Preview

Arms Control Disarmament And Nuclear Non Proliferation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1497 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arms Control Disarmament And Nuclear Non Proliferation
Nuclear Pakistan: Arms Control and Disarmament
And Nuclear Non-Proliferation
Arms and weapons are considered to be essential for the security of the country. The basic aim of any country is security and survival and to serve security and survival, tools are required which are capacity and capability to build your weapons for defence. Arms and Weapons are used for two things aggression and defence which is dependent upon the policy of the country. Thomas Hobbes said, “Humans are by nature Brutish, Nasty and violent”, So weapons in the hands of human beings who are brutish, nasty and violent can’t be guaranteed and that means devastation and war.
Arms control and disarmament and nuclear non-proliferation are relevant concepts to each other. The only objective is the survival of the humanity, to reduce the atrocities, war and to maintain peace. Arms control and Disarmament are the major aspects of the international politics today. If we see back last 10 years, the agenda of disarmament includes different concepts and different dimensions;
1) Reducing the chances of war and stabilizing the chances of prosperity.
2) Maintaining and expanding non-proliferation regimes that restrain the spread of nuclear weapons.
3) Constraining the spread of long range cruise missiles.
4) Banning chemical and biological weapons.
5) Restricting the size and composition of the conventional arms.
6) Creating regional confidence building measures and banning certain classes of non-nuclear arms like landmines.
These are the basic objectives of disarmament and nuclear non-proliferation regimes. The international powers like; America, Russia, China their national security policy revolves around that and for that purpose even during the cold war period they had started START (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty) and even CWCs (Chemical Weapons Conventions) and throughout the cold war most of the treaties were initiated bi-lateral and then they converted to multi-lateral. The realists have the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pf con case

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Subpoint A – Nuclear proliferation is an action fueled by fear and if there is increase in military force interference, that fear will be legitimized. According to the article “Why Countries Build Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century” by Zachary Keck, “Iran’s nuclear program is better explained, then, by the rise in the potential conventional threat the U.S. poses to the Iran.” As many countries are, Iran was obviously intimidated by the massive military force of the U.S. and made the decision to begin proliferating nuclear weapons. And if the U.S. uses military force as an act to prevent nuclear proliferation, that goal may not be fulfilled.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fundamental component of the proliferation debate revolves around the perceived or alleged efficiency of nuclear deterrence. Proliferation optimists argue that, “more may be better” because nuclear weapons increase the cost of nuclear conflict, ultimately deterring states from engaging in nuclear warfare with a nuclear-armed state (Suzuki 2015). Optimists argue that nuclear deterrence works reliably, thus there seemingly less to be feared from nuclear proliferation and beneficial to a state to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Haile Selassie

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Disarmament has become the urgent imperative of our time. I do not say this because I equate the absence of arms o peace, or because I believe that bringing an end to nuclear arms race automatically guarantees the peace…Disarmament is vital today, quite simply, because of the immense destructive capacity of which men dispose.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    nuclear policy and cite a variety of steps the government has taken to reduce the number of strategic nuclear weapons, tighten nuclear security, and dismantle U.S. and Russian warheads, as well as various ongoing programs of cooperative threat reduction and support for the peaceful nuclear cooperation programs overseen by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the United Nation’s nuclear watchdog agency.…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This book review is based on the book name Atomic Weapons and East-West Relations which wrote by P.M.S Blackett in 1956. The author provides detail, discussion, analysis and his opinion about atomic power and the relation between East which represented the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) and West which represented the United State of American (US) during cold war period which their relationship were like a competition. On the other hand the author shows bad and good side of both countries. He doesn’t support any countries but mostly in this book is about analysis the situation. He gives the information and analysis about the effect of using atomic weapon as well.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arms Limitations Talks

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The arms limitations talks played a big role in reducing tensions during the Cold war for example the United States and the USSR, helped relieve the public about an outbreak of a nuclear war and significantly reduced the number of nuclear weapons in the world.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Waltz argues that more states with nuclear weapons will have a positive effect on stability in the world. This stems from a realist perspective on the international system and states’ behaviour; assuming that states coexist in a condition of anarchy and that they act rationally. In the anarchic order, self-help is the principle of action, meaning that states help themselves by providing for their own security. In this case self-help refers to the acquisition of nuclear weapons. As rational actors states wont run major risks for minor gains and thus war becomes less likely when the costs of war rises in relation to possible gains. Waltz therefore concludes that the knowledge of the large-scale destruction…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Calls upon the UN to encourage the governments in the region, through different resolutions or reports, to formulate a clear long-term national strategy for complete disarmament;…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scare

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In addition to the reduction in weapons, the number of countries which were developing, had developed or were seriously discussing nuclear programs has dropped since the 1980’s. This was due to a combination of factors that still determine such decisions today, including security, expense, need for status or prestige, internal politics and other factors.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    HAHA

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Disarmament is the act of reducing, limiting, or abolishing weapons. Disarmament generally refers to a country's military or specific type of weaponry. Disarmament is often taken to mean total elimination of weapons of mass destruction, such as nuclear arms. General and Complete Disarmament refers to the removal of all weaponry, including conventional arms.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another method in the attempt to eliminate nuclear proliferation as much as possible is the Non-Proliferation Treaty. It is an agreement to abandon the use and creation of nuclear weapons in exchange for help in developing nuclear power for peaceful uses. The only countries who have never signed are India, Israel, and Pakistan, which have all developed nuclear weapons. North Korea also signed, but later…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Waltz and Sagan

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    _ Not only do nukes deter attacks on the homeland, they deter attacks on any vital…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The revolutionary events which occurred over the past two years in the Middle Eastern Countries, often referred to as the “Arab Uprisings”, have undoubtedly raised the international community’s concern regarding the social and political stability of the Region, especially in reference to the actual capacity of the states of the Area to grant, maintain and defense peace and security, considering, above all, the regional lack of regulations regarding Weapons Of Mass Destruction (WMD), the threat and risk that they might represent in a socially instable scenario, and the attempt from the United Nations to overrule these regulations deficits, starting from UNSC RES. 3263 of 1974, which commended the establishment of a NWFZ, ultimately reconfirmed by the 2012 UNGA Draft Resolution A/C.1/67/L.1, as well as the boosts toward the new idea of developing a WMD Free Zone (WMDFZ), firstly set forth by UNSC RES. 687 of 1991, supported also by the 1995 NPT Review Conference. In reference to the above mentioned agreements, the Republic of Serbia, aligned with the priorities of the European Union and this Organization, has been an advocate of all the initiatives of regulations of WMD. It has signed and ratified all major agreements on the matter, such as Geneva Protocol in 1996, BWC in 1992, NPT Treaty in 1992, CWC in 2000. Moreover, the Republic of Serbia has been reaffirming its position of staunch supporter of disarmament: firstly, as a participant to the successful 2010 Conference of Revision of NPT, whose final document (NPT/CONF.2010/50) supported the early entry into force of the CTBT (signed by Republic of Serbia in 1996), as well as the idea of the universal adoption of the IAEA Additional Protocol (signed by Republic of Serbia in 2009); to continue, as a strongly proactive country in the implementation of the…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Current Affairs Analysis

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sagan, Scott D. 1996-1997. “Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons?: Three Models in Search of a Bomb”. International Security 21 (3).…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Arms Control & Disarmament

    • 35746 Words
    • 143 Pages

    Arms control is a term for restrictions upon the development, production, stockpiling, proliferation, and usage of weapons, especially weapons of mass destruction.[1] Arms control is typically exercised through the use of diplomacy which seeks to impose such limitations upon consenting participants through international treaties and agreements, although it may also comprise efforts by a nation or group of nations to enforce limitations upon a non-consenting country.…

    • 35746 Words
    • 143 Pages
    Powerful Essays