Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Models of Government: Autocratic, Democratic, and Optimal Government

Good Essays
950 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Models of Government: Autocratic, Democratic, and Optimal Government
Autocratic, Democratic, and Optimal Government: A Sketch
W. A. Niskanen
In his paper Niskanen provides valuable analysis of the effects of the voting rule, the progressivity of the tax structure, and the length of the fiscal horizon in democratic governments and interesting insights of the effect of alternative regimes on policies, such as war and immigration, that affect the number of people subject to the regime.
His article follows Mancur Olson’s work called “Autocracy, Democracy, and Prosperity”. This paper is focused on the set of historical conditions that led to the progression from anarchy to autocracy to democracy. The motivation to write this paper was to understand why some autocracies were broadly popular.
Models of Government
The section entitled “Models of government” develops simple is HHhmodels of autocratic, democratic, and optimal governments, where each model includes two common functions relating economic conditions and tax revenues to the primary fiscal decisions relating economic conditions by each type of government. This provides a basis for comparing economic conditions resulting from each type of government. Each of the major types of government is defined by who controls the government and by the economic and fiscal conditions that best serve their interests.
Autocratic government is defined as one controlled by a specific autocrat. And the interests of this autocrat are defined in terms of the difference between the level of tax revenues and the level of total government expenditures for goods and services. Further, for the autocrat, the tax rate that best serves his interests is the revenue-maximizing tax rate.
For democratic government is less obvious who controls this government. Niskanen supposes that the effective decision-maker in a democracy with majority rule is the median voter who is assumed to be from a median-income household. The interests of the median voter are defined in terms of the sum of his income minus taxes plus transfer payments received.
The voter is concerned about both his income after taxes and transfer payments received, this rate is substantially lower than the revenue maximizing tax rate that is characteristic of autocratic government. A democratic government will spend more for government services than an autocratic government because an increase in these services over some range increases both the income after taxes and the transfer payments received by the median voter.
For the model of optimal government, the effective decision-maker is assumed to be a person who has no idea about his or her future income and simultaneously, this person is assumed to be risk-neutral to future income after taxes.
At this point, Niskanen states that no real government is optimal or perfect. The primary value of defining the characteristics and outcomes of optimal government is to provide a basis for comparison with the major types of real governments.
The Parameters
The section “The Parameters”, presents several sets of parameters for each type of government, each estimated from recent economic and fiscal conditions in the United States. In the subsequent analysis are compared the first-year effects with the long-term effects. For the comparison is also defined a parameter that reflects the actual set of fiscal and economic conditions in the United States in 1989.
Some Suggestive Quantitative Results
The models of government now provide a basis for suggestive quantitative answers to the several questions relating to the level of government spending or to the average tax rate. The differences in the fiscal decisions and economic outcomes are striking.
Outcomes based on parameters, that reflect the actual set of fiscal and economic conditions, are calculated to replicate the major fiscal decisions by government in the United States in 1989. The major results are that the autocratic government is a great benefit to the autocrat but a disaster for the general population. The autocrat would probably try to maintain the general population in effective slavery and the substitution of democratic for autocratic government generates large net benefits to the general population. The substitution of optimal government for democratic government substantially increases average net income but at some loss to the majority of the population. Comparisons across the major types of government indicate that total output increases with each step toward an optimal government. In summary, the democratic government may be better than any relevant alternative.
The major pattern of Outcomes of fiscal decisions based on their first-year effects is that the long-term effects of a myopic autocrat are slightly lower than the first-year effects. Another pattern is that democratic government leads to substantially higher total output, but also to the higher expenditures for domestic government services.
The outcomes of fiscal decisions that are based on their long-term effects are superior to those based on their first-year effects, even in the short term. Autocracy is clearly the worst form of government. Optimal government would have a slightly lower total output, government spending, and tax rate in comparison to a democratic government with a long fiscal horizon and no transfer payments.

Further, Niskanen analyses the democratic government with different distribution of income, different tax payments and different transfer payments. In this model, the best system appears to be that based on 50 percent voting rule with the progressive taxation.

I admire Niskanen’s ability to reduce complex settings to simple model and to do so in a way that allows him to extract empirically meaningful and interesting implications. According to me, the most interesting finding is that output and government services are higher in a democracy than in an autocracy, but the tax rate is lower. Then, I would agree with Niskanen that this type of analysis is not complete and merits extension, especially the effects of population change should be incorporated.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Government takes various forms. To help classify different types of governments, consider the following basic principles.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ap Comparative Government

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Since the beginning of America’s democratic success in the late eighteenth century, countries around the globe have strived to mimic a form of government that reflects the freedom to be politically competitive. The overall successes of these democratic countries are what draw global attention. Yet even those countries who reflect the most democratic political atmospheres fail to fully encompass a legitimate liberal democracy due to such a reality being impossible. Though there is no true liberal democracy, there are still those countries within the world today that reflect various aspects of a growing democracy. Such democratic growth is subject to the…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Define each form of government in the chart below. Then give examples of states with that form of government.…

    • 257 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Edwards III, G. C., Wattenberg, M. P., & Lineberry, R. L. (2008). Government in America (9th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Education, Inc..…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    59617 GV101

    • 2187 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gandhi, J. and Przeworski, A. (2007). Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats. Comparative Political Studies, [online] 40(11), pp.1279-1301. Available at: http://cps.sagepub.com.gate2.library.lse.ac.uk/content/40/11/1279.full.pdf+html [Accessed 16 Jan. 2015].…

    • 2187 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison's Dilemma

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are many systems of governments that can be classified into different types. Some of them being common amongst countries and some of them not so much. The two main organizations and/or alternatives that are most familiar are the presidential systems and the parliamentary systems. Various distinctions between these two types of systems can be distinguished. In a presidential system, the president is set apart from the legislative branch where as in the parliamentary system the chief executive (prime minister) is part of the legislative branch (the parliament).…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Prisoners' Right to Vote

    • 3646 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Bibliography: A. Blais, L. Maissicotte and A. Yoshinka, “Deciding who has the right to vote: a comparative analysis of election laws” (2001) 20 Electoral Studies 41 at 58…

    • 3646 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Parliamentary and presidential forms of government are the two principal types of democracy in the modern world. The respective advantages and disadvantages of the two systems have been long debated, at first mainly by British and American political participants and observers, but with increasing frequency in other parts of the world, especially in Latin America and the emerging states of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.…

    • 2237 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Political Ideology Essay

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Through out the past there have been many different forms of political ideology. With all theses different types of government you have to wonder sometimes which one of theses forms of government would be the best to run the ideal society. In this paper I will compare and contrast; liberalism, social democracy, fascism, communism, and anarchy. Also I will give my opinion on which one of these forms of government would be the most ideal to run a modern day county or society. Before I can begin comparing and contrasting we need to have a working understanding of all the political ideology’s stated above.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this essay, the authors aim to compare the systems of governance in Indonesia and Singapore, as well as how their differences have led to varied repercussions in both countries; those (repercussions) that will be closely examined here are the growth/development of stable governmental institutions, as well as the just rule of law. These are relatively newly-decolonized states existing side by side, in recent years taking different paths of governance. This resulted in wildly different outcomes. What was it about their different political paths that caused the difference? Is the fault with the democratic process, or with their implementation? Is there a certain developmental threshold within which democracy is just doomed to failure? Many of these questions traverse along peripheries of political doctrine and liberal ethics. Certainly, democracy is an unpredictable, and often messy process. Only by answering hard questions like these can it be better understood, and refined. This is what the authors hope to achieve.…

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cheibub, José Antonio, Jennifer Gandhi, and James Raymond Vreeland. "Democracy and dictatorship revisited." Public choice 143.1-2 (2010): 67-101.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: 1. Rabb, Theodore K., and Ezra N. Suleiman. The Making and Unmaking of Democracy: Lessons from History and World Politics. New York: Routledge, 2003. Print. 2. Lakoff, Sanford A. Democracy: History, Theory, Practice. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1996. Print.…

    • 2609 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This week’s readings all deal with attempting to qualify the ways in which different types of regimes either support or undermine stability of the authoritarian regime. The first reading, by Geddes, is a broad survey of types of authoritarian regimes (personalistic, military or single party) how each democratize differently. Geddes finds evidence that in all cases, economic development is likely to increase democratization. But beyond this, there is a great deal of variation, between military regimes, personalist and single party regimes. Essentially, military officers, on average are more likely to support the unity and function of the military, more than they value…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism Vs Socialism

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While both types of governments are successful in today’s world, they obviously have many differences. While government involvement, the economic systems, and their exercise of freedom of choice…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Political Science Paper

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The two most common types of democratic governmental systems are Parliamentary systems and Presidential systems. For many years, people have studied the effectiveness of both and have given reasons why a certain country should obtain a certain form of government. Examples of two countries that use these systems are Canada and the United States. Canada uses a traditional parliamentary system, and the United States uses a presidential system. In this paper, I will focus on the strengths of a parliamentary system, and the weaknesses of a presidential system, to prove my argument. Canada is better off with a parliamentary system then a presidential system for many reasons. In order for my argument to be persuasive, I will explain the differences in the two. In comparison to a presidential system, a parliamentary system has more closure in making decisions, the parties that exist within the system tend to be stronger, and there is a responsible government, which allows for the government leader to be more actively involved with its citizens.…

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays