Business Strategy in a Global Environment: A Capstone Project that Integrates Ethical and Cross-Cultural Considerations
Business Strategy in a Global Environment: A Capstone Project that Integrates Ethical and Cross-Cultural Considerations
Submitted by
Catherine Giapponi
Management Department
Charles F. Dolan School of Business
Fairfield University
1073 North Benson Road
Fairfield, CT. 06824 cgiapponi@fairfield.edu Carl Scheraga
Management Department
Charles F. Dolan School of Business
Fairfield University
1073 North Benson Road
Fairfield, CT. 06824 cscheraga@fairfield.edu ABSTRACT
Undergraduate and graduate capstone courses at business schools are designed to integrate student knowledge and learning across all disciplines. Many capstone projects focus on U.S. corporations, with specific emphasis on the integration of information from the business functional areas and knowledge derived from the liberal arts core. Designing projects that challenge students to examine and wrestle with strategic decision making in the global environment can be challenging but provide rich opportunities for student learning. Many of our business students will be confronted with strategic decisions that require a critical examination of ethical considerations within the context of cross-national and cross-cultural differences.
Therefore, the development of learning opportunities that enable students to confront complex global issues and challenge their underlying assumptions about business decision making is important in developing future leaders. The purpose of this paper is to share our experiences with a business strategy capstone project that afforded the opportunity to adapt a capstone project framework to analyze a complex global decision in an undergraduate and MBA course. The projects enabled students to explore and critically analyze Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, or Cisco
System’s business strategies related to internet censorship in China.
INTRODUCTION
Teaching Business Strategy
There are significant challenges in teaching capstone business strategy
Submitted by
Catherine Giapponi
Management Department
Charles F. Dolan School of Business
Fairfield University
1073 North Benson Road
Fairfield, CT. 06824 cgiapponi@fairfield.edu Carl Scheraga
Management Department
Charles F. Dolan School of Business
Fairfield University
1073 North Benson Road
Fairfield, CT. 06824 cscheraga@fairfield.edu ABSTRACT
Undergraduate and graduate capstone courses at business schools are designed to integrate student knowledge and learning across all disciplines. Many capstone projects focus on U.S. corporations, with specific emphasis on the integration of information from the business functional areas and knowledge derived from the liberal arts core. Designing projects that challenge students to examine and wrestle with strategic decision making in the global environment can be challenging but provide rich opportunities for student learning. Many of our business students will be confronted with strategic decisions that require a critical examination of ethical considerations within the context of cross-national and cross-cultural differences.
Therefore, the development of learning opportunities that enable students to confront complex global issues and challenge their underlying assumptions about business decision making is important in developing future leaders. The purpose of this paper is to share our experiences with a business strategy capstone project that afforded the opportunity to adapt a capstone project framework to analyze a complex global decision in an undergraduate and MBA course. The projects enabled students to explore and critically analyze Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, or Cisco
System’s business strategies related to internet censorship in China.
INTRODUCTION
Teaching Business Strategy
There are significant challenges in teaching capstone business strategy
References: Balch, D. and S. Borah. 2009. Teaching Strategy and Skepticism: A Capstone Approach. Bambauer, D. 2009. Cybersieves, Duke Law Journal, 59, 377-446. Banning, K. 2003. The Effect of the Case Method on Tolerance for Ambiguity. Journal of Management Education, 27 (5), 556-557. Brey, P. 2007. Is Information Ethics Culture-Relative? International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction 3, 12-24. Bower, J. 2008. The Teaching of Strategy: From General Management to Analyst and Back? Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(4), 269. Capurro, R. 2005. Privacy: An Intercultural Perspective. Ethics and Information Technology, 7, 37-47. Cavanagh, G.F. 1990. American Business Values, 3rd edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Celly, K. 2007. Fostering Critical Thinking in Business Courses. The Cambridge Review, 8(1), 148-153. Crittenden, W. 2005. A Social Learning Theory of Cross-Functional Case Education. Journal of Business Research, 58, 960-966. Grant, R. 2008. Why Strategy Teaching Should Be Theory Based. Journal of Management Inquiry 17 (4), 276. Greiner, L., Bhambri, A. and T. Cummings. 2003. Searching for a Strategy to Teach Strategy. Husted, B. and D. Allan. 2008. Toward a Model of Cross-Cultural Business Ethics: The Impact of Individualism and Collectivism on the Ethical Decision-Making Process Kachra, A. and K. Schhnietz. 2008. The Capstone Strategy Course: What Might Real Integration Look Like? Journal of Management Education, 32(4), 476-508. Kitiyadisai, K. 2005. Privacy Rights and Protection: Foreign Values in Modern Thai Context. Lang, J. and J. Dittrich. 1982. Information, Skill Building, and the Development of Competence: An Educational Framework for Teaching Business Policy Lantos, Tom. 2006. Hearing of the Africa, Global Human Rights and International Operations Subcommittee of the House International Relations Committee, Subject: The Internet in China: Lü, Y. 2005. Privacy and Data Privacy Issues in Contemporary China. Ethics and Information Technology, 7, 7-15. Mitzutani, M, Dorsey, J., and J. Moor. 2004. The Internet and Japanese Conception of Privacy. Nakada, M. and T. Tamura. 2005. Japanese Conceptions of Privacy: An Intercultural Perspective Porter, M. 1988. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Schelfhaudt, K. and V. Crittendon. 2005. Specialist or Generalist: Views from Academia and Industry Scholtens, B. and L. Dam. 2007. Cultural Values and International Differences in Business Ethics Shafer, W., Fukukawa, K., and G. Lee. 2007. Values and the Perceived Importance of Ethics and Social Responsibility: The U.S Thomas, A. 2002. The Business Policy course: Multiple Methods for Multiple Goals. Journal of Management Education, 222(4), 484-497. Thompson, Clive, 2006. Google’s China Problem (and China’s Google Problem). The New York Times, April 23, 2006 Vitell, S., Nwachukwu, S., and J. Barnes. 1993. The Effects of Culture on Ethical DecisionMaking: An Application of Hofstede 's Typology. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 753-760. Whitcomb, L., Erdener, C., and C. Li. 1998. Business Ethical Values in China and the U.S. Wines, W. and N. Napier. 1992. Toward an Understanding of Cross-Cultural Ethics: A Tentative Model Wong, D. 1993. Relativism in P. Singer (Ed.), A Companion to Ethics, Blackwell, 442-450. Wong, D. 2006. Natural Moralities: A Defense of Pluralistic Relativism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.