Preview

Attention Getter For Capital Punishment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1696 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Attention Getter For Capital Punishment
Topic: Capital Punishment
General Purpose: To argue
Specific Purpose: To argue that the United States should outlaw capital punishment in all fifty states.
Thesis Statement: Capital Punishment should be outlawed in all fifty states because: (1) capital punishment once executed cannot be undone, and (2) the cost process of capital punishment isn’t worth the expense.
Introduction
I. [Attention Getter] Imagine being sentenced to die.
A. The United States gives you, the offender, five options to proceed.
1. Most likely your state will proceed with your execution through lethal injection.
2. There are other options if you so choose.
a) They are lethal gas, hanging, firing squad, and electrocution.
B. It’s hard to believe that the United States allows
…show more content…
[Constructive Argument] Capital punishment cannot be undone.
A. If any wrongfully accused individuals have been sentenced to death, nothing can be done for the individual after the execution.
1. The justice system makes mistakes.
a) Jennifer Givens, an assistant professor and legal director at the University of Virginia: School of Law, wrote a scholarly essay in June 2017 which states “Recent research suggests that the rate of wrongful convictions in capital cases where a death sentence was imposed is approximately four percent which means that approximately 120 of the roughly 3,000 inmates on death row in this country are not guilty” (Givens).
b) Givens also states “The common causes of wrongful convictions are well documented: police and prosecutorial misconduct, mistaken eye witness identification, false confessions, lying incentivized witnesses (usually jailhouse snitches), junk or stale science, and bad lawyering on the part of the defense counsel” (Givens).
c) Information provided by Givens shows that wrong convictions can easily happen.
B. Today, I will inform you of three instances where wrongfully convicted individuals were put to death because of capital
…show more content…
(1) It prevents the individual from committing more crimes while they are incarcerated.
B. [Attack the reasoning] Second, although capital punishment could be seen as a deterrent, there’s no data to support the claim.
1. From a scholarly essay written by John Lamperti, a professor of mathematics at Dartmouth university, the author does a statistical analysis on whether or not capital punishment deters murder.
a) In his findings, he states “Data from 1973 to 1984 show that murder rates in the states without the death penalty were consistently lower and averaged only 63% of the corresponding rates in the states retaining it” (Lamperti).
(1) This data is important because it analyzes murder rates in the states before and after the death penalty was reintroduced in the United States.
C. [Minimizing] Finally, capital punishment can’t be proven to be a deterrent, so the outlawing of capital punishment in the United States won’t increase crime.
D. [Impact] With the information I have provided, it contradicts those that want capital punishment.
1. There is no factual data to back up the claim.
2. Other deterrents must be taken into account.
3. The outlaw of capital punishment in the U.S. doesn’t have negative

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    George Bernard Shaw once said, “Murder and capital punishment are not opposites that cancel one another out but similar that breed their kind” (quoted in Costanzo 95). This shows why the act of the death penalty is not a deterrence to future criminals. If an individual truly feels the need to harm someone else, he/she will do it regardless of the consequences. By putting a murderer to death the, law is killing people, an act they are trying to deter people from.…

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In the early 1970, the top argument in favor of the death penalty was general deterrence” (Radelet & Borg, 2000, page 2). The authors argue that the death penalty does not prevent others from committing the same offense. They describe how deterrence studies have failed to support the hypothesis that the death penalty is more effective at preventing criminal homicides than along imprisonment.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bruck relies on the various cases of death row inmates to persuade the reader against the death penalty. His use of facts give body to the paper but little substance to support his stance. He states that the "rate of intentional homicide declined by 17 percent" in Florida when there were no executions performed in 1983 (David Bruck, 2).…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    10) The system can make errors with wrongful convictions being present today, what impact does this have on the idea of the death penalty as a punishment?…

    • 1912 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For this argument there is no proof to show that the action of capital punishment acts as a deterrent. When people kill, it is often done out of defence, anger, shock, or even accidently. The criminal doesn’t necessarily think before he or she pulls the trigger. Humans are famous for mistakes and…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    We consider the lethal injection humane compared to old forms of execution such as hanging or firing squad, when in reality, there have been many botched executions involving the lethal injection, and in some states, firing squad, gas chambers, hanging, and electrocution may still be used if the the lethal injection drugs are unavailable (Death, 2011). Because doctors are not ethically allowed to aid in the…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mistakes will be made in any system which relies upon human testimony for proof. We should be vigilant to uncover and avoid such mistakes. Our system of justice rightfully demands a higher standard for death penalty cases. However, the risk of making a mistake with the extraordinary due process applied in death penalty cases is very small, and there is no credible evidence to show that any innocent persons have been executed at least since the death penalty was reactivated in 1976... The inevitability of a mistake should not serve as grounds to eliminate the death penalty any more than the risk of having a fatal wreck should make automobiles illegal..."…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another benefit of the death penalty is that it decreases crime. A study was done in states where the death penalty was enacted and for every execution, 14 people are deterred from committing a murder each year (Muhlhausen). When criminals see the high form of punishment murders receive, they are fearful of what consequences they would face if they performed a similar violent crime.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is punishment by death for a convicted crime. American’s often consider it a controversial topic, especially in terms of its constitutionality. This paper aims to outline the constitutionality of the death penalty and argues that it is unconstitutional because it contradicts the Eighth and Sixth Amendments of the Constitution.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supporters of the death penalty always say that it is deterrent to crime but after several years of intensive research, 1)there is no proof that the death penalty is more effective than the alternatives. Furthermore the capital punishment is neither a practical nor a cost-efficient punishment. 2) In a detailed study in 2009,criminologists at the University of Texas at Dallas showed the falls information earlier studies provided, claiming that the death penalty had a deterrent effect (Christof Heyns and Juan Mendez). The government's job is it to protect the country’s citizens, but there is only little evidence that the death penalty is a strong deterrent to murder and other crimes. A recent study shows…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will examine the historical foundations, uses and the contemporary issues of the death penalty in America. It will go into where the death penalty came from and how it is used differently throughout the states. Understanding why America uses the death penalty. Outlines many issues caused by America using the death penalty. Discussing the different methods of execution and various laws adopted by various states.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment is embedded on an offender in case or a murder, drug trafficking, rape of a minor, treason, espionage, and few others. There are many questions that can be asked concerning this issue. Some are: Does it affect your religion? Do you believe it deters crime? Is the cost of the death penalty worth it? Is it humane? Noted in interviewing on these questions, most of the people say that the death penalty does not deter crime, that it is against their religion, it is a humane way to kill people, and that the cost is not worth it. For the most part the people whom were interviewed believe that the offenders who have committed capital crimes should just be put in jail for life instead of being put on the death…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is a cruel and barbaric way to stop crime. Most kids have heard the expression “do not fight fire with fire.” Using the death penalty is doing just that. Punishing criminals for murder by doing exactly what landed them in jail in the first place seems counterproductive. Instead, making felons live in prison, reflecting on their actions, gives them the opportunity to learn from their mistakes. No one would be able to live with themselves if they were involved with an innocent man being wrongfully executed. Eliminating capital punishment would make that fear…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thesis Statement: Research suggests that capital punishment should be abolished to obviate mishandled executions, prevent wrongfully convicted citizens from being put to death and to lower taxpayer dollars for incurred expenses for inmates on death row.…

    • 2185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays