Preview

Book Review: the Big Short by Michael Lewis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
533 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Book Review: the Big Short by Michael Lewis
The Big Short by Michael Lewis is about the lives of a few investors that foresaw the biggest credit bubble Wall Street has ever seen.

Reading the Big Short has taught me a lot about subprime mortgages and credit default swaps. Before I read this book I had no idea what subprime mortgages even were, much less that there was such thing as betting against them. Lewis addresses the fact that most people on Wall Street have no clue what they are actually doing. This is evident with how the market crashed and only a select few actually profited from it. This is of no surprise to me because I have had numerous finance classes and I still feel like I don’t understand much of the financial world. At the beginning of the class there was discussion about how there is a lack of confidence in the financial market because the people trusted to handle our money really have no clue themselves how the system works. Lewis also addresses how subprime mortgages came to be such a failure because of the systems that created the problem. For instance, credit agencies make people’s credit look better than it actually is because they are paid by the companies that request the ratings. I never realized how credit agencies actually worked and this affects the financial world majorly. During this time period lending standards declined and people with poor-credit were being put into homes they couldn’t afford. The exposure of subprime mortgages and credit default swaps led to the crash of 2008-2009. This turned into a global crisis resulting in a number of bank failures. Learning about the subprime lending scheme made me think about when I first bought a house. Lenders are pressured to get people into loans that they don’t qualify for. They also put people in adjustable rate mortgages in which people with not so good credit get a great interest rate to begin with but then go up after a certain period, usually about two years. This caused a lot of foreclosures because

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The government’s promotion of subprime mortgages created more problems that assistance. It was the initial cause of the 2008 financial crisis due to the rise in delinquencies and foreclosures. Basically many people were approved for houses that were not financially stable or capable of the long term obligation of buying a home. As subprime lending expanded, so did the crisis due to the over-regulation, deregulation and failed regulation that the government brought…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Subprime mortgages are generally granted to borrowers who cannot obtain conventional mortgages due to insufficient or delinquent credit histories. These borrowers may be forced to take interest-only loan, which have lower monthly payment but are very difficult to pay off in the end. Problems with mortgage financing are the generally accepted cause of the financial meltdown that occurred between 2007 and 2008 (Gorton, 2009). The Subprime Mortgage Crisis, or "mortgage mess" or "mortgage meltdown," was caused by a precipitous rise in home foreclosures that started in 2006 and spiraled out of control in 2007 and 2008. The excessive use of subprime lending during the housing bubble caused an unprecedented foreclosure fallout, the effects of which caused credit markets as well as global and domestic stock markets to face a major financial crisis (Mayer, 2008). The goal of this paper is to address the subprime mortgage crisis, the effects prior to and after the crisis, and discuss who were the biggest players affected by this crisis. Finally, Team A will provide several concepts learned during the course of this class, which may help ensure that something similar does not happen again in the future.…

    • 2391 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before we discuss the first question let’s get a working description of what subprime leaning is. A subprime lender is financial entity that has an inclination to lend to consumers that are not qualified for traditional loans due to their poor credit status and history of repayment difficulties. Lending to subprime candidates helped lead to secondary mortgage market issue sin 2008 (“Subprime lender,” 2011). A subprime loan is a loan with elevated fees and interest, given to someone with a lower credit score (“Subprime loan,” 2011). A major profit source for CitiFinancial and the Associates was subprime lending, this is lending to people who did not meet the customary credit requirements of banks. In the 90’s this lending had provided access to credit to many people who would not have qualified for prime loans because of their credit history. In one study the researchers found that 35 percent of the subprime borrowers were over 55 years and African Americans were twice as likely to borrow in the subprime market as in the prime market (Baron, 2010). There were a few forms of subprime lending that CitiFinancial and the Associates dealt with. One of those forms was home equity loans marketed to borrowers to consolidate their bills. Another aspect of subprime lending was single-premium life insurance sold along with a loan to pay off the principal in the case of the death of the borrower (Baron, 2010). These companies were making a lot of money on both these subprime lending activities. The question is, are there moral concerns associated with subprime lending, I would have to say yes there are moral concerns. It seems that the companies are targeting a certain demographic of consumer. By definition the target is consumers that are not…

    • 3619 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Econ

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Background: Although the basic function of financial markets is straightforward – to match people who have money with people who need money – the way finance and Wall Street actually operate can get very complicated, and involves lot of jargons. The movie Inside Job however, does not involve very many new terms, and explains the recent global financial crisis nicely (even though some of the opinions in the movie may seem biased).…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Foreclosure 1 1

    • 1152 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Shiller, R. J. (2008). The Subprime Solution: How Today 's Global Financial Crisis Happened and What to Do about It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http://www.questia.com…

    • 1152 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dodd Frank Thesis

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There were several factors that contributed to the market failure that can be observed as far back as the repeal of The Glass-Steagall legislation in 1998. Banks became involved with precarious investments, asset managers began dealing in high-yield mortgage-backed securities, and credit agencies such as Moody’s, S&P and Fitch presented AAA ratings on the junk securities all of which was just the start of the breakdown in the market. Then in 2006, there was a strong drive for short-term profits in which 84% of sub-prime mortgages were issued by private lending firms to low and moderate income borrowers (Swift, 2011). The lack of regulation allowed companies to write trillions of dollars in derivatives all while not reserving any dollars against future claims. Additionally, with combination of the majority of the sub-prime lenders not being obligated to the standard mortgage laws and regulations, the use of nonbank underwriters, and exempt status from federal regulations lead to the financial crisis of…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Big Short, a film centering around the 2007-08 financial crisis and its causes, does an effective job of depicting corporate greed in capitalist society. Through a clever stylistic choice of having well-known celebrities explain complex wall-street jargon through intelligible metaphors - the film succeeds in explaining the build up towards the financial crash. It also shows that not everyone was blindsided by the housing bubble, and that a handful of economists not only successfully predicted it, but with great foresight were able to short it, betting against the housing market - in order to make a massive profit. Despite the film doing an excellent job of explaining both the gross negligence of the…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Big Short Analysis

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The name Adam McKay is immediately associated to Will Ferrell and the comedy genre, fruit of their previous collaborations in “Anchorman”, “Step Brothers”, and “The Other Guys”, which also adds a fair amount of action and stunts. With “The Big Short”, a terrific adaptation of Michael Lewis’ bestselling novel of the same name, there’s a big turn in the approach and genre. There’s no more Will Ferrell, but there are Christian Bale, Steve Carell, Ryan Gosling, and Brad Pitt – how about that? And more! Even based on true events, Mr. McKay doesn’t dispense some utterly laughable scenes and a punchy dialogue that immerse us into the Wall Street schemes related to the housing and credit bubble during the 2000’s, which culminated in the 2008 financial crisis, regarded as the worst since the Great Depression. The plot is focused…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was a challenge for me to understand and follow the flow of events in the film “The Big Short”, but it kept me interested throughout the whole 130 minutes. The movie is based on the economic crisis of the 2007-2008 that was caused by an unstable housing market of the USA. It is adopted from the book “The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine” by Michael Lewis, which was published in 2010.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    main reasons that led the housing market bubble to fall and cause over most homes in San…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Inside the Meltdown

    • 49753 Words
    • 200 Pages

    When I came to the agency, we were still in a very benign economic environment, but the FDIC staff, our supervisors as well as our economists, were expressing a lot of concerns about what we call the underpricing of risk. There was just too much credit out there, and there was a risk premium being charged for the credit that was being extended. And that was particularly true in the mortgage markets. ...…

    • 49753 Words
    • 200 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Predatory lending has caused many conflicts in the American society. Victims who fall for predatory lending are usually low income homeowners or those having financial difficulties. Consumers do not realize that mortgage payments are impossible until 3-4 years after predatory lending. This imposes a significant role in the destruction of the American dream. Constance M. Ruzich, a teacher at Robert Morris University in Pittsburgh, and A. J. Grant, also a teacher at RMU, state in their essay, “Subprime mortgages are home loans made at higher rates of interest to burrowers who represent higher credit risks and have lower credit scores.” People with subprime mortgages have a difficult time paying their taxes. Predatory lending, or subprime mortgages, has significantly taken part in the downfall of the economy. Ruzich and Grant say, “Ten years ago, few Americans had heard of subprime mortgages or predatory lending, but by 2008, a survey of economists had identified the effects of the mortgage crisis as the number one threat to the U.S. economy, greater than that of terrorism or conflict in the Middle East.” This statement shows how these lendings have affected the economy at a reasonably rapid rate. The economy of the United States has crumbled at a very accelerated rate like a house on fire. It is no longer what it used to be and in only getting…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Big Short

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For those of you who don't know, The Big Short focuses on the largely felt 2008 economic collapse of the housing market, but rather than show us a story of the people suffering from the collapse or the bank greed that caused it (there are elements of both throughout the story, but they are not the key focus), The Big Short tells the story of the people who were able to foresee the collapse and bet against the housing market inevitably leading to their wealth. Michael Burry, played by the unlimitedly talented Christian Bale, is depicted as being the first to catch on to the scam. Burry, with his prosthetic eye and social insecurity, weaves his way through the files that everyone else seems to have overlooked and becomes 100% certain of the ticking time bomb lying within the mortgage market. His certainty leads him to invest his clients' money in a bet against the banks which causes an uproar within the investment community. The bankers laugh in his face and gladly accept his money while all of his clients scorn him for his seemingly rash and ridiculous decision. This of course begins the word of mouth that leads our other key characters to follow Burry's lead and invest against the market themselves, picking up just as much flack along the way. Among them are Mark Baum (Steve Carell) and his team (strung along by Jared Vennett played by Gosling), and the wannabe millionaires (currently working out of a garage) Charlie Gellar (John Magaro) and Jamie Shipley (Finn Wittrock) who enlist the help of retired investor Ben Rickert (Brad…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The American Dream

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Fannie and Freddie Helped Spawn the Mortgage Crisis, So Did Affordable Housing Mandates” by Hans Bader January 9, 2012…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Economy Tourism

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What happened was this: banks were approached by thousands of possible new home owners asking for loans. This was during a period where the United States real estate market was climbing fast, and the value of homes was rising quickly. The banks approved these ‘bad’ or ‘sub-prime’ mortgages under the mentality that if the new home owners were to foreclose, the property would have a higher value than what it originally was due to the climbing real estate market, meaning that the bank would not lose money but make a profit! What actually happened was that the real estate market crashed, and banks were out of pocket due to the massive numbers of foreclosures on mortgages occurring. This set off the global financial crisis, which led to a global economic downturn and the recession in most developed countries. All that because of some bad debts in the States!…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays