Preview

Brief Summary: The Ethics Of War

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1405 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Brief Summary: The Ethics Of War
Just War

PHI 208

Dr. David Tredinnick

May 5, 2014

Just War

War is an organized and often prolonged conflict that is carried out by states or non-state actors. It is characterized by extreme violence, social disruption and economic destruction. War should be understood as an actual, intentional and widespread-armed conflict between political communities, and, therefore, is defined as a form of political violence or intervention. The set of techniques used by a group to carry out war is known as warfare. Ethics of war can be a sensitive and debated subject. I believe that there are times when a war is justified. Three topics I would like to discuss are: what kind of virtues do people in the military
…show more content…
The acts of war

Involve killing and this could lead to an internal conflict with the Soldiers moral values. Not too

many people can kill someone else without feeling some guilt whether it happens immediately or

later in time when they have time to pause and think about what happened. There may be times when a leader could give an order that is morally unethical. It is the Soldiers discretion as to whether or not to follow those orders. The military has its own set of laws that must be followed and there are also rules of war that must be followed. The Soldier can decide to disobey the immoral orders at risk of being punished if the orders end up being permissible. Ethical training and counseling will help ensure that the Soldiers internal conflict is addressed. “Moral relativism is often characterized in terms of cultures, and cultural anthropologists have identified many practices that contrast, and even conflict” (Mosser, 2013). The United States Military is made
…show more content…
It is characterized by extreme violence, social disruption and economic destruction. War should be understood as an actual, intentional and widespread-armed conflict between political communities, and, therefore, is defined as a form of political violence or intervention. Rules need to be in place because of the unpredictable violent nature of a war. This is where ethics comes into play. The purpose of war ethics is to decide what is right or wrong both for individuals or Nations. Ethics will also lead to debates on public policy, government, and individual action. Some questions that arise are: Do people in the military need to possess certain virtues? Yes, there will be times when a Soldiers moral ethics will be challenged. Aristotle stated, “A temperate person is moderate and has self-control”. These are important and needed qualities in a Soldier. Are there times during the war when Soldiers virtues will be conflicted? Yes, “Moral relativism is often characterized in terms of cultures, and cultural anthropologists have identified many practices that contrast, and even conflict” (Mosser, 2013). The United States military is comprised of many Soldiers with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds. Because of this, there will be many challenges that will be met on the quest for one common goal. When is a war justified or unjustified? That question will most

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    “Morality is contraband in war”, as quoted by Mohandas Gandhi, showcases how our morality as humans is constantly challenged by war. The act of warfare and killing humans has been a part of mankind’s existence since the invention of the gun itself. As time moved forward, and new discovers were made, the variety and caliber of these weapons began to develop. With each passing decade and through World Wars, firearms were becoming more and more lethal. Scientists were being hired to invent and produce weaponry that would kill a man in his tracks, while being more light weight and more mechanically sound. In order to do this though, they had to run many tests, some…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    EXPOSITION The justification of war — both in terms of jus in bello and jus ad bellum — is a difficult and complex task. This difficulty is increased immensely when trying to apply just war principles to terrorism, a complicated mix of typical and unconventional tactics that can be performed by both established and state governments. In the essay, I will critically address the discussion of terrorism by Michael Walzer in chapter 12 of “Just and Unjust Wars” (1977) and advocate for the justification of revolutionary terrorism. Walzer’s judgment of terrorism oversimplifies and neglects important complexities that must be considered in the ethical analysis of terrorism.…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    c. The core of the culture is the Army’s ethics. The moral complexity of the Army’s lethality on the battlefield necessitates a strong professional ethos at the institutional level and well-developed character and ethos at the Soldier level. Moral values, such as the seven Army values, and ethical principals must be expressed through action to give them purpose. Leaders at all levels can set the conditions for an ethical culture where ethical and virtuous behavior is rewarded and unethical behavior is punished.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of military ethics, a person should have the choice to kill in order to defend their country. People should look to see this is justifiable, “Consider the situation…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “This publication was the fourth of a series on the Army's Professional Military Ethics (PME) that the Army Chief of Staff, General George Casey, started in 2009. General Casey encouraged the Army to think critically about our PME and promote dialog at all levels as we deepen our understanding of what this time-honored source of strength means to the profession today. In his book, Pfaff (2011) explores the cultural values, challenges the Army faces, in a time of persistent irregular conflicts. Pfaff argues that the challenges come from the nature of the conflict. The guerrilla soldiers change the nature of war from forcing your will on your enemy to convincing the enemy to accept your position.” (Pfaff,…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were used to simple rules followed by society, knowing that killing is bad, your not allowed to drink alcohol under 21, and simply how to stop at a stoplight. Your morality is twisted and turned by the effects of war as killing once may have been bad in society but when you're faced against the dilemma that it's either “kill or be killed” the soldiers thoughts and emotions change drastically in that moment and forever. In society it's a rare moment to even come close to dying on a daily basis, whereas these soldiers are faced with almost dying every day instantaneously, they change because the set of rules they may have been used to following have changed. Killing may have been bad but now they are forced to survive without even taking a second thought to as if what they are doing is bad. If they had the moment to think about it in their thoughts they would be thinking about how the people they are killing may have families, be somebody's son/daughter, somebody's brother, somebody's lover,etc. If they were not forced to do this their morality and emotions wouldn't let most of them be able to do…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram argued that the following factors could help explain the situation at My Lai. Military training sets apart soldiers from all others to prevent opposition with authorities outside the military. The purpose of basic training is to break down the concepts of individuals and expand on the group or unit. During this time the soldiers spend a lot of time being disciplined. Following orders is the basis for the soldiers' actions. Cultural differences set the two sides, further apart and race was used to depersonalize the actions of war. The soldiers involved with this massacre felt that they were just following orders…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    War is a very controversial topic for many people. Depending on the person’s outlook on the war, it can be depicted as something good or bad. War brings destruction wherever it goes, whether it is on a place or the people, and it ultimately is inevitable. War also protects a country from having further destruction and keeps the people at home safe from any danger. As a person can see in many recordings of war, there are many comparisons and contrasts that are expressed through soldiers, veterans, and civilians. Some comparisons seen in many of the testimonies given by effected people are dehumanization, dislocation, and alienation; but they also have contrasts that can be seen through nationalism, technological advancements, and the coming home for many…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The word “immoral” is defined by The Cambridge Dictionary as, “Outside [of] society’s standard of acceptable, honest, and moral behavior.” Universal examples of immoral behavior include killing, stealing, lying, cheating, and many more. During the darkest, bloodiest war in the 20th century- World War ll, countless soldiers, prisoners, and common people; fathers, mothers, and children, violated many of these ethics of society. They abandoned and betrayed their family and they stole from stores in times of disaster. These people are not justified in their actions because immorality dehumanizes people and it contributes to the problem.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1a) Our justice system has always stated " innocent until proven guilty." The war in Iraq has brought out several ethical dilemmas since significant changes in the military action and homeland security. Holding terrorists suspects without legal representation, charges or court hearings is almost absurd. However, using the paradigm model, it really explains itself. The paradigm of short term versus long term is best suited for this type of dilemma. The government is taking immediate present action, due to the need of human safety since 9/11 and hoping this will help build the future. However, they government at the same time could be risking the future by holding the suspects without normal U.S. laws and court procedures. Is the government…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Individual actions are to support the goal of protecting the United States as a whole. A soldier who qualifies as an expert with the M-4 rifle is an example of virtue theory. The excellence of this soldier will increase the effectiveness of the team or company similar to utilitarianism. Obeying a direct order is part of the foundation of the Army. Shooting to kill in combat can go against an individual’s morals and ethics but deontology states duty is the primary factor regardless of individual belief.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compared to the early 20th century, the wars of today are vastly different. The reasons for fighting, the styles of fighting, and who is fighting are all very different. However, in an age that is far removed from the past, a few things regarding war have remained the unchanged. One of the ideas that has remained unchanged in a time that is every changing, are the rules of war, as described by Michael Walzer in his book, Just and Unjust Wars. Naturally, in a time where so much has changed, there are starting to be a few objections to Walzer’s claims on the rules of war. Even though the wars of today are far different from those of the past, the moral equality of soldiers remains the same regardless if they are associated with being on an unjust…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Things They Carried

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An Individual that may have had high morals entering a war would sometimes come out of it, with little or no morals at all. The experiences…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Soldiers Thoughts

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    War, is it right or wrong? This question is defiantly up for discussion. If you are a civilian, war can be something you are for, against or maybe just don’t care about. Once you have joined the military, war is your life. In a way, war is your career. You are a hired assassin, hired to protect your family, friends and this county. All while putting your personal feelings aside.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People often say that we seek peace but fight a bloody battle. Why must we fight fire with fire? The earliest account of a war is dated back to more than 2,000 years ago, as much as we want all fighting to cease and live in harmony, that goal is close to impossible. What the military does is, it uses its skill set to try and diminish the use of the same skill which is often abused and used for terror.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays