) Legal origins. Q J Econ 117(4):1193–1229 Hall RE, Jones CI (1999) Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quart J Econ 114(1):83–116 Hill KQ (2003) Democratization and corruption—systematic evidence from the American states. Am Polit Res 31(6):613–631 Jaggers K, Gurr TR (1995) Tracking democracy 3rd-wave with the polity-III data. J Peace Res 32(4):469–482 Jain AK (2001) Corruption: a review. J Econ Surv 15(1):71–121 Johnston M (2005) Syndromes of corruption: wealth, power, and democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2005) Governance matters IV: governance indicators for 1996–2004. World bank policy research working paper series Knack S, Azfar O (2003) Trade intensity, country size and corruption. Econ Govern 4(1):1–18 La Porta R, Lopez-De-Silanes F, Shleifer A et al. (1999) The quality of government. J Law Econ Organ 15(1):222–279 Lambsdorff JG (1999) Corruption in empirical research—a review. Transparency International, Berlin Lambsdorff JG (2004) Framework Document 2004: a background paper to the 2004 Corruption Perceptions Index. Transparency International and Passau University Landes D (1999) The wealth and poverty of nations: why some are so rich and some so poor. W. W. Norton & Company, New York Leite C, Weidmann J (1999) Does mother nature corrupt? Natural resources, corruption, and economic growth. IMF Working Paper. International Monetary Fund. Washington DC Macaulay TB (1843/2001) Critical and historical essays: vol 1. The World Wide School, Seattle Mauro P (1995) Corruption and growth. Q J Econ 110(3):681–712 Miller WL (2006) Corruption and corruptibility. World Dev 34(2):371–380 Reinikka R, Svensson J (2006) Using micro-surveys to measure and explain corruption. World Dev 34(2):359–370 Rodrik D, Subramanian A, Trebbi F (2004) Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. J Econ Growth 9(2):131–165 Rose-Ackerman S (1999) Corruption and government: causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Sachs JD (2001) Tropical underdevelopment. NBER Working Paper Sandholtz W, Koetzle W (2000) Accounting for corruption: economic structure, democracy, and trade. Int Stud Q 44(1):31–50 Schiavo-Campo S (1998) Government employment and pay: the global and regional evidence. Publ Admin Dev 18:457–478 Stevens P (2003) Resource impact—curse or blessing? A literature review. J Energy Lit 9(1):3–42 Sung H -E (2004) Democracy and political corruption: a cross-national comparison. Crime, Law Soc Change 41:179–194 Transparency International (2004) Global corruption barometer. Transparency International, Berlin Treisman D (2000) The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. J Publ Econ 76(3):399–457 Van Rijckeghem C, Weder B (2001) Bureaucratic corruption and the rate of temptation: do wages in the civil service affect corruption, and by how much? J Dev Econ 65(2):307–331 Williams R (1999) New concepts for old? Third World Q 20(3):503–513