Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Case Study/Reaction Paper the Stanford Prison Experiment

Good Essays
960 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study/Reaction Paper the Stanford Prison Experiment
| Case Study/Reaction Paper | The Stanford Prison Experiment | |

Reviewing and Analyzing:
The Stanford Prison Experiment

The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted at Stanford University in California from August 14 to August 20, 1971. Led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo, twenty-four male students whom were chosen out of 75, were randomly assigned roles of prisoners and guards, for an investigation into the causes of conflict between military guards and prisoners. According to Zimbardo, this was funded through the US Office of Naval Research and took place out of the basement of the Stanford psychology building which they transformed into a mock prison [ (Stanford Prison Experiment, 2013) ]. The participants, who were chosen, answered a newspaper ad asking for volunteers to help establish psychological effects on those in prison; while being paid $15 per day. [ (Stanford Prison Experiment, 2013) ]. In order to conceal the surroundings of the area, and to make it more believable, the “prisoners” were blindfolded anytime that they left their cell in order to make sure no one could visualize the exit. Prisoners were not addressed by their name, but by their ID numbers; giving them a sense that they were no longer more valuable than the guy in a cell down. Guards wore khaki shirt and pants that were similar to that of an actual prison guard, and mirrored sunglasses to prevent any eye contact. The prisoners on the other hand, wore only a white gown no undergarments, a chain around one ankle, and a stocking cap; made out of women’s leggings. The prison cells were able to hold three prisoners each, and until the study was complete, that is where the participants would spend all day and night. The guards however, worked their eight-hour shifts and were able to go home after every day. On the second day of the experiment, the three prisoners in a cell, blocked their cell door with their beds and took of their stocking caps; refusing to come out. [ (Stanford Prison Experiment, 2013) ] The guards ultimately came up with a decision, and that was to set up a “privilege cell”. The other prisoners, whom were not involved in the riot, were allowed special treatment like better meal quality. This cell allowed guards to once again gain control over the prison. The cell also allowed for the guards to use psychological tactics on the prisoners, calling some “good prisoners” and “bad prisoners” [ (Stanford Prison Experiment, 2013) ]. After only 36 hours, cell mate #8612 began to act crazy. Screaming, cursing, and had a rage out of control. After awhile, the guards and Zimbardo finally were convinced this participant was suffering and they released him [ (Stanford Prison Experiment) ]. Soon, the guards would take their control a little bit further on those still in the study. Making the prisoners repeat daily duties such as cleaning their cell, cleaning toilets without gloves, over and over. This was one a power affect, and two to insure this was their new identity. Punishments for not following the rules included “the hole” and push-ups. The guards became increasingly cruel as the experiment continued. Such as not allowing the prisoners to urinate or defecate anywhere but in a bucket placed in their cell. Sometimes the guards wouldn’t even let the prisoners empty the bucket. Removing mattresses, stripping inmates of clothing, was the guards way of embarrassing the prisoners. Ultimately the participants, the guards, prisoners, and even Zimbardo himself were all into their roles, and their new identities. As superintendent, Zimbardo was soon addressed by parents and even a more outside source on treatments occurring during this study, after a visitation was allowed. Christina Maslach, a graduate student in psychology whom Zimbardo was dating at the time, was the one who questioned its morality. Six days into the two week’s planned duration, the Stanford Prison Experiment was closed [ (Stanford Prison Experiment) ]. The findings were that the situation, rather than individual personalities, caused the behavior of the prisoners and guards [ (Stanford Prison Experiment, 2013) ]. The Stanford Prison Experiment in my eyes, seems like something we all have thought about here and there; “I wonder what I would do if I were stuck in a cell for that long.” While a lot of individuals can argue, the thought has never crossed their mind, a lot of others have wondered. While I believe the conditions may not have been the most proper, in all reality, a lot of the treatment done in the experiment happens in prisons. I find it very interesting to learn from a hands-on experience. I can understand the debate on this study due to the psychological affects it took on the participants, but I find more and more that sometimes, a study needs to be accurately done, in order to get the best results. While I do not favor the treatment, I also realize that in prisons, it can become much worse than the situation these volunteers were put through. Riots, stabbings, suicides, prison “gangs”, even rape occurs. The treatment that occurs in most prison systems is a debatable topic itself, because they are there for breaking the law, sometimes even harming another individual is the reason, therefore a lot of us become numb to the knowledge of what actually occurs behind the walls. The Stanford Prison Experiment for me was a learning opportunity. I find that a lot of people could really learn something from researching this topic. Control is not always at the grips of our own hands, sometimes our mind decides to take over; creating a new identity, good or bad.

Works Cited
Stanford Prison Experiment. (n.d.). Retrieved from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment
Stanford Prison Experiment. (2013, February 6). Retrieved February 14, 2013, from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment

Cited: Stanford Prison Experiment. (n.d.). Retrieved from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment Stanford Prison Experiment. (2013, February 6). Retrieved February 14, 2013, from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment began just like any other, with a general question: “Would a negative environment would be able to control…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Watch the video on the Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment available in the Webliography (Quiet Rage http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/quiet-rage-the-stanford-prison-experiment/). In your Threaded Discussion, worth 20 pts, post your thoughts regarding the following discussion questions excerpted from Zimbardo:…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The prisoners and guards had many burdens of disobedience. In the beginning of the experiment, the "prisoners" were stripped of everything and emotionally torn down for being "disobedient". They were dehumanized in every way. They couldn't speak to another unless they called each other by their prison identification number. They were told the rules of the prison and explained they would be punished if any of the rules were broken. They had to ask permission to do things that they would do on a daily basis such as going to the bathroom and smoking a cigarette. Throughout the experiment, the more aggressive and authoritative the guards became, the more disobedient that the prisoners became even to the point of rioting at during the beginning of the experiment. Everything else was taken away from them. They didn't have anything to think about except for following the rules. The conversations the prisoners had consisted of talking about ways to escape the prison and overthrowing the guards. They hardly ever spoke of their personal lives and lives outside of the prison.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo Prison Eperiment

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The experiment took place in the basement of the Psychology department in Stanford University and selected 24 undergraduate students out of 70 volunteers due to their lack of psychological issues and had no criminal record. Zimbardo paid each of the 24 participants 15 dollars a day in a span of one to two weeks. The 24 volunteers were randomly assigned to play a role as either a guard or a prisoner. The cell was made up of three prison cells, each one holding three mock prisoners. The guards chosen had to work in an eight hour shift alongside two other participants. The guards chosen have their own cell to themselves and one small room for solitary confinement. Kendra Cherry stated in her article that, “According to Zimbardo and his colleagues, the Stanford Prison Experiment demonstrates the powerful role that the situation can play in human behavior” (Cherry). The volunteers for this experiments took on their role almost instantaneously.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fake prisoners and fake guards in a spurious jail is a peculiar way to determine roles in society. Philip G. Zimbardo was the mastermind of the Stanford Prison Experiment, which was a psychological experiment that determined the roles of members in a society that became a fiasco (“Philip G. Zimbardo” 1). The experiment left emotional and mental scars on mock-prisoner lives. The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) illustrates the way a person changes when a label and power is all of a sudden given to hoax guards in order to control fraud prisoners.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When people are given little to no direction or training, and are faced with dealing with people they may perceive as a threat to their own safety and the well-being of others, they have a propensity to overstep what most would consider reasonable behavior. The “guards” in the experiment were put into a position of authority and took the steps they deemed necessary to maintain order. In spite of the fact that they knew it was an experiment, they were immersed in the situation and played the role given them. The “prisoners” played their part and were so wholly immersed in the role and the environment that their entire perspective of reality was altered. They began to believe they were helpless and unable to help themselves out of the situation they found themselves. They had become powerless to change the situation, in spite of the fact that it was just an…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A team at Stanford University, led by Phillip Zimbardo, conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment to investigate causes of conflict between military guards and prisoners. Zimbardo and his team were seeking to observe the inherent personality traits of prisoners and guards and see if this was the chief cause of abusive behavior in these settings (Haney, Banks, and Zimbardo, 1973). This study is one that is well know and well-recognized. Zimbardo and his study are often discussed in many psychology courses today, and have even caused reform in prison systems as well as IRB/APA ethical committees.…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The simulated prison included three six by nine-foot cells. Each cell held inmates that included three cots. There was a tiny space three that was designed to look like solitary confinement, and another small room to act as the prison yard. Of the 24 volunteers 3 of them were prison guards that worked eight hour shifts around the clock for the next two weeks. While the experiment slated to last 14 days, it had to…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment that Philip Zimbardo evented. He wanted to study the human response of captivity, of the prison life. Zimbardo randomly assigned roles to the prisoners and the guards. Each role was uniquely identified. For example, he gave the guards sticks and sunglasses and the prisoners were arrested by the police department and were forced into the basement of the jail which was converted into the psychology department that was converted into a makeshift jail. Zimbardo wanted the experiment to be as realistic as he possibly could have made it, therefore, he assigned each role to help do so. Testing each individual and then assigning them to roles would of gave inconclusive readings and therefore, it was…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. If you were a prisoner, would you have been able to endure the experience? Why or why not? What would you have done differently fromwhat the subjects did in this experiment? If you were imprisoned for five or more years, how would you adapt to this environment? What would you do in order to survive?…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The stanford prison experiment is one of the infamous experiments conducted in the history of psychology. The experiment was conducted at Stanford University in August, 1971 by a team of researchers led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo. The basic premise was to find out and determine what happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph? Does the system that we inhabit and are a part of start to control our behaviour or our inner morality and values continue to direct it? It was a study of the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or a prison guard. To carry out this experiment, a subterranean jail was set up in the psychology department building. Adverts were placed in local newspapers offering $15 per day for participants in this program. Of the 75 responses, the 24 male subjects judged to be most mentally and emotionally stable were selected. Those 24 were then divided into two groups randomly, of 12 prisoners and 12 guards. The group selected to be the guards were outfitted in ‘military-style’ intimidating uniforms. They were also equipped with wooden batons and mirrored shades, to prevent eye-contact and make the guards appear less human. The researchers held an orientation session for guards the day before the experiment, during which they instructed them not to physically harm the prisoners. In the footage of the study, Zimbardo can be seen talking to the guards: "You can create in the prisoners feelings of boredom, a sense of fear to some degree, you can create a notion of arbitrariness that their life is totally controlled by us, by the system, you, me, and they'll have no privacy... We're going to take away their individuality in various ways. In general what all this leads to is a sense of powerlessness. That is, in this situation we'll have all the power and they'll have none." The prisoners were instructed to wait at home "to be called" for the start of…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Test subjects were randomly assigned to either the role of the prison guard or the prisoner and were set to remain in this position for two weeks. They were then placed in a section of the basement in the Stanford psychology department, which was transformed into a makeshift jail. Several guards, who had not previously shown any signs of violent behavior, began using forceful ways to control the prisoners. On the other hand, the prisoners began to show signs of dehumanization and became totally dependent on the guards. Relationships between the two groups changed drastically very soon. After only six days, the experiment got out of hand and was shut down out of fear that one of the prisoners may become seriously injured. Following the experiment, many of the guards were shocked by how they behaved in that situation, and many of the prisoners couldn’t believe they acted in such cowering and depending…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taser

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Maxfield and Babbie in their book Basic of Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology explain the purpose of the Stanford Prison Experiment was to test the situational hypothesis of the prison environment itself. Maxfield and Babbie state, “…the prison environment creates dehumanizing conditions independent of the kinds of people who live and work in the institutions (Maxfield and Babbie, p. 43. 2009).” The experiment took on an exploratory design, which indicates the specific problem had not been clearly defined (Maxfield & Babbie, 2009). Zimbardo himself could only compare experiments of this nature to his high school friend, Milgram who conducted research on obedience to authority figures as related to the Holocaust. Exploratory research is begun to explore an issued regarding society to answer of the questions needed to conduct further studies. To this date the Stanford Prison Experiment has not be replicated exactly in any series of further on experiments related to the outcome of the original. The experiment was created by Curtis Haney, Craig Banks, and Philip Zimbardo (1973) in the basement of the Stanford University psychology department building where the “prison” was constructed. The “prison” consisted of cells, a “yard”, and a solitary confinement cell. An ad was placed in a newspaper and 75 volunteers answered the call but only twenty-one were chosen. The subjects with physical or psychological problems were vetted and those left were offered $15.00 a day to participate. The left over subjects were randomly assigned to be either guards or prisoners (Babbie & Maxfield, 2009).…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The experimenter was shocked at the results as well saying, "It was degrading....To me, those things are sick. But they (the prisoners) did everything I said. They abused each other because I requested them to. No one questioned my authority at all."…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1971 Phillip Zimbardo conducted a controversial study know as the Stanford prison experiment. The experiment was a psychological study of human reactions to being imprisoned and how the effects would interfere with the normal behaviors of both authorities and the inmates in prison. Zimbardo and his team hypothesized “that prison guards and convicts were self selecting of a certain disposition that would naturally lead to poor conditions.” Zimbardo used undergraduate volunteers to play the roles of the guards and the prisoners in a mock prison he created in the basement of the Stanford psychology building. He then recorded how both the prisoners and guards quickly adapted to their roles, and soon this lead to one-third of the authorities taking place in sadistic acts towards the prisoners, which was argued to have lead to psychologically harmful situations. Due to the appalling conditions of the prison, both sanitarily and psychologically the experiment ended on August 30, 1971 just six days after it began, which was eight days short of the foresighted fourteen days it was supposed to have lasted. Many similarities in the ethical concerns of the Stanford experiment were found in the Milgram experiment which was conducted in 1961 by Stanley Milgram one of Zimbardo’s high school friends.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays