The enormous favours that he heaped on them at the beginning of his reign has a political purpose…
Agrippina was related to the Claudian ‘gens’, one of the oldest and most illustrious patrician families with imperial connections. Her father Germanicus had risen through the cursus honoroum to two consulships and the proconsulships of Germany and Gaul. Germanicus’s brother was the brother was the future Claudian emperor, Claudius. Agrippina’s family lineage was therefore immensely prestigious. Her mother is quoted twice by Tacitus asserting her descent from the blood of the divine Augustus. According to revisionist Barret, Agrippina would have learnt from her mother in her formative years a powerful sense of her important place in the scheme of things.…
Tacitus stated that Agrippina’s “passion to acquire wealth was unbounded”. This is indeed indicative of the general consensus of ancient sources toward her, with greed, manipulation and ambition forming the central tenets of her character. Her marriages played a central role in fulfilling her idealistic goals, in the process, propelling her into the public consciousness.…
The Rape of Lucretia is a legend that was important to the Romans. It was a tragedy about a Roman matron woman who commits suicide. The story is important because it expresses the role of married women in the Roman civilization. It describes what behavior the Romans considered appropriate for a typical Roman wife. From reading this excerpt from the History of Rome, one learns that a women’s worth is based on their virtue, men considered their wives as possessions, and rape enraged the Roman population.…
The reign of Tiberius ( 42 B.C- 37 A.D) is a particularly important one for the Principate, since it was the first occasion when the powers designed for Augustus alone were exercised by somebody else. In contrast to the approachable and polite Augustus, Tiberius emerges from written and archaeological sources as a mysterious and darkly complex figure, intelligent and sneaky. Tacitus refers to Tiberius as a “villainous emperor.” (Tacitus, Annals) His severe depression and dark moods had a great impact on his political career as well as his personal relationships. He contributed to significant political, social, legal and military developments; he became involved with both domestic and foreign diplomacy as well as building programs which all aided his significance within the Roman Empire during his reign.…
This, however, is not highly out of the ordinary, for a writer of his time, as the role of the Roman matron was not to strive for political success herself, but to support her husband in his achievements. Agrippina disregarded the status quo and thus became the target for many slanderous exaggerations through representation in ancient writings, and became the epitome of all that was evil in woman.…
women, at the time, to be able to keep Rome’s population intact. To solve this dilemma,…
Roman accomplishment, even in times of fate, settles off for her any time throughout life. She determines to instill in her mind what she wants, why she wants it, and not letting anybody or anything get in her way. I have seen first-hand how the idea that hard work pays off is not a one dimensional mindset, that it can be applied to an aspects of life and yield success. “My children motivate me. You can always do better in life, and I am one to do better, better, better” (815).…
One can imagine that the courtship and marriage of Claudius and Agrippina must have been all joy, excitement, sweetness and light. She must have been delighted at her husband-to-be’s influence in getting the incest law rewritten just for her. The honeymoon intensity between them may not have lasted very long. Donald L.…
However, even with disadvantages in status, citizenship, and education, women were sometimes able to influence the political system. In China, women of the imperial family often played an important role in politics, usually listening behind a screen so that they didn’t distract the men from negotiating, but telling their husbands their opinions later that night. In Rome, women weren’t allowed in places of political debate, but there were several notable women who gained a reasonable amount of power from affecting politics in the only ways available to them: birth, marriage, or murder. A legendary example would be Tullia who lived in circa 500 BC. She was the daughter of a very early Roman king, but conspired with her husband to kill her father. After she ran over her father in a carriage, her husband became the next king of Rome. (Padgett) There are various examples like this throughout Roman history: women whispering and plotting where men paid no attention, but forever changing the history of Rome with changes in kings and…
Agrippina the younger is recognized as one of the most ambitious women in history who encompasses a great desire for power, wealth and supremacy. The Julio Claudian period was solely a patriarchal society, but this didn’t mean women could not hold any influence. It is in this period we see ambitious women such as Agrippina attaining power through men. Agrippina chose specific individuals with influential talents; she formed political allies with them in the positions of power that would ultimately pave the way to her own desires and ambitions centered mostly around the promotion of Nero, and what Tacitus describes as “a vigorous, almost masculine despotism.”…
Agrippina the Younger’s three marriages were significant in her rise to prominence as they all served her political advancement; protection from enemies, fortune and eventually, power in politics. Her first marriage was to Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus, a man seventeen years her senior, described as a “wholly despicable character” (Suetonius). Her second marriage was to Gaius Sallustius Passienus Crispus, cut short by his death, but gaining her immense fortune. Her third and final marriage was to her uncle, Emperor Claudius, giving her the political power she craved, just as her mother did before her.…
Images and interpretations of a person can change over time. Such movement is paralleled with changes in opinion and morals throughout generations. Cleopatra the seventh is subject to this fluctuation. Ancient images and interpretations differ greatly to the impression left today merely by her name. Chris Dumasis, a modern day historian amplifies this theory in ‘Interpretations of Cleopatra’. She argues, “women have been demeaned of their true substance since the early time of patriarchal society.” Taken into account, this argument entails that when studying ancient sources it must be understood that at times, only a very narrow view of the events are presented in history. Cleopatra is a victim of this view. Roman and Latin interpretations are extremely one sided and are the few ancient sources of her that remain today. But they do not count for the entire story, as they were only two of the few literate societies at the time. As a result, the true image of Cleopatra may have been suffocated for centuries, only capably of being fully appreciated by modern day images and interpretations of her.…
Tacitus made his thoughts clear that Agricola was the best type of man from the beginning. He suggests that the tender care of his mother played a huge part in him being sheltered from the temptations of evil companions. Tacitus also put this down to the fact that Agricola had “sound instincts”1. He was described by Tacitus as someone that did nothing for show, a man that was not lazy and wanted to make himself known to the army. He would learn from the skilful and would associate himself with the bravest of men. He did not appear to be scared of anything, ideally the model soldier. He served his military apprenticeship to the satisfaction of “Suetonius Paulinus a hard working and sensible officer”2. Suggesting that from the beginning, Agricola was set up to be a model leader and of great significance to anywhere he went in terms of military operations. “Agricola…
In this project I am investigating how Empress Theodora become so powerful, what ways did she use? The author of The Secret History, the only source of information about Theodora, was named Procopius. He was a great historian of the Byzantine Empire, who was born in Caesarea on the coast of Palestine in 500 A.D., and died around 565 A.D. After his death, only two other books written by Procopius were found: History of the Wars and Buildings. The Secret History was originally written in Latin, published by Niccolo Alamanni in 1632, and translated into English by G.A. Williamson in 1996. Procopius has very negative things to say about Empress Theodora. He felt disdain towards her and her husband, Justinian. Even though he worked with them, he…