Preview

Breathalyzer Policy In High Schools

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
729 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Breathalyzer Policy In High Schools
Promposals, pretty dresses, corsages, tuxedoes; those are just some things that correlate with the word prom. Not only is it a wonderful and magical night that many high school students anxiously await their entire high school careers for, but it is also a really important milestone in one’s high school experience. Due to the escalating numbers of alcohol consumption at school dances, multiple schools (one of which included Northern Secondary School) decided to take action and proposed to implement a breathalyzer policy at school proms. Personally, I do not agree with that decision; I believe that it’s an unnecessary thing to do. Though the schools that suggested this policy had good intentions, it’s still an unreasonable thing to force upon …show more content…
Under the Education Act and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, students have to right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, and since the schools have no legitimate reason to assume that every single student will be consuming alcohol, the policy then becomes an invasion of privacy and unconstitutional. Secondly, students should not be subjected to stand in a line waiting for their turn to blow into a breathalyzer on their special night. Prom is not just another party, but a special rite of passage, like a graduation ceremony. Students spend so much time, effort and money trying to make this night perfect and they should not be forced to spend half of their time waiting in line. This would be especially unfair to those who are sober and are required to blow into a breathalyzer to prove it. Adding to my point above, not all students consume alcohol prior to prom. Only a select few do so and those students don’t represent the entire student population. The phrase, “One bad apple can spoil the bunch” does not apply to this situation; it would be simply unjust to punish the entire student body for a bad decision of a couple students. Lastly, the use of a breathalyzer is pointless. Nothing replaces the old fashioned human interaction. It should be obvious, or at least reasonably clear, which students have been drinking before …show more content…
Not only is it a violation of student rights, but it is also a waste of time and a feeble and tedious way of checking whether the students are under the influence of alcohol. In this day and age, alcohol isn’t the only substance impairing students, so rather than treating all the students as offenders and forcing them to blow into breathalyzers, schools should use other methods to further educate the students on how to have a great time without alcohol/substance. In the case of Northern SS, I believe that although the principal had pure intentions of helping the students, he did not approach this situation in an effective manner. Not only did he waste a lot of time and effort to dealing with this situation, but he may have caused the relationship between him and his students to become hostile. Nonetheless, if all schools were to implement such breathalyzer policy to prevent alcohol consumption at school events, why stop there? They might as well also enforce a policy that requires students to participate in a blood test or a pat down before entering any school-related event then. With that being said, prom should be remembered as a night of unforgettable memories, not as a night where you used a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lowering Drinking Age

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages

    "A comparison of college students attending schools in states that had maintained, for a period of at least ten years, a minimum drinking age of 21 with those in states that had similarly maintained minimum drinking ages below 21 revealed few differences in drinking problems" (Hanson, "The Legal Drinking Age: Science vs. Ideology"). For example, a large study of young people between ages of 16 and 19 in Massachusetts and New York after Massachusetts raised its drinking age revealed that "the average, self-reported daily alcohol consumption in Massachusetts did not decline in comparison with New York" (Hanson, "The Legal Drinking Age: Science vs. Ideology"). College students, young teens and drinking will always be inevitably associated with each other regardless of the circumstances or rules. So what is the point of conceiving and enforcing a policy that is already failed and is doomed to fail? Cocco 3 Administrations cannot stop alcohol abuse, but they cannot ignore it either. With the college administrations ignoring it with the hopes that it will go away is simply unaccepted and should not even be an…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Underage drinking around state college, or anywhere is common. They're young and reckless. Penn State has a code of conduct, "we need to do a better job of communicating behaviors/consequences that are already in place". Students who are being disrespectuful to the code of conduct and not following these rules, will be expelled. That's no doubt. It's what young students…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I feel like the first sentence of Earl’s statement is true because those two-thirds of adolescent and adult usually start drinking at a young age. That would make it easier for them to get attached to alcohol . Having people take a written test just to get a drinking license could help but it wouldn’t help as much. I also think that stores would lose money because not everyone that drinks is going to have a drinking license. I disagree with Earl Rochester argument.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Underage students are not going to stop drinking even if they aren't allowed in the bars (Jeffrey Patch 2/12/03). Most bars provide at least reasonable assurance that all customers will be drinking safely with staff members paid to keep patrons in line and police officers an earshot away (DI Editorial Board 9/25/06). Downtown establishments monitor the patrons' alcohol intake, use careful wristband systems, employ sober staff, and pay heavy fines if found to be serving to minors (Lindsay Schutte 10/1/04). Police records show that 93 percent of underage drinkers cited for possession of alcohol were ticketed at the bars (Drew Kerr & Nick Peterson 12/9/05). Irresponsible and underage consumers are hit where it hurts the most, their wallets, while responsible users are free from expensive tickets and fines. "We are not after underage drinking but rather binge drinking," said City Council member Connie Champion. "It is about the abuse of alcohol, not the consumption" (Jessica Seveska 10/19/04). Enacting a 21-ordinance in…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that the principal should change the rule, no drinks in class. I think that because what if people really need a drink because they just got out of gym and they are about to pass out? You can’t send them to the hallway to get a drink when they are on the verge of passing out. Well I am gonna tell you why you should let students drink water while they are in class.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hawks Nest Argument Essay

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    My first thought when I was told that students were drunk was “how am I going to tell Mrs. Davis and not have my peers hate me because I ruined their night.” They could face disciplinary actions through the school or even legal actions. At that time, all I did was send a direct message to Mrs. Davis on Twitter that said: “The water guns are filled with alcohol.” I decided that my integrity and my responsibility to the school were more important to me than my classmates’ thoughts. I doubted that she saw my message right away but in the event that she didn’t see it, I decided at half time to find her and make her aware of what was going on. Once I talked to her, I felt accomplished. I knew that I had made the right decision.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Burke, Sheila. "TN Supreme Court to Hear Field Sobriety Case." The Tennessean. N.p., 23 Mar. 2013. Web. 28 Mar. 2013.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In July 2008 Mr. John McCardell (Founder, Amethyst Initiative; Former President, Middlebury College) formed the Amethyst Initiative, which states, the drinking age in Maryland should be lowered on the premises of college campuses. A majority of major league college presidents concur with this, because they too believe the drinking age should be reduced, spending thousands of dollars per year to regulate students and ensure the underage students aren’t drinking. Because so much money is put towards patrolling the drinking, it is taken from the money that could’ve been used for educational purposes.…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With these laws in place to ban trick or treating for ages 17 and higher more teens are out later and drinking more. Under age drinking is a risk factor that has appeared because of the age ban.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main issue is today’s society is underage drinking. There has been a lot of controversy on this subject from many different sides of the issue; there are some people who believe that the drinking age should be lowered from twenty-one to eighteen years old as it was during the Vietnam war, the old-school mentality was “old enough to fight, old enough to drink.” The con side disagrees however stating that lowering the drinking age would bring about a rise in traffic accidents, and encourage young adults to binge drink. My understanding of the pro side is that they feel that lowering the drinking age from twenty-one to eighteen or nineteen would reduce the amount of binge drinkers in college aged students, and help teach people to drink responsibly. (Holder, 2003)…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    So this would be a possible explanation as to why many students at the high school are participating in such behavior. If the students at the high school are encountering such things as drunk…

    • 1194 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Dui Deterrence

    • 2584 Words
    • 11 Pages

    “Have one drink for the road” was, until recently, a commonly used phrase in American culture. It has only been within the past 20 years that as a nation, we have begun to recognize the dangers associated with drunk driving (Sutton 463). According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, this year 519,000 people, or one person per minute, will be injured in alcohol-related accidents. 10,839 people will die in drunk-driving crashes this year – that is one death every 50 minutes. The heartbreaking part is, every injury and lost life due to driving after drinking can be prevented. Drinking while driving “accidents” are not merely “accidents.” Getting in a vehicle after consuming alcohol, which severely affects the function of the brain, is not an accident. It is lack of responsibility. Individuals that consume alcohol irresponsibly must begin to take responsibility for themselves and for other innocent drivers on the road. Unfortunately, in spite of great progress, alcohol-impaired driving remains a serious national problem that tragically affects many victims annually (Hanson). It is time that laws and consequences for drinking while driving strengthen and people begin to think twice before driving a vehicle after drinking. Individuals who make the decision to drive after consuming alcohol, not only put themselves in a dangerous situation, they also put an entire community at risk. Current laws, which are not strict or powerful enough, must be increased in order to keep our neighborhoods around the nation safe. Although many people think current drinking while driving limits and laws are strict enough, the rising number of individuals who continue to make an irresponsible decision to get behind the wheel of a vehicle after consuming alcohol, make it imperative that current legal limits, laws, and consequences for drinking while driving, be increased in order to punish drivers appropriately and help repair communities, relationships, and, most…

    • 2584 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drinking while driving is very well know around the United States. Drivers license should be lost and suspended for a year if caught drinking while driving. It is a dangerous habit to get into and people should not get away with it. Drinking while driving is dangerous to the public and has very serious effects who drinks. Why Should a problem like this be dealt with? This is very dangerous to those around and people could get seriously hurt from this. It’s not right that people get hurt and injured from car accident because people think it’s ok to drink and drive. Teens are some of the numbered people that are drinking and driving. An example would be a boy by the name of Ethan Couch was son of a multimillionaire was drinking, and driving and crashed into a disabled…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without suspicion of drug use, schools cannot require drug tests of athletes, because it violates their Fourth Amendment right. According to the US Bill Of Rights: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause.” (Cayton). This means that you need probable cause or suspicion of drug use before you can require a drug test of someone. School athletes should not be subject to unjust searches based on non-existent evidence. The searches would be both unlawful and unreasonable thus making the policy unconstitutional. Nevertheless, there are many people who oppose this policy, and believe that student-athlete drug testing is needed to protect the common good and ensure the safety of everyone (Mikula). However, no policy should be able to violate the constitution and infringe on the student’s privacy. An example of this is from a court case involving a Texas School District. The Texas School argued that they needed a policy to test student-athletes for drugs to help control the “drug crisis” going on at their school.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Random drug testing in high schools is constitutional, and all students who participate in competitive extracurricular activities can be forced to comply with random drug testing. Schools are also allowed to conduct drug tests on students if suspicion arises that they have been using drugs. There are many reasons why conducting random drug tests on students is important. Drug tests are not only useful for creating a strong and secure place for learning, but they also provide an escape for students who have been put under…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics