Preview

California Code Of Civil Procedure: Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
600 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
California Code Of Civil Procedure: Case Study
• What is the time frame for replying in your state?

In light of the California Code of Civil Procedure, rule 412.20, a timely response to a summons and complaint would be 30 days after the date you were served the papers, to file a response or answer statement with the court. Although, if you were served by substituted service, then you will have an additional 10 days to file a response with the court, but it requires proof of service by the plaintiff that says that defendant was served by substituted service and not personally served.

• What happens in the event of default?

Under the California Code of Civil Procedure § 585 a judgment may be had, if the defendant fails to answer the complaint, but first requirements must be met and that means the plaintiff must have:
…show more content…
• The defendant’s 30 days expired;
• Defendant failed to file a responsive pleading to the complaint; •
• Defendant must be served with a statement of damages and that’s because the law requires that the plaintiff inform the defendant of the specific monetary damages sought before a default can be taken.

After all of the requirements have been met, which means that the defendant was served the summons, complaint, statement of damages, and failed to respond on time. The plaintiff then has according to the California Rules of the Court § 3.110(g), 10 days after the time limit for service has elapsed for entering a default. Otherwise the court may enter an Order to show Cause why sanctions should not be imposed (id.)
An application of Entry of default must be filed by plaintiff, which encompasses a request to entry default form; Proof of Service of Summons; Statement of damages and Proof of Service of Statement of Damages. [CCP § 425.11]

• Which motions would you file, and why, if the opposing party

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In July of 2000 Curtis Williams was indicted by a grand jury in Williamson County, Texas for aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury. While under indictment, Williams traveled to Louisiana from Texas on a Greyhound bus. The bus Williams was traveling on was scheduled to make a stop at the Shreveport Greyhound Bus terminal on September 12,…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The facts of the case stated that on August 2, 2009, Riley, who belonged to the one of the gangs of San Diego, California, and others shot at a rival gang member while driving past them. The shooters got into Riley’s car and drove away. Then, twenty days later on August 22, 2009, the police pulled Riley over driving a different car because of his expired license registration tags. They found that his driver’s license had been suspended. Police searched his car before impounding it. During the search, the police located two guns in the car and then arrested Riley for possession of said guns. Riley had his cell phone in his pocket at…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Relief Sought: Ted Chimel brought light to the fact that police officers arresting a suspect at that suspect’s home could not search the entire home without a warrant to search but may search just the area in the vicinity of that suspect…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On 09/10/15 the defendant was instructed to report on 09/11/15 @1:00 pm to CSO Santiago, and pick up bus pass. The defendant did not report as instructed. CSO Santiago attempted to contact the defendant via telephone left message to report no later that 4:00pm on this date. If not the defendant need to contact CSO Vasquez on Monday 09/4/15.…

    • 59 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chimel v California (1969) was a landmark case that involved Officers armed with only an arrest warrant, enter Ted Chimel’s home and arrest him for burglary. The Officers decided to search his entire house in search of the stolen coins from the burglarized coin shop. They justified their search maintaining that it was to uncover evidence but that it was incident to arrest. Chimel was convicted and his appeal reached the U.S. Supreme Court; where they overturned the ruling stating that “the search of Chimel’s residence, although incident to arrest, became invalid when it went beyond the person arrested and the area subject to that person’s “immediate control” (Schmalleger, 2014). This case gave officers the authority to conduct a protective…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Here, plaintiff sufficiently set forth the terms of the parties' Property Settlement Agreement concerning plaintiff's interest in defendant's Deferred Compensation Agreement The issue of the case…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    BUS 311 Week 5 Quiz

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    10. A plaintiff must establish all of the following in order to be successful in proving the defendant's negligence in a product liability lawsuit except…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief: US v. Conti

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    (1) the central purpose of the program in which the speech in question occurs; (2)…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Defendant: Case Study

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Defendant when his daughter was living with him constantly updated the Plaintiff of what was going on with their daughter.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    However, no statements made by any party during the conciliation process can be used in any subsequent lawsuit. The conciliation process is not a prerequisite for an individual to file a lawsuit in state or federal court. Under the ADEA, the employee must merely wait 60 days after filing a charge with the EEOC and the appropriate state agency before filing a lawsuit against the employer. Title VII and the ADA require the EEOC to issue a "Notice of Right to Sue," also known as a "right to sue letter," before an individual can file a suit in court. The right to sue letter can be issued at the complaining party's request or by the EEOC following its disposition of a discrimination charge. The employee has 90 days after receiving the right to sue letter to file…

    • 4069 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To prove that a defendant has committed a tort, a plaintiff must establish that the…

    • 3682 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe Stogner v. California (2003) favors the offender’s rights because the offender escaped justice due to passage of time. In some cases, I believe passage of time could be acceptable, but in cases of serious personal and psychological injury, I do not believe passage of time should be such a factor.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    California Court System

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    California is home to one of the largest court systems in the United States. Filing nearly nine million cases in its lifetime, the system has served over 37 million people (Darling). The California system can be separated into three branches. The first branch is known as the Supreme Court of California, and they are the state’s highest court. They review cases involving judgments of death and misconduct among attorneys. They also have the power to review cases that have been conducted in lower court systems. The second branch is known as the Courts of Appeal. This branch is California’s ‘intermediate’ court. Most of the cases that are submitted to this branch are decided by three judge panels, and the results are published. The jurisdiction of this branch covers the same amount of jurisdiction as its lower counterpart in the Superior branch. The third branch of the California Court System is the Superior Courts branch. This branch has jurisdiction over all criminal and civil cases. This is the lowest court in the California system, and therefore it sees the greatest volume of cases.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    AUTO PARTS LTD, Nanor (plaintiff) entered into a contract with Auto Parts Ltd to buy a Nissan Homer. He paid ¢19,000.00 to Auto Parts for the price of the vehicle and Auto Parts promised to get the vehicle ready for collection by 29 December 1977 which the failed to deliver.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ombudsman Schme

    • 5234 Words
    • 21 Pages

    The Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2006 Reserve Bank of India Central Office Mumbai TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short Title, Commencement, Extent and Application 1 2. Suspension of the Scheme 1 3. Definitions 1 CHAPTER II ESTABLISHMENT OF OFFICE OF BANKING OMBUDSMAN 4. Appointment & Tenure 3 5.…

    • 5234 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays