Preview

Atheist Argument

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
349 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Atheist Argument
So on an atheist page I follow the admin posted this and then some random guy says
"This argument is fallacious you all blame God for the bad things in life when really it's people because God gave us free will" and then several atheists begin to bicker and argue with him over who is right and wrong for literally an hour straight before I even read any of it but they totally miss the point this dude is so full of himself for having used all these big words and was so sure he was so much smarter than everyone in that forum until I hit him with this:
"Your argument was flawed from the start because you misunderstood the whole post. The post is simply calling this man out on his bullshit that if there was a god why in the world would he want
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    My Response to Mccloskey's "On Being an Atheist"
    • 2632 Words
    • 11 Pages

    My Response to Mccloskey's "On Being an Atheist"

    The paper written by McCloskey is nothing more than an Atheists attempt to justify his atheistic ideas and at no time should ever be taken by any other person as anything more than one man’s opinions which are based completely upon speculative ideas. Throughout this paper, I read statements like, “theists feel…”,” Most theists believe…”, “They do not think…”, and “Most theists conclude…”; however, the person giving these tidbits is only one person, as opposed to the “most” which he seems to speak for, and he is no more a “theist”, than the “man in the moon”. I would be more inclined to over look his made-up statistics, had a single one of his claims lined up with my theistic ideas; however, every time he claimed to know how the “theists” think or feel, it turned out to be the opposite of my theistic point of view. The very basis for this fallacy can be tied to a statement in McCloskey’s opening sentence: “…the grounds upon which theists base their belief in God…” In this statement, McCloskey claims to know why theists believe in God. My next claim is pure speculation; however, if I were to ask every person in my church congregation, “why do you believe in God”, I seriously doubt anyone would respond with the cosmological argument or the teleological argument.…

    • 2632 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument
    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument

    exist. He says that anyone who has an understanding of the existence of God can and logically…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Response To Mccloskey's 'On Being An Atheist'
    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Response To Mccloskey's 'On Being An Atheist'

    The 1970’s philosopher McCloskey brings into question the three major arguments that are commonly presented against the question of God’s existence. McCloskey does so in an article entitled “On Being an Atheist.” In this article McCloskey commonly refers to these arguments as “proofs” rather than simply arguments. Furthermore, he argues that these “proofs” can’t be positively established and therefore one should throw said “proofs” out. In terms of a theistic view on the question of God’s existence theist openly admit that there arguments could indeed be defeasible. Theists acknowledge that there is a possibility that a defeater can be presented to shut down the conclusion…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Alister Acgrath: A Comparative Analysis
    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Alister Acgrath: A Comparative Analysis

    McGrath’s book was a criticism of Dawkins’ book The God Delusion. McGrath points out that one of Dawkin’s main arguments is that the world is so complex and improbable, that if God created the world he would have to be at least as complex and improbable as the world. Dawkins then argues that something so complex would need an explanation that we currently do not have. McGrath points out that Dawkins has admitted that humanity itself is incredibly improbable, however, we are here. McGrath is stating that it is irrelevant how improbable God is just as it is irrelevant how improbable humanity, what is relevant according to McGrath is whether God is actual. McGrath argues that it is obvious that God is incredibly improbable, however, anything that created humanity, and humanity itself is incredibly improbable. Therefore, it is not reasonable to say God is very improbable and therefore he does not exist, because any explanation for the creation of humanity will be improbable. However, Dawkins argues this point by stating “We cannot, of course, disprove God, just as we can't disprove Thor, fairies, leprechauns and the Flying Spaghetti Monster.” Moreover, McGrath argues that Dawkins unfairly portrays religious people as not very intelligent. McGrath disputes this by pointing out that both he and Antony Flew converted to religion as adults after obtaining educations at some of the best schools in the world. Dawkins…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close

    “Just because you’re an atheist, that doesn’t mean you wouldn’t love for things to have reasons for why they are.” (13)…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    GCSE Questions
    • 1462 Words
    • 8 Pages

    GCSE Questions

    (e) [12 marks] Discuss this statement. You should include different, supported points of views and a personal viewpoint. You must refer to Christianity in your answer.…

    • 1462 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mccloskey's Arguments Against Atheism
    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mccloskey's Arguments Against Atheism

    Comfort in atheism, McCloskey states people are happier in the knowledge there is no God, allowing them to find comfort from self and the good will of others. McCloskey says if God were to exist then He would be responsible for the things which cause man to need comfort, calling it “cold comfort from religion” with God as the responsible party for any and all evil. Continuing with this line of reason, he advocates many different forms of terminating life as a means to avoid the need for comfort, some less objectionable methods are also given which generally follow with making use of modern medicine . This solution has characteristics of the atheist solution to accept the absurdity of life without God and live bravely, it also uses elements of what Craig calls entering into the area of God, by seeking to give purpose and value to life, which without God does not exist. Man cannot simply…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Theistic Argument Bias
    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Theistic Argument Bias

    In What Question Does a Theistic Argument Answer, Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski argues that the three arguments for the existence of a deity are responses to an assortment of inquiries. We cannot know if one of the arguments is successful, unless we can comprehend the question the argument aims to answer. In addition, we need to know who is asking the question. For instance, an agnostic may be asking a question directed towards both a theist and atheist. She also believes dialogue between open-minded individuals is more productive than a debate with a dogmatic individual. The open-minded dialogues can lead to a better understanding of the subject. Arguments for God were not originally intended to convert…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Philosophical Argument For God's Sake
    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Philosophical Argument For God's Sake

    In this paper I will: (i) state the premises and conclusion of St. Thomas Aquinas's “Uncaused Cause” argument, I will argue that the argument is a deductive argument. Merriam-Webster.com's definition of cause is: “something or someone that produces an effect, result, or condition: something or someone that makes something happen or exist”. (www.merriam-webster.com) A deductive argument is an argument in which the premise or premises claim to prove that the conclusion is true. An inductive argument is an argument in which the premise or premises claim to prove that in most cases the conclusion is true. I will argue that the argument is a priori. A Priori knowledge is knowledge that can be obtain based…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cosmological Argument: Proving The Existence Of God
    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Cosmological Argument: Proving The Existence Of God

    There are 3 main arguments that each seek to prove the existence of God; the Ontological, Cosmological, and Teleological Arguments. Each is different in its approach, but all arrive at the same conclusion. Ontological Argument argues God’s existence from the assumption of the existence a “Greatest Thing that can ever be conceived.” From there, it argues that in order for something to be “The Greatest Thing ever” it must exist physically (that is outside of the mind). The Cosmological Argument argues that since everything in the universe is contingent (or is dependent on other things for its existence), there must be a first cause that set the universe in motion.…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    response to Being an Atheist
    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages

    response to Being an Atheist

    In fact McCloskey places the bar even lower by referring to the “proofs of” rather than “arguments for” God’s existence, thereby overstating the Theist’s claim. With respect to the “proofs” for God’s existence that McCloskey attempts to deal with, namely the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments, McCloskey offers trivial objections that are easily answered. With respect to arguments for God’s non-existence, McCloskey offers the logical form of the problem of evil which, while rich in rhetoric, does not contain enough logic to necessitate its title. McCloskey ends his article with a pragmatic justification of Atheist, stating that Atheism is more comforting that Theism; a point that is stark in its irrelevance.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    On Being an Atheist
    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    On Being an Atheist

    McCloskey makes the claim that he is reminding fellow atheist why they believe there is no God. He claims that the traditional proofs have no merit. I believe the sheer magnitude and complexity of the world we live in is strong evidence of an intelligent designer and creator. Only an intelligent creator could form a world where the air that we breathe is part of such a complex system. We also live in a world that has morals, which points to a morally perfect Being that we model our lives and society by. The Cosmological, Teleological and Moral arguments create a cumulative case for why God exist. God’s existence is not solely dependent on any one argument, rather an accumulation of several arguments. Although McCloskey tries to argue the Cosmological, Teleological and Moral arguments from the same point, they are intended to build upon each other.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Bertrand Russell: Why I Am Not a Christian
    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bertrand Russell: Why I Am Not a Christian

    He believes that a true Christian is someone who believes in God and immortality and someone who truly believes in Christ and his teachings. Now he begins to gives reasons as to why he is not a true Christian. He begins with the first which is existence of God by using several arguments. The first one is First Cause Argument. It states that everything there is in the world has a cause and a purpose. Everything is made by someone, for example, take a watch, a watch is made by a human but who made humans. We come to a chain where if you go further and further back you come to the First Cause and people have given the First Cause the name of God. So in my example, if humans made watch then god made humans. God is the First cause. He argues here that if God made humans and humans made objects then who made god. If we are to believe this theory then we must believe that someone must have made god. The question is who made god. He is not trying to prove that there is no god he just believes that it is our minds and imagination that came up with the fact that everything in this world has a beginning. "There is no reason to suppose that the world had a beginning at all," (Russell, 24). I agree with his theory on the First Cause Argument. Not everything has a beginning because if we were to look at it deeper then nobody knows that God actually exists except for what's written in books by people many years ago. Even if he does exist according to the theory we should also know how god was…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Is the Greek Idea of a Sound Mind and Body Essential for the Succe
    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Is the Greek Idea of a Sound Mind and Body Essential for the Succe

    made an attempt to express his valid point of view, and does so, but fails to…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Of Theism Vs. Atheism
    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Arguments Of Theism Vs. Atheism

    Do you believe in God? God is a being that no one has ever been able to prove exists. When someone chooses to believe in God; that decision is based solely on their faith. It is a decision that someone decides in their heart, which is often based on experiences in their life; whether they are simply personal experiences or religious ones. It is not a secret to anyone that God has never been be seen, heard, nor touched by any living human according to history and the present day. Though, the bible gives the personal testimonies of many righteous men of God’s goodness and existence, how can one prove that to be true? According to Nils Ch. Raught (2007) “If [an] argument from religious experiences is to be successful, we must focus our attention on those religious experiences that closely resemble ordinary perceptual experiences” (p. 180). So, I…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics