Ms. Greear stated that Mr. Daubert had kissed one of the female players named Kendra Wallin. He had kissed her once on the forehead and once on the cheek. In addition, Ms. Greear stated that Mr. Daubert had put his hands on Ms. Wallin’s waist. It was not clear from Ms. Greear’s statements if she witnessed the kisses by Mr. Daubert or if she was told that it took place by Ms. Wallin.…
Bravo Fernandez v. United States is a court case that deals with Double Jeopardy. Double Jeopardy can be defined as “the prosecution of a person twice for the same offense (dictionary.com). ” Bravo Fernandez v. United States was argued on October 4th, 2016, because of an incident that took place in May of 2005. Mr. Fernandez, whom is the president of a private security firm in Puerto Rico, and Hector Martinez-Maldonado who is a member of the Senate. Both traveled to Las Vegas to watch a boxing match. Mr. Fernandez and Mr. Martinez-Maldonado were indicted for the trips payment. The charges were violation of the federal bribery statute, conspiracy, and the Travel Act. These charges tied Mr. Martinez-Maldonado’s support of legislation beneficial…
On March 8th, I attended a hearing at the Federal Court. The case of Velu Nadarajanv Mirc et al. is a case related to a request to defer removal. The H&C application is based solely on the applicant's establishment in Canada.…
Grutter v. Bollinger was also a case in which race was still used as an admission factor. This case involved the admission process to The University of Michigan's law school. Just as the University of Texas they used the hard data and soft data process to admit different students into their program. Race was used as a plus factor under the soft data category and the law school was seeking critical mass by becoming more diverse within its student population. Yet, the question was how did the university know the race of the person? As they did not have a so called race check box. They asked different questions such as where the students are from or what language was spoken within their homes. The court again said this was ok, as they school was…
In the People v. Caballero case, the 8th amendment was being denied when 16 year old Graham was served with “…a minimum of 110 years before becoming parole eligible” (People v. Caballero). Terrance Graham’s VIII amendment was violated, he was given a cruel and unusual punishment of a 110 year sentence, and only after that would he be eligible for parole. Graham was a 16 year old boy who was committed for armed burglary and attempted armed robbery, and was sentenced to probation. However, his probation was revoked and was sentenced to life in prison for burglary: “…leaving Graham with no possibility of release unless he was granted executive clemency” (PJDC). The number of given years is cruel because it falls out of a human’s natural life…
This 2009 Supreme Court decision was a result of alleged racial discrimination with regard to internal promotions of nineteen New Haven, Connecticut firefighters. New Haven city officials invalidated test results when no Blacks scored high enough to meet the minimum score necessary to be eligible for promotion. Therefore, the White and Hispanic candidates that did pass with the necessary scores felt they had been discriminated against based on their race. The city decided not to certify the test results because of the disproportionate number of white candidates in comparison to minorities, and…
In this essay, I will focus on the sentence and police officers’ decision in the Paul Bernanrdo and Karla Hamolka case, both known as “The Ken and Barbie Killers”. Since I am finishing my last year in Social Sciences profile Law, Society and Justice, I am interested to work on a famous Canadian trial that affected the whole Canadian population and even the United States. The decision made by police officers was controversial and brought many debates, thus I will analyze this decision under two ethical theories and determine whether they were right or wrong. For my analysis, I will use the Utilitarianism Ethics and Kantian Ethics. These two theories of ethics have different goals and understanding of rightful and wrongful actions.…
Spot check was for the purposes of checking licenses, insurance, mechanical fitness of cars sobriety of the drivers.…
The Supreme Court decision in King v. Burwell surrounded the challenge of provision to the Affordable Care Act. The key question the case focused on was whether Obamacare authorized federal tax subsidies for individuals purchasing health insurance through a state exchange. The challenger, King, argued the way the law was written can’t allow for states to subsidized insurance through a federal-run exchange. They argued that insurance subsides are only allowed in states that operate their own insurance exchange. Pointing to a clause “established by the state,” the plaintiff argued the way the law, written by members of Congress, authorizes only to tax and subsides in states that established…
How did the Three Branches of government respond to the social issues of freedom of religion based on Wallace v. Jaffree case?…
A rare criminal case comes out to court, the case is on an out of hospital birth of two twins. The convict is a 57-year-old Utah midwife who was sentenced to half of a year in prison. The midwife committed manslaughter, the judge finally decided after he calls the trial, the most difficult trial he has ever had to decide. The midwife told the parents of the twins that she could surely deliver the twins safely, but whenever one baby came out purple and unable to breathe, Sorensen used outdated techniques and equipment that was too bulky for the young infant. This resulted in suffocation and the baby did not make it. In the courtroom, Sorensen tried to explain to the judge how she had delivered over a thousand physically fit and healthy babies,…
In the case of Gonzales v. Raich, the Supreme Court made a judgment that affected the California users of medical marijuana. Under a law the federal Controlled Substance Act, marijuana is a schedule one controlled substance, however under a 1996 state California law, marijuana is legalized for usage for people who have a prescription from a doctor for medical usage. When the federal Drug Enforcement Administration enforced the CSA by destroying one of the defendant's marijuana plants, the defendants claimed that their constitutional rights were infringed upon.…
Kenneth Edelin is a third year resident at Boston City Hospital in Massachusetts. His supervisor, Hugh Holtrop, assigned him to do an abortion for a seventeen-year-old girl named Alice Roe. Ms. Roe and her mother signed a consented to carry out the abortion. Edelin performs a Caesarean surgery because it was safer for Ms. Roe’s health. While performing the surgery, Edelin had to prolong the surgery three minutes after the placenta was removed, so he could cut off any supply to the fetus.…
In the case study provided, one can see many areas where the development of the child in question can be taken into consideration when looking at the case from a law standpoint. In any case involving children, one must always take into account their environment, their developmental age, and their true age. With each age group, there is a norm for development and each child must be evaluated regarding that norm. In this case, the current law regarding the “age of accountability” can be upheld through three basic points. These points are the biosocial, the cognitive, and the psychosocial areas of…
In the 2001 extradition case United States v. Burns,[6] the Supreme Court declined to decide…