Preview

Assignment 1 answer

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
957 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assignment 1 answer
BUSI 393 - ASSIGNMENT #1
ANSWER GUIDE QUESTION 1: 10 MARKS
Review with Mike any legal issues he may use to defend the claim brought by Grace.
Can Grace bring her action against Mike in Small Claims Court?
The law is that an action can only be commence in Small Claims Court in B.C. where there is a civil action and the remedy sought is damages of less than or equal to $25,000.
Mike could argue that since Grace is suing for $75,000 she must commence the action against him in the Supreme Court of B.C. and not in Small Claims Court.
Can Grace base her claim on the Charter of Rights and Freedoms?
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms applies only to Government and Government action or decision making. It prevents the government from creating laws or taking action that would be contrary to the rights guaranteed in the Charter.
In this case because the action by Grace involves an interpersonal relationship between an employer and an employee, the Charter would not apply. She would have to base her arguments on the appropriate section(s) of the Human Rights Code.
It seems that Mike's defences under these two grounds would be successful. He may be able to stall the action brought by Grace but perhaps not eliminate it. She will have to begin her action in B.C. Supreme Court for breach of the Human Rights Code (not the Charter of Rights and Freedoms)
QUESTION 2: 15 MARKS
a) Assess any legal rights that Meghan and Duncan may have against Neil (10 marks)
Issue: Do Neil and Meghan have a contract?
Law and Application:
In order for there to be a contract there must be intent, offer, acceptance and consideration. The onus will be on Meghan to prove that she has a contract with Neil.
In commerce generally, the element of intent is presumed to exist. It seems that Neil and Meghan are dealing at arm's length and that intent would likely be presumed to exist.
An offer is a proposal plus intent. The offer must have clarity on the parties, the object and the exchange. The facts tells us

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    If Pat brings an action against Dan, what are the legal issues involved in this action and how should each be resolved? Discuss.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Procedure: Plaintiff Katko filed suit against Briney in Mahaska District Court seeking damages for injury suffered by defendant. After trial by jury and in accordance with jury verdict, Court awarded plaintiff actual and punitive damages. Court denied defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for new trial. Defendant appealed.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is a dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant as to the plaintiff’s actual role in the start-up of CMSA. Mr. Beatty states that he ‘founded’ CMSA while the CMSA states that he is exaggerating his role. The Courts perceived that Mr. Beatty played an important role in the start-up but did not ‘create’ CMSA.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The respondent Andrews, a British subject permanently resident in Canada. Andrews met all the requirements for the admission to the British Columbia Bar except for Canadian Citizenship, section 42(a) of Barrister and Solicitors Act. He commenced legal action for a declaration that the requirement violated section 15(1) Of the Canadian charter of rights and freedoms; this was dismissed at the trial but allowed on the appeal. The appellants, the Law society of British Columbia and Attorney General of British Columbia, appealed against this declaration that the requirement for Canadian Citizenship infringes the section 15(1) of the Canadian charter of rights and freedoms.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The plaintiff's theory: Millan feels that she is right, because the money was stolen from her and Dean Witter did not verify things like they were suppose to and they just allowed her son to forge her signature and withdraw money from her account on many different occassions.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    MGMT 520 MIDTERM EXAM

    • 829 Words
    • 3 Pages

    (25 points) What potential legal theories of recovery can and should Melissa allege against the following parties (provide support for your answer)?…

    • 829 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Froogle V. Mary Ccp 410.10

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The issue is whether or not Froogle has jurisdiction over Mary who is an out of state resident and business owner.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court’s judgment in R. v. Morin (1992) 1 SCR 771, set out “administrative guidelines” regarding claims made involving section 11(b) of the Charter, and how to assess the reasonableness of institutional delay. Some of the factors that the Supreme Court considers in regards to whether a delay is reasonable or not includes reasons for the delay, length of the delay, prejudicial effect on the Appellant and any waiver of time periods. In R v. Morin, on behalf of the majority, Sopinka J. explained that depending on the presence or absence of prejudice, the administrative guidelines for institutional delay could be adjusted. Between committal and trial, an eight to ten months administrative guideline was establish by the Court for Provincial Court cases, and following a preliminary hearing a delay of an additional six to eight months is considered reasonable. In R. v. Jordan case, the judge found 32.5 months institutional delay and a two months total Crown delay. Of the 32.5 months institutional delay, overwhelmingly lack of resources caused 19 months of delay in Provincial Court. After examining the total amount of institutional/Crown delay, the judge concluded that this delay “substantially exceeded” the guidelines set out by Morin, but, on its own, it is not an unreasonable delay. The Appellant submitted an application for a stay of proceedings that was dismissed by the trial judge, because the judge concluded, the prejudice experienced by Jordan resulting from the delay was not substantial. According to the judge, the delays were institutional and the Appellant charges were more serious. Any meaningful prejudice experienced by Jordan was not significant. Also, because of a prior conviction, he was subject to a conditional sentence order; his bail condition did not have any significant impact on him and while on bail he was also able to find employment. Thus, the Appellant…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Love For

    • 1472 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If Pat brings an action against Dan, what are the legal issues involved in this action and how should each be resolved? Discuss. If Pat brings an action against Dan, what are the legal issues involved in this action and how should each be resolved? Discuss. If Pat brings an action against Dan, what are the legal issues involved in this action and how should each be resolved? Discuss.If Pat brings an action against Dan, what are the legal issues involved in this action and how should each be resolved? Discuss.If Pat brings an action against Dan, what are the legal issues involved in this action and how should each be resolved? Discuss.If Pat brings an action against Dan, what are the legal issues involved in this action and how should each be resolved? Discuss.If Pat brings an action against Dan, what are the legal issues involved in this action and how should each be resolved? Discuss.If Pat brings an action against Dan, what are the legal issues involved in this action and how should each be resolved? Discuss.If Pat brings an action against Dan, what are the legal issues involved in this action and how should each be resolved? Discuss.If Pat brings an action against Dan, what are the legal issues involved in this action and how should each be resolved? Discuss.If Pat brings an action against Dan, what are the legal issues involved in this action and how should each be resolved? Discuss.If Pat brings an action against Dan, what are the legal issues involved in this action and how should each be resolved? Discuss.If Pat brings an action against Dan, what are the legal issues involved in this action and how should each be resolved? Discuss.If Pat brings an action against Dan, what are the legal issues involved in this action and how should each be resolved? Discuss.If Pat brings an action against Dan, what are the legal issues involved in this action and how should each be resolved? Discuss.If Pat brings an action against Dan, what are the legal issues involved in…

    • 1472 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is not to say that our constitution bears completely no recognition of rights , as there are some provisions that do in fact recognize certain rights and freedoms for individuals. This includes s116, s80 and s41 .…

    • 2521 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Blair, Annice, Kathleen Ryan Elliott, Bonnie Manning, and Marcus Mossuto. "A Legal Handbook: Methods of Legal Inquiry." Canadian and International Law. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 2004. 16, 39. Print.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Small Claims Trial Essay

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I was overwhelmed with excitement, as I was about to witness my first small claims trial in the reputable small claims court located at 7765 Hurontario Street, Brampton, which was repetitively used as a source in the small claims textbook. To my surprise there were two buildings, the large one being the criminal court while the smaller one was the small claims court. These seem to be the main cause of confusion for many people including myself. This is because the address for small claims on our books was actually for the criminal courts instead. I failed to understand why they could not create a way to distinguish them. When I finally arrived at the small claims court, I was enthusiastic to see the endless amount of people…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a great deal of debate regarding the entrenchment of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Canada’s constitution. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, a document that “sought to protect individual rights by preventing laws that unfairly discriminate or that take away human rights”, was entrenched when Canada’s Constitution was patriated in 1982 (Canadian Human Rights Commission [CHRC], n.d.). However, the entrenchment of the Charter of Rights in the Constitution was controversial as some believed that it transfers the power from elected representatives to the court (University of Alberta, 2013). This paper will be arguing that the entrenchment of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Canada’s Constitution promotes democracy…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Quiz

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bob has a dispute with Ace Company over a perceived product defect. Bob hires a lawyer and after discussing the facts and issues, Bob’s attorney agrees to file a lawsuit against Ace.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Offer and Acceptance

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An offer is defined by Treitel as "an expression of willingness to contract on certain terms, made with the intention that it shall become binding as soon as it is accepted by the person to whom it is addressed", the "offeree". In addition, an offer is a statement of the terms on which the offeror is willing to be bound. When an offer has been made, it doesn’t means a contract has formed until the offeree accepts the offer.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays