Preview

Brief of Begay V. United States 553 U.S. 137, 128 S.Ct. 1581

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
893 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Brief of Begay V. United States 553 U.S. 137, 128 S.Ct. 1581
LEGAL THEORY Chapter 4 CASE BRIEF

Name: Professor:

553 U.S. 137, 128 S.Ct. 1581

Facts: In September 2004, New Mexico police officers received a report that Larry Begay, the petitioner here, had threatened his sister and aunt with a rifle. The police arrested him. Begay subsequently conceded he was a felon and pleaded guilty to a federal charge of unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of § 922(g)(1). Begay's presentence report said that he had been convicted a dozen times for DUI, which under New Mexico's law, becomes a felony (punishable by a prison term of more than one year) the fourth (or subsequent) time an individual commits it. (Supp.2007). The sentencing judge consequently found that Begay had at least three prior convictions for a crime “punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year.” 377 F.Supp.2d 1141, 1143 (NM 2005). The judge also concluded that Begay's “three felony DUI convictions involve conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another.” Id., at 1145. The judge consequently concluded that Begay had three or more prior convictions for a “violent felony” and should receive a sentence that reflected a mandatory minimum prison term of 15 years. Ibid.

Procedural History: After petitioner Begay pleaded guilty to felony possession of a firearm, his presentence report revealed he had 12 New Mexico convictions for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), which state law makes a felony (punishable by a prison term of more than one year) the fourth (or subsequent) time an individual commits it. Based on these convictions, the sentencing judge concluded that Begay had three or more “violent felony” convictions and, therefore, sentenced him to an enhanced 15–year sentence. The Tenth Circuit rejected Begay's claim that DUI is not a “violent felony” under the Act. appealed. The Court of Appeals panel by a vote of 2 to 1 rejected that claim. 470 F.3d 964 (C.A.10 2006). Begay sought

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    While waiting for a bus in 2014, 2 undercover/plainclothes police officers approached Humberto and accused him of selling drugs. After some discussion they decided he was not selling drugs but instead littering. The officers then gave Humberto the choice of receiving a ticket or being brought down to the police station, he chose the ticket. In protest, Humberto didn’t pay his fine nor did he appear in court. This resulted in a failure to appear charge which caused a littering ticket to become a $2,600.00 fine. After receiving correspondence informing him of his penalty, Humberto still did not go to court because he felt it would be useless since he did not have the $2,600.00.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Violation 3: On 02/21/2009 Mr. Machjokowski was drug tested in accordance with his Parole Order. The test found that Mr. Machjokowski tested positive for marijuana. See attached lab test…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Cain met employee Oliver Dean Emigh (“Emigh”) and owner John Roberts at the Bargain Barn in March of 1998. John Cain (“Cain”) was a self-employed computer consultant. John Roberts (“Roberts”) explained to Cain that he needed documents typed for Republic of Texas (“ROT”) legal matters due to being a member of the ROT. Cain met with Johnie Wise and Roberts the next day at the Bargain Barn to discuss computer related topics. Cain became worried about Roberts, ROT affiliation when he went to work for Roberts on a daily basis. Cain told the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) about Roberts’ request for secretarial assistance on ROT matters on March 10, 1998. The FBI confirmed Cain’s story by the information that they received through their investigation. Cain said he would contact FBI Agent David Church (“Agent Church”) with any additional information that he gathered. Cain informed Agent Church that Robert’s was asking him to run checks for outstanding warrants against ROT members at which time he advised him that running warrant checks was illegal. Agent Church told Cain that he should inform Roberts that it was illegal. Cain attended a ROT meeting after Agent Church told him to attend the meeting if he wanted. Jack Abbott Grebe Jr. (“Grebe”) visited Cain on a regular basis to make photocopies. Wise started coming with Grebe on these visits to Cain’s residence. Cain contacted Agent Church on March 24, 1998 to discuss talks of obtaining information on explosives from the internet. Cain mentioned that he felt that Roberts was trying to recruit him as a ROT member during the meeting. Cain informed Agent Church on April 29, 1998 that Wise and Grebe asked him to find e-mail addresses of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Drug Task Force (DEA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), FBI, White House, United States Attorney General, Texas Attorney General, and Texas…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: William E. Story had promised his nephew, William E. Story II, $5,000 if his nephew would abstain from drinking alcohol, using tobacco, swearing, and playing cards or billiards for money until the nephew reached 21 years of age. The uncle responded to his nephew in a letter dated February 6, 1875 in which he told his nephew that he would fulfill his promise. The uncle died a couple years later without sending the money to the nephew.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    only turned himself in after the NYPD found out about the incident after the media reported in on television. The NYPD was not called by New…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case District of Columbia ( DC ) vs Heller an officer for DC got declined for the permit to have a gun in his home for the year. After this he decided that this was unfair and took it to court. He pointed out that he was a police officer and he carries a firearm with him at all times for the protection of others and himself, but the court denied him the right to have a firearm for the protection of him and his family. The constitutional issue with this case is the fact that it’s how DC wanted gun owners to break down their guns, have a trigger lock on it, and keep the ammo away from the firearm even though the gun is broken down without the trigger lock.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. John Marshall means in his statement that the constitution does not allow the judiciary branch to rule in such a way that Marbury would like. Although Marbury did lose his job, the context in which he earned his job was unconstitutional. Marshall's statement is referring to the inability of the judiciary branch to compensate Marbury for a job which was given in an unconstitutional way.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v Madison 1803 will forever and always be a Supreme Court Case that will live infamously in today’s history. During the election of 1800 against incumbent president John Adams of the Federalist Party versus the Anti-Federalist Party nominee Thomas Jefferson, with Jefferson being the victor. Before Adams were to leave the presidential office, he made what is called “midnight appointments” of new judgeships to counter act the Jeffersonians once in office. John Marshall, who was secretary of state of the time, failed to deliver seventeen commissions, one of which belonged to William Marbury. James Madison, Marshall’s successor, failed to deliver the rest of the appointments at the request of Thomas Jefferson.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    of all felony arrests are ‘lost’ at any stage in the arrest disposition process (including trials and appeals) because of the operation of the exclusionary rule.”…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper I’m going to detail the judicial process of a Supreme Court case, which was the first of its kind. The Supreme Court did not have original jurisdiction over this case. It traveled through each juridical system before reaching the Supreme Court. This case was of interest to them, not to question it the defendant was guilty, but were his constitutional rights violated in the process of prosecuting him. This case began with an anonymous tip that the defendant was growing illegal contraband at his home. The DEA assigned Detective Padraja and Detective Bartelt to sit on the home. After making the decision that no one was home the…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prior to Marbury v Madison, the Supreme Court only received it's judicial powers through the construction of the Constitution and what legislature enacted. Marbury v Madison was known as the first judicial review conducted by the Supreme Court. As a result of the Supreme Court's decision in Marbury v Madison, it gave the court its power to review the acts of Congress and the Executive and to oppose any acts of the legislature and the Executive that violated Constitutional rights of all citizens in the United States. The Supreme Court began its rise to an equal branch of the government.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Strikes

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In 1991 the “tough on crime” Governor Pete Wilson was elected. Wilson was a staunch supporter of the popular but controversial “Three Strikes” law. Two years into Governor Wilson’s first term, the people of California already sickened by public safety issues, were further outraged when a parolee abducted and murdered Polly Klaas. Polly’s father Mark Klaas lobbied diligently for passing the “Three Strikes” law, in which an individual with a prior serious or violent felony conviction, would a receive 25 to life sentence if convicted for any two non violent felonies. Several parts of the law are little known to the public. If you have one serious or violent felony, and you are convicted…

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With the defendant's past history of arrests with gun possession and the sentencing that the he got i am serving him to 10 years in a federal state prison. The sentence that was given was determinate in which he can reduce his sentence down if does “gain” time. With the abiltiy to gain time he can The reason why the sentence is 10 years in prison and 4 years on probation is because in the past he was on probation but violated it then, he served 18 months in jail and violated his parole. To me the sentencing that he was given on both counts was a slap on the wrist. The defendant was still able to buy guns and be arrested many times for it.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper discusses the immigration of Hispanics to the United States in which they faced prejudice, segregation and racism. We will discuss such topics as dual labor market, affirmative actions, quotas, instructional discrimination, reverse discrimination, glass ceilings, glass walls and glass escalators. “Hispanic workers are among the fastest growing segments of the U.S. labor force,” said Jesse Caballero, Senior Career Advisor for empleosCB.com, a subsidiary of CareerBuilder.com focused on online job search for the Hispanic community. “They are also among the two groups reporting the highest levels of severe discrimination in the workplace. Fifteen percent said they have been addressed with a racial slur at work. Roughly one-in-four feel they are paid less and have fewer career advancement opportunities compared to their Caucasian counterparts.”…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Strike Proposal

    • 2651 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In 1983, a young man named Michael was brought before a Pennsylvania court on a charge of armed robbery: he stole $50 from a taxi driver using a toy gun. A few days later he was arrested and was subsequently convicted. Although the trial judge sentenced Michael to 6 months in prison and required that he repay the $50, the prosecutor demanded the 5 year minimum sentence required by state law. The trial judge ruled the mandatory sentencing law unconstitutional, and Michael served his prison time and repaid the money. Four years later, the state supreme court ordered the trial judge to sentence Michael to 5 years in prison. The trial judge refused and resigned. The judge to whom the case was reassigned permitted Michael to remain free pending another appeal to the state supreme court. Michael realized the futility of his cause in court and quietly disappeared, and he remains at large today.…

    • 2651 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics