At The Pitt Rivers Summary
At The Pitt Rivers
While “At The Pitt Rivers” may center around the development and progress of a couple, it also speaks to the influence that couple had on the narrator. Although the narrator may seem like just another pair of judgemental eyes, they (the gender of the narrator is never actually revealed--therefore could be referred as “they”) are looking at this couple very anthropologically. The narrator notices all the fine details of the way that they interacted: “They stood there looking at each other, not talking anymore, and I realised I hadn’t made a mistake after all. Absolutely not. They didn’t touch each other, they just stood and looked; it seemed like ages” (Lively 27). They noticed all the little details, all the tiny hints …show more content…
For instance, because they are noticing the love, they put their own relationships under a microscope: “The first time was with a girl in my class at school and I suppose it was a bit of a trial run, really, I mean I’m not altogether sure how much I was feeling it but it seemed quite important when it was going on” (Lively 25). When reading this passage in your head, you can almost sense the doubt and unsureness. Also, there is the fact that the narrator then take themselves into perspective: “I’m not that good-looking myself, only a B+” (Lively 25). This passage reveals that they may be thinking of the love the couple that they are watching invalidates all the love that they have had or may ever have. Until the narrator of this story sees the couple the story is centered around, they believe they know what love is but, the couple makes them second guess if they have really ever experienced it …show more content…
First of all, the narrator themself criticizes the quality of their work before having witnessed the couple in love: “Sometimes I feel I’m getting somewhere with this poetry, and other times it looks to me pretty awful” (Lively 27). The narrator is acknowledging that their work isn’t perfect and that it is missing something. After the narrator has witnessed the story that has unfolded before them they decide that their poetry doesn’t do any justice to their topic: “I never did go on with that poem. I tore it up, as far as it had got; I wasn’t so sure about that conversation, that there could even be one, or not like I’d been imagining, anyway” (Lively 31). Now, the author has seen that maybe they don’t know what they’re doing. They recognize that their work is faulty, the new information that they have learned from the couple most likely to blame. Where the narrator may have already been a great poet, the experiences they have witnessed have changed the way they perceive things and perhaps even made them a better
While “At The Pitt Rivers” may center around the development and progress of a couple, it also speaks to the influence that couple had on the narrator. Although the narrator may seem like just another pair of judgemental eyes, they (the gender of the narrator is never actually revealed--therefore could be referred as “they”) are looking at this couple very anthropologically. The narrator notices all the fine details of the way that they interacted: “They stood there looking at each other, not talking anymore, and I realised I hadn’t made a mistake after all. Absolutely not. They didn’t touch each other, they just stood and looked; it seemed like ages” (Lively 27). They noticed all the little details, all the tiny hints …show more content…
For instance, because they are noticing the love, they put their own relationships under a microscope: “The first time was with a girl in my class at school and I suppose it was a bit of a trial run, really, I mean I’m not altogether sure how much I was feeling it but it seemed quite important when it was going on” (Lively 25). When reading this passage in your head, you can almost sense the doubt and unsureness. Also, there is the fact that the narrator then take themselves into perspective: “I’m not that good-looking myself, only a B+” (Lively 25). This passage reveals that they may be thinking of the love the couple that they are watching invalidates all the love that they have had or may ever have. Until the narrator of this story sees the couple the story is centered around, they believe they know what love is but, the couple makes them second guess if they have really ever experienced it …show more content…
First of all, the narrator themself criticizes the quality of their work before having witnessed the couple in love: “Sometimes I feel I’m getting somewhere with this poetry, and other times it looks to me pretty awful” (Lively 27). The narrator is acknowledging that their work isn’t perfect and that it is missing something. After the narrator has witnessed the story that has unfolded before them they decide that their poetry doesn’t do any justice to their topic: “I never did go on with that poem. I tore it up, as far as it had got; I wasn’t so sure about that conversation, that there could even be one, or not like I’d been imagining, anyway” (Lively 31). Now, the author has seen that maybe they don’t know what they’re doing. They recognize that their work is faulty, the new information that they have learned from the couple most likely to blame. Where the narrator may have already been a great poet, the experiences they have witnessed have changed the way they perceive things and perhaps even made them a better