The phrase blood diamonds or conflict minerals is used to describe a rough diamond that was traded illegally in order to finance violence. It has only been a few short years since the global attempt to ban the trade of blood diamonds and conflict minerals began, but the industry is still corrupted by far greater issues. These issues entailing, practices that directly exploit workers, children, and communities. Furthermore sexual violence, hunger, and illiteracy are commonplace in impoverished diamond mining communities. In the last fifteen years alone, illicit diamond mining has fueled brutal civil wars in Angola, Côte d’Ivoire, Sierra Leone, Liberia, the Republic of Congo, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. (“Gerstein”) Leaving a trail of human destruction that has not been present since World War II; with a collective death toll of 3.7 million lives. (“Congo’s Conflict Minerals: The Next Blood Diamonds.”) As a consequence consumers are still having to wonder, did someone die for that diamond? (“Conflict …show more content…
Consequently, without a clear supply chain, it is near impossible for consumers to confidently claim their product is conflict free (Dias). Currently the Democratic Republic of Congo is the primary source of gold, tin, tantalum, and tungsten, which are used to power cell phones, laptops and digital cameras (Mooney). On the contrary, the DRC is a site of horrific bloodshed and struggle, where an estimated five million people have been killed since the conflict began in 1996 (Dias). In an interview supported by The Huffington Post, a fourteen year old girl spoke beyond her years when adapting the statement, "anyone who buys a cell phone should question their conscience and insist on fair trade”