Preview

Asymmetric Integration in the EU: Nuclear Energy Policy within European member states

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2392 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Asymmetric Integration in the EU: Nuclear Energy Policy within European member states
Roberto Maria Sciarra
Prof. Lars Rensmann
PL 315 Institutions and Policies of the European Union
November 2, 2013
Asymmetric Integration in the EU: Nuclear Energy Policy within European member states

The delegation of powers by member states for the process of integration has made the European Union unique in its kind. Although the main European theoretical schools might argue whether the EU is more supranational and intergovernmental, no one can argue that European states have made a serious commitment to create an “ever closer union”. Especially with the arrival of the single currency, it is clear that the level of cooperation among the European member states is nothing comparable either to any other International Governmental Organization (IGO) in the world or to any other federal state. Nowadays, the EU legislation affects several policy areas by trumping domestic law and by hampering the sovereign powers of its member states. However, compared to all the other policy fields that EU monitors, regulates, and enforces, the nuclear policy field has remained quite silent. Indeed, while all the other policy areas went through a functional integration process, the issue of nuclear energy remained clearly in the hands of states and rather went through a process of disintegration. Nonetheless, nuclear energy is far for not being important in the European scenario; a lot of states make nuclear energy one the main sources of power and the public sphere pays serious attention to it.
Therefore, this paper will try to address the nuclear energy integration process as a failure compared to the fact that member states really take into account the importance (and the dangers) of nuclear energy. The paper will basically focus on the main EU institution that deals with nuclear energy (EURATOM) and its failure. In addition, public opinion, alongside with the policies adopted in this field by the governments of the member states, will be taken into analysis to



Cited: Barry, Andrew, and William Walters. "From EURATOM to "Complex Systems": Technology and European Government." Alternatives 28 (2003): 305-29. JSTOR. Web. 03 Nov. 2013. Croft, Stuart. "European Integration, Nuclear Deterrence, and Franco-British Nuclear Cooperation." International Affairs 72.4 (1996): 771-87. JSTOR. Web. 03 Nov. 2013. Johnson, Debra. "Nuclear Energy Policy in the European Union: Meltdown or False Alarm?"Journal of International Affairs 53.1 (1999): 149-63. JSTOR. Web. 03 Nov. 2013. Schneider, Mycle. "France’s Great Energy Debate." Bullettin of the Atomic Scientists 69.1 (2013): 27-35. JSTOR. Web. 03 Nov. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As the theory outlines the three streams did indeed diverge after the crisis at the Fukishima-Daichi Nuclear power station on March 11th, 2011. The public outcry over the perceived danger of utilising Nuclear Power to source our energy (Is nothing new, as there has always been a strong anti-nuclear lobby within public discourse, however it reached its pinnacle during this crisis in March 2011. This is the 1st stream of the theory in action since the crisis dominating news headlines across the globe had put the question of whether Europe’s Nuclear power stations are safe on the agenda. The 2nd stream of Kingdon’s Multiple-Streams framework was initiated when the European Nuclear Safety Regulation Group (ENSREG) were empowered by the European Commission based off a mandate given to it by the European Parliament and the Council to examine the current situation which the European Nuclear Energy sector found itself in and to conduct stress tests on Nuclear reactors across the European Union. And finally, the 3rd stream was when the European Commission after consulting reports made by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the European Nuclear Safety Regulation Group, adopted a formal position on the matter and compiled a proposal on it. The legislative proposal adopted by the European Commission at the end of the agenda setting stage adopted the…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tucker Nuclear Summary

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to remain at the forefront of technological innovation and industrial prowess, the United States must become cognizant that the use of nuclear energy is by far the most efficient policy regarding the creation of power despite the possible risks. This is the belief of William Tucker, the author of the New York Times published article, “Why I Still Support Nuclear Power, Even after Fukushima”.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today nuclear power as an efficient and low consumption energy has been used widely, however, nuclear energy has potential and serious problems which people can not control.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear powers biggest threat is from the public’s perception of it. As seen in Germany as well as throughout Europe, if the public deems something too unsafe and does not want to live near it, the governments will have no choice but to shut down the plants and look for different sources of energy. Compared to biofuels and solar power, nuclear power is already extremely established and generates a large share of the worlds’ power, and faces most of its issues in the political realm instead of the practical…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tannenwald, N., (1999) ‘The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-use’ International Organization 53(3): 433-48…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fission and Fusion

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Article 2: “Should the world increase its reliance on nuclear energy?” The beginning of this article gives brief examples of the pros and cons of nuclear reactors from both sides. Opponents cite the case of the recent Japanese power plant disaster and dangers of Iran’s formation of nuclear power. Proponents argue that the backlash is overblown. They say how there have been no measured effects of human…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Eerkens, J. (2006). The nuclear imperative: A critical look at the approaching energy crisis. (Vol. 11, pp. 1-18). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three Mile Island Effects

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Todd H. Otis, A Review Of Nuclear Energy in the United States: Hidden Power, (New York, NY: Praeger Publishers,…

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lettow, Paul Vorbeck. 2010 Strengthening the nuclear nonproliferation regime. New York Council on forgein Relations. Print…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    and climate policy objectives to be met at least EUR 30 bn will have to be…

    • 10253 Words
    • 42 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The highly praised neo-realist thinker Kenneth Waltz is of the opinion that Iran should go nuclear (Waltz, 2012). He considers that a nuclear Iran will bring nuclear stability in the area of the Middle East. There have been past antagonism and unsympathetic liaison between Iran and the US and her supporter Israel. The anxiety has lately been intensify by Iran’s nuclear ambition (Wege, 2013). At the same time Matthew Kroenig and Colin Kahl are in favor of attacking Iran only differentiating them with one of attacking as soon as possible ( Kroenig, 2012) while Colin wants to take the time with a more diplomatic means first and war as last resort (Kahl, 2012). The West has reacted to this endeavor by hitting Tehran with various sanctions and trade embargos on her commodities. We have seen how ineffective this is against North-Korea and yet they have in the end been able to develop nuclear weapons. After acquiring nuclear weapons for several years the North-Korean leadership has not directly decided to use it neither against their southern neighbors nor against Japanese and US military bases and installations. Thus the question poses: how will the region change if Iran acquires the Nuclear weapon?…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Japan's Nuclearisation

    • 3591 Words
    • 15 Pages

    When North Korea declared the use of uranium enrichment on an industrial scale it caused international unease. This revelation brought to light the on-going issue of state’s nuclear capability. In a post-Cold war era the global arena is wary of any nuclear movement or development within states. An international non-proliferation treaty entered into force in 1970 holding the signatures of the nuclear states; the United Kingdom, the United States, France, Russia and China. It promotes cooperation and the goal of nuclear disarmament in an age where states arm themselves to deter other states from resorting to the use of nuclear weapons. Japan “is what non-proliferation specialists call a “threshold” nuclear weapons state – a …[state] that could stage a nuclear breakout virtually overnight should its electorate and leadership resolve to do so” (Holmes, 2012). For the purpose of this essay, the term nuclear will cover both nuclear energy and nuclear weapons as uranium can form both.…

    • 3591 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As Lucas W. Davis suggests, the continuously increasing enthusiasm for nuclear power has been shifted down by the Fukushima nuclear accident in 2011. In addition, voices for establishing restrictive regulations and increasing security systems are becoming louder and louder. Actually, controversy on nuclear power can be tracked back to the 1950s, when scientists pointed out that “nuclear accidents, proliferation risk, and the storage of spent fuel” are inevitable problems of nuclear power. Until today, these potential risks still exist and threaten people’s daily life. Therefore, more than a few economists doubt…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nuclear Technology

    • 1360 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Concerns about the disastrous event in the past make people to look into nuclear technology in a very negative perspective. For example, the 1979 partial meltdown of a reactor at Three Mile Island and the Chernobyl disaster in 1986. On that note, the most recent international event regarding nuclear technology possession, where Iran falls under probation for using nuclear technology for non-peaceful purposes (Iran entitled to use peaceful nuclear technology: EU official, 2013). It is not denied that nuclear power could lead to nuclear weapon creation which has long-lasting devastating effects on the environment and harmful to mankind. Though there are some disadvantages in nuclear technology, the amount of advantages is higher compared to risks that it brings (Sustainable Development & Nuclear Power). The benefits and the importance of nuclear technology are exposed in the following parts of the essay.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays