Attachment Development and the Influence of Daycare on Attachments
The development of attachment relationships between children and parents constitutes one of the most important aspects of human social and emotional development. For years, the predominant view of infant-caregiver attachment was that it was a “secondary drive” i.e. that any attachment formed was because of the infant associating the caregiver with providing for physical needs such as hunger. However, John Bowlby argued that attachment is an innate primary drive in the infant. This theory was reinforced by Harlow & Zimmerman’s (1959) experiment involving baby monkeys who had been separated form their mothers and offered two surrogate “mothers”. One of these was made of wire, but had a nipple attached which provided food. The other was made of soft cloth and provided no nutrition. The results showed that the monkeys fed from the “wire mother” but cuddled up to the “soft cloth mother” and ran to “her” when frightened. It therefore seemed reasonable to conclude that the “soft cloth mother” provided “contact comfort” and satisfied a basic or primary need. Regardless however of whether attachment behaviour is instinctual or goal orientated, it results in the infant maintaining proximity to the parent.
Bowlby also recognised that the attachment was not purely dependent upon the social and emotional interaction between the infant and caregiver. It is also heavily dependent upon the infant’s cognitive development in terms of being able to represent an object that is not physically present. He based his argument on Piaget’s contention that this level of object permanence is not acquired until the infant is about eight months old. Thus, Bowlby suggested that attachment occurs in stages so as to allow for the needed cognitive development which enables the infant to miss an attachment figure and hence, demonstrate attachment behaviour. Bowlby claims that during the first phase (0-2 months) infants begin to develop a repertoire of signals, of which the cry is most
Bowlby also recognised that the attachment was not purely dependent upon the social and emotional interaction between the infant and caregiver. It is also heavily dependent upon the infant’s cognitive development in terms of being able to represent an object that is not physically present. He based his argument on Piaget’s contention that this level of object permanence is not acquired until the infant is about eight months old. Thus, Bowlby suggested that attachment occurs in stages so as to allow for the needed cognitive development which enables the infant to miss an attachment figure and hence, demonstrate attachment behaviour. Bowlby claims that during the first phase (0-2 months) infants begin to develop a repertoire of signals, of which the cry is most
References: Ainsworth, M. (1963, 1967) cited in Meins, E. (2003). Emotional Development and Early Attachment Relationships. In A. Slater and G. Bremner (Eds), An Introduction to Developmental Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Ainsworth, M. (1989) cited in Passer, M. and Smith, R. (2006) Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behaviour. New York: McGraw Hill. Bowlby, J. (1980) cited in Meins, E. (2003). Emotional Development and Early Attachment Relationships. In A. Slater and G. Bremner (Eds), An Introduction to Developmental Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Buss and Plomin, (1984) cited in Daniel, B., Wassell, S. and Gilligan R. (1999) Child Development for Child Care and Protection Workers. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Chess and Thomas, (1977) cited in Daniel, B., Wassell, S. and Gilligan R. (1999) Child Development for Child Care and Protection Workers. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Daniel, B., Wassell, S. and Gilligan R. (1999) Child Development for Child Care and Protection Workers. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Dozier, M., Chase Stovall, K Emde & Robinson, 1979 cited in Lamb, M.E., Ketterlinus, R.D. and Fracasso, M.P. (1992) Parent-Child Relationships. In M. Bornstein and M. Lamb (Eds), Developmental Psychology: An Advanced Textbook. Hove and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoicates, Publishers. Fahlberg (1994) cited in Daniel, B., Wassell, S. and Gilligan R. (1999) Child Development for Child Care and Protection Workers. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. George, Kaplan & Main (1985) cited in Meins, E. (2003). Emotional Development and Early Attachment Relationships. In A. Slater and G. Bremner (Eds), An Introduction to Developmental Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Harlow and Zimmerman (1959) cited in Meins, E. (2003). Emotional Development and Early Attachment Relationships. In A. Slater and G. Bremner (Eds), An Introduction to Developmental Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Hazan. C and Shaver, P.R. (1994). Author’s Response: Deeper into Attachment Theory .Psychological Inquiry, 5(1), 68-79. Lamb, M.E., Ketterlinus, R.D. and Fracasso, M.P. (1992) Parent-Child Relationships. In M. Bornstein and M. Lamb (Eds), Developmental Psychology: An Advanced Textbook. Hove and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoicates, Publishers. Main & Solomon (1986, 1990) cited in Meins, E. (2003). Emotional Development and Early Attachment Relationships. In A. Slater and G. Bremner (Eds), An Introduction to Developmental Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Meins, E. (2003). Emotional Development and Early Attachment Relationships. In A. Slater and G. Bremner (Eds), An Introduction to Developmental Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, (2001b) cited in Passer, M. and Smith, R. (2006) Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behaviour. New York: McGraw Hill. Passer, M Posada et al., (2002) cited in Passer, M. and Smith, R. (2006) Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behaviour. New York: McGraw Hill. Scarr, (19980 cited in Passer, M. and Smith, R. (2006) Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behaviour. New York: McGraw Hill. Stams et al., (2002) cited in Passer, M. and Smith, R. (2006) Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behaviour. New York: McGraw Hill. Santrok, (19940 cited in Daniel, B., Wassell, S