Preview

Case Should Judges Be Appointed Or Elected?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
699 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Should Judges Be Appointed Or Elected?
Zane Singletary
09/16/2014
ENGL-101-16
Ms. Kimberly B. Ward

Should Judges be Appointed or Elected Introduction and Outline Since the United States Democracy was first established, legislators and constituents have asked the question “Should judges be appointed or elected?”. Many state legislators have argued that since judges make decisions that directly affect constituents, they must be elected and nonpartisan races are held for judgeships. On the other hand, the United States Constitution states that all federal judges shall be appointed to the bench and have lifetime tenure so as to preserve judicial independence. Although this policy may sound admirable, this method oftentimes leads to higher executives appointing their personal comrades,
…show more content…
Elaborate how McCrory’s actions is a slap in the face to the voters of North Carolina, who will be making the decision for themselves in November.
2. Both Martin and Hunter are candidates in the 2014 General Election in November and McCrory’s decisions obviously shows unfair favoritism and corruption.

II. The People Should Decide Who The Right Choice Is.
A. Ask How Do Local Judges Affect Their Communities?
1. Elaborate on how local district court and resident superior court judges affect constituents in their community.
2. State that a judge should have a good relationship with the locals so as to determine what is best for the local judicial system.
B. Testimony of Why Local Judges Should Be Elected.
1. Explain that in order to have a good relationship with the people, the people should decide who is best for them and their community, not a governor in a far away city.
2. Give the testimony of the Honorable Judge Ola Lewis, Senior Resident Superior Court Judge of the 13th Judicial District of North Carolina, and the importance of a judge having a good relationship with local constituents and why they must be elected. Offer her experience as a district and superior court judge as the reason for being qualified to answer this
…show more content…
Conclusion
1. Wrap up everything in the paper and restate the thesis with examples from the above paragraphs to back the thesis.

Works Cited

American Constitution Society, Mark Dean Martin Interview. “Judicial Independence in Peril?” Online video clip.
YouTube. YouTube, 24 August. 2011. Web. 16 Sept. 2014.

Blythe, Anne. "McCrory Appoints Mark Martin Chief Justice of NC Supreme Court." Local & North Carolina State News from Raleigh, NC | NewsObserver.com. Local & North Carolina State News from Raleigh, NC | NewsObserver.com, 18 Aug. 2014. Web. 16 Sept. 2014.

Bracken, David. "McCrory Appoints Bob Hunter to Fill NC Supreme Court Vacancy." Local & North Carolina State News from Raleigh, NC | NewsObserver.com. Local & North Carolina State News from Raleigh, NC | NewsObserver.com, 20 Aug. 2014. Web. 16 Sept. 2014.

Carlton, Alfred P. Federal Judges: Appointment Reform (2002): 5. 1 Apr. 2002. Web. 16 Sept. 2014. <http://search.proquest.com/docview/221492659?pq-origsite=summon>.

Singletary, Honorable Judge Ola Lewis, Senior Resident Superior Court Judge 13th Judicial District of North Carolina. Personal interview. 13 Sept.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In November 1983, Connaughton ran for the position of Municipal Judge of Hamilton, Ohio, and lost to James Dolan. Dolan resigned from the position a month later and was arrested for perjury charges. While an investigation took place, the Journal News ran an article quoting Alice Thompson, a witness, saying Connaughton had used his “dirty tricks” and offered Thompson and her sister benefits “in appreciation” for Thompson’s testimony. Connaughton claimed Harte-Hanks Communications’ (HHC) article was false and had defamed him, injuring his personal, political, and professional reputation. HHC then…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Judicial Selection in the States." Judicial Selection in the States. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Jan. 2013. <http://www.judicialselection.us>.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. How important a role does the electorate play in the attitudes and actions of our elected officials?…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Have you thought about how much the Supreme Court decisions really affect your life and what we do on a daily basis or how important these decisions are to our civil liberties? Earl Warren and William Rehnquist are two of the most well knows Supreme Court Chief Justices. Each having different opinions on the importance’s of civil liberties and public order maintenance. Many of the court cases that each Chief Justice would hear would change the very way that we live today. As well as how law enforcement interact with regards to the 5th, 6th, 8th, and 14th Amendments. In this essay we will discuss compare and contrast the Chief Justice Earl Warrens Court versus the William Rehnquist Court, with special regards to how they effected the law enforcements, then finally addressing how the current Supreme Court balances out civil liberties against public order maintenance.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Can be better suited to a candidate who would find it difficult to produce written evidence…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compare and contrast the role of and function of judges, lawyers and lay people within the English courts…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | a. The county judge is similar to a city manager, running the day-to-day affairs of county government.…

    • 3044 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, I will explain why Texas should retain the partisan election of judges. Texas is one of the few states that choose their judges using a Partisan voting method. Partisan elections can be unreliable and deceitful. A high legal position such as a judge should never be chosen in such a manner. Judges are not chosen based on merit or skills.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law M1

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this task I shall compare and contrast the roles and functions of judges, lawyers and lay people in the English legal courts.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Objective: Examine the potential impact on judicial independence that results from the election of judges versus the appointment of judges.”…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Prejudices play an important role in a jury's decision. Explain the prejudices of three jurors and how those prejudices affect their voting.…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The advantages of a commission driven approach to the Courts of Appeals and Supreme Court are useful due to the impact that the position will have on case law that will affect every individual in the State of Indiana. It removes the political element by giving the choice to individuals that have a variety of interests and political neutrality. The disadvantages of a commission driven approach comes from the interests that put the individuals on the commission and since the Chief Justice of the State Supreme Court is chosen by the commission, an individual may have favors to return. The partisan election method involves some advantages and disadvantages. The advantages come from the fact that the election is localized to each of the counties of Indiana which allows the citizens to get to know the judge and his judicial philosophy.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chief Justice John Marshall was put in an interesting situation, as he was now responsible for overseeing Marbury’s petition to the court regarding those same commissions. Chief Justice Marshall decided that Marbury did have the right to the writ for which he had petitioned and that the laws of the United States allowed the courts to grant Marbury this writ. Marshall however ordered that the writ could not be granted because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 which granted the court the power to order such a writ was unconstitutional. Chief Justice Marshall exhibited how Congress had overstepped its authority in Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, and used the opportunity to declare the Supreme Court’s responsibility to uphold the constitution.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maddox declared that his rights to due process were violated as it is stated in the doctrine of Brady v. Maryland. This violation is proven by the state failing to disclose a photograph taken by the police of Elder’s bed neatly made shortly after the alleged rape. The police found no blood, semen, or fluids of other kinds on the bedspread during an examination, no rape kit was used either, and proof of a letter was found that Debbie Phillips had left the insurance Maddox belonged to for financial reasons by way of a written statement from a witness by the name of Brenda Phelps. Maddox had appealed the denial of habeas relief.…

    • 762 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Negligence and Points

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. According to the case, why didn't the court approve summary judgment for product liability claims? (5 points)…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays