Preview

Casablanca Good And Evil Research Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1183 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Casablanca Good And Evil Research Paper
Good and Evil in Casablanca
Casey Adams
Ethics
Paper on Good and Evil
Capella University
October, 2013

Abstract
The concepts of Good and Evil can take on many forms, and the theories of what makes good or evil can be expressed in a variety of ways. Casablanca has both evil and good characters making moral decisions that affect not only themselves, but potentially the world. In this joint, this “gin joints, in all the towns, in all the world….” (Wallis & Curtiz, 1942) we see a story of good triumphing over evil following the old adage of love conquers all.

If Kant and Mill were in Casablanca Taking a look at Casablanca through the
…show more content…
But the others wait in Casablanca... and wait... and wait... and wait.” (Wallis & Curtiz, 1942) In this mass departure of souls fleeing the Nazis, Ilsa and Laszlo must escape to America were Laszlo can continue his anti-Nazi opposition. In order to make it to America they must persuade Rick that his moral obligation is to aid them, for the consequence of not helping them would badly cripple the Nazi resistance movement.
Deontological
Moral responsibility, or duty, falls under the deontology theory of Immanuel Kant. According to Sommers and Sommers (2010) “A good will is good not because of what it effects or accomplishes, nor because of its fitness to attain some proposed end; it is good only through its willing, i.e., it is good in itself” (p. 232). In deontology the fact that you are a human being, gives you rights, dignity, and fundamental moral value.
Laszlo epitomizes the duty that Kant theorized was morally essential. When Rick inquired of Laszlo if he thought it was worth all the fighting, he responded with “You might as well question why we breathe. If we stop breathing, we 'll die. If we stop fighting our enemies, the world will die.” (Wallis & Curtiz, 1942) In this you see that Laszlo believes it is his duty to the world to go on fighting the evil he observes in the world in the figure of the
…show more content…
(Rachels & Rachels, 2012) As well, the Nazi did not respect the civil liberties, rights, or dignity of their fellow humans, the Jews. In this they desecrated the will of moral right.
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism or the greatest happiness principle, is mainly characterized by happiness and consequentialism. The measure of good and evil is balanced between individual 's happiness and the happiness of the community. (Sommers & Sommers, 2013) If you treat others how you wish to be treated, you are acting in the greater good for the most amounts of people, and in doing so, you are acting with morals. To act selfishly, you are acting morally wrong. This theory relies on producing the greatest amount of happiness. (Sommers & Sommers, 2013)
Rick lost his moral high ground long ago because of the consequence of Ilsa’s actions in Paris when they were lovers. When Ilsa and Laszlo enter Café Americian they must overcome Ilsa’s previous actions to convince Rick to assist the couple in their escape to America. Rick must choose the moral right in order to bring about the greatest happiness for Laszlo, who in turn will be able to bring about the greatest happiness for the Jewish

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Response To Casablanca

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pearl Harbor bombing was such a huge part of our role in World War II, and since Rick represents America, I knew he would have his own Pearl Harbor. Sure enough, Ilsa came back into Rick’s life and was his very own “Pearl Harbor”. It was very easy to pick up on this symbolism because Rick saw her and his attitude completely changed. This was another one of the best representations in the movie. It worked so well because it was so similar to what happened to our country and how we handled the situation afterward. Rick sat down with Ilsa and Victor to have a drink which he had never done before. To me this was a sign that Rick was suddenly changing his ways. This single event changed everything, just like the bombing of Pearl Harbor. This help the audience understand the situation a little…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It's ironic that the thing that ‘rouses him from his state of crime' (Pojman, Vaughn 358) is the horse that his father is on. He hesitates to shoot the enemy soldier because of the beauty of the scene; the horse, the valley, and the sky. Carter Druse ponders if it is so terrible to kill the enemy during war. (Pojman, Vaughn 358) Kant felt that it was duty to the…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the most controversial aspects of Kant’s moral philosophy is his theory regarding the concept of duty. Duty is the moral necessity to perform actions for no other reason than to obey the dictates of a higher authority without any selfish inclination. Immanuel Kant states that the only moral motivation is a devotion to duty. The same action can be seen as moral if it is done for the sake of one’s duty but also as not moral (Kant distinguished between immoral and not moral) and simply praise-worthy if it is done out of inclination. Thus, to have moral worth, an action must be done from duty.…

    • 934 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ideal utilitarianism, like most forms of utilitarianism, is concerned solely with maximising the good. What is distinctive about ideal utilitarianism is its view as to what the good is, as to what it is that we ought to try to bring about. The ideal utilitarian, unlike the hedonistic utilitarian, is not concerned only with happiness, but also with other intrinsic goods, such as beauty or knowledge. A leading advocate of ideal utilitarianism was GE Moore. Hedonistic utilitarianism holds that the only type of good is pleasure, and that everything else is valuable only insofar as it causes pleasure. Hedonistic utilitarianism therefore holds that we ought to act in whatever way maximizes pleasure.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Classical utilitarianism therefore needs to argue, either that maximising happiness for all is an "enlightened act of self interest", or that through natural…

    • 2399 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greatest Happiness principle in general is good, but it has many flaws as any ethical systems does. Due to our inability to perfectly predict the future according to our actions (assuming he future is capable of being altered with our actions), the results we desire are capable of, and often do, fall short of what was intended. If unforeseen parameters caused all of our actions to backfire, even though we were attempting to act in accordance with Utilitarianism, we would all be considered immoral as our results only caused pain. If this happened to everyone in the entire world, then no man could be considered moral. The Greatest Happiness principle also allows for us to cause pain to others as long as a majority of the people become…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The prominant criticism of Utilitarianism is that it is extremely hard to predict the results of an action. The outcomes of all situations are hard to predict, so how can we possibly apply the rule of the greatest happiness for the greatest number if we do not know who will benefit most? It is also difficult to decide whether an outcome is morally good or bad. People have contrasting opinions on what they think is right or wrong and it depends on the individual who is making the decision. This causes problems because a thing that is good to one person may at the same time be bad to another, "One man's happiness is another man's pain." Without an absolute definition of happiness, it is hard to arrive at a 'right' decision.…

    • 977 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1942 classic, Casablanca, Rick is the American owner of the prominent bar, Café Américain, where people from all over the Moroccan city come to gamble and make shady deals to escape the place. Despite all of the drama and variety of people that pass through, however, Rick has remained largely uninvolved, maintaining a strictly neutral stance with all who know him. This all changes, however, the day his ex-lover and her husband stop in. Despite his character’s initial detachment, Bogart allows the viewer to see the emotions of Rick through his interactions with Ilsa, Victor, and Captain Louis Renault.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dichotomy of good and evil is as old as the story of the world, and timeless in its relevance to just about everything we do in life, from our political and spiritual views to our taste in music, art, and literature to how we think about our simple dietary choices. But while most of us recognize that these concepts of good and bad aren't always black-and-white categories, we never cease to be surprised when someone or something we've perceived as "good" does or becomes something we perceive as "bad," from an esteemed politician's transgression to a beloved celebrity's slip into addiction or Scientology or otherwise socially undesirable…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant Deontological Theory

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The moral duty is what we should be doing. Good is defined as doing what is right and avoiding doing wrong. We have a duty to act in such a way that our actions are moral even if it produces unfavourable results.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The plasticity of human is endlessly tremendous as a mystery. General speaking that human beings are filled with compassion but sometimes regard things with hatred; some people fire to each other whereas they declare that they are loyal believers for peace; and possibly humans are more capable for conflict than harmony. This essay is going to interpret that the human conflict, intervention and the issue about identifying good and evil, in order to unfold the statement that humans have a tremendous capacity for harmony and conflict, peace and war, compassion and hatred. And it will be concerned with the conflict of Arabs and Israeli, the teaching of Christian and Buddhism, the case study of 9/11 terrorist attacks, the Stanford Prison Experiment and the abuse in Abu Ghraib, the biological viewpoint as evidence to demonstrate the statement.…

    • 1975 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem of evil is as ancient as humanity itself. Since the dawn of man, thinkers, philosophers, religionists and practically every human being who have suffered at the hands of evil have pondered this enigma, either as a logical-intellectual-philosophical or emotional-religious-existential problem. The preponderance of evil as a reality in human existence, and man’s fascination with it is everywhere evident. Open a newspaper, switched on the television, look around the office, school, family and practically every social environment and context, and the imprint of evil is as it were, omnipresent.…

    • 7053 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism 2

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilitarianism like the Judeo-Christian ethic is viewing others in a high regard. Utilitarian desire the greatest happiness as an end and the Judeo-Christian perspective seeks love and obedience to God. These two…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism as most know view that in order to determining what we should do, we must consider what specific act would produce the best overall consequences. They view the ethical goal is to lead is a life rich in pleasure or happiness both in point of quantity and quality for…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Utilitarianism consists of whether actions are morally right or morally wrong based on the effects of the actions consequences. When deciding if an action is morally right one must identify what type of action is being performed, and determine what benefits and harm will result from the course of action as well as how will it affect everyone that is involved. “Utilitarian’s believe that the purpose of morality is to make life better by increasing the amount of good things (such as pleasure and happiness) in the world and decreasing the amount of bad things (such as pain and unhappiness). Utilitarian’s think that what makes a morality be true or justifiable is its positive contribution to human (and perhaps non-human) beings.” (Santa Clara University,…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays