Preview

Case Study Ford Pinto

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
658 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study Ford Pinto
Ford Pinto Case study
The moral issue of the Ford Pinto case is whether or not Ford Company is responsible for the explosion caused by the failed tank. Ford is morally responsible for the incident since it could have been prevented, public safety should be their top priority when designing their products, and they have disregarded the utilitarianism principle.
Ford is responsible for the Ford Pinto incident because of many reasons. First of all the engineers and the top managers of the company knew of the risks involved in placing the car on the market. They had many alternatives instead of this model, but since profit is the main factor in their decision, they went ahead and market the product. When a company decides to place a product on the market the responsible thing to do is to test it and verify that it does not impose any danger to the public. Responsible decision making is composed of deontological considerations, rational goals and respect for those involved.
As a respected company with a good reputation, Ford should consider public safety as its main priority when designing a product. It is unethical to allow people to die or be injured because of the cost incurred in order to prevent that. Ford should have taken precautious measures in advance in order to prevent harm. But they have already forecasted and assumed future liability from a defective product. They have adopted a policy of allowing a certain number of people to die or be injured even though it could be prevented. There is an ongoing debate whether it is possible to put a price on a life, to use it in the calculations that lead to a positive economic outcome. Since Ford is evidently a profit oriented company and their social responsibilities are low, it is evident that they consider profit as its main priority when making decisions in regard to their design.
The company disregarded the utilitarianism principle since they went against the right of happiness for the people involved.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant would have would have certainly believed that Ford acted wrongly by not upgrading the integrity of the Pinto’s fuel system after learning about the danger of explosions in low-speed rear end collisions. Kantian deontology asserts that “nothing can possibly be conceived in the world, or even out of it, which can be called good, without qualification, except a good will.” (Kant 1). Although some human qualities are intrinsically valuable, or good for their own sake, Kant believes that these actions can become bad if the intention of the user is questionable. This intention is what ultimately determines the morality of an action, meaning “a good will is good not because of what it performs or effects, not by its aptness for the attainment of some proposed end, but simply by virtue of the volition.” (Kant 2). These “virtue of volitions” are referred to by Kant as maxims, or fundamental principles for conduct and decision making. Kant believes that in order for a maxim to be morally valid, it must be able to be universally applied to situations…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ford Pinto Case Study

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From reading the two assigned papers discussing the Ford Pinto fires, it is easy for someone to judge Gioia’s decisions as fallible before all the factors are in place. For example, the culture of the Ford motor company at the time, Gioa’s mental state. I believe he feels very responsible and that is why he wrote the paper and uses it as a living case study in his MBA classes.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three social issues that are in this case are that one, social issue in this case was Ford claimed the reason for the recall of the 1.9 million Ford Pintos was not for safety but for “reputational” reasons. This is a social issue because, after all the evidence was piled up on their company for being unsafe and hazardous, they couldn’t just admit they made a mistake and recall the vehicles to make them safer. No, they had to use the reputation card to help their company’s image in the long run so they wouldn’t lose profit. In this issue, there is no utilitarianism because there mindset in making this decision isn’t for the right reasons. There not doing it to intentionally increase the safety of everybody. One version, rule-utilitarianism, considers that, “a rule or code of behavior is morally right if, by its application, the consequences are more favorable that unfavorable to everyone.” They weren’t being moral when they made this decision. The citizens and people had nothing to do with the recall. It was their own self-pity and arrogance. Another social issue in this case is that in June of 1978, Ford knew that its fuel tank did not meet Federal Safety Standards, yet they didn’t do anything to warn the owners of this. It’s a fact that if people were warned of this issue, thousands and thousands of people wouldn’t want to buy the Ford Pinto. Being that this was a social issue, Ford was all about making a profit and hid crucial information for the public. The third of many social issues in this case are that when Ford was being prosecuted in the courtroom, they defended themselves against negligence by claiming its car was comparable to other subcompacts at that time.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ford Pinto Case

    • 937 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this essay, I will talk about the ford Pinto case, and how the information was withheld from public in order to save company from huge losses and at the same time keep company’s reputation intact. I don’t think the decision of the ford company to with hold the information about the safety-issue of the car for which they were already aware of; was the right thing to do.…

    • 937 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The contents of this paper will analyze the GM ignition case using several concepts taught in ethics. This will include a background of the issue as well as a detailed evaluation of the decision by GM from the utilitarianism and Kantian perspective. This will show that GM’s decision was morally wrong as well as prove that GM should be held morally responsible for their actions.…

    • 3185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ford Pinto- Ethics

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In early 1968, the Ford Motor Company decided to take on the foreign car competition by introducing a compact, affordable vehicle they named the Pinto. What began as the decision to enter the race for the top small car ultimately led to an unprecedented court case wherein the Ford Motor Company found itself charged with reckless homicide and was the first corporation charged with criminal conduct. In this paper, the authors delve into the tragedy of the Ford Pinto fires and the ethical standards and boundaries of the Ford Motor Company at that time.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ethical issues presented in this case are the different views that each individual has on how the idea of corporate social responsibility (CSR). This dispute is between Mr. Milton Friedman, John Mackey, and T.J. Rodgers; all of which has a different outlook on CSR. The definition of CSR refers to the responsibilities that business has to the society in which it operates and to those actions that a business can be held accountable. Most philosophers have come up with three different types of responsibilities that corporations can be held accountable for. The first and most important of the three is a corporation’s duty to not cause harm. If a corporation can avoid causing harm to society and consumers then they are almost obliged to do so even if it is not required by law. The second responsibility is the responsibility to prevent harm. In this situation a business would have the responsibility to prevent harm even if they were not the cause of this harm. Thirdly there is the responsibility to do good, which would involve charity work and volunteering.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ford Pinto

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages

    One of the biggest automotive news stories in the latter part of the 1970’s dealt with tales of exploding Ford Pintos and the considerable awards civil court juries were presenting to victims of accidents involving the cars.…

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Murata , Junichi. "From Challenger to Columbia: What lessons can we learn from the report of the Columbia accident investigation board for engineering ethics?." Virginia Tech: Digital Library and Archives.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case of the Ford Pinto

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Ford Pinto first rolled off the Ford Motor Co. production lines in 1971 and stayed in production in its original state until 1978. The vehicle engineers were tasked to develop the vehicle and put it into production within 25 months, which was nearly half the time in which the average new vehicle is put into production. The Ford engineers were aware that rear-end impact safety tests were pretty standard at the time, but they were not required by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration at that time. The vehicle was rushed into production anyway to compete with foreign compact cars being developed by the Japanese during that time period. Only after the vehicle was made available to the public was the vehicle tested. The Ford Pinto ended up failing the rear safety test, due to the fact that it was susceptible to fire from rear end collisions. Ford engineers determined that the problem could be resolved by installing a baffle, which protected the gas tank from being punctured during rear-end collisions. The part would have only cost between $6.65 and $11 to be install, but the Ford Motor Co. determined through cost-benefit analysis that the cost of lawsuits would be less than the cost of installing the baffle and decided not to install the baffle. Ford Motor Co. also failed to notify customers of the problem and offer them the option to have the baffle installed. Between 1971 and 1978 the Ford Pinto would be involved in thirteen rear-end collisions that caused the vehicle to start on fire. The actions of the Ford Motor Co. were scrutinized for the production of the vehicle. (DeGorge)While the vehicle did meet the safety standards of the time, Ford Motor Co. knew of the problem and did nothing to resolve it. This leads us to the question the ethical actions of the Ford Motor Co. production of the Ford Pinto. After realizing there was a safety issue with the Ford Pinto, was it morally right…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ford Pinto Project

    • 1896 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Ford Motor Company has been the leading car company for many decades. In the late 1960’s early 1970’s the company was losing the battle with Japanese with the small efficient cars. Lee Iacocca, Chief Executive Officer the Ford Motor Company wanted a car that will be competitive to these Japanese compact cars. With this intention in mind, the company wanted to manufacture a sub-compact vehicle that weighs less than 2,000 pounds and costs under $2,000. The result is the Ford Pinto. The Ford Pinto was one of the earlier sub-compact cars of the 1970’s. The Pinto was a catalyst in the revitalization of domestic compact cars at this time when Japanese imports were front rumors. Sure the car was simply affordable but had one flaw that would tarnish its reputation and the company’s. The Ford Pinto had fire hazard issues resulting from the placement and construction of the gas tank. When a Pinto is rear-ended the car would burst into flames resulting in an explosion. The company realized this concern during production. Because Iacocca wanted a fast sell of these cars records indicated that there was not a rear end collision test conducted until months after it was already in the market. Management did a cost analysis and determined that the cost of fixing the problem versus any lawsuits; it would be cheaper to pay for the lawsuits that would arise.…

    • 1896 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pinto Fires Case Study

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For instance, he remarked that he was not forced to make any of these decisions by Ford and he owned up to failing to recall the cars. However, he did acknowledge later on in the lecture that Ford’s culture and the time period back then did not value safety as much as we do today. He mentioned that in the office it was commonplace for them to following the saying, “build them to sell them, not to get them back” and that it would need to be very serious and to ultimately cost more money than to just recall…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fords argument to the government was, “It would be cheaper in the long run to just let their customer’s burn!” How can this even be a dilemma or a problem? If that statement could be made, the vehicle is not the problem, the person in charge is. I have learned that in my attempts to save one dollar, in most cases the result is losing more. Although the text stated that Ford Pinto lost more than 50 million dollars in lawsuits and bad publicity, other text found on Engineering.com and Time.com states that Ford saved money by not correcting the problems. A summary table from Engineering.com states:…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comm 101

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to W.D. Ross with his 7 basic Prima Facie Duties, they did not follow the duty of beneficence, duty of self-improvement and duty of nonmalefience (Shaw, Barry & Sansbury 2009, pg 78-80). First, Ford did not give the best to others, that is why they did not follow the duty of beneficence, Second, they did not improve the Pinto with a slightly higher price but launch the product with absolute danger. Lastly, the third duty is no causing other injury, we can see that Ford Pinto give an absolute injured to the society and given nearly 500 people died.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ford Pinto

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    ANS: The Pinto case raise the moral issues of what is the dollar value of the human life. That the businesses should not be putting a value on human life and disregard a known deadly danger. In order to perform a risk/benefit analysis, all costs and benefits must be expressed in some common measure. This measure is typically in dollars, as the Ford Motor Company used in its analysis. This can prove difficult for things that are not commonly bought and sold on the open market. Therefore, totell someone that there is a certain price for their life is a preposterous notion. There are numerous things which individuals consider priceless. Ford thought they could get away with a dangerous automobile by paying off those lawsuits from people who were injured and the families of the dead. Ford thought it was more cost effective not to fix the dangerous condition than to spend the money to save people. In the criticism of using a number, Ford seemed to blindly follow the dictated numbers without giving any extra consideration to the fact that it in face was a human life they were quantifying. It is hard to achieve values without norms and we have ineffective norms without values. Norms are rules that prescribe what concrete actions are required, permitted or forbidden. These are rules and agreement about how people are supposed to treat each other. Everyone has the right to have a safe and healthy workplace or have the right to expect product they purchase to be safe. Lesson learned is that they shouldn’t be ignoring an obviously dangerous condition and shouldn’t be putting a value on human life.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays