Preview

BUSI 301 Courtroom Observation

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2181 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
BUSI 301 Courtroom Observation
Courtroom Observation, Case # 82A04-8876-CV-285, White vs. Gibbs/O 'Malley 's Tavern
The case that is being tried is case, 82A04-8876-CV-285, Deborah White vs. John Daniels and O 'Malley 's Tavern, and is being argued before a mock U.S. District Court, in the Northern District of Indiana. The plaintiff in this case is Deborah White, and her attorneys are Amanda Babbit and Jackson Walsh. The attorneys for the defendants, Patrick Daniels and O 'Malley 's Tavern, are Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter.
Mr. and Mrs. White entered O 'Malley 's Tavern on Saturday, July 28, 2007, in Gary, Indiana. Edward Hard, who was an ex-fiancé of Mrs. White and a patron that night, approached the couple to convey his congratulations on their recent marriage. After conveying his best to them, Mr. Hard went back to his seat and resumed his consuming his alcoholic beverages. Mr. Daniels was the only licensed bartender working at O 'Malley 's Tavern that night, and served Mr. Hard the alcoholic beverages that he had consumed on the night in question. Mrs. White and Mr. Daniels, the bartender, confirmed that Mr. Hard consumed four to six shots in about twenty-eight minutes, after the Whites arrived. Therefore, Mr. Daniels had constructive knowledge of the possible intoxication level of Mr. Hard, but not an absolute knowledge level. After Mr. Hard consumed his last alcoholic drink, a count which was in the teens, he proceeded to stand up, stepping on a pool cue causing him to fall. Other patrons in the tavern witnessed this occurrence, but Mr. Hard re-established his composure and returned to his stool before Mr. Daniels could witness his stumble. In this case, Mr. Daniels was not able to gain absolute knowledge of Mr. Hard’s intoxication. As the Whites were leaving, Mr. Hard allegedly shouted, "She should be my wife!" The Whites ignored his comment and walk out of the tavern. As they were leaving, Mr. Hard pursued them, attempted to strike Mr. White but fell to the ground. As they



Cited: Chrisman, R (2011). Presentation: Understanding Agency and Employment Relationships [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from Liberty University Blackboard.Gaines-Tabb v. ICI Explosives, USA, INC. - November 9, 1998. (n.d.). Leagle Home. Retrieved from http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?page=3&xmldoc=1998773160F3d613_1669.xml&docbase=CSLWAR2-1986-2006&SizeDisp=7Gumprecht, M. E. (2008, March 12). Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment, Civil Action No. 82A04-8876-CV-285. Retrieved February 2, 2013, from http://www.gumpville.com/school/law/2008-03%20-%20Summary%20Judgment%20Motion%20(Pro%20Plaintiff).pdfHoly Bible: The new King James version, containing the Old and New Testaments. (1982). Nashville, TN: T. Nelson.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Docket Vs ZNK Case Summary

    • 3343 Words
    • 14 Pages

    (Duke) telephoned Black Brown and arranged for the purchase of 5 kilos of crack cocaine. Duke later traveled to the meeting location, at 539 seven mile, Detroit, Michigan, and advised the agents in charge of the case that the vehicle of connect man was at the residence. Moments later, Brown and White drove up to the home in a black Benz. Duke informed Black that he had the five kilos of crack cocaine but Duke would have to go get it from the connect man at the “trap.” (The trap is a drug-dealing location used to avoid association with the drug dealers.) The U.C.A. traveled to the trap, met with Connect man and purchased five kilos of crack cocaine for $100,000 in cash Brown then called the U.C.A. to report that the 1/4 that remained of the transaction would arrive at the location shortly to buy crack cocaine from U.C.A. for $1,575. During a telephone call with Brown, Duke was told that the “mail box” 1/4 of crack would be ready shortly. Duke then told Brown to meet him “up top,” which was a code for Connect man’s “trap” on seven mile in Detroit. Duke and Brown later met at the location on seven mile and transacted the 1/4 crack cocaine that was the other part of the original deal on 5 kilos purchase and sale of cocaine. The crack cocaine retrieved weighed 1/4…

    • 3343 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Affymax, Inc. Case

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page

    The defendants in the case is Johnson & Johnson. Johnson & Johnson is headquartered in New Jersey and operates in multiple foreign countries.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Korb v. Raytheon, 707 F. Supp. 63 (D. Mass) case involves an employee, Lawrence J. Korb and Raytheon Corporation the company. “Korb was terminated from his position as vice president for Washington operation of Raytheon Corporation because he publicly expressed opinions, which was a conflict of interest with the corporation’s economic concern” (http://www.loislaw.com.libdatab.strayer.edu/pns/index.htp). The case involves freedom of speech, information and challenges with the employment law. The case of Korb v. Raytheon allowed the public to view the relationship between Raytheon and the influence regarding the Department…

    • 2070 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jdt2 Task 1

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages

    References: innegan, S. (2013). Constructive Dishcarge Under Tittl VII and the ADEA. The University of Chicago Law Review, 561-562.Grace Liebermann V. Genesis Health Care - Franklin Woods Center, CCB-11-2770 (District Court of Maryland 2013).Johnson V. Lacaster-Lebabib Intermediate Unit 13, 11-cv-01598 (District Court for the Eastren District of Pennsyvania 2012).Pennsylvania State Police V. Suders, 542 US 129 (Supreme Court 2004).Religious Discrimination. (2013, 03 24). Retrieved from U.S. Equal EMployment Opportunity Commision: http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/religion.cfm…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Battery occurs when the defendant’s acts intentionally cause harmful or offensive contact with the victim’s person. [See Restatement §§ 13, 16, 18.] Accidental contact, by contrast, must be analyzed under negligence or strict liability.…

    • 847 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    White V. Gibbs Case Study

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the case of White v. Gibbs, the plaintiff, Mrs. Debbie White, sued O’Malley’s Tavern alongside Patrick Gibbs. Gibbs served as bartender at the tavern during the night in question. Mrs. White seeks settlement under the state of Indiana’s Dram Shop Act. Under the Dram Shop Act, a bartender assumes liability to any persons injured who were served alcohol while exhibiting obvious signs of intoxication (Todd, 1986). Since the two parties reside in different states, the case was brought to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. The defendants, Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, sought summary judgment on their behalf. Mrs. White’s rebuttal was that the summary judgment should…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Virtual Organizations Portal., Apollo Group, Inc., & Baderman Island. (2012). eCampus: Login. Retrieved from https://ecampus.phoenix.edu/secure/aapd/CIST/VOP/Business/BadermanIsland/internet/index.asp…

    • 1128 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Commonwealth vs. Hunt

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Taylor, Benjamin, and Witney, Fred. U.S. Labor Relations Law. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1992.…

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    5th Edition, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Retrieved April 1, 2007, from University of Phoenix, Resource, MGT434-Employment Law…

    • 2010 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Oberservation

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This court case took place in United States District Court in the Northern District of Indiana. This is court case number 82A04-8876-CB285, White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The lawyers in this case are Benjamin Walton, xxxxx Van Meter who represent the defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern and Jackson Welch, Amanda Babot who represent the plaintiff Debbie White. The defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern are seeking a summary judgment which is a procedural device used during civil litigation to promptly and expeditiously resolve a case without a trail. A judge grants summary judgment only if there are no disputes as to the material facts of the case and the party is entitle to judgment as a matter of law. (1) The defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern claim there is no evidence to support that the bartender John Daniels saw any visual signs of intoxication from Edward Hart. This means the defendant isn’t subject to any legal wrong doing. The plaintiff Debbie White is requesting the court to deny the defendants request for summary judgment. The plaintiff claims there is evidence to show the bartender John Daniels saw visual signs that Edward Hart was intoxicated. The plaintiff claims that with the amount of alcohol Edward Hart had consumed in the time he was in the Tavern there would be noticeable visual signs that he was impaired. The plaintiff’s attorney claims there are four (4) factors of actual knowledge of intoxication which would point to visual signs of intoxication. Upon leaving O’Malley’s Tavern Edward Hart crashed his vehicle into the Plaintiffs vehicle causing harm to the Plaintiff and the death of her husband.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bennett-Alexander, D. D., & Hartman, P. L. (2007). Employment law for business (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of White vs. O’Malley’s Tavern (case number 82A04-8876-CB285)Mrs. White is asking that the bar be held liable for her husband’s death. Mrs. White and her husband were involved in a car crash with someone who had been drinking at O’Malley’s Tavern. Sadly, the crash killed Mrs. White’s husband. What is interesting about this case is that Mrs. White knows the person that had the collision with them that caused her husband’s death. Mr. Hart, the other person involved with the crash, was an ex boyfriend of Mrs. White. The situation began at O’Malley’s Tavern where both Mr. Hart and Mr. and Mrs. White were at. Mr. Hart was not there with Mr. and Mrs. White and seemed to be disturbed by their presence. In the courtroom observation it was discussed that Mr. Hart was still a bit bitter over the breakup and that this may have fueled his drinking even more. The lawyers for Mrs. White are claiming that the bar should be held responsible for allowing Mr. Hart to get as intoxicated as he was and have the crash in the first place. However, the bartender is claiming that he never seen any signs that Mr. Hart was too drunk. Mrs. White claimed there was an incident where Mr. Hart was too drunk to walk so he tripped over a pool cue and fell. However, Mrs. White also says that the bartender did not witness this event. She says that by the time the…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A telling sign of his alcohol problems were that he failed to graduate law school because he was too drunk to pick up his diploma. He became a stock speculator and travelled extensively with his wife. They lost 2 babies for unexplained reasons. She almost died with the second loss. There was a lot of stress associated with his job and this caused more drinking, as did the standard business social drinking. In 1929 he was involved in the stocks for General Electric. His drinking by this time is heavy. And was noticed by his father in-law who suggested he go se a specialist. He is seen by Dr. William D. Silkworth. He denies that he has a “Drinking Problem” even though he has an enlarged liver at this point. He ends up losing his job when he is caught drinking with another woman. He at this time is also now starting to be picked up by the police for drunkenness.…

    • 752 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “We may speak privately in my office.” He took my hand roughly, I shook it away. “I am perfectly capable of walking myself up a staircase ” I spat. He glared in return, turned on his heel and seemed to jog up the staircase. I followed him into his office. “Please have a seat.” I stood. He didn’t seem to care. “I would like my divorce papers.” I repeated. “I can’t give them to you Joanne. It goes against everything our society deems reasonable.” I raised my head. “Screw our society!” I exclaimed “Why should I have to suffer at the hands of a drunk and not get to have any say in it?”…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Obersvation

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages

    On Saturday, July 28, 2007, Mr. Bruno and Mrs. Deborah White arrived at O’Malley’s Tavern, in Gary, Indiana, around 7:00 p.m. Edward Hard, a frequent patron of the bar and Mrs. Whites former fiancé, was also present that night. “Almost immediately after they walked in, Mr. Hard approached the Whites, kindly offered his congratulations regarding their marriage and returned to his stool at the bar to resume drinking” (Gumprecht, 2). As…

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays