Preview

Assess The Difference Between Democracy And Fascism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1622 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assess The Difference Between Democracy And Fascism
Compared to other political forms, democratic government is the fairest and just way to govern the citizens within a society. This can be showcased through the differences between fascism, and democracy, an example being Hitler’s fascist Germany back in 1933, compared to modern democracies of today. Democracy advocates and protects all individuals within a society, the same cannot be said for fascism societies, where elitism and hatred are ingrained within the ideology. Within the Third Reich, Hitler implemented the Nuremberg Laws to oppress Jews within Germany during that time, forcing them to wear the Star of David to showcase that they were of Jewish descent, and putting them into ghettos; this alienated the Jewish people of Germany. …show more content…
Democracy prevents such tragedies from occurring from laws such as the consent of the governed, allowing citizens to kick voted government elected officials out of power. People within democracies are imprisoned for hate crimes, proving that genocide cannot occur with proper laws enforced, and consent of the governed. These examples show and prove that democracy should be fully embraced as it protects the well-being of all in society, not just an elite few. Democracy does not allow for indoctrination of people, as many views are expressed within a democracy, a totalitarian leader is not the only source of information. Although fascists are voted into power they destroy a once democratic state from the inside; such as, when Hitler combined both the office of Chancellor and President into one, making himself into an all-powerful dictator, and taking away people’s rights. There are checks and balances within a democracy that makes it so people are not taken of their rights. All in all, democracy shows to be the better system for the life of the citizens within the state, as they have individual rights and freedoms, the ability to choose who is in office, and do not have to worry about being sent away to death camps simply for their …show more content…
Communism is not a legitimate form of government, as these governments are not voted into power, they overthrow the current government system through revolution, and often it does not represent the vast will of the people. Democracy counters this, as elected government officials represent the will of the people, and serve their interests within their respective legislative, or executive branches. These elected representatives are held to the consent of the governed making them accountable for their actions; this is not the case for Communism in Stalin’s Soviet Union, as he was not voted into office; therefore, he is not accountable to anyone for his actions. Communism in the USSR was an oppressive form of political power, with Stalin being a totalitarian leader, he forced his citizens into grueling work camps and struck fear into their hearts through his KGB, the secret police. The work camps in Soviet Russia at the time propelled the USSR’s economy from being that of a mainly agricultural state to becoming an industrialized state. This was achieved by taking away people’s rights and forcing them into the camps. He implemented five year plans to reach the same industrial status as western democracies with capitalism. Stalin claimed to be for the worker’s rights however, this was not what actually occurred. Stalin and the communist party set goals for production, and
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Joseph Stalin Dbq Analysis
    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Joseph Stalin Dbq Analysis

    Joseph Stalin established a modern totalitarian government in Soviet Russia. He is known as the “Man of Steel”. A totalitarianism is a type of government that takes total, centralized, state control over every aspect of public and private life of their people. His rule had changed the people of his empire in numerous ways. Stalin had total control over economic needs. According to document 6 “By 1940 Russia produced more pig iron than Germany, and far more than Britain or France. Numbers of cattle grew in the 1920s, but fell increasingly during the collectivization of agriculture after 1929, and by 1940 hardly exceeded the figure for 1920. Since 1940 the industrial development of the Soviet Union has been impressive, but agricultural production has continued to be plumiding”. The document illustrates how pig iron had significantly increased as a result of the “Five Year Plan”, however heavy industry led to expense of food supplies. This would cause limited production of consumer goods. It caused a step back because of the severe shortages of housing, food, clothing as well as other necessary goods. The Five Year Plan didn’t help much to excel their economic as Stalin hoped, it impacted by creating famine. Stalin rising to power promised an economic boom for Russia however, in that process many people suffered and died of starvation. According to document 5, “The purge began its last,…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stalin Dbq
    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stalin Dbq

    In 1917, Russia was crumbling into pieces. The World War I was draining all of Russia’s resources. There was shortage of food throughout the country, which left people starving. At the battlefront, millions of Russian soldiers were dying, they did not possess many of the powerful weapons that their opponents had. The government under Czar Nicholas II was disintegrating, and a provisional government had been set up. In November of 1917, Lenin and his communist followers known as the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government and set a communist government in Russia. However, in 1924, Lenin died and Josef Stalin assumed leadership of the Soviet Union, which was the name for the communist Russia. Stalin was a ruthless leader who brought many changes to the Soviet Union. Stalin’s goal was to transform the Soviet Union into a modern superpower and spread communism throughout the world, and he was determined to sabotage anyone who stood in his way. He used many methods such as collectivization, totalitarianism and five year plan’s to achieve his goals. Stalin’s rule brought both harmful and beneficial consequences to the Soviet Union; however, the negative factors were so terrible, that they overwhelm the positive factors.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Campaign Boondoggle: Case Study
    • 1722 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Campaign Boondoggle: Case Study

    There are a couple of quotes from President John Adams that state: “Democracy... while it lasts is more bloody than either aristocracy or monarchy. Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There is never a democracy that did not commit suicide.” “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. ” (Brainyquote.com, 2013). Essentially Democracy is the giving over of government to the whims of the masses every action the government should take and neglects the rule of…

    • 1722 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between America And Usa
    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Similarities Between America And Usa

    Democracy as a political system first emerged in ancient Greece and Rome. It encourages the participation of citizens in the election of their representatives in government. Democratic countries also observe human rights. In most democratic countries, power is balanced between various arms of government in order to promote checks and balances. In addition, many of these countries have a constitution that they adhere to.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ism Examples
    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Ism Examples

    Firstly a democratic government is a government in which the people get to vote. If the voting is not rigged then the government will not be as enforcing or powerful, people could choose what laws the government should enforce if they can get 50% of the populations votes. On the other hand a totalitarian government gives no power the the citizens of their country. This can cause the killings of millions of citizens. Secondly in a democracy you have your favorite candidate elected into office.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    American Democracy: a Real Democracy or Hidden Oligarchy?
    • 3373 Words
    • 14 Pages

    American Democracy: a Real Democracy or Hidden Oligarchy?

    Democracy is a complicated concept. It is not just a structure of government, or electoral politics, democracy is “politics with purpose” (Oakes, pg. 491). The people should have input on how their government is run and their rights of “life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness” should be protected by the…

    • 3373 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Totalitarian Regime After World War I Essay
    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Totalitarian Regime After World War I Essay

    Immediately after becoming the leader of the Soviet Union, Stalin began the Great Purge to clear all other threats who could get in the way of his political power. This was the beginning of a totalitarian regime in the Soviet Union. Stalin knew that the USSR needed to improve its economy in order to keep up with all of the other countries, so he put the Five Year Plan into place. This plan at great social cost produced rapid industrialization and claimed to have eliminated unemployment. Stalin’s new ideas were working for the nation as they started to see improvement.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism and Democracy Have Had Effect on the Rights of the People Positively and Negatively Essay Example
    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Absolutism and Democracy Have Had Effect on the Rights of the People Positively and Negatively Essay Example

    There is a lot more processes in democracy that can get complex or get shut down before it started. When compared to absolutism, democracy would take longer process when the absolute ruler will just pass a law without concretions of other people of equal…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Voting in a Democratic Society
    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Voting in a Democratic Society

    In a true democratic society, it is essential to ensure a government that follows the will of the people and not the one that force the people to follow it, that is, a “government of the people, by the people, and for the people” as said by Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg address which lasted a little over two minutes on November, 19, 1863. Democracy is not government of some people by some people and for some people as a frequent practise in some developing nations. Democracy is a nation ruled by its citizenry. The beauty of democracy is that the minority will have their say but the majority will have their way. Functioning democracy implies where the people approve to the government operating the nation. All eligible voters are given chance to select their leader through their right to vote and to be voted for. In a truly democratic society, the representative or candidate who have been elected are liable in many ways to the people who voted and elected them. They have to implement those pledges made during elections with much transparency, accountability and good governance.…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    absolutism and democracy
    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    absolutism and democracy

    Democracy is when the people vote for who’s in charge. A man doesn’t vote to get their properties of privileges taken away, so they put their trust in the new government system that’s supposed to make the power of men more equal. If a person in power were to take over someone’s free will said person probably wouldn’t want to listen or follow that person. A ruler wants their people to like and respect them, not dislike them and wish them out of power, this causes the ruler to try to please every party.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Democracy Is America Essay
    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Democracy Is America Essay

    Democracy has many key things that make it a very strong government such as freedom, voicing opinions, and the right to vote. When having all the governments side by side Democracy stands out as being the best one, and should be…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Democracy: Is The United States A Democracy?
    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Democracy: Is The United States A Democracy?

    Though there is no exact definition of a democracy, it does “refer to a regime whereby political power is widely spread,” (68 Gerner, Ferdinand, and Lawson) and involves equality when it comes to politics. In a democracy, the people run the government. This system is thought to have four key elements: a system in which the government is chosen or replaced through free and fair elections, active participation of the people in politics and civic life, protection of the human rights for all the people, a rule of law in which the laws and procedures are equally applied to all the citizens. In a democracy, the people are sovereign because they are the highest form of political authority. They are the ones that “choose their leaders and hold their…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Winston Churchill Said That Democracy Was Not Perfect but That It Was the Best Political System Available. Was He Right?
    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Winston Churchill Said That Democracy Was Not Perfect but That It Was the Best Political System Available. Was He Right?

    Democracy, by far, is viewed as being a much more equal, reliable and honest form of government organisation, to comparison with a monarchy or a dictatorship, where the individuals of a state have very little or no say at all to the ruling and management of their country.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Is Democracy Is The Worst Form Of Government?
    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Is Democracy Is The Worst Form Of Government?

    (Spina, Cha & Dana Cha, 2011) The biggest virtue of a democratic government is that it represents the views of the majority. Autocracy is a system of government by a single person with absolute power, usually characterised by exerting force to take control of a group of people reluctant to be under his rule. A fundamental problem of politics in the past, and even the present, is that autocracy and dictatorship should be avoided. Such systems undermine the individual’s liberty, as the autocrat is the driving force behind all decisions of the state, giving little or no consideration to his advisers. It is such that these tyrants of state leadership sometimes make wrong decisions which led to the decimation of many human lives. Adolf Hitler of Nazist Germany is a famous example of an autocratic leader. Hitler was power hungry; his lofty goal led to the epoch of World War II, causing the deaths of 17 million people. Another example is of Joseph Stalin, past leader of the Soviet Union, and the cause of the Holodomor. Almost half a million Ukrainian civilians who objected to Stalin’s new law of agricultural collectivisation were shipped to remote areas such as Siberia where they are left to fend for themselves, which will lead to their eventual deaths. Democracy is the contrast and thus a preferred form of government in comparison to autocracy.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Non-Democratic Countries
    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Non-Democratic Countries

    In non-democratic countries people are not participating in political process and they were restricted by central body. The government has absolute powers over its citizens and nobody have a right to freely participate in election, decision making process and so on. The government dominated everything and every activity within the territory of its sovereignty. Furthermore, the government has an authority to practice some policy to mobilize people for particular purposes like demonstrating against some countries or the activity of opposition parties or to show off that their government is representing their dignity and choices (Allen, 2002). But in no democratic regimes people are not self-governing and human rights and individual freedom is under threatened. The government and leaders are repressing minority groups, opposition parties and create inequality among their citizens. Besides, head of the government has a complete power to make any decision and law. Free media, newspaper and organizational activity are prohibited, also markets and economy is dominated by the government. But, in non-democratic regimes the government makes disparity among its citizens, maybe support certain people or social class and serve them, simultaneously neglect others. Alternatively, there is a weak rule of law and doesn’t play a vital role and undermined by the oppressive government. Moreover, the government may pass a law or procedure that doesn’t reflect people’s interest like Kurdistan when parliament passed a law of polygamy without asking people which was not in favor of women (Ahewar, 2008), but they tolerated under the pressure of religious…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics