Preview

Banning the Use of Firearms

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1013 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Banning the Use of Firearms
Anti-Gun Control
Firearms are often used to defend and protect citizens. Banning the use of firearms will not better our society because crime rates will stay the same or even decrease, gun control laws may not follow through, and people still use guns to provide food for their families. The right to private property (guns) is not absolute in the constitution. Citizen’s right to own and bear arms must be balanced by a greater need for safety (Warfel, 2000). The idea of taking firearms away to make the nation safer is understood but justified. It is said that half of all US households own at least one gun and roughly 30,000 people die yearly from a gunshot wound (2013). However, firearm incidents have declined 40% since 1992. In the book “More guns, less crime” by Dr. John R. Lott, he states in the 1990s more guns were produced and bought while murder rates and accidental gun deaths decreased by 40% (Lott, 1997). This demonstrates that guns help lower crime rates.
The number of guns being produced in the United States or US has increased. At the same time, crime rates have drastically decreased. Criminologist Gary Kleck claimed that crime victims who defend themselves with guns are less likely to be injured or lose property than victims who either did not resist, or resisted without guns. This was found to be true even though victims using a gun faced more dangerous circumstances either in robberies and assaults. According to the Gun Owners Foundation, as many as 200,000 women use a gun every year to defend themselves against sexual abuse (Administrator, 2008). Women feel protected when they are able to defend themselves with a firearm; it gives them a better way to self-defend themselves. Also, in Vermont, citizens do not need permission to carry a gun. Yet, Vermont has remained one of the top five safest states in the union. This demonstrates that carrying a gun can make a safer environment. One poll by the Justice department states 74% of felons agree that



Cited: “The Debate Over Gun Control.” 123HelpMe.com. 30 Jan 2012 Gun Owners Foundation Facts Sheet. N.p., 19 Sept. 2008. Web. 31 Jan. 2013. Lott, John R. More Guns, Less Crime. N.p.: n.p., 1997. Web. 2 Feb. 2013. Simon, Richard. "In the End, Even NRA Opposed Bill." Los Angeles Times 3 Mar. 2004: A.11. Web. 31 Jan. 2013. Warfel, Michael W. "Gun Protection." 15 Apr. 2000: 14-15. ProQuest. Web. 29 Jan. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In her essay “Why Handguns Must Be Outlawed,” Nan Desuka brings for the issue whether handguns should be outlawed except to police and other service units. I disagree with Desuka’s position on banning handguns. This essay offers arguments why they should be banned without offering realistic solutions to the problems Desuka states in owning handguns. Retaining legalized handguns affects all of us. It’s essential to Collectors and sportsmen, and vital to all our safety. I do not believe that banning handguns will overall decrease violent crimes or the deaths due to violent crimes.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “The Accessibility of Guns Lead to Gun Crime,” written by Alan M. Ruben apprises us that firearms have one sole purpose and that is to cause harm, meaning committing an injury, homicides, or suicides. Most people believe that owning a firearm gives the reassurance that they are protected and no harm can come to them. Ruben shows statistics that guns are not the most secures ways of bringing protection, but it can actually bring danger. “States with the highest level of gun ownership have 114 percent higher firearm murder rates and 60 percent higher total homicide rates than states with the lowest gun ownership”(Ruben). Gun ownership has shown that there is more danger being brought upon rather than protection. Statistics have made an estimate that not every gun owner is capable of having the responsibility of a firearm. “It is estimated that over 40 percent of gun acquisitions occurs in the secondary market. That means that they happen without any background whatsoever… guns show rank the second to corrupt dealers” (Ruben). Not every person who purchases a firearm are trustworthy, some may have a negative use instead of a greater purpose.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firearm injuries are one of the top ten causes of death in the United States (“Statistics”). Firearms are the second leading cause of traumatic death related to consumer product in the U.S. and are the second most frequent cause of death overall for Americans ages 15 to 25 (Violence Policy Center para.4). Every two years more Americans die from firearm injuries than the total number of American soldiers killed during the eight year Vietnam War (Violence Prevention Institute). In 2005, 11,346 people were killed by firearm violence and 477,040 were victims of a crime involving a firearm. In 2006, firearms were used in 68 percent of murders, 42 percent of robbery offenses and 22 percent of aggravated assaults nationwide (National Institute of Justice). “Homicides committed with firearms peaked in 1993 at 17,075, after which the figure steadily fell, leveling off in 1999 at 10, 11. Gun-related homicides have increased each year since 2002”(National Institute of Justice). The federal government needs to take action to prevent similar tragedies from happening in the future. In an effort to stabilize and decrease firearm related injuries and deaths in the U.S. a strong federal law to control guns is…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every day, dozens or even hundreds of people find themselves victims of gun violence. 30,000 people on average are killed each year by firearms while 64% of all firearm deaths are suicides, and firearms are the third-leading cause of injury-related deaths nationwide. ("Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence," May 11, 2015). With those statistics, it would make sense why people think that gun control is the answer, and some regulations like background checks and increased penalties for those convicted of using guns in crimes are needed.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government assumes that if society confines gun control that criminal activity will be reduced, however, offenders generally aim for victims who are unarmed. This would make it effortless for the criminal to assault a bystander while it leaves the victim vulnerable.Controlling weapons will not keep them out of felon’s hands. Each individual has the entitlement to protect themselves against unjustified acts. Righteous residents would have a sense of security knowing that firearms could be carried legally for his or her own protection and safety. A decrease in rifle sales, along with ammunition, will damage a state’s economy. Aside from criminal abuse, firearms are valued for friendly competitions and hunting purposes. Individuals who possess guns are put to a challenge to see if they can handle true responsibility. Besides regulating firearms completely, there are other alternatives to resolve gun…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although guns provide a good way to protect us, they also offer an effective method to kill others. Perhaps many people may argue that gun is just one of the numerous tools killers use, they believe that gun control can’t eliminate murder. However, “The biggest problem with firearms is they kill quickly and they kill efficiently. The problem there is the instant impulse leads to death” (Schoener). Even though the government set up several restrictions for owning guns, killers can easily get them. What is worse, with the gun culture, people are more likely to release their anger by shooting. These entire make the gun law the most dangerous law we’ve ever…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Control Legislation

    • 2525 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The aim of gun control legislation should be to deal with the problem of illegal gun traffic and to find methods to curb it. (Aborn, 1994, p.433)…

    • 2525 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Guns do a lot of bad, but do a lot more good for society. Banning guns will not stop the problem, but will just make it worse. Guns are apart of our society as Americans they have been around since colonial years, and are not leaving anytime soon. “The number of guns in America has increased by more than 50 percent since 1993, and in that same period the gun homicide rate in the United States has dropped by half. (Kristof, The Times).” Guns offer protection for individuals. One day you could be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and a shooting breaks out, you will pray there is someone else there with a concealed firearm to help control the situation while waiting for police to arrive. They can’t do that if guns are banned. “We need to understand that we cannot stop crimes and murders. And banning guns would be a step, or two, backwards instead of moving forward in the right direction (The Times News).” The research conducted to produce this paper was drawn from a multitude of sources all with different…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    ”Nearly three weeks after the latest mass shooting claimed the lives of nine people, 52% of Americans now oppose stricter gun control laws, 6 percentage points more than the 46% of Americans who support such laws.”(diamond,2015).In the past year, there has been many shootings. If the guns are taken away, some of these could have been solved but that’s only solving one problem. Taking them isn’t helping the helpless people that can’t defend themselves without them.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stricter Gun Control Laws

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Guns should not be used in such ways where others could be harmed or killed. They should be used only for self-defense to protect themselves and their valuables, not as weapons to take other 's lives. As of 2009, the United States has a population of 307 million people. Based on production data from firearm manufacturers, there are roughly 300 million firearms owned by civilians in the United States as of 2010. Of these, about 100 million are handguns. Based on survey data from the U.S. Department of Justice, roughly 5,340,000 violent crimes were committed in the United States during 2008. These include simple/aggravated assaults, robberies, sexual assaults, rapes, and murders. Of these, about 436,000 or 8% were committed by offenders visibly armed with a…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On any given year, roughly 12,000 Americans are killed in gun-related homicides. That means, on average, 33 U.S. men, women and children die at the hands of others using firearms each day. Stopping this violence entirely is an impossible task. As a people, all that Americans can do is try to mitigate this violence using policy, and recently attempts have been made at doing so by limiting the people’s right to bear arms. On paper, this approach makes sense: to lessen gun violence, fewer guns should be legally allowed in society and more regulations should be imposed on those weapons that can be carried. However, gun control is admittedly not that simple: some cities and states with more stringent policies have lower violent crime and firearm…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stricter Gun Control

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Schumer and Presser go on to say that when the short burst of public outcry is over, attention fades from the issue of gun control until the next mass shooting occurs. Schumer and Presser, like Kleck, attribute this loss of attention to the fact that the proponents of gun rights are often more passionate about protecting their rights than proponents of gun control are passionate about regulating guns (2013, 2). Additionally, Robert Wolpert and James Gimpel argue that gun owners are concerned with protecting their self-interest, which is why gun owners are often opposed to stricter gun control regulations (1998, 241). With this understanding, one can see the perspective of those that oppose stricter gun control regulations. With understanding of the opposing side’s perspective, one can be more prepared to refute the opposing argument. For this reason, the articles written by Schumer and Presser and Wolpert and Gimpel are extremely beneficial when preparing to refute the other side’s…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2008, sixty seven percent of murders were committed in the United States with guns, sixty seven percent is 10,886 out of 16,272 crimes that involved guns. (Agresti, James D) More gun control could decrease that number significantly. Gun constrictions will not hinder Americans hunting or hobbies, it will help stop the shooter from getting guns. Even though people think that guns are not a problem, there needs to be more restrictions on guns because it would decrease shootings and mass murders, it would reduce deaths and injuries associated with guns, and civilians do not need semi-automatic weapons.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banning School Shootings

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many countries have a controversy whether they should ban guns or whether not to. In the United States they have not banned handguns completely like other countries. Can you just imagine how much peaceful things would be if they would ban them in the united states as well? Lately as you can see in the news there have been massive gun shootings in schools from all ages. How is it possible for just any one to get hold of a gun that easily? Some benefits to banning handgun would be there won't be so much gun violence, not everyone can get hold of a gun so easily, and the population or estimates of kids dying do to gun issues would drop massively.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each year, a number of people die from guns. The popular saying is “guns do not kill people, people kill people” which is true; however, guns are used to aid in violence and many would argue that eliminating guns through stricter laws would decrease violence. As the number of gun owners in the world increases the government and its citizens would benefit from implementing stricter regulations regarding the safe keeping of guns in the home. The lack of gun safety results in the ability to access these guns with distressing outcomes. While many individuals argue that guns need to be restricted within the United States, the real argument is for allowing the Constitutional right to bear arms while implementing stricter laws to ensure these firearms do not fall within the wrong hands.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics