Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Cas Brief

Satisfactory Essays
1203 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cas Brief
CAS 9-LINE BRIEF
(GOOD FOR FIXED WING OR ANY U.S. CAS A/C) */**/***/ ‡/§

IP/BP:”_______________________________”

HEADING:”_______” (DEG MAG, IP/BP TO TGT) OFFSET: ”_______” (L/R)

DISTANCE: ”________” (IP TO TGT IN NM FOR F/W, CENTER OF BP TO TGT IN METERS FOR R/W)

TGT ELEVATION: ”_____________” (FEET MSL)

TGT DESCRIPTION: ”___________________”

TGT LOCATION: ”______________________” (INCLUDE GRID ZONE ID)

TYPE MARK: ”________________________,” “LASER CODE: _______” (IF APPLICABLE)

LOCATION OF FRIENDLIES: ”____________” (FROM TARGET, CARDINAL DIRECTION AND DISTANCE IN METERS)

“EGRESS:L/R PULL____________________” (CARDINAL/SUBCARDINAL DIRECTION AND CP/IP [AS REQUIRED])

“SAY WHEN READY TO COPY REMARKS”
REMARKS (USE AS APPROPRIATE):
(FINAL ATTACK HEADINGS):_______
(LASER-TARGET LINE):_______
(THREAT):__________ (DESCRIPTION, CARD DIR FROM TGT, DISTANCE IN METERS, TYPE OF SUPPRESSION)
(GUN-TARGET LINE):________

“TOT:_______” OR “PUSH ASAP”
“SAY WHEN READY FOR AMPLIFYING INFORMATION” : TALK-ON BIG TO SMALL
CAS 6-LINE BRIEF
(USE THIS FOR USMC HELO CAS ONLY) */**/***/ ‡/§

OBSERVER/WARNING ORDER: “(HELO C/S) ____________, THIS IS (OBSERVER C/S) _____________, STANDBY FOR 6-LINE”

CONTROLLER POSITION: “MY POSITION ________________ (GRID, STREET, LOC’N, ETC…) MARKED BY ______________ (TALK-ON, AIR PANEL, IR STROBE, ETC..)”
2. DIRECTION FROM CONTROLLER TO TARGET: “_____________” (DEGREES MAGNETIC)
3. DISTANCE FROM CONTROLLER TO TARGET: “____________” (METERS)
4. TARGET DESCRIPTION “________________”

5. TARGET MARK TYPE “_________________”

6. REMARKS “___________________________” (EX: COME OVER MY L/R SHOULDER, L/R PULL, FAHS____________, PUSH ASAP, REPORT WINGS LEVEL, TYPE ORDNANCE REQUESTED, ETC…)

CAS AIRCRAFT CHECK-IN DATA
CALLSIGN:___________________________________________ MSN#:_______________________________________________
NUM/TYPE A/C:_______________________________________
POSITION/ALTITUDE:__________________________________
ORDNANCE: DASH 1:___________________________________________ DASH 2:___________________________________________ DASH 3:___________________________________________ DASH 4:___________________________________________
TIME ON STATION:____________________________________
ABORT CODE:_________________________________________
ADD’L REMARKS:_____________________________________
FAC: FR & EN SIT:
GAMEPLAN:
TYPE I, II, III CONTROL, READ BACK 4, 6, & REST
REQUIRE IP/BP INBOUND, IN W/ HDG, VISUAL, TALLY, CONTACT CALLS FOR AUTH FOR ORD RELEASE
RISK ESTIMATE (DANGER CLOSE) DISTANCES FOR CAS ORDNANCE (COMBAT USE ONLY)
| | |10%PI |.1%PI |
|MK-82 |500LB BOMB |105 |245 |
|MK-83 |1000LB BOMB |120 |305 |
|MK-84 |2000LB BOMB |110 |315 |
|MK-20 - NT 3 |ROCKEYE CBU |140 |230 |
|2.75” RKT |300 METER SHOT (RW) |70 |145 |
| |1K METER SHOT (RW) |100 |185 |
|5” RKT |ZUNI’S VAR. WARHEADS |125 |290 |
|HELLFIRE |AGM-114 (AH-1) |50 |125 |
|MAVERICK |AGM-65 (F-18, AV-8) |35 |95 |
|AGM-130 |2000 LB, TV GUIDED |70 |220 |
|GUNS |20, 25, 30MM GATLING |50 |85 |
|AC-130 |25MM/ 40MM |35/25 |65/75 |
| |105MM CANNON |65 |165 |
|GBU-10/24 |2000LB LGB |70 |250 |
|GBU-12 |500LB LGB |50 |170 |
|GBU-16 |1000LB LGB |75 |195 |
|GBU-31 |2000LB JDAM |80 |265 |
|GBU-32 |1000LB JDAM |75 |210 |
|GBU-38 |500LB JDAM |55 |185 |
|GBU-51 |500LB LCDB LGB |35 |100 |
|GBU-39 |250LB SDB |35 |135 |

SOURCE: MCRP 3-16.6A, J-FIRE, DEC 2007

NOTE 1: DELIVERIES THAT TAKE PLACE CLOSER TO FRIENDLIES THAN THE 0.1%PI DISTANCE ARE CLASSIFIED AS “DANGER CLOSE” AND REQUIRE THE SUPPORTED COMMANDER’S INITIALS TO INDICATE ACCEPTANCE OF RISK.
NOTE 2: WHEN ORDNANCE IS A FACTOR TO THE SAFETY OF FRIENDLY TROOPS, THE AIRCRAFT’S FINAL ATTACK HEADING SHOULD BE PARALLEL TO FRIENDLY LINES.
NOTE 3: CLUSTER BOMBS ARE NOT RECOMMENDED FOR TROOPS IN CONTACT.

*REMEMBER: PLAIN ENGLISH WORKS IF YOU NEED TO USE IT!
**NOTE: ONLY THE PORTIONS INDICATED IN BLUE NEED TO BE READ TO THE AIRCRAFT.
*** ALWAYS TRY TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE CORRECTION FROM THE MARK / FROM LEAD OR DASH 2’S HITS IN THE FOLLOWING FORMAT:
“FROM (THE MARK/LEAD’S HITS/DASH 2’S HITS), (DIRECTION [DEG MAG]), (DISTANCE [NEAREST 10M])”
EXA: “FROM LEAD’S HITS NORTHWEST 100” / “FROM THE MARK SOUTH 50”
‡ POSSIBLE TECHNIQUES TO MARK YOUR POSITION: 6 DIGIT GRID OR BETTER, TALK-ON, AIR PANEL, SMOKE (DO NOT CALL COLOR), TRP, CHECKPOINT, STREET NAME/INTERSECTION, BUILDING/CITY GRID REFERENCE NUMBER, IR STROBE, CHEMLIGHT BUZZSAW, HDG/ DIST FROM PROMINENT GEOREF ETC… USE MULTIPLE METHODS TOGETHER IF POSSIBLE. BE CREATIVE! IF IT WORKS BUT IT’S NOT ON THIS LIST, USE IT! ENSURE AIRCRAFT ARE BRIEFED ON ALL FRIENDLY LOCATIONS IN THE AREA FOR FRATRICIDE CONSDERATIONS.
§ POSSIBLE TECHNIQUES TO MARK THE TARGET: 6 DIGIT GRID OR BETTER, TALK-ON, M203 SMOKE, ARTY/MORTAR SMOKE, TRACER FIRE, SHIFT FROM A TRP/ CHECKPOINT/ GEOGRAPHICAL REFERENCE, BUILDING/CITY GRID REFERENCE NUMBER, IR POINTER (IZLID, PEQ-4, PEQ-2), IR DESIGNATOR, ETC…, ETC… AGAIN, BE CREATIVE AND USE WHAT YOU HAVE AVAILABLE TO YOU!!!

LAST UPDATE JAN 1, 2008
JTAR REQUEST (SUBMIT THIS TO HIGHER OR THE DASC TO GET CAS A/C SENT TO YOU)
|1. UNIT CALLED: |THIS IS: |REQUEST #: |

YELLOW HIGHLIGHTED PORTIONS INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED ELEMENTS OF THE JTAR (YOU CAN OMIT THE REST). COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS APPEAR ABOVE IN GREEN TEXT.

AFTER YOU TRANSMIT THE JTAR, THE DASC WILL READ YOU BACK YOUR MISSION DATA (LIKE AN ARTY MTO) – COPY IT DOWN IN THE SPACE BELOW:
MSN#_________________________________________
CALLSIGN______________________________________
TYPE/# OF A/C_________________________________
ORDNANCE_____________________________________
______________________________________
EST. TOT______________________________________ 9 LINE CASEVAC REQUEST (SUBMIT THIS HIGHER OR DASC)

LINE 1: LOCATION OF PICK-UP SITE: (6 OR 8 DIGIT GRID) ______________________________________________________
LINE 2: RADIO FREQUENCY AND CALLSIGN:
______________________________________________________
LINE 3: NO. OF PATIENTS: (BY PRECEDENCE)
A URGENT (1 HR. LOSS LIFE/LIMB/EYESIGHT)___________
B URGENT SURGICAL(SURG. INTERVENTION)___________
C PRIORITY __________________________________________
D ROUTINE __________________________________________

LINE 4: SPECIAL EQUIPMENT REQUIRED:
A NONE__________________ B HOIST________________
C EXTRACTION EQUIP_____ D VENTILATOR__________

LINE 5: NUMBER OF PATIENTS BY TYPE:
L LITTER_____________ A AMBULATORY____________

LINE 6: SECURITY AT PICKUP SITE:
E ENEMY TROOPS IN AREA ____ N NO ENE. TROOPS____
P POSSIBLE ENE. TROOPS______
X ENE TROOPS IN AREA, ARMED ESCORT REQUIRED_____

LINE 7: METHOD OF MARKING PICKUP SITE:
A PANELS_______ B PYROTECHNICS_______
C SMOKE_______ D NONE_______
E OTHER________IE, IR BUZZ SAW, NATO ‘Y’ OR ‘T’

LINE 8: PATIENT NATIONALITY/STATUS:
A US MILITARY_____ B US CIVILIAN_____
C NON-US MILITARY_____ D NON-US CIVILIAN____

LINE 9: CBR CONTAMINATION:
N NUCLEAR/RADIOLOGICAL_____ B BIOLOGICAL_____
C CHEMICAL_____ D NONE_____

REMARKS: (ZAP #S OR: NAME, RANK, SSN, NATURE OF INJURIES, AMPLIFYING INFO)___________________________
______________________________________________________
___________________________________________
______________________________________________________
LINES 1-4 & 6 MINIMUM REQUIRED FOR COC TO REQUEST AIR. DON’T WAIT FOR ALL INFO TO SUBMIT. CONTINUE TO UPDATE WITH HIGHER AS SITUATION DEVELOPS
HELICOPTER LANDING ZONE BRIEF

CURRENT LOCATION (GEO. FEATURE, CKPT, GRID, ROAD/INTERSECTION, ETC…)

MARKED BY________ FAR, ________ NEAR (AIRPANEL, BUZZSAW, CHEM LIGHTS, IR STROBE, SMOKE, TALK-ON)
WINDS (BLOWING FROM WITH NEAREST SUB-CARDINAL DIRECTION AND ESTIMATE SPEED IN KNOTS)
LZ SIZE ________ BY ________ METERS (INCLUDE COMPOSITION, FLAT OR SLOPED)
HAZARDS (POWERLINES, BROWNOUT CONDITIONS, LANDMINES, FIGHTING HOLES, STAKES ETC…)
ENEMY SITUATION (DIR, DIS, TYPE FROM LZ)
FRIENDLY SITUATION (DIR, DIS FROM LZ)
STANDING BY TO MARK LZ
| |SINGLE |2 A/C | |
|CH-53 |200’X300’ |300’X400’ |LARGE ROTOR WASH |
|CH-46 |100’X100’ |200’200’ |CAPABLE OF SEMI-ROUGH TERR. |
| | | |LANDING |
|UH-60 |100’X100’ |200’X200’ |UNARMED |
|UH-1N |75’X100’ |150’X150’ |VARIETY OF MSN/ORD |
|AH-1W |75’X100’ |150’X150’ |NARROW SKIDS REQ. FLAT, SMOOTH |
| | | |SURF. |

LZ MARKING GOUGE:

*USE WELL SECURED AIR PANELS (DAY), CHEM STICKS (NIGHT) WITH SIGNAL MIRROR (DAY), IR BUZZ SAW (NIGHT) FOR LZ ID AND MARKING
MISC:
AIRCRAFT EMERGENCY FREQ (GUARD): 243.0 (UHF)
ALL U.S. MILITARY AIRCRAFT CONTINUALLY MONITOR THIS FREQ. EVEN IF YOU HAVE NO AIRCRAFT SLOTTED TO SUPPORT YOU, YOU MAY BE ABLE TO CONTACT ONE FOR EMERGENCY CAS/CASEVAC SUPPORT.

WIND

5-10’

LANDING DIRIECTION*

5-10’

30°-45°

NATO Y

NATO T

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Case Brief

    • 7225 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Combined Source: Company Profiles and Directories;US Law Reviews and Journals, Combined;Federal & State Court Cases - After 1944, Combined;Newspaper Stories, Combined Papers…

    • 7225 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief No 1

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plaintiff and Defendant: The plaintiff/appellant is Harvestons Securities, Inc. The defendant/appellee is Narnia Investments, Ltd.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Candidate Yonker began his brief with strong command presence and confidence. He continued to give the rest of the brief with the same tone and presence that he was displaying to the fire team. SNC’s brief was presented in a clear and fluent manner. At the end of the brief all members knew what their tasks were and what their role was in accomplishing the mission. SNC maintained constant communication with every member throughout the evolution. Once the team hit the first point of friction, SNC positioned himself where he would be able to best assist the team. The problem was quickly identified and the team leader adjusted and continued with the solution. SNC effectiveness under a stressful situation allowed the team to maintain forward progression…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CASE Brief

    • 978 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Prior restrictions had been placed on Rodman’s conduct due to personal problems adversely impacting upon her place of work.…

    • 978 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief A4

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On November 11, 1974, Gnazzo had an intrauterine device (IUD) inserted in her uterus for contraceptive purposes. The IUD was developed, marketed and sold by G.D. Searle & Co. (Searle). When Gnazzo’s deposition was taken, she stated that her doctor had informed her that “the insertion would hurt, but not for long,” and that she “would have uncomfortable and probably painful periods for the first three to four months. On October 11, 1975, Gnazzo found it necessary to return to her physician due to excessive pain and cramping. During this visit she was informed by her doctor that he thought she had Pelvic inflammatory Disease (PID). She recalled that he stated that the infection was possibly caused by venereal disease or the use of the IUD. The PID was treated with antibiotics and cleared up shortly thereafter. Less than one year later, Gnazzo was again treated for an IUD-associated infection. This infection was also treated with antibiotics. Gnazzo continued using the IUD until it was finally removed in December of 1977.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Joseph Kly met Walter and Helen Pestinikas in the latter part of 1981 when Kly consulted them about prearranging his funeral. In March, 1982, Kly, who had been living with a stepson, was hospitalized and diagnosed as suffering from Zenker's diverticulum, a weakness in the walls of the esophagus, [***4] which caused him to have trouble swallowing food. In the hospital, Kly was given food which he was able to swallow and, as a result, regained some of the [**1342] weight which he had lost. When he was about to be discharged, he expressed a desire not to return to his stepson's home and sent word to appellants that he wanted to speak with them. As a consequence, arrangements were made for appellants to care for Kly in their home on Main Street in Scranton, Lackawanna County.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS Rumarson Technologies, Inc. (RTI) sued Robert and Percy Helmer to collect from them personally $24,965 owed to it by Event Marketing, Inc. (EMI) when EMI's check to pay RTI bounced. Robert and Percy Helmer were authorized signatories on EMI's corporate account, and they signed the check. RTI argued that as signatories they could be held personally liable. The lower court agreed and ruled in favor of RTI holding the Helmers liable. The Helmers appealed. Also of note, is that check was dated 1998 although there is some non-material dispute as to whether it was August 14, 1998, or on or around July 13, 1998.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Photosynthesis first must be determined by plotting O2 evolution vs time at different light levels. The rates calculated from each O2 evolution curve are then plotted against light level. [ For example, the figure below shows O2 evolution curves when photosynthesis was allowed to occur in the presence of two different light…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Is there error in the court denying a jury instructions on criminally negligent homicide, instead instructing on reckless manslaughter, which alleges the defendant had intent to kill, when there is enough evidence to support the theory the defendant’s conduct was unintentional.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case brief

    • 593 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Issues: 1) Whether the district court erred in concluding that hay is not a “product “for purposes of a strict liability in tort cause of action. 2) Whether the District Court erred in concluding that the Rothings negligence claim against Kallestad fails because it was unforeseeable that the hay could cause injury and death to the Rothings’ horses, thus no duty of care existed. 3) Whether the District Court erred in concluding that the Rothings’ breach of contract claim against Kallestad fails because it was unforeseeable that the hay could cause injury and death to the Rothings’ horses. 4) Whether the District Court erred in imposing discovery sanctions against the Rothings. 5) Whether the District Court erred in awarding attorney’s fees to Kallestad and denying the Rothings a hearing in respect to the calculation of attorney’s fees. (₱3-7)…

    • 593 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Brief

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On the evening of January 5, 1993, Tracie Reeves and Molly Coffman, both twelve years of age and students at West Carroll Middle School, spoke on the telephone and decided to kill their homeroom teacher, Janice Geiger. They agreed that Coffman would bring rat poison to school the following days so that it could be placed in Geiger 's drink. After that , they would steal Geiger 's car and drive to the Smoky Mountains. On the morning of January 6, Coffman placed a packet of rat poison in her purse and board the school bus. Coffman told another student, Christy Hernandez, of the plan and show her the poison. Hernandez went and informed her homeroom teacher, Sherry Cockrill. Cockrill then informed the school principal, Claudia Argo. When Geiger entered her classroom that morning, she observed Reeves and Coffman leaning over her deck; and when the girls noticed her, they giggled and ran back to their seats. Geiger saw a purse lying next to her coffee cup on the top of the desk. Shortly after Argo called Coffman to the principal 's office, rat poison was found in Coffman 's purse. Both Reeves and Coffman gave written statement to the Sheriff investigator concerning their plan to poison Geiger and steal her car.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    case brief

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS: In August of 2003 Detective Shane Blankenship, a social worker, was assigned to investigate and interview Michael Shatzer about claims that Shatzer had sexually abused his three year old son. At the time of the investigation Shatzer was incarcerated at Maryland Correctional Institution-Hagerstown for an unrelated child-sexual abuse offense. Before asking Shatzer any questions, Detective Blankenship informed Shatzer of his rights, Shatzer then obtained a written waiver of those rights. Blankenship proceeded to end the interview, release Shatzer back into the general prison population, and end the investigation. After two years and six months, Dectective Hoover reopened the investigation, interviewed Shatzer's son who was now eight years old, who could now describe the incident in more detail. In March of 2006, Hoover went to Roxbury Correctional Institute to interview Shatzer about sexually abusing his son. After approximately 30 minutes of interviewing, Shatzer agreed to take a polygraph; in which he failed. At no point during this second interview did Shatzer request to speak to a lawyer or refuse to answer Hoover's questions without a lawyer present. After incriminating himself, Shatzer was charged with second-degree sexual offense, sexual child abuse, second-degree assault and contributing to conditions rending a child in need of assistance. In court, Shatzer moved to suppress his March 2006 statements in regards to Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981). The trail court denied his motion. The Court of Criminal Appeals of Maryland reversed the trail courts decision stating that release of Shatzer back into the general prison population did not constitute a break in custody.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Specifically, Maddox asserted that his right to due process was violated as outlined in violation of the doctrine of Brady v. Maryland by the state 's failure to disclose a photograph taken by the police shortly after the alleged rape showing Elder 's bed neatly made, the results of a police examination of the bedspread which revealed no blood, semen or other fluid, and lastly a written statement by another witness, Brenda Phelps, that Debbie Phillips had stated that she dropped her insurance with Maddox for financial reasons. Maddox appeals the denial of habeas relief.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Brief Memorandum

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plaintiff, Elian Gonzalez, a six year old minor, through his “next of friend”, Lazaro Gonzalez, filed an asylum application with the INS (Immigration & Naturalization Service), which was denied. The plaintiff’s then filed a claim in the federal district court which stated the Plaintiff’s due process rights were violated and the INS had overstepped their power in interpreting the statute, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1158 . The Court determined the Plaintiff’s rights had not been violated nor had the INS misused their power and the ruling of the INS was valid. Plaintiff then filed appeal to the Federal Appellate Court.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Applications for asylum may not be made against the wishes of a parent of a child that lacks the mental capacity to request asylum and a third party cannot speak on behalf of a minor because it is the right of a…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays