Preview

Blackstone

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1046 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Blackstone
1. Why go public for Blackstone
Blackstone’s IPO reflect some of public private equity company’s advantage and also the special need for itself.
2. What are the built-in tensions with a public private equity? How does Blackstone’s attempt to reconcile them?
Brief Introduction
The Blackstone Group is an American multinational private equity, investment banking, alternative asset management and financial services corporation based in New York City.
Blackstone specializes in private equity, creditand hedge fund investment strategies, as well as financial advisory services Blackstone's private equity business has been one of the largest investors in leveraged buyout transactions over the last decade, while its real estate business has actively acquired commercial real estate.
The product of months of intense and secret analysis within the firm, the move- the sale of
10% of the general partner- was carefully planned to balance the interests of all parties involved. The structure made use of a specialized vehicle called a Master Limited Partnership form. On March 22, 2007, Blackstone rocked the investing world by announcing plans to go to public.
WHY go public? WHAT are the built-in tensions with a public private equity firm?
HOW does Blackstone’s structure attempt to reconcile them? IS Blackstone’s model the future for large scale PE? IF you were a limited partner (LP) in Blackstone, HOW would you view the structure Blackstone has put in place to go public? UNIT HOLDER?
OR LP?
First, public fund could be inexpensive source of capital for the firm: At the market average of 20x earnings, Blackstone’s implied cost of capital was 5%. Historically its investments had returned 30% to 35%, offering a good spread, especially as the firm, raising bigger funds, was increasing its own commitments to its deals.
Second, going public is a way of deepening the connection between employees and the firm:
As a partnership, most of Blackstone’s investment professionals were compensated

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bear Stearns Case Summary

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By the 1990’s the firm was a major player in initial public offerings for a variety of foreign and…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the absence of a structured legally binding agreement, there were no contingencies set in place incase of an exit or termination of the partnership. This should have been planned ahead of time. As far capital distribution goes, at the beginning of the partnership, we put $25000 and the chefs put $10,000 plus $10,000 adding…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fi516 Advanced Finance

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages

    (e) Private placements can generally bring in funds faster than is the case with public offerings. (Points: 20)…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For a private company to raise money in the financial markets an initial public offering (IPO) has some advantages. One of the first benefits is generating revenue from the sale of shares of stock in the company. The company’s owners gain liquidity in their share of the company. This liquidity makes it easier for the owners to sell their interests in the company. Going public gives the company access to the public markets in the…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    M1 Unit 3 Business Plan

    • 4037 Words
    • 17 Pages

    receive more or less than 50% of the business unless agreed upon by both partners.…

    • 4037 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    27% and 26%, respectively. Both companies ' 2005 returns on equity ("ROE 's") are up…

    • 2974 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, you have to evaluate the LBO proposal and decide whether the $38 per share o¤er…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As pointed out previously, Huffman Trucking has experienced tremendous growth over the past few years. Our huge trucking fleet and large number of employees exceed the usual numbers for a privately held trucking company. The growth of our company has become so significant that we must now face the issue of expanding our business. Even though our expansion can be done in many ways, our financial team has narrowed down our expansion options to becoming a publicly shared company (through an IPO), acquiring another organization in the same industry, or merging our business with another organization. Expanding our company in any of the for-mentioned ways can have many advantages for our owners and employees. In order to determine which expansion…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    become a big issue amongst investors. They are concerned that the current unlevered structure is not maximizing value and are wary of the risks associated with…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The firm is considering takeover offers assumingly because the competition is attempting to gain market share. There is no evidence in the case which…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Study Guide

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Notes: The Shareholders, Cary Bryant, CLO, Me, Carol Tempest, VP HR, Jamal Moore, Aaron Webb…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CORPORATE FINANCE WORKSHOP QUESTIONS WEEK 2 –Questions based on Lecture 1, Introduction and Basic Concepts 1. Which of these could explain why someone would choose to operate as a sole proprietorship rather than as a corporation? a. Sole proprietorships have limited liability b. There are relatively few rules relating to the establishment and running of a sole proprietorship c. The firm can last forever d. It is easy to raise large sum of money e. All of these answers 2. The primary goal of a publicly-owned firm interested in serving its stockholders should be to: a. Maximize expected total corporate profit. b. Maximize expected EPS. c. Minimize the chances of losses. d. Maximize the stock price per share. e. Maximize expected net income. 3. The value that the financial markets place on a company’s debt and equity securities will depend on the: a. Standard deviations of the returns from investments in those securities. b. Risk and expected return from investments in those securities. c. Expected return from investments in those securities. d. Interest rate on the debt securities. 4. Shareholders in a company have limited liability, which means that: a. Shareholders can be called upon to contribute only the amount unpaid on shares held in the company. b. The maximum the shareholders can be called upon to contribute is the current market price of the shares. c. Shareholders can never be called upon to make an additional contribution to the company’s assets. d. Shareholders have little or limited interest in the activities of management of the company, because the management and ownership of the firm are separated.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fi 504 Case Study 2

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages

    If LJB Company decides to go public, it must take into account the cost against the benefits of doing so. The increased standard of internal control requires a lot of funding and will probably require them to add employees in order to keep up with the more stringent demands in financial reporting among other costs.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cumberland Entertainment

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What do you think of the Cumberland opportunity? As a private equity financier, would you invest in it – why or why not?…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of Citigroup’s main concerns was the risk of their exposure from holding leveraged loans. Due to the increasing risks and costs associated with holding these loans, Citigroup approached several large investors, including a private equity firm and a hedge fund, about purchasing leveraged loans from their portfolio. Blackstone expressed interest in a portfolio that contained a total face value of $6.11 billion, with16 different issuers. Blackstone, one of the world largest private equity firms, was reviewing materials for their potential purchase of a $6.11 billion pool of leveraged loans from Citigroup, one of the world’s largest banking entities. Most of these loans were used to finance large leveraged buyouts (LBOs). Citigroup would help the transaction by offering debt financing for the purchase of the loam, while Blackstone would offer the rest of the fund and take the first loss.…

    • 887 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays