Preview

Business Ethics Case Study: Ford Pinto

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1043 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Business Ethics Case Study: Ford Pinto
Case Study: Ford Pinto

MGT/216
07/17/20

Case Study: Ford Pinto
Abstract
In 1971, Ford Motor Company (FMC), on the advice of then vice-president Lee Iacocca, introduced the first subcompact vehicle, the Ford Pinto. After production had begun and the release of the Pinto in the United States, Ford discovered a defect in the design on the fuel system; the gas tank was placed in the rear of the vehicle. This error could cause the vehicle to explode on low speed rear end collisions due to a bolt puncturing the fuel tank. Ford conducted a risk/analysis to determine whether to recall the vehicles or leave the situation as is and suffer the consequences as they arise. After concluding that the vehicles could be modified for $11 per vehicle, Ford decided not to recall the vehicles. Based on their risk/analysis the cost to recall the vehicles sold would be $137 million, Ford determined that it would be more profitable to leave the vehicles as is and pay out costs in lawsuits because this figure adjusted to $49.5 million, substantially lower than the cost to recall the product. Ethics and morals would prove to be ignored for profit and gain.
Ford Motor Company Pinto Case Ford Motor Company Mission Statement (1996), “We are a global family with a proud heritage passionately committed to providing personal mobility for people around the world."
In 1978, three female teenagers died in automobile accident, the cause of this fatal accident was a rupture of the gas tank. As a result, the Ford Company was fined $30,000 for each conviction and millions of dollars in punitive damages to the families of the lost teens. The national Highway traffic safety administration broke down the average cost of an accident. The purpose was to make changes in the fatal accident involving three teenage females. The result of this cost consist of the following: Loses of productivity, medical, property, insurance, legal, and loss of employment, pain a suffering, funeral arrangements,



References: Ford Motor Company (2010). Retrieved from http://www.fordmotorcompany.com Legget, Christopher. (1999). The Ford Pinto case: The evaluation of life as it applies to the negligence-efficiency argument. Retrieved from http://www.wfu.edu/~palmitar/Law&Valuation/Papers/1999/Leggett-pinto.html National Academies Press. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php Trivino, L. Nelson, K.A. (2007) Managing Business Ethics, Straight talk about how to do it right (4th e.d). Retrieved from the University of Phoenix eBook Collection database

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Trevino, L. K. (2011). Managing Business Ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right. (5th ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc..…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Treviño, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2007). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Trevino, L., & Nelson, K. (2007). Manageing Business Ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.…

    • 2643 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Personal Ethics Paper

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Trevino, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2007). Managing Business Ethics. Straight Talk About How to…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eth 316 Essay Week 1

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Trevino, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2007). Managing Business Ethics (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc..…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Treviño, L., & Nelson, K. (2007). Managing Business Ethics. Straight Talk About How To Do It Right (4th ed.). Retrieved from The University of Phoenix eBook Collection database.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Grimshaw and the surviving family members of Lilly Gray sued Ford Motor Company for negligence and strict liability. In the original verdict Richard Grimshaw was awarded $2,516,000 for compensatory damages and $125 million in punitive damages. The Gray’s were awarded $559,680 in compensatory damages. Because of a motion filed by Ford Motor Company the punitive damages awarded to Richard Grimshaw was later reduced to $3.5 million.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Trevino, L.K., and Nelson, K.A (2007). Managing business ethics. Straight talk about how to do…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ford Pinto- Ethics

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In early 1968, the Ford Motor Company decided to take on the foreign car competition by introducing a compact, affordable vehicle they named the Pinto. What began as the decision to enter the race for the top small car ultimately led to an unprecedented court case wherein the Ford Motor Company found itself charged with reckless homicide and was the first corporation charged with criminal conduct. In this paper, the authors delve into the tragedy of the Ford Pinto fires and the ethical standards and boundaries of the Ford Motor Company at that time.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ford Pinto Project

    • 1896 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Ford Motor Company has been the leading car company for many decades. In the late 1960’s early 1970’s the company was losing the battle with Japanese with the small efficient cars. Lee Iacocca, Chief Executive Officer the Ford Motor Company wanted a car that will be competitive to these Japanese compact cars. With this intention in mind, the company wanted to manufacture a sub-compact vehicle that weighs less than 2,000 pounds and costs under $2,000. The result is the Ford Pinto. The Ford Pinto was one of the earlier sub-compact cars of the 1970’s. The Pinto was a catalyst in the revitalization of domestic compact cars at this time when Japanese imports were front rumors. Sure the car was simply affordable but had one flaw that would tarnish its reputation and the company’s. The Ford Pinto had fire hazard issues resulting from the placement and construction of the gas tank. When a Pinto is rear-ended the car would burst into flames resulting in an explosion. The company realized this concern during production. Because Iacocca wanted a fast sell of these cars records indicated that there was not a rear end collision test conducted until months after it was already in the market. Management did a cost analysis and determined that the cost of fixing the problem versus any lawsuits; it would be cheaper to pay for the lawsuits that would arise.…

    • 1896 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ford Pinto Ethics Essay

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Pinto crashes have caused 500 burn deaths to people who would not have been seriously injured if the car had not burst into flames. The figure could be as high as 900.” Ford was not obligated legally to change the unsafe gas tank design. However, acting legally doesn’t mean the behavior is ethical. Ford was ethically responsible either to inform consumers of the probable harm or stop production when they knew of the apparent danger to buyers and take the necessary actions to eradicate them by redesigning the gas tank. Ford withholding valuable product information that violated the moral rights of others, and exchanging human life for company gains and profits is not only unethical but egregious.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ford Pinto is the worst car ever made and it was discontinued in 1980. The car was available as in three models, hatch, wagon, and coupe, whose design was not appealing. However, the main problem was the fuel system that was faulty and Ford had ignored designs to fix it. The poor design led to ignition and explosions of the fuel tank after minor rear or front collisions. The fuel tank was placed behind the…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ford Pinto

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    ANS: The Pinto case raise the moral issues of what is the dollar value of the human life. That the businesses should not be putting a value on human life and disregard a known deadly danger. In order to perform a risk/benefit analysis, all costs and benefits must be expressed in some common measure. This measure is typically in dollars, as the Ford Motor Company used in its analysis. This can prove difficult for things that are not commonly bought and sold on the open market. Therefore, totell someone that there is a certain price for their life is a preposterous notion. There are numerous things which individuals consider priceless. Ford thought they could get away with a dangerous automobile by paying off those lawsuits from people who were injured and the families of the dead. Ford thought it was more cost effective not to fix the dangerous condition than to spend the money to save people. In the criticism of using a number, Ford seemed to blindly follow the dictated numbers without giving any extra consideration to the fact that it in face was a human life they were quantifying. It is hard to achieve values without norms and we have ineffective norms without values. Norms are rules that prescribe what concrete actions are required, permitted or forbidden. These are rules and agreement about how people are supposed to treat each other. Everyone has the right to have a safe and healthy workplace or have the right to expect product they purchase to be safe. Lesson learned is that they shouldn’t be ignoring an obviously dangerous condition and shouldn’t be putting a value on human life.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ford Pinto Case

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    External social pressures play a big part in the decision reached about the Ford Motor Company. When you have highly respected individuals such as retired NASA engineer Dr. Leslie Ball say “The release to production of the Pinto was the most reprehensible decision in the history of American Engineering” (Newton, Ford, 2007, p. 1); there is cause for concern. There would be more social pressure today as opposed to the 70’s simply because of the availability of internet. There were a number of options that Ford had that would of prevented the deaths of so many people yet it was not done until eight years after the release of the first model. Lee Iacocca’s favorite saying was “Safety doesn’t sell cars (Newton, Ford, 2007, p. 1)”. Society today would not tolerate nor accept that kind of philosophy from corporations today. Ethically or morally is it right to put value on a human life as Ford did when doing their cost analysis.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Ford Pinto: it had defects and automobile products that contributed to accidents and fatalities despite greater attention to safety features.…

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays