Preview

Can We Escape Our Biological Heritage Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1506 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Can We Escape Our Biological Heritage Analysis
Throughout this essay I will be defending the idea that we cannot escape our biological heritage through the argument from Evolutionary Psychology. I will also present and critique conflicting ideas of our human nature through the idea Standard Social Science Model (SSSM). To begin this paper I will firstly break down what is meant by the question ‘can we escape our biological heritage?’ as well as mention the importance of the answer to this question and explain what is meant by the ‘Theory of Human Nature’.
More simply, the question of ‘can we escape our biological heritage?’ is asking whether or not there is more to human nature than our biology. The answer to such a question has significant impacts for our life. If humans are nothing more
…show more content…
Just like all other living things evolved and adapted, and just like the rest of the human body and evolved, our “psychological mechanisms are evolved adaptations” therefore there is nothing ‘immaterial’ about human nature and we are therefore completely subject to the biological heritage of our evolution (Tooby & Cosmides, 2005, p. 9).
Evolutionary Psychology is replacing the traditional views of psychology and the standard social science model of the mind. This traditional view believes that we can escape our heritage due to the fact that the content of our social and mental lives is not determined by our biological heritage. The main claims of the SSSM view are:
• The mind is tabula rasa, a blank
…show more content…
There would be no reason for our minds to evolve to experience mental illness, yet we experience it. If the brain also contains complex modules to help us survive, surely there should be a module with would help prevent us suffering from mental illness as this would greatly help our survival, however we do not. Therefore, by these reasoning, the argument from Evolutionary Psychology that our mind is a combination of complex modules that developed by evolution but at least be partly false. These critics who are supporters of SSSM may say that its idea of development due to socialisation explains why we experience mental illness. It is often said that glorification of thinness, the high standards of beauty and the social pressures exerted on us by media is the reason we develop mental illnesses like eating disorders. Because our brain develops purely by what it is exposed to and has no specific modules to deal with these pressures, it makes sense that humans experience high levels of mental health

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evolutionary psychology is “a subfield of psychology concerned with origins of behaviors and mental processes, their adaptive value, and the purposes they…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evolutionary Psychology is an approach to psychology, in which knowledge and principles from evolutionary biology are put to use in research on the structure of the human mind. This field really examines natural selection and how it favors behaviors that help keep a species going from one generation to the next. Psychologists studying the behavior of Amy Winehouse using the evolutionary perspective may explain why her children could be good singers or could also become addicted to drugs.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the evolutionary approach is a biological one, it suggests that aspects of human behaviour have been coded by our genes because they were or are adaptive. However, a debate of this approach is the nature vs. nurture approach, nature supporting the evolutionary approach being that we have evolved through survival value and its ability to increase an individuals opportunities to pass on their genes, an example showing this was Bowlby’s theory of attachment – concerning the role of evolution is the explanation of stress as an adaptive response to environmental pressures. Animals born without such responses die quickly. Nurture, on the other hand, is a view proposed by the social approach suggesting behaviour is affected by experience and environment.…

    • 973 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Human nature is a vexing issue: some argue that we are born as blank slates and our 
natures are defined by upbringing, experience, culture and the ideas of our time. Others 
believe that human nature is innate and pre-destined, regardless of time and…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I have always held the belief that Nature v Nurture is not a zero-sum game. To steal a line from T.S. Elliot’s The Hollow Men, I believe humans are born into this world a “shape without form.” That shape, of course, is our nature; the sum of our genetic make-up and natural tendencies based on some combination of predisposition and innate sense of self. The form, then, necessarily reflects our experiences and the way those have restructured our ‘self.’ The nurture of our mind, particularly at a young age, is instrumental in providing depth and context to our natural shape. Both aspects of our ‘self’ are complimentary. Just like we are unable to understand shape without the context of form, we are similarly unable to understand humans without an understanding in the dynamic of both nature and nurture expressed through our behavior, desires, and interactions.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The concept of Nature v. Nurture has been a psychological debate that initially began in 1871 by Sir Francis Galton. The debate consisted of the idea whether or not people have specific behavioral traits due to one’s lineage or rather the experiences one has in his/her lifetime. As the conflict carried on, a third view had birthed itself. This view mediated the two oppositions, saying this conflict should not be one at all. Rather than one side opposing the other, both sides together could be the answer to this prolonged debate. It is perceived that people are similar to their ancestry to a certain extent, then as they begin to live their lives more freely; their behaviors are later modified with their personal experiences.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Over the course of the last century one of the greatest debates in psychology concerns, the basis of behaviour, specifically whether behaviour is innate i.e. genetically controlled, or whether it is learnt through the socio-cultural environment. This is often referred to as the Nature vs. Nurture debate. There are two main arguments on this issue. The ‘Nativist’ claims that all behaviour is innate believing that genes control the majority of animal behaviour. On the other hand, the empiricist position suggests that all behaviour is learned through an individuals cultural experience and conditioning – that individuals begin life as blanks slates. Extremes of both these positions are reductionist, since they explain all behaviour at one level of explanation. This debate has evolved in such a way that the modern question is not whether behaviour is innate or learned, but rather how much of behaviour, if any, is genetically determined. Most psychologists now accept that both heredity and the environment are necessary for human existence and influence our behaviour. Therefore the question has shifted to considering to what extent nature or nurture affects our behaviour and how they interact– not so much nature or nurture, as nature via nurture. The debate endures because both sides have the ability to create a scientific environment to support their cause.…

    • 2173 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, many still question whether the influences of nature and nurture respectively could overrule one another in any circumstances. 17th century philosopher John Locke theorised that human nature is a blank state, ready to be influenced by a given environment. If Locke’s assumption holds true, this would…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Biological: personalities, preferences, behavior patterns, and abilities all stem from our physical makeup.( Rene Descartes)…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The End of Nature Versus Nurture The article "The End of Nature Versus Nurture" was about the arguments and debates over the past fifty years over the issue of nature versus nurture. The first thing that de Waal mentioned in the article was how we can't possibly think about where the issue will be at fifty years from now without looking back fifty years first (1999). He talks about learning and instinct, which fifty years back was as hot a debate as nature versus nurture is now. There were two main views of behavior; the fact that it was a product of trial and error learning (de Waal, 1999) and that species are born with fixed-action patterns de Waal, 1999). Both groups of people eventually had to learn that both of their philosophies had to be combined in order to draw a more accurate conclusion. The only problem with this was that neither side wanted to accept this fact and one of these outraged people even resorted to pouring a bucket of cold water over his opponent's head. After de Waal talked about learning and instinct, he went on to talk about some burdens of the past. He mentioned how it is typical for humans to believe that human behavior can be easily changed since it is learned. This is exemplified with situations like communism and Nazi Germany. Both of these attempts at changing human's behavior failed. Communism failed because it was out of touch with human nature and the Nazi Germany failed because they were trying genetic manipulation instead of social engineering (de Waal, 1999). He continues by saying that even political agendas today are inspired by social-Darwinism, which is the idea that the strong will out compete the weak and eventually make for an improvement in population (de Waal, 1999). This is a main reason why categories of suppressed people fail to see biology in good light. These things are continuing to fade away though because a connection between genes and behavior is getting larger and larger. Studies now prove that you can like…

    • 1241 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APUSH FRQ Outline

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To what extent was “the Gilded Age” an age of inaction, apathy, and extremism in American politics?…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This evolutionary theory, generally credited to Charles Darwin, can not explain the link between worldview and developmental theories. Although it is similar to behaviorism, as it does have a reinforcer for behavior found in the individual’s drive for survival and reproduction (Credit), it cannot fit because of a difference in ideas. Worldview is maintained through underlying and differentiating beliefs. The evolutionary theory, however, enforces actions are primal in nature (Credit). How an individual interprets the world cannot be boiled down to a primal drive, rather, their worldview has to be shaped by different ideas and beliefs that make the individual unique. Furthermore, their worldview cannot be defined as an unstoppable urge, but rather, an intelligent thought process. The incompatibility between worldview and the evolutionary theory can be credited to the difference in the drive behind a human’s thoughts and…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This essay just looks at one of these theories, which is the theory of Sigmund Freud’s…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A new idea is never accepted easily; when an idea first comes into existence many questions are raised before the notion convinces anyone. Along with a new theory comes many new controversies and critiques which go against the bright new idea. An example of a brilliant idea which still has many controversies surrounding it is the notion of evolutionary psychology. As this field progresses into the world, many brilliant scientists from around the world reason why they think it’s false. Both supporters and adversaries not only helped shed light for each other, but also helped shed light in helping me decide whether I wanted to stand behind this new field, or be among the many that decline it.…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evolutionary psychology is an approach in the social and natural sciences that studies the psychological behaviours and adaptations of humans to the changing physical and social environment. It’s basically a combination of evolutionary biology and cognitive psychology. In 1859, Charles Darwin set out his theory of evolution by natural selection as an explanation for adaptation and speciation. He believed that all plants and animals had evolved from a few common ancestors by means of natural selection. The theory is based on the assumption that living organisms face environmental challenges. This means that those who adapt best to the environment will have a greater chance of surviving, having children, and passing on their genes to the next…

    • 4135 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays