Preview

Building a Bridge Between Popper’s Philosophies

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
734 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Building a Bridge Between Popper’s Philosophies
Micky Chen
Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University

Building a bridge between Popper’s philosophies
Karl Popper is regarded one of the greatest philosophers of his century. He had a major influence on the establishment of the philosophy of science and politics. Yet little research has been done on the interconnection of his theories’ elements. His philosophies are generally regarded unconnected. Therefore, we look for a link between his political and scientific theory. To what extent is his scientific and political philosophy interrelated? Popper’s philosophy of science and political theory are discussed before searching for a bridge between the various elements of his philosophy.

Popper holds that in the philosophy of science, demarcation is the central problem. Unlike the traditional view, he argues that there is no unique methodology specific to science. Instead, he uses falsifiability as criterion (critical rationalism): if a theory can be tested and falsified it is scientific; conversely, a theory which is compatible with all observations, is unscientific. Observation can never lead to confirmation of a claim because of the induction problem (Van Willigenburg 2008, p. 60). It is impossible to reach a sufficient level of confirmation of empirical claims. There are no absolute truths. All knowledge is hypothetical, provisional, and conjectural.

Popper, the herald of anti-totalitarianism, distanced himself from dogma and propaganda. He considered the general view on historicism to be the principal theoretical presupposition underpinning most forms of authoritarianism and totalitarianism (Thornton 2009). Thus, he pleaded for the ‘Open Society’, in which critical discussion and argument are of vital importance. It is defined as ‘an association of free individuals respecting each other's rights within the framework of mutual protection, and achieving a growing measure of humane and enlightened life’ (Levinson 1953, p. 17).
Popper proposed three



Bibliography: * Levinson, R 1953, In Defense of Plato, Harvard University Press, Cambridge * Niebuhr, R 1960, The Children of Light and the Children of Darkness, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago * Njvls 2008, ‘De filosoof Karl Popper’, Mens en Samenleving, viewed 14 october 2011, <http://mens-en-samenleving.infonu.nl/filosofie/20750-de-filosoof-karl-popper.html> * Stokes, G 1997, ‘Karl Popper’s Political Philosophy of Social Science’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 27 Issue 1, pp. 56-79, viewed 13 October 2011, <http://pos.sagepub.com/content/27/1/56.abstract/> * Thornton, S 2009, ‘Karl Popper’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, viewed 13 October 2011, <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/popper/> * Van Willigenburg, T 2008, Introduction to the Philosophy of the Management Sciences, Kant Academy, Utrecht

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    John Sheldrake and Frederick Herzberg (2003). Management Theory. 2nd ed. United Kingdom, Cornwall: Thompson Learning. 156-159.…

    • 2929 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    SCIE1000 Philosophy Essay

    • 1148 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Alan Chalmers, a British-Australian philosopher of science and best-selling author, suggests a common view of science by which scientific knowledge is ‘reliable’ and ‘objectively proven’ knowledge that is derived from facts of experience, experimental procedure and observations. This essay aims to discuss the problems that are likely to be highlighted by a Popperian hypothetico-deductivist when confronted with Chalmers’ adverse views on the validity of the scientific method. Both Alan Chalmers and Karl Popper - renowned for the development of hypothetico-deductivist/falsificationist account of science - represent the two major, contradictory theories (falsification and induction) regarding the functionality of science. I will be structuring my argument around these two models and the several complications surrounding the inductivist’s account of science that are seemingly solved by Popper’s alternative.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science and Religion

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As one sociologist Popper argues that science is a open belief system where every scientist’s theory can be falsified, as science can be open to criticism and tested by others. For example if scientist argues water boils at 100 degrees Celsius this can be tested (falsified). However with religion this is impossible as you are unable to test religious ideas on what happens after death. This leads to religion not being falsified and science ruled by the theory of falsification. Thus leading to Popper to believe science has been successful in explaining and controlling the world becoming the main ideological influence in society today.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Popper science is an open belief system where every scientist’s theories are open to scrutiny, criticised and tested by others. He says that science is governed by the principle of falsificationism. This is whereby scientists set out to try and falsify existing theories, deliberately seeking evidence that would disprove them. Such as the fact that the big bang is a theory that everyone accepts but there is much more that scientists do not know and more needed to be found therefore it could be false. It argues that there always can be more and more evidence for every theory that has ever been made and proven. Then when disproving these knowledge claims allows scientific world to grow. It is cumulative, whereby it builds on achievements of previous scientists. This explanation shows that science can be a belief system as nothing can ever be proven 100% as there will always be something or someone that will disprove a theory with other evidence and therefore people belief what they have been told. This is much like religion in a way by the fact that religion cannot be proven it is something that people belief in.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Popper argued that induction cannot be used in science. He says that induction can never be proven by experimentation. Science instead uses deduction by formulating theories and hypotheses. Science uses the method of conjecture and refutation. Hypotheses can never be proven or verified, but their success can be compared to other hypotheses. The usefulness of a hypothesis can be determined through deduction or predictions. Scientists test theories by making completely falsifiable claims. If there is nothing you can to do disprove the claim then the hypothesis is corroborated. A corroborated theory should not be considered true, merely accepted until better theories are discovered. Popper said that a theory can never be confirmed by observation. Where Hume argues that our theory originates from repetition, Popper argues that theory begins before repetition. Therefore, Popper argued that science does not even use induction.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1984: Oppression of Truth

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Howe, Irving, and George Orwell. 1984 Revisited Totalitarianism in Our Century. New York: Harper & Row, 1983.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wolff, J. (2006) An introduction to political philosophy. 1st edn. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Locate four articles or books on your philosophy written by different management theorists and published in the past 5 years in academic literature. At least two must be from peer-reviewed journals. The articles or books may be theory articles, research articles, or a combination.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Platos Kallipolis

    • 3467 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Plato’s Republic is to a very large extent totalitarian, or rather on the “surface” appears to be totalitarian in the way he formulates it and lays down it blue prints.…

    • 3467 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Schlipp, Paul Arthur. The Philosophy of Karl Popper. Illinois; The Library of Living Philosophers. 1974.…

    • 2407 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    World War 2 Propaganda

    • 1628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    ● Adam, Peter (1992). Art of the Third Reich. Harry N Abrams Inc. p. 177.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chaos City Essay Outline

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    iii. Hans Morgenthau: said” Political realism believes that politics, like society in general, is governed by objective laws that have their roots in human nature. In order to improve society it is first necessary to understand the laws by which society lives. The operation of these laws being impervious to our preferences, men will challenge them only at the risk of failure/”…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “In learning a paradigm, the scientist acquires theory, methods, and standards together, usually in an inextricable mixture. Therefore, when paradigms change, there are usually significant shifts in the criteria determining the legitimacy both of the problems and of proposed solutions.” – Thomas Kuhn. This quote is from Thomas Kuhn’s work The Structure of Scientific Revolution, in which Kuhn describes his view on science as not something that needs to rely on refutability for confirmation of a theory. Unlike Karl Popper’s philosophy of science, Kuhn concentrates on the social aspects of science and the reasons for revolutionary changes in science in which he accredits to paradigm shifts. He argues that “normal science” isn’t just about a mere collection of facts and data to prove points, but it also is a history and a tradition that creates a certain scientific community by passing on the knowledge to students. Overtime as a paradigm increases in its use, and/or collection of data, anomalies can accumulate leading people to question the current paradigm and concentrate on the anomalies; thus creating a new paradigm that stems from the current leading to scientific revolution.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    H. Marcuse

    • 2835 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Herbert Marcuse was known as one of the best known philosophers and writers of the 1960s. He was born in Berlin but would leave in 1933 for the United States; he died in 1979 during a visit to Germany. In 1964, Marcuse would publish his most influential and to many his most important book, One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. In this book, Marcuse explains the concept of one dimensional society and how it is a form of social oppression that uses production and consumerism as tools to abolish critical thought and opposing behavior. He argues that our society is distorted due to the misuse of our resources in an effort to obtain false needs while commonly ignoring our true basic needs as human beings. This would gradually make the difference between true and false needs less and less apparent to society.…

    • 2835 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Gomez-Mejia, L., & Balkin, D. (2002). Management and Its Evolution (8th ed.). New York: McGraw∠'Hill.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays