Article 6
Gait & Posture 31 (2010) 307–310
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Gait & Posture journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/gaitpost
Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance
Ross A. Clark a,*, Adam L. Bryant a, Yonghao Pua b, Paul McCrory a, Kim Bennell a, Michael Hunt a a b
Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria 3010, Australia Department of Physiotherapy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history: Received 9 July 2009 Received in revised form 10 November 2009 Accepted 15 November 2009 Keywords: Balance Motor control Movement disorder Rehabilitation Force plate Biomechanics Gait Posture
Impaired standing balance has a detrimental effect on a person’s functional ability and increases their risk of falling. There is currently no validated system which can precisely quantify center of pressure (COP), an important component of standing balance, while being inexpensive, portable and widely available. The Wii Balance Board (WBB) fits these criteria, and we examined its validity in comparison with the ‘gold standard’—a laboratory-grade force platform (FP). Thirty subjects without lower limb pathology performed a combination of single and double leg standing balance tests with eyes open or closed on two separate occasions. Data from the WBB were acquired using a laptop computer. The test– retest reliability for COP path length for each of the testing devices, including a comparison of the WBB and FP data, was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland–Altman plots (BAP) and minimum detectable change (MDC). Both devices exhibited good to excellent COP path length test– retest reliability within-device (ICC = 0.66–0.94) and between-device (ICC = 0.77–0.89) on all testing protocols. Examination of the BAP revealed
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Gait & Posture journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/gaitpost
Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance
Ross A. Clark a,*, Adam L. Bryant a, Yonghao Pua b, Paul McCrory a, Kim Bennell a, Michael Hunt a a b
Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria 3010, Australia Department of Physiotherapy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history: Received 9 July 2009 Received in revised form 10 November 2009 Accepted 15 November 2009 Keywords: Balance Motor control Movement disorder Rehabilitation Force plate Biomechanics Gait Posture
Impaired standing balance has a detrimental effect on a person’s functional ability and increases their risk of falling. There is currently no validated system which can precisely quantify center of pressure (COP), an important component of standing balance, while being inexpensive, portable and widely available. The Wii Balance Board (WBB) fits these criteria, and we examined its validity in comparison with the ‘gold standard’—a laboratory-grade force platform (FP). Thirty subjects without lower limb pathology performed a combination of single and double leg standing balance tests with eyes open or closed on two separate occasions. Data from the WBB were acquired using a laptop computer. The test– retest reliability for COP path length for each of the testing devices, including a comparison of the WBB and FP data, was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland–Altman plots (BAP) and minimum detectable change (MDC). Both devices exhibited good to excellent COP path length test– retest reliability within-device (ICC = 0.66–0.94) and between-device (ICC = 0.77–0.89) on all testing protocols. Examination of the BAP revealed
References: [1] Adkin AL, Frank JS, Jog MS. Fear of falling and postural control in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2003;18(5):496–502. ¨ [2] Bauer C, Groger I, Rupprecht R, Gabmann KG. Intrasession reliability of force platform parameters in community-dwelling older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89(10):1977–82. [3] Berg K, Norman KE. Functional assessment of balance and gait. Clin Geriatr Med 1996;12(4):705–23. [4] Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1(8476):307–10. [5] Blum L, Korner-Bitensky N. Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther 2008;88(5):559–66. [6] Deutsch JE, Borbely M, Filler J, Huhn K, Guarrera-Bowlby P. Use of a low-cost, commercially available gaming console (Wii) for rehabilitation of an adolescent with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther 2008;88(10):1196–207. [7] Dickinson JI, Shroyer JL, Elias JW. The influence of commercial-grade carpet on postural sway and balance strategy among older adults. Gerontologist 2002;42(4):552–9. [8] Doyle TL, Newton RU, Burnett AF. Reliability of traditional and fractal dimension measures of quiet stance center of pressure in young, healthy people. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86(10):2034–40. [9] Fleiss J. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 1986. [10] Frykberg GE, Lindmark B, Lanshammar H, Borg J. Correlation between clinical assessment and force plate measurement of postural control after stroke. J Rehab Med 2007;39(6):448–53. [11] Gustavsen M, Aamodt G, Mengshoel AM. Measuring balance in sub-acute stroke rehabilitation. Adv Physiother 2006;8(1):15–22. [12] Haas BM, Burden AM. Validity of weight distribution and sway measurements of the Balance Performance Monitor. Physiother Res Int 2000;5(1):19–32. [13] Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991;59(1):12–9. [14] Jarnlo GB. Functional balance tests related to falls among elderly people living in the community. Eur J Geriatr 2003;5(1):7–14. [15] Nichols DS, Glenn TM, Hutchinson KJ. Changes in the mean center of balance during balance testing in young adults. Phys Ther 1995;75(8):699–706. [16] Piirtola M, Era P. Force platform measurements as predictors of falls among older people—a review. Gerontology 2006;52(1):1–16. [17] Ramchandani A, Carroll K, Buenaventura R, Douglas J, Liu J. Wii-habilitation increases participation in therapy. In: Proceedings of 2008 Virtual Rehabilitation, IWVR; 2008. p. 69. [18] Salavati M, Hadian MR, Mazaheri M, Negahban H, Ebrahimi I, Talebian S, et al. Test–retest reliability of center of pressure measures of postural stability during quiet standing in a group with musculoskeletal disorders consisting of low back pain, anterior cruciate ligament injury and functional ankle instability. Gait Posture 2009;29(3):460–4. [19] Savoie S, Tanguay S, Centomo H, Beauchamp G, Anidjar M, Prince F. Postural control during laparoscopic surgical tasks. Am J Surg 2007;193(4):498–501. [20] Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86(2):420–8. [21] Springer BA, Marin R, Cyhan T, Roberts H, Gill NW. Normative values for the unipedal stance test with eyes open and closed. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2007;30(1):8–15. [22] Winter DA, Patla AE, Frank JS. Assessment of balance control in humans. Med Prog Technol 1990;16(1–2):31–51.