Preview

Attorney-Client Privilege Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
549 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Attorney-Client Privilege Research Paper
Attorney-Client Privilege
AK

Defense attorneys often have to defend clients who are guilty of horrible crimes such as murder, rape, or assault with a deadly weapon. Their job is to defend the client, no matter of what the client actually did; their job is to try and get them off, or get them the minimum punishment. Attorney also have an attorney-client privilege, where the attorney is to keep anything the client tells them a secret, unless it is agreed upon to be used in the trial by both parties; the client and the attorney. So if a client was convicted to 25 years for killing two police officers and then admits to their defense attorney that they committed a third murder of a security guard, the attorney is expected not to relay this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hu Vs Fang Case Study

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    RULE: A [legal professional] shall not reveal information relating to representation of a client unless the client consents after consultation, except for disclosures that are impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation, and except as stated in paragraph…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I corrected your cover page – all I had to do was center the five lines on the cover page and delete some spacing between the lines. Citations are not correct, spacing is a problem, basic keyboarding problems with a space before a period at the end of a sentence and a space before a comma within a sentence.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The defense attorney says what he wants to say because the prosecutor has the last word in the process. The defense attorney is there for the criminal/defendant and to make the juries question all the evidence against the defendant. The prosecutor is there to give the last word in hopes that the jury can see the evidence for what it is.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A court administrator is in charge of the day-to-day office duties that keep the courthouse smoothly running. These administrators need managerial and organizational skills in order to track information, manage processes and delegate tasks to employees. Court administrators work closely with judges and referees, but also supervise court staff who perform clerical and financial duties. Court administrators start out earning approximately $36,000 per year, but can end up making $96,000.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defense lawyers fail to prepare for trial or to do proper investigations on the crime and the defendant’s background. The result is inability to interrogate the witnesses and experts and as such cases end up in wrongful convictions (Stuntz, 2011).…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Their main goal is to obtain the complete dismissal of the charges brought against their client or obtain a not guilty ruling by the jury of their peers or the judge. The criminal justice system is a 3 part system which includes the judge and jury, the prosecutor, and the defence lawyer. Each part of the system is there in order to prevent abuse of power, and make sure each person receives a fair and equal trial. If the accused did not have a defense attorney they would have noone to fight for them and their rights, this would cause the system to be even more corrupt and unbalanced, as every person presented to the court would already be guilty because they have no one to show the contradicting evidence in their…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper explores what I think is the constitutional flaw of our criminal justice system, attorney-client privilege. Under certain circumstances, information possessed by an attorney cannot be disclosed to others without the client 's consent because of the attorney-client privilege or certain other legal concepts. The attorney-client privilege, which dates back to the reign of Elizabeth I, was originally based on the concept that an attorney should not be required to testify against the client and, thereby, violate a duty of loyalty owed to the client. At that…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The fifth amendment's privilege not to answer, critics carp, insulates the guilty defendant from revealing his complicity.' While this is true, ironically it also can…

    • 4738 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I have always admired my family members and everything they do. Especially, my mother because i have always followed her footsteps. Even now as i grow into an adult following her footsteps has helped me more than ever with my future of becoming a paralegal. I’ve had the honor of working in a law office and gaining more interest in the profession and even more knowledge of it. In fact, “The Central Florida Paralegal Association (CEPA) was founded in 1938 to serve paralegals through continuing legal education and professional development” according to an article on paralegal411.org.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Public defenders don’t put values on money – they are mostly short on budget all the time – and they are the only ones who stand up for people who cannot afford, or whom no one wants to defend for. According to the United States Constitution sixth amendment, everyone has a right to have an attorney when they are arraigned in the court. Public defenders are the leading figures that follow the sixth amendment recognized by the government. But there is also a dilemma the public defenders would have to face. Michael Becker told us that it makes him feel more pressured when he knows the defendant is innocent, because if he loses the trial, he feels guilty for not being able to prove his innocence. However, If I were a public defender, the biggest dilemma I would have is to overcome the inner madness at the convict, particularly when the defendant shows no signs of regret; especially the case of psychopaths, who cannot sympathize with the victims and enjoy the agony of the victim or enjoy the murder itself. For example, Richard Ramirez, a serial killer with 20 victims, said after he was caught “I love to kill people. I love watching them die. I would shoot them in the head and they would wiggle and squirm all over the place, and then just stop. Or I would cut them with a knife and watch their faces turn real white. I love all that blood. I told one lady to give me all her money. She said no. So I cut her and pulled her eyes out.” If my client told me that, I would feel an urge to flip everything upside down. I cannot picture myself defending those horrendous criminals who trampled the victim’s rights…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A defense attorney can either be hired by the client, or the courts can appoint one to the accused. Prosecutors are there to represent the people and that…

    • 1422 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Right to Counsel

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages

    National Committee on the Right to Counsel 2011 National Legal Aid and Defender Associaton http://www.nlada.org/Defender/Defender_Kit/NCRC Retrieved October 9, 2011…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Right to Counsel

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The right to counsel is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution. It provides for counsel in phases of a criminal proceeding for anyone who cannot afford one. This wasn’t always the case. Early colonial days did not allow defendants the opportunity to hire their own attorney nor was one appointed. This right has been earned in incremental stages involving several precedent cases. Those cases include Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932), Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938), Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 321 (1972), and United States v. Wade, 388 U. S. 218 (1967). Today, counsel is guaranteed in all phases of critical pretrial events. Counsel is also guaranteed during post-trial sentencing procedures and in a first appeal to a conviction ensuring the presence, expert advice, and assistance at all stages of a prosecution (Kanovitz, 2010, p. 409).…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Right to Counsel

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights grant citizens privileges that can be interpreted in different ways, the right to counsel being one of them. The right to counsel is contained in the 6th and 14th Amendments of the United States Constitution while the 5th Amendment gives way to avoidance of self-incrimination. It holds the same meaning but stated differently to account for a variety of circumstances.…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A client does have attorney-client privilege when information is given to a paralegal. The only requirement is that the paralegal must keep the information confidential and not reveal it to anybody unless the client specifies otherwise…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays