Preview

Article Summary of "Conflict Assessment" by Joyce Hocker and William Wilmot

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1135 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Article Summary of "Conflict Assessment" by Joyce Hocker and William Wilmot
Chapter Six describes ways of assessing conflict and identifying conflict patterns. Conflicts can seem very complex and confusing. Additionally, "most of us are notoriously inaccurate at describing our own behavior in a conflict."(p. 129) System theory offers an organizing scheme for conflict assessment. A full assessment will describe the workings of the overall conflict system, identify recurring patterns within the conflict, and identify individuals' contributions to the conflict system.

Systems theory analyzes conflicts in terms of roles, processes, and patterns. It seeks to discover the rules that govern the system's behavior, and the function that the conflict serves within the system. The systems theory approach starts with some basic principles. The first is that "systems operate as an interdependent unit with no villains, heroes, good and bad people, healthy or unhealthy members."(p. 131) Systems analysis focuses on the patterns of interaction between people. Such patterns of interaction show circular causality: each element of the system is affected by all the others, and affects all the others in turn. A second principles is that people in a system are assigned specific roles, and the system works to keep people in their assigned roles.

Systems, including conflicts, are sustained by the cooperation of their members. As the old saying goes, it takes two to tango. Fortunately, this means "the cycle can be changed be any one person changing his or her behavior."(p. 132) Another principle is that systems with intense relationships tend to produce triangles, as low power members form alliances. Triangles behave in predictable, and sometimes toxic, ways over time. The authors note that "systems develop rules for conflict that, no matter how dysfunctional, are followed as long as the basic structure of the system does not change."(p. 132) Finally, conflict serves some function within the larger system. Resolving the apparent conflict may create a vacuum

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Webster 's defines conflict as: To come into collision; be in mutual opposition (274). If you wanted to choose an organization to study conflict in, you would have to look no further than the military. The military has no single approach to conflict management. There are too many individual personalities within a multitude of internal systems to be able to singularize the conflict. It is often the case that the conflict you are having was caused by a system put into place by someone outside your organization. It could be as simple as the cause and effect syndrome.…

    • 838 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Systems Theory defines a scientific cross-discipline method for analysing the mechanisms of how complex systems operate and for understanding the behaviour they exhibit.…

    • 3866 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Systems Theory applies to an organization within an organization that turn inputs into outputs responding to customer’s need and feedback. This is a continuous system that repeats until it no longer receives feedback or the need is gone.…

    • 845 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Edward

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The systems approach sometimes called systems analysis is an interdisciplinary field for the study of objects in their complexity (O 'Brien, 2003). In an attempt to understand the object of study in its environment, its functioning, its mechanisms, in what does not appear as the sum of its parts, for example, this approach aims to identify:…

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In team settings, individual team members generally handle conflict in five key ways as identified in an adaptation of the Thomas-Kilman Conflict Inventory (1976): Avoidance, Accommodation, Competition, Compromise, and Collaboration. All five conflict styles can be both beneficial and/or costly to individual and team success. It can also be argued that all five conflict styles may be useful to resolve conflicts under certain circumstances. Please review the five conflict styles listed below:…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just about anything in life can viewed as having systems (Baccarini 2013). They can be found anywhere from within nature to anywhere in society and business. To better understand the principle of systems and the theories associated with them it is important to define what a ‘system’ is. There have been many experts who have helped create and contribute to systems theory and they all have similar thoughts when defining what a system is. Bánáthy (2013) states that “system means a configuration of parts connected and joined together by a web of relationships”. Similarly, the Systems Thinking (2012) blog defined systems as “a group of interacting, interrelated, and interdependent components that form a complex and unified whole”. Additionally, Business Dictionary (2013) defines it as an organized, purposeful structure that consists of interrelated and interdependent elements. These elements continually influence one another to maintain their activity and the existence of the system, in order to achieve the goal of the system.…

    • 4370 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Systems Theory/Ecological Theory explains human behavior as the intersection of the influences of multiple interrelated systems. Even for individual issues, families, organizations, societies, and other systems are inherently involved and must be considered when attempting to understand and assist the individual or family. According to this theory, all systems are interrelated parts constituting an ordered whole and each subsystem influences other parts of the whole.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Conflict is defined as the consequence of real or perceived differences in mutually exclusive goals, values, ideas, attitudes, beliefs, feelings, or actions (a) within one individual (intrapersonal conflict), (b) between two or more individuals (interpersonal conflict), (c) within one group (intragroup conflict), or (d) between two or more groups (intergroup conflict). Conflict is dynamic. It can be positive or negative, healthy or dysfunctional (Sullivan 2013, 2009). According to Thomas (1992) conflict is “the process that begins when one party perceives that the other party has negatively affected, or is about to negatively affect, something that he or she cares about” (p. 653). Far from it, conflict is also constructive, as it can be catalytic to new ideas, progress and positive change and growth (Rahim 1986, White…

    • 3530 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Psychodynamic Theory Essay

    • 1757 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A ‘system’ is defined as an individual or group within a social environment whose actions have a direct or mutual consequence upon others within the social environment. Teater (2010:17) evaluates systems theory: “the whole of a system is greater than the sum of its’ individual parts”; defining the theory as a means of developing and altering an individuals’ perceptions of their systems through an understanding and appreciation of each individually. By this definition, systems theory is closely linked with psychosocial theory and methods, both depending not only on the individual but also their constantly fluctuating social environment to define their development and…

    • 1757 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Vliert, E. V., & Dreu, C. K. (1997). Using Conflict in Organizations. Sage Publications. NYC:…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ass. This Is a Paper

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The theories and perspectives covered in Chapter 2 (“The Inner Experience of Conflict”) focus on what occurs at a psychological level in conflict situations. Responses by interdependent individuals to perceived incompatibilities in goals, as well as responses in how to achieve these goals (also when relevant, attitudes, values, beliefs, and modes of behavior), influence their communicative behavior. To a lesser degree, the converse is also true.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Emotions are states of feeling. Emotions set actions “into motion”. They change and transform. Feelings are facts, not right or wrong, they just exist. Individuals experience emotions in conflict. Self protective emotions are associated with the right hemispheres of the brain while pro-social are left brain ruled; conflict resolution depends on overcoming raw emotion and developing left-brain functions. Relationships are defined by the kinds of emotions expressed. One emotion regulates other emotions. People develop emotion-behavior patterns early in life and build on them.…

    • 4935 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Conflict Theory Paper

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The conflict theory is one of three major ideologies of sociology that explains social life. It conveys life as a constant struggle between groups for power and scarce resources. This rationale was established by Karl Marx who observed small powerful groups exploiting the people in social classes below them. Marx and other conflict theorists believe that we need inequality to survive, and struggle among social classes is normal. The conflict theory best explains social life than other theories for many reasons. One being it explains the inequalities of money, gender, class, and age in the most accurate way. These types of characteristics obviously create advantages and disadvantages for people. They inadvertently…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    System thinking is the discipline of seeing wholes, perceiving the structures that underlie dynamically complex systems, and identifying high-leverage change opportunities. Peter Senge uses a rainstorm as an example of how humans interrelated actions have a diverse affect on each other, and how humans usually don’t see those invisible links because it takes years to take form. Because people don’t usually see them for years and only focus on snapshots, it arises the questions of why there problems never seem to get solved. According to the author Peter Senge, “Systems thinking is a conceptual framework, a body of knowledge and tools that has been developed over the past fifty years, to make the full patterns clearer, and to help us see how to change them effectively” (1990, p.468). The approach of systems thinking is fundamentally different from traditional forms of analysis. Traditional analysis focuses on the other constituents of the systems set of elements that interact to produce behavior of which it is part, which in meaning, instead of isolating smaller and smaller parts of the system being studied, systems thinking works by expanding its view to take into account larger and larger numbers of interactions as an issue is being studied (Daniel Aronson) (Raines, 2009).…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Conflict Case Study

    • 2357 Words
    • 10 Pages

    According to Wilmot and Hocker there are two ways in which their Conflict Assessment Guide can be used. I decided to use the guide by “picking several questions from each section that appeared to apply to our conflict (p205).” I broke down the questions into four categories: orientation of conflict, interests/goals, styles/behaviors, and the nature of conflict. In the orientation of conflict section I noticed that we disagreed on our perceptions of conflict. I see conflict…

    • 2357 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays