Preview

Case Study: United States V. Parks

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
318 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study: United States V. Parks
After reviewing the United States v. Parks case, I believe that Parks should have been charged with a crime. The responsible corporate officer doctrine states that even if the corporate officer did not know about the crime or engage in the crime then the court can still find the officer criminally liable (Kubasek, 2017 p. 161). In this case, Parks received a warning letter from the Food and Drug Administration and still failed to correct the unsanitary conditions. Parks should be convicted even though he may not have intended to hurt anyone. Being the President of a food company, one should understand the diseases that can be passed along by rodents and the damage that can be done to a company's reputation from a sanitary violation. The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of the County of Jackson, State of Missouri.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is it constitutional to take away money from a person although it was gained for an interview with a publisher about one’s past crimes? Is it constitutional to take the money and give it to the victim of these past crimes? Does this or does not contradict the First Amendment which allows to express one’s mind freely with no discrimination concerning the context? The dispute over the Son of Sam law can be lead down to one question: whether speaking about crime is also a crime. Obviously, there could be two answers, one negative, and another one positive. According to the Son of Sam law, there is only one interpretation: if a…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects individuals against employment discrimination on the bases of color, as well as national origin, sex, religion. This law applies to any employers with 15 or more employees including the local state, government, employment agencies, labor organizations and federal government jobs.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To understand the question focusing on the court cases of Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education, we must first understand each court case on its own. Plessy v. Ferguson resulted in the year 1896. The case involved the 1890s Louisiana law that basically stated that there were separated railway carriages that were specifically labeled for blacks only and whites only. Plessy v. Ferguson involved Homer Plessy who was seven-eighths white and one-eighth black and appeared to look like a white man. Plessy took an open seat on a white only railway car. He was soon arrested for violating the 1890 law. When Plessy was convicted of violating the 1890 law during his trial, he soon filed a petition against the judge, John H. Ferguson. Ferguson…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ruth Bader Ginsburg, born Joan Ruth Bader, was born in New York, New York on March 15, 1933. She was the daughter of Russian immigrants Nathan and Celia Bader. Her father owned a small clothing shop while her mother cared for Ginsburg and her older sister, who died of meningitis at age 6. Her mother took a vested interest in Ginsburg’s education. While Ruth was in school, her mother noticed many of the girls in her class were also named Joan, so she suggested that her daughter be called Ruth instead. At age 15, Ginsburg graduated from high school. Her mother died before she could see her graduate high school. Ginsburg met her husband Martin while she was attending Cornell University her freshman year.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court held that the word commerce comprehended navigation, and that it had the power to regulate navigation. Secondly, the Supreme Court held that navigation involved the control of navigable waters, and included the power to keep them open and free from obstruction, and to make improvements. Thirdly, the Supreme Court concluded that under the commerce clause Congress had the power to authorize improvements in waters within the limits of a state…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The landmark case that opened up the ability for business to operate across state lines was Gibbons v. Ogden. The case started in 1809, when the Legislature of the State of New York granted exclusive navigation privileges of all boats that moved by fire or stream in the waters within the jurisdiction of the state, for twenty years, to Robert R. Livingston and Robert Fulton (Livingston). They wanted a monopoly on a national network of steamboat lines, but were unsuccessful in their pursuit. Only the Orleans Territory awarded them a monopoly on the lower Mississippi (Livingston).…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    McWilliams V Dunn Supreme Court of the United States Introduction The Dunn v. McWilliams case is a famous court case that was heard before the supreme court of United States in April 24, 2017. The case involved James McWilliams as the petitioner against Jefferson Dunn was the commissioner and was representing the Alabama department of corrections. The focus of the case was the sixth amendment of the US constitution was useful in providing for the right to the assistance of an attorney to represent them in defense. However the oral arguments in the case pointed out that it was unclear on whether the defendant’s right to an attorney allows for him to an independent expert who would be devoted in advocating specifically for the defense’s case.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The case of Thompson versus Oklahoma raises a number of issues regarding the trials and punishment of juveniles for heinous crimes. This case was argued on November 9, 1987 and involves the trial of fifteen-year-old William Wayne Thompson. Along with his older brother and two friends, William Thomspon brutally murdered Charles Keene, his sister’s husband. His motive was revenge for abusing his sister. William Thompson was a “child” according to Oklahoma law, but he was tried as an adult, convicted with murder, and sentenced to death. The Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma upheld this ruling. Because he was only fifteen years old at the time of the murder, this ruling violated the Eighth Amendment, causing this case to be brought to the Supreme…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, the Supreme Court made the wrong decision because a company is not a person and thus does not have the same rights as one. Hobby Lobby employs 23,000 people, all of which could receive all 20 state covered forms of birth-control. The owner of Hobby Lobby felt that certain forms terminated a life, which many doctors disagree with. Hobby Lobby claimed they were being forced to allow employees to receive these forms violated their religious rights and decided to pursue a court case against the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services, Sylvia Burwell.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Louisiana placed a law giving separate railway cars for blacks and whites. In 1892, Homer Plessy- 7/8 Caucasian, sat in a "whites only" car of a Louisiana train, and refused to move to the car for blacks and was then arrested. The Court had to decide whether the Louisiana law was unconstitutional under the 14th amendment. The Court ruled that the state law was within its constitutional boundaries. The majority of this case supported the state-imposed racial segregation. The Court based their final decision on the separate but equal doctrine and agreed that the state had separate facilities for blacks and whites, which were equal. Brown stated that the 14th amendment was imposed to provide complete equality of races before the law. In…

    • 3484 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 2012, a family called the Greens ran Hobby Lobby, which is a craft store. This family are Christians and have strong faith in what they believe in. Being a very religious family, that they believe that giving or promoting contraceptives, will make them seem as if they are going against their own belief (Oyez, 2013). Contraceptives are artificial methods or various techniques to prevent pregnancy due to sexual intercourse, so the Greens family refuse to provide those things to their workers. This is where the Greens family is furious to give these types of protection to their workers, so they sued.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hedgepeth V. Roberts Case

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Justice Roberts was born on January 27, 1955 in Buffalo, NY. Roberts was confirmed on May 8, 2003, and received his commission on June 2, 2003 By President George Bush.…

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When it comes to the Park Doctrine, I agree with the law to some extent. Regardless of the size of the business, if you are the boss you are responsible for everything that occurs in your organization. As a senior leader of a company not only are you responsible for your own mistakes, you are also responsible for the mistakes made by your employees. Arguably, many would say that when he/she took on the responsibility of a senior leadership role to oversee the operations of an organization automatically comes with the responsibility for their employees’ actions. Nonetheless, I believe the CEO should be held criminally responsible especially when substantial evidence exists against them. On the other hand, criminally charging a senior leader…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abraham Lincoln once said, “Don’t interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties” (Shmoop.com). On September 17th, 1787 the signing of Constitution of the United States of America took place. The members of the Constitutional Convention met to create a strong, centralized government after the dissatisfaction of the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution created a government made by the people, for the people, which includes minors. Every American citizen has undeniable rights that are provided in the Constitution and that should also protect minors while they are at school and at home, where they should be able to express themselves without punishment as well.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays