Artificial Intelligence Argumentative Essay
The smartest human beings in the world have had their eyes open to the dangers of Artificial Intelligence, but now it is the breaching point of new outbreaks in developments in AI causing more hazards we need to be aware of. Stopping AI now will be the most important task for civilians to take on for generations to come. Because of the potential dangers of AI, research and development needs to be slowed or even better stopped before it’s too late. Research and development performed by, “humankind’s most prominent geeks… ,wrote by Erik Sofge from “Popular Science” magazine needs to be slowed or stopped. Research is something we need to take seriously before we ever start the development of AI. AI is cute when viewed from modern day life, but
…show more content…
Researchers will first make the machines, “…do a lot of jobs for us and not be super intelligent,” written by Bill Gates a passionate technology advocate, which will let our interests favor AI until something catastrophic occurs. How much more superior will these machines will become over us until we make a move? Ai has the argument of how it can benefit to humankind’s needs. One positive factor is Nano bots, “… these bots could fights diseases in the human body or eat radioactive material on the planet,” written by Nick Bostrom, author of the book “Superintelligence”. A plus for AI is that these machines can help everyday life to be easier for us, for example: Siri. But, one thing leads to another. Once the public sees the “goodness” in AI it will be like a kid in a candy store, we will want more and more causing further advancements into AI when we should halt its advancement. Nano bots will be used in medical fields which will become very useful until these machines realize the only way to get rid of the disease they are made to fight is to kill humans prone to get this disease through
Researchers will first make the machines, “…do a lot of jobs for us and not be super intelligent,” written by Bill Gates a passionate technology advocate, which will let our interests favor AI until something catastrophic occurs. How much more superior will these machines will become over us until we make a move? Ai has the argument of how it can benefit to humankind’s needs. One positive factor is Nano bots, “… these bots could fights diseases in the human body or eat radioactive material on the planet,” written by Nick Bostrom, author of the book “Superintelligence”. A plus for AI is that these machines can help everyday life to be easier for us, for example: Siri. But, one thing leads to another. Once the public sees the “goodness” in AI it will be like a kid in a candy store, we will want more and more causing further advancements into AI when we should halt its advancement. Nano bots will be used in medical fields which will become very useful until these machines realize the only way to get rid of the disease they are made to fight is to kill humans prone to get this disease through