Preview

Battlestar Galactica and Philosophy

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1598 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Battlestar Galactica and Philosophy
There 's no "frakking" way I could generate a good overview of a show like Battlestar Galactica. Only a show like Battlestar Galactica could take a derogatory word we all know and sensor it in a way that gives it emphasis, hence the "frakking" genius behind the Battlestar Galactica series. However, the show cannot be explained in just one word. The realistic feel to the military comradery and operations that take place within the show allow one who has never been in the military to imagine the experience. Also, the crew of Galactica are all very genuine and believable characters who are driven by basic human needs and desires. There are also fine examples of how a crew works together under good leadership. In a way, the plot revolves around leaders such as the character of Commander Adama. One can watch as emotions flair and problems escalate throughout the progression of the story. Yet Adama builds strength in his crew from the conflicts. I will argue Commander Adama 's actions toward the beginning of the series were utilitarian due to his view of Cylons as lifeless objects. However, his reasoning becomes difficult to determine as he develops a love for crew members that reveal their Cylon identities. In this essay I will briefly explain Utilitarianism as understood from philosophers such as Bentham and Peter Singer. Secondly, I will introduce William Adama and the crew aboard the Galactica. Lastly and most importantly, I will provide examples of Adama’s utilitarian actions throughout the show.
The theory behind the philosophy of Utilitarianism stems from a man named Jeremy Bentham. In Bentham’s essay The Utilitarian Calculus, he endeavors to document suffering on the basis that man at his core is purely hedonistic. “Motivational hedonism is the claim that only pleasure or pain motivates us.”(Moore) To Bentham, beings controlled by pleasure and pain bear the moral responsibility to limit pain and maximize pleasure to its greatest extent. He had advocated for the



Cited: Battlestar Galactica. Prod. and Dir. Ronald D. Moore and David Eick. Perf. Edward James Olmos, Mary McDonnell, Katee Sackhoff, Jamie Bamber, and Grace Park. 2004. Sci-Fi Channel, 2003. DVD. Jensen, Randell. “The Need of the Many vs. the Few.” Battlestar Galactica and Philosophy 2008. 101-13. Print. Moore, Andrew, "Hedonism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2011 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is the theory of the team player. A person would give up personal excellence to promote team excellence. Utilitarianism is how the group as a whole can improve or achieve excellence. According to Boylan (2009) An action is morally right when it produces more utility for the group rather than for the individual; “the greatest good for the greatest number” (pp. 12-1).…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    phil 111 exam

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Utilitarianism is moral theory that tries to lay a set of rules that you should follow to achieve the most good or pleasure from any one act. Two popular proponents of this systems are philosophers by the name of Jeremy Bentham and James Mill. They both have different ideas for how one should go about the use of utilitarianism to achieve the greatest happiness. Bentham's approach is often called quantitative utilitarianism in which Bentham came up with an idea called the felicific calculus which is a way one can measure the level of happiness that can come out of one certain decision. For Bentham pleasure is countable and tangible, by this I mean that pleasure can be used as sort of a measuring system for what should be morally right or wrong. Now on the other hand James Mill takes a different view of utilitarianism in which he allows for so called greater pleasure. Meaning that even though the decision that the felicific calculus tells you to make may not be the most pleasurable because some decisions have the potential to grow overtime into a more rewarding pleasure. This is where Mills is commonly referred to as a qualitative utilitarianism because he differentiates between the qualities of the pleasures you can choose. This greater pleasure idea, though, also raises a few questions in such that is it really that the decision is a so called greater pleasure or is it that you choose such decision because of the opportunity to create more pleasure. It seems as though pleasure is still the end result when you make this decision it is just that you have the opportunity to fail or be successful in this decisions which is not really consistent with the idea of pleasure but more so of opportunity.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Utilitarianism is a non religious ethic, and is based on the greatest good for the greatest number and takes into account the greatest happiness principle. Jeremy Bentham put forward the idea of Utilitarianism and the "Principle of Utility", this is the rule where a decision regarding wether an action is good or bad is based upon the results they produce. He took many things into account such as the end results of the action ("Telological"), the results of the action ("Consequentalists"), and He also argued that the "Hedonistic" value of any human action is easily calculated by considering how intensely its pleasure is felt, how long that pleasure lasts, how certainly and how quickly it follows upon the performance of the action, and how likely it is to produce happiness. Bentham devised a "Hedonic Calculus" which considered all these areas when attempting to decide whether an action was 'good' or 'bad'.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism in ethics is the theory that the rightness or wrongness of an action is determined by its usefulness in bringing about the most happiness of all those affected by it. The word utilitarianism comes from the Greek word telos, which means “end”. Under this direction, acting ethically means making decisions and taking actions that benefit the people by maximizing “good” and minimizing “bad” (danielsfund.org). Englishmen Jerry Bentham and John Stuart Mill were too of the most influential developers of the utilitarian view point. Utilitarianism focuses on the pursuit of happiness.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act Utilitarianism

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The theory of Utilitarianism was first developed by Jeremy Bentham who was a philosopher of the 18th century. Bentham developed this theory to create a modern and rational approach to morality which would suit the changing society.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a relativist, consequentialist and teleological system of ethics based on the idea of ‘utility’. This means usefulness and utilitarian suggest that everyone should be the most useful thing. The theory was devised by Jeremy Bentham who said “an action is right if it produces the greatest good for the greatest number”. He believed human beings are motivated by pleasure and pain.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a teleological theory which looks at the consequences of an act to decide whether it is right or wrong. There are lots of strengths to utilitarianism and not many weaknesses. One of the strengths is that it is a theory which established whether something was good or bad according to the majority of people. Bentham came up with this theory and it is known as the principle of utility. Bentham said ‘Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them to point out what we shall do’. This is the foundation for the principle of utility and it is a strength to utilitarianism as pleasure and pain can determine how people act. Bentham also said the aim of utilitarianism is ‘the greatest good of the greatest number’ and he used the Hedonic Calculus that he created to measure how good an act is and how many people it will affect, this is a major strength of utilitarianism because it tries to please everyone and each individual is equal. A weakness of Bentham’s view was noticed by Mill, Mill said it failed to differentiate humans from animals as animals can share the same pleasures that humans have, so this make human beings equal to animals. Mill also said that Bentham’s Hedonic Calculus was a weakness as it was too impractical as to use it you have to think of the; purity, intensity, certainty, extent, duration and fecundity of an act. In some situations this would be pointless as there might not be time to complete the Hedonic Calculus. For example is your house was on fire and you only had time to save either you cat or your dog you would not be able to think through the Hedonic Calculus as by the time you have your house would be burnt to the ground. This is a weakness to Bentham’s theory but not to utilitarianism because you can still please the majority without looking at the Hedonic Calculus every time you want to complete an act.Bernard…

    • 517 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Modern utilitarianists have adapted the theory that you should make the greater number of people happier instead of discarding it which happened to many other theories. Jeremy Bentham is one of the more notable people to adapt utilitarianism as he had an empirical observation of happiness is the equivalent to pleasure and the absence of pain as people desire please and seek to avoid pain. He also thought that we should carefully measure any possible outcomes or consequences of an action before we decide on the choice we will make. His adaptation of the theory also changed many laws because it was thought to be to correct to consider the consequences. Bentham also created the Hedonic calculus which was helpful in determining measurements of pleasure, which can be used with the utiltitarian theory.…

    • 616 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "Create all the happiness you are able to create; remove all the misery you are able to remove." - Jeremy BenthamJeremy Bentham created the utilitarianism school of thought, which is an incredibly useful ethical position. It can be most effectively defined by Wikipedia, "Utilitarianism is the idea that the moral worth of an action is solely determined by its contribution to overall utility." Utilitarianism has many benefits, but those benefits are harmonized with some major flaws. I will discuss the founding fathers of utilitarianism, the strengths and weaknesses of act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism, other forms of utilitarianism, and recent philosophers of this school of thought.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a moral theory which centers on happiness and how we can promote it, and is measured by our actions. Utilitarianism explains how human’s ultimate goal is to achieve happiness. This is also called hedonism, limiting the amount of pain and equating happiness with pleasure. This theory explains how we aim for happiness through our actions.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mill's Utilitarianism

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Utilitarianism derives itself from a combination of hedonism and consequentialism. Hedonism suggests that consequences are good as long as they lead to pleasure, which is the ultimate good in the case of utilitarianism. On the other hand, consequentialism argues that the right action is the one that produces the best consequences, and maximizes utility. Mill argues that the only factor relevant to actions is the amount of pleasure or pain produced, not the motives that propel action. Utilitarianism seems to be based off of a calculation aiming to minimize pain and maximize pleasure. While justice can initially be seen as an objection to this school of ethics, it can be argued that justice complements, and does not challenge the principles…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832), he argued that utilitarianism maximises pleasure for the most people such as pleasure and happiness and minimises suffering for the most people, such as pain and unhappiness. An act should only be done if it fulfils this requirement (Nathanson, 2016). Another aspect of utilitarianism is consequentialism, which holds the consequences of ones conduct. This impacts on the standard for judgement about the rightness or wrongness of that particular conduct (Haines, 2016).…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Bentham, an English moral philosopher and legal reformer, the highest principle of morality is to maximize happiness, the overall balance of pleasure over pain. This principle explains the Utilitarianism doctrine that is mostly the solution of everyone in every century. Utilitarianism can bring the most benefit for people. In contrast, throughout the three stories “Justice” by John Stuart Mill, Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro, and “The One who Walks Away From Omelas” by Ursula K. Le Guinn, it is easy to see that utilitarianism mostly requires sacrifice that indirectly leads to dehumanization and repression of the individual voice.…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Utilitarianism

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” –John Stuart Mill. Utilitarianism is based on doing what makes a person happier or provides more pleasure to that person and decreasing the things that makes you unhappy. Happiness and the absence of pain are considered the most desirable things to a person. According to utilitarianism, no matter what a person does, if it increases that person happiness, it is perfectly fine, and “wrong” if it decreases their happiness.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics