Preview

British Rail Privatisation

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
30615 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
British Rail Privatisation
OCCASIONAL PAPER 23

BRITISH RAIL PRIVATISATION ~ COMPETITION DESTROYED BY POLITICS

Stephen Glaister

Fundación Rafael del Pino Conference: Competencia en el Transporte Ferroviario

The University of Bath School of Management is one of the oldest established management schools in Britain. It enjoys an international reputation for the quality of its teaching and research. Its mission is to offer a balanced portfolio of undergraduate, postgraduate and post-experience programmes, research and external activities, which provide a quality of intellectual life for those involved in keeping with the best traditions of British universities.

BRITISH RAIL PRIVATISATION COMPETITION DESTROYED BY POLITICS

CRI Occasional Paper 23

Stephen Glaister
This paper was prepared for a conference entitled ‘Competencia en el Transporte Ferroviari’ held on September 16th and 17th 2004 in Madrid The paper and conference were sponsored by Fundación Rafael del Pino Rafael Calvo, 39 28010 Madrid
© Fundación Rafael del Pino 2004

Desktop published by Jan Marchant

ISBN

All rights reserved

Centre for the study of Regulated Industries (CRI)
The CRI is a research centre of the University of Bath School of Management. The CRI was founded in 1991 as part of the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA). It transferred to the University of Bath School of Management in 1998. It is situated on the 8th floor of Wessex House (North), adjacent to West car park.

The CRI is an interdisciplinary research centre investigating how regulation and competition are working in practice, both in the UK and abroad. It is independent and politically neutral. It aims to produce authoritative, practical contributions to regulatory policy and debate, which are put into the public domain. The CRI focuses on comparative analyses across the regulated industries. CRI activities and outputs include: • • • • • Regulatory statistics, information and analysis Discussion



References: (the bold numbers refer to the footnote in which first cited) Bartle I (2004), Britain’s Railway Crisis – A Review of the Arguments in Comparative Perspective, Occasional Paper 20, Centre for the study of Regulated Industries, University of Bath. (8) Clarke J (2004), Making Markets Work in Rail Freight, The Transport Economist, Spring. (23) Department of Transport (1984), Buses. (11) Department of Transport (1993), Gaining Access to the Railway Network, February. (13) Department for Transport (2004), The Future of Rail, Cm 6233, July. (2) DETR (1998) A New Deal for Transport: Better for Everyone, Government’s White Paper on the Future of Transport, Cm 3950, July. (19) DETR (2000), Transport 2010: The 10 Year Plan, July. (30) Domberger S (1998), The Contracting Organisation, A Strategic Guide to Outsourcing, Oxford. (3) Evans A (2004), Rail Safety and Rail Privatisation in Britain, Inaugural Lecture of Imperial College London. (25) Foster C D (1992), Privatisation, Public Ownership and the Regulation of Natural Monopoly, Blackwell. (5) Foster C D (1994), The Economics of Rail Privatisation, CRI Discussion Paper 7, April and reprinted in The Development of Rail Regulation, CRI Collections Series 2, November 2003, University of Bath. (8) Foster C D and Castles C (2004), Creating a Viable Railway for Britain - What Has Gone Wrong and How to Fix It, typescript. (1) Foster C D (2005 forthcoming), British Government in Crisis, Hart Publishers, Oxford. (6) Glaister S and Travers T (1995), Liberate the Tube!, Centre for Policy Studies. (12) Glaister S, Kennedy D and Travers T (1995), London Bus Tendering, Greater London Group, March 1995. (29) Glaister S, Burnham J, Stevens H and Travers T (1998), Transport Policy in Britain, Macmillan. (4) Glaister S, Scanlon R and Travers T (2000), Getting Partnerships Going, Institute for Public Policy Research. (35) 56 STEPHEN GLAISTER Gomez-Ibanez J A (2002), Glas Cymru and the Debate over Non-Profits, Teaching Case, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard. (25) Helm D (2000), A Critique of Rail Regulation, The Beesley Lectures in Regulation, IEA and London Business School, October. (8) Jones I (2001), On-rail Competition in the Privatised Passenger Rail Industry, in Regulating Utilities: New Issues, New Solutions, Robinson C (ed), Edward Elgar. (17) Kennedy J and Smith A S J (2004), Assessing the Efficient Cost of Sustaining Britain’s Rail Network, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, May. (28) Lawrence G (2001), The Rail Industry in Great Britain, Institutional and Legal Structure 2000/2001, Industry Brief, Centre for the study of Regulated Industries, University of Bath. (8) National Audit Office (2000), Ensuring that Railtrack Maintain and Renew the Network, HC 397 Session 1999-2000, April. (8) National Audit Office (2004a), Network Rail: Making a Fresh Start, HC 532. (8) National Audit Office (2004b), London Underground PPP: Were They Good Deals?, HC 654. (33) National Audit Office (2004c), London Underground: Are the Public Private Partnerships Likely to Work Successfully?, HC 644. (37) Nombela G, de Rus G and Betancor O (2004), Airport Congestion in EU: More Investment or Better Pricing?, Utilities Policy. (18) Office of the Rail Regulator (1994), Competition for Railway Passenger Services, A Policy Statement, December. (14) Office of the Rail Regulator (2000), The Periodic Review of Railtrack’s Access Charges: Final Conclusions, Vols I & II, October. (8) SBC Warburg (1996), Railtrack Share Offer, Prospectus, 1 May. (7) Shaoul J (2004), Railpolitik: The Financial Realities of Operating Britain’s National Railways, Public Money and Management, January. (20) Strategic Rail Authority (2001), Building a Better Railway, March. (31) Strategic Rail Authority (2003), Everyone’s Railway: The Wider Case for Rail, September. (32) Strategic Rail Authority (2004,) Britain’s Railway Properly Delivered, Annual Report 20032004. (9) Transport for London (2001), Proposed Management Plan for the London Underground, April. (34) 57 COMPETITION DESTROYED BY POLITICS Transport for London (2004), London Underground and the PPP: The First Year 2003/04, June. (37) Transport Select Committee (2004), The Future of the Railway, HC145, March. (21) Walder J and Amenta T L (2004), Financing New Infrastructures: Public/Private Partnerships and Private Finance Initiatives, in Hanley R E (ed) Moving People, Goods and Information: The Cutting-Edge Infrastructures of Networked Cities, Spon Press. (36) Winsor T (2004a), The Relationship Between the Government and the Private Sector: Winsor-v- Bloom in context, Incorporated Council of Law reporting, 5 April. Also available at http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/upload/pdf/ICLR-annual-lec-050404.pdf (10) Winsor T (2004b), 2004 DfT Rail Review - Submission by the Rail Regulator, Office of the Rail Regulator, 6 May. (26) Wolmar C (2001), Broken Rails, London, Aurum Press. (16) Other references Department of Transport (1992), New Opportunities for the Railways, The Privatisation of British Rail, Cm 2012. DETR (1997), Developing an Integrated Transport Policy, June. Glaister S (1999), Integrated Transport: A Future for Rail?”, in Beesley (ed.), Regulating Utilities: A New Era?, IEA, Readings 49. Gomez-Ibanez J A (2003), Regulating Infrastructure, Harvard. Grayling T (2002), Getting Back on Track, Institute for Public Policy Research, January. HM Treasury (1998), Comprehensive Spending Review: New Public Spending Plans 1999 2002, Modern Public Services for Britain Investing in Reform, July. National Audit Office (2002), Pipes and Wires, April. Public Accounts Committee (2000), The Office of the Rail Regulator, HC 536, Session 19992000, July. Strategic Rail Authority (2002), The Strategic Plan, January. 58

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Q: How is the freight and passenger pool working?
W.V.: Very satisfactorily. I don’t like that expression “pool,” how- ever, that’s a common construction applied by the people to a combi- nation which the leading roads have entered into to keep rates at a point where they will pay dividends to the stockholders. The railroads are not run for the benefit of the “dear public”—that cry is all nonsense—they are built by men who invest their money and expect to get a fair percentage on the same.
Q: Does your limited express pay?
W.V.: No; not a bit of it. We only run it because we are forced to do so by the action of the Pennsylvania road. It doesn’t pay expenses. We would abandon it if it was not for our competitor keeping its train on.
Q: But don’t you run it for the public benefit?
W.V. The public be damned. What does the public care for the railroads except to get as much out of them for as small consideration as possible? I don’t take any stock in this silly nonsense about working for anybody’s good but our own. . . .…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    At the turn of the century, transport & technology were very limited. There were around five categories of transport available: “Trams, bicycles, animal power, rail transport and sea transport”.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Basic Economic Problem is that needs and wants are unlimited but resources are limited. Cost Benefit analysis (CBA) is a technique for assessing the monetary and social costs and benefits of a capital investment project over a given time period. It is by this method that we decide to which project proposal our limited resources go. CBA has traditionally been applied to big public sector projects, therefore in theory it would be a good method of working out whether to consider subsidizing a series of high-speed rail lines in order to reduce short-haul air flights, however this does not necessarily mean that it is a useful method for this proposal.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This report is based on the findings from the National Passengers Survey (Spring 2012) which took place between 28th January and 30th March 2012. The aim of the survey was to provide a network wide snapshot of the passengers’ satisfaction with train travel. Passengers of South West Trains were also a part of this survey and this analysis is based on the responses of those passengers only. The total sample size used was 2334 and all the questionnaires were checked to confirm that the details provided were for a real journey.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Industry Comes of Age

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * Statutory enactments interfered with the railway business by saying it’s a public enemy that makes money out of common people…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    High Speed 2 Feasibility

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The institute of Railway Operators’ definition of capacity, adopted in the Department for Transport Rail Technical Strategy is; ‘The number of trains that can be incorporated into a timetable that is conflict free, commercially attractive, compliant with regulatory requirements, and can be operated in the face of anticipated levels of primary delay whilst meeting agreed performance targets’. This definition emphasises the dynamic nature of capacity and identifies the fundamental factors that affect it.…

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Australia, the United Kingdom, and Canada are three countries that have transferred ATC control to private organizations; and passengers/tax payers suffer in the aftermath. (Pitfalls pdf citation) “In the United Kingdom, the newly privatized National Air Traffic System (NATS) has been forced to go to the government for financial bailouts valued to date at two thirds of the original sale price, while technological failures have led to multiple system shutdowns and operational irregularities.” (Pitfalls pdf citation) Fees generated by the air industry for normal operations generally accelerate under a privatized model. “In Canada, the privatized system has led to massive increases in user fees for passengers.” (Pitfalls pdf citation) Australia’s privatized ATC system pales in comparison to the other two countries featured. “In Australia, excessive demands on controllers have led to a series of strikes, while failures with new technologies led to actual radar blackouts and major traffic disruptions.” (Pitfalls pdf citation) As the symptoms experienced by Australia appear to be made up of technological and human factors, they show a valid argument against privatization of a system as intricate and pivotal as the…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    escalation of commitment

    • 2084 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Greening J., (2012). High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain’s Future – Decisions and Next Steps. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/3648/hs2-decisions-and-next-steps.pdf. Last accessed 15th Oct 2013.…

    • 2084 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rail industry is profitable and growing industry. In North America, five companies are dominant and each one has its own advantage.…

    • 3428 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many differences between the trains and the railway systems in Europe and North America. Both are very unique, and are shaped by the environment, the history, the people and the geography of the region or country that they are in. Some railways are even completely different from most of the others in their country, depending on their history. Some are more advanced, and others still have a nostalgic air to them. All in all, every railway is unique.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Robber Barrons

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages

    W.V.: The public be damned. What does the public care for the railroads except to get as much out of them for as small consideration as possible? I don’t take any stock in this silly nonsense about working for anybody’s good by our own….…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Conrail Case

    • 2389 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In an industry beset by limited options to consolidate domestic rail traffic, CSX looked at Conrail as an avenue to increase market share and gain access to the North East rail network. With air travel, road travel and trucking taking an increasing share, significant revenue growth became difficult. As Conrail became profitable, Congress explored ways of privatizing it, giving CSX an opportunity to acquire Conrail. Though Conrail suffered from performance inefficiencies it had certain strengths relative to CSX and Norfolk with respect to highest revenue per mile of track operated, per carload originated etc. Conrail with operating revenue of $3,686 million and 29.4% of Eastern rail freight traffic was attractive enough for CSX to consider the merger. The joint entity would have $8.5b in rail revenue and would control the Eastern market with a market share of 70%. CSX estimated the acquisition to also create synergies resulting in consolidation of overlapping operations and not only increase the joint entity’s revenue through service improvements, but also the operating incomes through economies of scale. Cost synergies was expected to help in increasing the annual operating income by $370m and revenue increases was expected to help increase annual operating income by $180m. (Based on valuation of synergies, taking PV of terminal value, we estimate the gains in Operating Income to be equal to $3,047.13.) CSX expected the acquisition to improve the joint entity’s competitive position vis-à-vis Norfolk Southern as the joint entity’s rail networks would facilitate long-haul, contiguous and therefore low cost service. As Norfolk Southern lacked access to Northeast market it would be less able to provide long-haul routes from South or Mideast. The purchase of Conrail would thus provide CSX with control of the Eastern rail network. From a financial perspective, the projected revenue…

    • 2389 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Executive Summary 1. Introduction and Framework 2. Industry Case Studies A. Railroads 1. History 2. Application of the Framework B. Natural Gas 1. History 2. Application of the Framework C. Banking 1. History 2. Application of the Framework D. Airlines 1. History 2. Application of the Framework E. Mobile Telephony 1. History 2. Application of the Framework 3. Conclusions and Application to the U.S. Telecommunications Industry…

    • 12491 Words
    • 50 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Heathrow: Our Solution

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    LAST year, when Britain’s government was being lobbied to revive controversial plans to expand Heathrow airport, ministers dodged the issue using the time-honoured technique of setting up a committee of grandees. Further heat was taken out of the debate when the Department for Transport downgraded its forecasts for passenger growth. Having predicted just before the financial crisis that 495m passengers a year would want to use Britain’s airports by 2030, it now puts the potential demand by then at just 320m. But that is still 100m more than passed through British airports last year. Even by the latest forecasts, London’s five airports will have to turn away about 13m passengers a year by 2030, rising to 46m in 2040 and 92m in 2050. Some scope exists for them to switch to regional airports but the potential for lost growth, as business trips are skipped and foreign tourists give London a miss, is great.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Funding of Regulators should be provided out of consolidated revenue and not by industry as with the Office of Transport Security, state rail authorities and the ACCC etc…

    • 2384 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays