Preview

Assignment Philo

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
469 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assignment Philo
Dyna U. Barquio BSEd English 2D February18, 2015
Philosophy
A Reflection Paper
“God’s not Dead”
The story of a college freshmen and earnest Christian, Josh Wheaton, finds his faith tested and challenged on the first day of his Philosophy class by the strict, atheist and confrontational Professor namely Professor Radisson. Radisson starts his class by keeping and telling his students that they will need to renounce in a sheet of paper, the existence of God, or else they get a failing grade. When Josh’s fellow student begins writing the words “God is Dead” on a piece of paper. Josh found himself in confusion for having to choose between his faith and his future life. He refused to obey the instruction causing the annoyance of his professor. Radisson gave him a disheartening task. If Josh will not admit and write that “God Is Dead,” he must prove God’s existence by presenting well scholarly, academic arguments and proof for the benefit of the course. Moreover, he’ll have a one-on-one discussion in front of the class. Auspiciously, he was able to defend his belief against his atheist professor.
“Faith is taking the first step even when you don’t see the whole staircase”. Truly the movie “God’s Not Dead” awakened me as a Christian. That it takes fervent heart and passionate faith to really fight for what you believe. Josh is a great example for this. He stand to his belief and prove to everyone the existence of God. He sacrificed and took a risk of losing his loved ones and his future life not because he wants to but because he knows what he’s doing. His faith is indeed consistent and immeasurable. Josh’s stand to his faith and belief is somehow analogous in standing up for your best friend. You don’t want someone to trouble him nor someone dismay him. You don’t want to happen this because you care and love him. You’ll do everything to protect him and to make him happy.
Truly, this movie taught me that “Faith takes God

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Phil 101

    • 2375 Words
    • 10 Pages

    A. Protrusion of the disk material may impinge on nerve roots that exit through intervertebral foramina.…

    • 2375 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phillis Wheatly was born in 1753. At the young age of 8, Phillis was kidnapped and brought overseas on a slave ship to Boston. John Wheatly then purchased Phillis as a servant for his wife. Phillis was taken under the wing on Susanna, John’s wife.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Beyond Scared Straight, Josh does not change. He has grown into his ways so much that he cannot stop and he is used to it. Stephen, another teen who visited Corcoran did not change much either, especially after his mother was gone. Stephen thought he had no reason to be good anymore because the woman who taught him to be good died. A reason how people don't know how to change is clued through "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" by Jonathan Edwards. Edwards explains the consequences of not believing in God or being saved. There are possibilities that people would not know how to get saved. Also, maybe all their life they grew up without believing in anything and they might not know how to make a relationship with God. They still do their own things because that is what they are used to. Some people believe in something else besides God, and so they would not be afraid of Edwards's speech, even if he were screaming from the top of his lungs and describing the horrific consequences of not believing. Above all, many people do not know how to change and are used to their normal…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Phil 101

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In understanding “The Grand Inquisitor” and chapters taken from The Brothers Karamazov, the heart of Ivan’s search is a philosophical question: if God is almighty, why would God allow people to suffer? While this line of questioning can be seen as attacking faith by asking why God punishes people, it opens the door to understanding that faith requires willingness. Ivan Karamazov’s rejection of secular and Westernized faith can also be seen as the failed struggle of trying to find a God he can believe in. Ivan says he wants to get to know his estranged brother Alyosha (Dostoevsky, 1993, p. 1), but Ivan is lost and faithless, primarily because Ivan is unwilling to believe in God when he sees so much suffering in the world. Aloysha cuts to the heart of the estrangement between the two of them when he asks Ivan how he can love without having God in his heart (Dostoevsky, 1993, pp. 36-37).…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Christopher Hitchens’ New Atheist novel, “God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything” written in 2007, highlights everything that is wrong with religion, and how its effects are detrimental to society. Hitchens critiques Christianity, Judaism, and even Hinduism and Buddhism, for their atrocities and blasphemous beliefs and makes a very valid point as to why many individuals have turned away from religion. Though quite persuasive in some cases, other times the novel makes points that seem weak or trivial in regards to the “evilness” of religion. Each chapter of Hitchens’ book emphasizes a certain wrongdoing religion has committed, or how religion has poisoned society.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In February of 1968, H. J. McCloskey’s published an article called, “On Being an Atheist.” In this, he argues that atheism is a more comfortable, logical and realistic than theism. He mentions the evil that is in the world and how it doesn’t make any sense to find comfort in a God that purposely causes pain, disease and natural disasters. McCloskey also mentions it is unreasonable to live by faith in this world. In this article, he argues the three theistic proofs including, the argument for design, the teleological argument and the cosmological argument.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Christianity succeeds where atheism fails, atheism is ultimately death an exercise in futility. God’s existence enables us to live happy lives with a hope for things yet to come . These arguments, defenses, and theodicies all serve as ways for a person to understand in part, none by themselves offer indisputable proof of God’s existence. They do however make the existence of a necessary being, a first cause, probable. Building on this this first cause, the God of theism, becomes more evident, this finally gives the suggestion of the God of Christianity, the God of the Bible. This God who reveals Himself in the Bible, as one who created, sustains, loves, and died for His creation. The problem of evidence evaporates for the one who accepts this God, the true God. He reveals Himself to those who seek Him in faith, ones who truly believe. Craig rightly quotes Francis Schaeffer “If God is dead, then man is dead too.” The atheist must live the noble lie to find any meaning to life, this often fails…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    It goes without question, that human beings will always question the existence of “God”. Whether these questions are formed in support or denial of an omnipresent creator they are important in helping shape our morality. H J McCloskey and his article “On Being and Atheist” is very critical of theists. It thus presents several arguments on how believers are incorrect in their belief in “God”, cosmological and teleological. McCloskey also focus’s on the existence of evil and how one can find comfort in atheism when facing evil.…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever thought to yourself, is there a god? Is there actually an almighty being to protect us? Someone who will be there to forgive us for our immoralities? Well in this report, I will be examining evidence there is that suggests the existence of god to determine whether or not there I a possibility of the existence of God.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    H. J Mccloskey Essay

    • 2165 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Australian Philosopher and atheist, H.J. McCloskey published an article titled “On Being an Atheist” in 1968. In this article he offers arguments and what he refers to as “proofs” that a theists’ beliefs in an omnipotent, omniscient God should be disregarded. McCloskey bases his article on the Cosmological argument, the Teleological argument, on the problem of evil and ends his writing discussing why he claims that being an atheist offers more comfort than a theist has from a belief in God. This response will argue the truth and validity of the claims that McCloskey attempts to disprove in his article and will offer an argument to disprove that atheism is comforting.…

    • 2165 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Response Paper

    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1968, a article was published by a man named H.J. McCloskey called “On Being an Atheist”, in which an attempt to present arguments against the existence of God is made. In his work, McCloskey attempts to provide readers with the argument that atheism is more “reasonable and comfortable (McCloskey,1968)” compared to the alternative theistic view. In his article, McCloskey attempts to make arguments against the three typical theistic proofs of God which includes the cosmological and teleological arguments, along with the argument from design. McCloskey uses the existence of evil and the irrationalness off faith against the theistic view of God. At the beginning of the article it seems that an intriguing argument will be made regarding the theistic view point of God, yet as McCloskey continues the argument becomes more biased in attacking spiritual beliefs which questions his validity.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pseudo-questions: Asking a question based on a false premise. "Why does the Obama administration want to punish poor people?" A political pundit might ask this question about the proposed health care plan in which Americans will be required to buy insurance. 


Equivocation: Relying on two meanings of a word to make your point; changing the meaning partway through the argument. "I'm not prejudiced. Some of my best friends are black." This argument takes advantage of different meanings of the word "prejudiced". On the one hand, it can mean actively or knowingly disliking people of a particular race or ethnic group. But on the other hand, it can also mean having under-the-surface, unconscious stereotypes. Most people probably have the second kind of "prejudice", even if it's subconscious. 


Ad hominem: attacking the person instead of the issue; name-calling. "Arnold Schwarzenegger is a muscle-bound lunkhead who doesn't know what's best for this state." This would be a personal attack on an individual that doesn't at all address any kinds of arguments or issues.

Mere assertion: Stating something but not giving any reason for it. "God doesn't exist." The most common atheist "argument" is no argument at all but simply a statement of fact. Of course, in the case of atheism, atheists are arguing from negative evidence, which is much harder than simply making the assertion.


Circular reasoning: Using the premise itself, or something that follows from the premise, in order to prove the premise. "I know God exists because the Bible says so and the Bible is the word of God." This argument is circular; in fact, nothing in the Bible can be said to "prove" the existence of God.


Red herring: Changing the subject. Bringing up irrelevant information instead of addressing the relevant points. "The drinking age should be lowered to 18 because 18 year olds are old enough to die for…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In fact McCloskey places the bar even lower by referring to the “proofs of” rather than “arguments for” God’s existence, thereby overstating the Theist’s claim. With respect to the “proofs” for God’s existence that McCloskey attempts to deal with, namely the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments, McCloskey offers trivial objections that are easily answered. With respect to arguments for God’s non-existence, McCloskey offers the logical form of the problem of evil which, while rich in rhetoric, does not contain enough logic to necessitate its title. McCloskey ends his article with a pragmatic justification of Atheist, stating that Atheism is more comforting that Theism; a point that is stark in its irrelevance.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Expect different forms of the argument from religious experience, e.g. inductive argument, direct awareness, cumulative argument. Also expect reference to Swinburne’s principle of credulity and principle of testimony. Maximum Level 2 if summary of types of religious experience with no reference to argument for God.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Issues About Christianity

    • 3891 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Tutu, D., & Allen, J. (2011). God is not a Christian: and other provocations. New York, NY: HarperOne.…

    • 3891 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays

Related Topics